AzTrials
AzTrials

Unilateral Carpal Tunnel SyndromePhase 1/2StimRouterNCT00665132

Acute Human Study: StimRouter for Peripheral Nerve Stimulation of Discrete Peripheral Nerves

A Phase 1/2 study testing StimRouter System in people with Unilateral Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, run by Bioness Inc at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is being done to see how well a new investigational medical device, the StimRouter (STR) System, will work to treat the chronic pain in people who have failed previous treatments for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) pain, including surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Unilateral Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
What is being tested?
StimRouter System
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2008to Dec 2008
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Chronic peripheral pain persisting for greater than or equal to 3 months diagnosed previously as a mononeuropathy of the median nerve at the level of the carpal tunnel (i.e., diagnosed CTS)
  • Average chronic pain level greater than or equal to 5/10 [on 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) (BPI#14)], where such pain is attributed to injury, irritation, or entrapment of the median nerve at the level of the carpal tunnel (i.e., diagnosed CTS)
  • Failure of a single prior carpal tunnel release surgery to provide relief, where such failed surgery was performed greater than or equal to study entry
  • Able to tolerate stimulation (TENS)
  • Temporary pain relief is achieved by local anesthetic block of the target median nerve suspected to be the source of chronic pain symptoms
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Ability to give informed consent and understand study requirements
  • Ability to quantify pain using a 0-10 numeric rating scale [A screening tool will be used to ensure that subjects can rate 3 common pain scenarios (mosquito bite, stubbed toe and broken bone) on a 0-10 NRS relative to each other, with mosquito bite < stubbed toe < broken bone]
  • Willing and able to understand and comply with all study-related procedures during the course of the study
  • Motivated to maintain an accurate diary for the study duration

Who cannot join

  • Metal implants in the forearm
  • Active infection
  • Active or existing skin disorder or irritation which, at the physician's discretion, contraindications use of skin gel electrodes
  • Allodynia
  • Regular use of antiplatelet medications [e.g., aspirin, ticlopidine (Ticlid), clopidogrel (Plavix), tirofiban (Aggrastat), and eptifibatide (Integrilin)]
  • Anticoagulated (taking warfarin or heparin, including fractionated heparin) or has a bleeding disorder
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Cardiac pacemaker
  • Implanted neurostimulator (e.g., spinal cord, deep brain, vagus nerve stimulator) or implanted pump or infusion device
  • History of cardiac arrhythmia with homodynamic instability
  • Untreated drug habituation or dependence
  • Psychologically or medically unstable
  • Uncontrolled seizures (averaging > 2 seizures per month)
  • Pregnant or plan on becoming pregnant or breastfeeding during the study period
  • Currently require, or likely to require, diathermy and/or MRI during the study duration
  • History of adverse reactions to local anesthetic (e.g., lidocaine)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • The Center for Pain Relief

    Charleston, West Virginia, 25301

Other trials in United States

About this study

This study is being done to see how well a new investigational medical device, the StimRouter (STR) System, will work to treat the chronic pain in people who have failed previous treatments for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) pain, including surgery. These people have been treated for CTS pain before including surgical carpal tunnel release, but without good results, and they are still having pain. The study will look at both the good and bad effects of the StimRouter System for treating this kind of pain and as a general peripheral nerve stimulation device for treating chronic pain. The study will also help to understand other possible uses for the StimRouter System.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, single-center, open label study designed to evaluate the clinical use of the StimRouter (STR) as a peripheral nerve stimulation device for the treatment of chronic pain. The clinical study is proposed to serve as an evaluation of the preliminary StimRouter design, proposed implantation techniques, electrical stimulation parameters, and outcome measures for the StimRouter. The current study will utilize the median nerve (in the context of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), status-post a single failed carpal tunnel release (CTR) surgery)as a model to represent the device's more general intended use as a peripheral nerve stimulator to treat chronic pain.

Being tested
StimRouter System
Keywords
wrist, hand, pain, failed CTR, carpal tunnel syndrome, CTS, CTR, carpel tunnel release, Peripheral nerve, Median nerve
Medical subject headings
Pain, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • StimRouter SystemDevice

    Implanted with StimRouter System receive 6 hours (or less if not tolerated by the Subject)of electrical therapeutic stimulation each day for a total of 5 days (from start of successful programming)

Study groups in NCT00665132
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
StimRouter (SR) for CTSExperimentalPercutaneous implantation of StimRouter System
Receives: Device: StimRouter System

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Implant Success

    Success of device implantation was defined as uncomplicated minimally-invasive implantation of the StimRouter Lead near the targeted peripheral median nerve, resulting in production of desired paresthesias in the sensory distribution of the median nerve when active peripheral nerve stimulation was applied. This outcome parameter was intended to serve as an indication that the lead and electrode stimulating positions could be correctly placed while still maintaining the minimal invasiveness of the procedure. Fluoroscopic imaging was used to document positioning of the StimRouter Lead and, by applying stimulation from a commercially available Dakmed External Pulse Generator (EPG) to the StimRouter Lead, desired paresthesia response was confirmed.

    Measured: at device implantation procedure

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Patent Satisfaction

    Numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0-10 where 0 = not satisfied and 10 = very satisfied

    Measured: Day 5 after final stimulation

  2. Percent of Participants Reporting Pain Change From Baseline to Day 5

    Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questions 14 and 15 were used to measure pain change after 5 days use of StimRouter System. In the BPI, an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) is used to rate pain intensity, where zero (0) indicates ''no pain'' and 10 indicates ''pain as bad as you can imagine.'' At enrollment, participants circled the number that best described how much baseline pain they had 'on average' (BPI #14). After enrollment and during the study, patients circled the one number that best described how much pain they had at that time 'right now' (BPI #15). The percent of participants with change from Baseline to Day 5 was calculated.

    Measured: Day 5

  3. Mean Change in Pain Achieved by Participants Who Reported Pain Change From Baseline to Day 5

    Using Brief Pain Inventory questions 14 and 15, those 9 subjects who had pain change from Baseline to Day 5 were analyzed to determine change in pain for the overall group. In the BPI, an 11-point NRS is used to rate pain intensity, with a 0 for ''no pain'' and a 10 for ''pain as bad as you can imagine.'' At Baseline, patients circled the number that best described how much baseline pain they had 'on average' (BPI #14). During the study, patients circled the one number that best described how much pain they had at the time 'right now' (BPI #15).

    Measured: Day 5 after final stimulation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Apr 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2008
  3. Primary completionDec 2008
  4. Study completionDec 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
10 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00665132
Sponsor's protocol ID
CP-STMR07-001-Rev A.1
Acronym
StimRouter
Status last verified
May 2016
First submitted
21 Apr 2008
Last updated
6 Jun 2016
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Eisenberg E, Waisbrod H, Gerbershagen HU. Long-term peripheral nerve stimulation for painful nerve injuries. Clin J Pain. 2004 May-Jun;20(3):143-6. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200405000-00003.

    PubMed 15100589
  • Day M. Neuromodulation: spinal cord and peripheral nerve stimulation. Curr Rev Pain. 2000;4(5):374-82. doi: 10.1007/s11916-000-0021-7.

    PubMed 10998746

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing StimRouter System in people with Unilateral Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, run by Bioness Inc at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Jun 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Implant Success (time frame: at device implantation procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00665132, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in