AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 2August IIINCT00664521

Atacicept in Combination With Rituximab in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis (August III)

A Phase 2 study testing Rituximab and Atacicept in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany at 8 sites in 4 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability of combined treatment with atacicept and rituximab in subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving re-treatment with rituximab. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
Rituximab and Atacicept
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
27 participants
Where
8 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
Mar 2008to Oct 2010
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male and female subjects
  • Greater than and equal to (>=) 18 years of age at the time of Informed Consent
  • Who have rheumatoid arthritis satisfying American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria with a disease history of at least 12 months
  • Subjects must have active disease defined by DAS28 >3.2
  • Subjects must have received previous treatment with rituximab and must be candidates for re-treatment with rituximab
  • Female subjects of childbearing potential must be willing to avoid pregnancy by using an adequate method of contraception for 4 weeks before study day 1 (SD1), during the treatment period and for 12 months after the last dose of rituximab, and must have a negative urine pregnancy test at the screening visit and SD1
  • Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply

Who cannot join

  • Current neurological disease excluding migraine
  • Inflammatory joint disease other than rheumatoid arthritis
  • Any contraindication to rituximab as per national label
  • Use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs; including methotrexate) for less than 3 months or change in dosing regimen within 28 days before SD1, or methotrexate dose regimen >25 mg/week
  • Participation in any interventional clinical trial within 1 month before SD1 (or within 5 half-lives of the investigated compound before SD1, whichever is longer)
  • Prednisone dose regimen >10 mg/day (or equivalent), or change in steroid dosing regimen within 28 days before SD1
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Active or latent tuberculosis within the year before screening or major infection requiring hospitalization or intravenous anti-infectives within 28 days before SD1
  • Serum Immunoglobulin G (IgG) below 6 gram per liter (g/L)
  • Known hypersensitivity to atacicept or to any of the components of the formulated atacicpet
  • Known hypersensitivity to rituximab, to any of the components of the formulated rituximab or to murine proteins
  • Breastfeeding or pregnancy
  • Other protocol defined exclusion criteria could apply

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 4 countries.

8 sites in 4 countries

France3 sites
  • Research Site

    Nice

  • Research Site

    Paris

  • Research Site

    Strasbourg

Other trials in France

Sweden2 sites
  • Research Site

    Malmö

  • Research Site

    Stockholm

Other trials in Sweden

United Kingdom2 sites
  • Research Site

    Newcastle

  • Research Site

    Norwich

Other trials in United Kingdom

Netherlands1 site
  • Research Site

    Amsterdam

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Multi-centre, Exploratory, Pilot, Phase II Trial of 150mg Atacicept Given Subcutaneously in Combination With Rituximab in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability of combined treatment with atacicept and rituximab in subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving re-treatment with rituximab.

Being tested
Rituximab, Atacicept, Placebo matched to atacicept
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RituximabBiological

    Rituximab will be administered as an intravenous infusion at a dose of 1000 mg at Weeks 1 and 3.

  • AtaciceptDrug

    Atacicept will be administered at a dose of 150 mg subcutaneously once a week from Week 7 to 32.

  • Placebo matched to ataciceptDrug

    Placebo matched to atacicept will be administered subcutaneously once a week from Week 7 to 32.

Study groups in NCT00664521
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Rituximab Plus AtaciceptExperimentalRituximab will be administered as an intravenous infusion at a dose of 1000 mg at Weeks 1 and 3, followed by atacicept 150 mg subcutaneously once a week from Week 7 to 32.
Receives: Biological: Rituximab; Drug: Atacicept
Rituximab Plus PlaceboPlacebo comparatorRituximab will be administered as an intravenous infusion at a dose of 1000 mg at Weeks 1 and 3, followed by placebo matched to atacicept subcutaneously once a week from Week 7 to 32.
Receives: Biological: Rituximab; Drug: Placebo matched to atacicept

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE was defined as any new untoward medical occurrences/worsening of pre-existing medical condition without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was defined as an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 64

  2. Percentage of Participants With Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Level Less Than 3 Gram Per Liter (g/L)

    Measured: Week 64

  3. Percent Change From Baseline in Vital Signs and Routine Safety Lab Parameters at Week 32

    Vital signs assessed included blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), pulse and body temperature. Routine safety lab parameters evaluated included red blood cell (RBC), hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelets, mean cellular hemoglobin (MCH), MCH concentration, MCH volume, white blood cell (WBC), lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, neutrophils, gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin, alkaline phosphatase (AP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin, calcium, creatinine, glucose, potassium, total protein, sodium, uric acid, and blood urea nitrogen. Percent change from baseline was calculated as ([Week 32 value minus baseline value] multiplied by 100) divided by baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 32

  4. Percent Change From Baseline in Anti-tetanus and Anti-diphteria Immunization Titer at Week 32

    Percent change from baseline was calculated as ([Week 32 value minus baseline value] multiplied by 100) divided by baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 32

  5. Percent Change From Baseline in Anti-pneumococcus Titer at Week 32

    Percent change from baseline was calculated as ([Week 32 value minus baseline value] multiplied by 100) divided by baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 32

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Based on C-reactive Protein (ACR20-CRP), ACR50-CRP and ACR70-CRP at Week 32

    ACR20-CRP response: greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with >=20% improvement in at least 3 of the following: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function; and 5) acute-phase marker (CRP). ACR50-CRP and ACR70-CRP response are defined as >=50% and >=70% improvement in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) respectively together with >=50% and >=70% improvement in at least 3 of the following respectively: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function; and 5) CRP.

    Measured: Week 32

  2. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints (DAS28) Based on CRP (DAS28-CRP) at Week 32

    DAS28-CRP incorporates non-graded joint counts for tenderness and swelling based on a total of 28 joints, CRP as a marker of inflammation, and a general health assessment using a 100 mm visual analog scale (the participant's global assessment of disease activity). DAS28 score ranges between 0 and 10 representing current disease activity. A value above 5.1 represents high disease activity, a value below 3.2 represents low disease activity, and a value below 2.6 represents remission.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 32

  3. Median Percentage Change From Baseline in Levels of Total, Mature and Memory B Cells

    Flow cytometric analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of total, mature and memory B cell levels.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 3, 7, 12, 16, 26 and 32

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Apr 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2008
  3. Primary completionOct 2010
  4. Study completionOct 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
27 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00664521
Sponsor's protocol ID
28155
Acronym
August III
Status last verified
Nov 2016
First submitted
21 Apr 2008
Last updated
30 Dec 2016

Publications

  • van Vollenhoven RF, Wax S, Li Y, Tak PP. Safety and efficacy of atacicept in combination with rituximab for reducing the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis: a phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Nov;67(11):2828-36. doi: 10.1002/art.39262.

    PubMed 26137975

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Rituximab and Atacicept in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany at 8 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Dec 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in France, Sweden, United Kingdom, Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Dec 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (time frame: Baseline up to Week 64). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00664521, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Dec 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in