AzTrials
AzTrials

Ankylosing SpondylitisPhase 3NCT00667355

A Study of Adalimumab in Japanese Subjects With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis

A Phase 3 study testing adalimumab in people with Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by Abbott at 19 sites in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of adalimumab in Japanese subjects with active ankylosing spondylitis Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Ankylosing Spondylitis
What is being tested?
adalimumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
41 participants
Where
19 sitesJapan
Study dates
Feb 2008to Jan 2011
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject who meets the definition of Ankylosing Spondylitis based on the Modified New York Criteria, has a diagnosis of active Ankylosing Spondylitis and has had an inadequate response to or intolerance to one or more nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Who cannot join

  • History of cancer, lymphoma, leukemia or lymphoproliferative disease, active TB, HIV
  • Previously received anti-TNF therapy
  • Spinal surgery or joint surgery involving joints to be assessed within 2 months prior to the Screening

Trial locations and contacts

19 sites in 1 country.

19 sites in 1 country

Japan19 sites
  • Site Reference # / Investigator 46791

    Aichi

  • Site Reference # / Investigator 46789

    Fukui

  • Site Reference # / Investigator 46798

    Fukuoka

  • Site Reference # / Investigator 46799

    Fukuoka

  • Site Reference # / Investigator 46796

    Hiroshima

  • Site Reference # / Investigator 46782

    Hokkaido

  • Site Reference # / Investigator 7297

    Hokkaido

  • Site Reference # / Investigator 46795

    Hyōgo

  • Site Reference # / Investigator 46797

    Kagawa

  • Site Reference # / Investigator 46787

    Kanagawa

  • Site Reference # / Investigator 46790

    Nagano

  • Site Reference # / Investigator 46793

    Osaka

  • Site Reference # / Investigator 46794

    Osaka

  • Site Reference # / Investigator 46783

    Saitama

  • Site Reference # / Investigator 46784

    Saitama

  • Site Reference # / Investigator 46792

    Shiga

  • Site Reference # / Investigator 46785

    Tokyo

  • Site Reference # / Investigator 46786

    Tokyo

  • Site Reference # / Investigator 46788

    Toyama

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: A Multi-Center, Open-Label Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetic Study of Adalimumab in Japanese Subjects With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis

To evaluate efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of adalimumab in Japanese subjects with active ankylosing spondylitis

Read the detailed description

It is reported that the prevalence of Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) in Japanese patients is extremely lower than that of Caucasians; therefore, a controlled, double-blind study with similar sample size in Western studies for active AS in Japan was not able to be conducted. As a result, this study was conducted with an open-label design to investigate efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of adalimumab in Japanese subjects with active AS. The inclusion criteria and primary endpoint measurement (Achieving Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20 at Week 12) were designed the same as the Western studies for active AS in consideration with the confirmation of Western data. Treatment with adalimumab was to be continued until the approval of adalimumab for AS in Japanese subjects with active AS.

Being tested
adalimumab
Keywords
Ankylosing Spondylitis
Medical subject headings
Spondylitis, Ankylosing

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • adalimumabBiological

    Also called ABT-D2E7, Humira

    40 mg or 80 mg every other week, subcutaneous

Study groups in NCT00667355
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AdalimumabExperimentalAdalimumab 40 mg or 80 mg subcutaneously (SC) administered every other week (eow) until approval of adalimumab for Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) in Japan. All subjects received 40 mg of adalimumab SC eow at Baseline. The subjects who completed 16 weeks of therapy and who failed to achieve Assessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20 (ASAS 20) response on or after Week 16, could increase the dose of adalimumab to 80 mg eow. When the dose was increased, the higher dose was to be continued during the rest of the study.
Receives: Biological: adalimumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Subjects Achieving Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20 (ASAS 20) at Week 12

    ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) subjects. ASAS has 4 domains: patient global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 20 = at least 20% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute improvement ≥ 10 units on a 0 - 100 scale (0 = no disease activity; 100 = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening (defined as a worsening of ≥ 20% and a net worsening of ≥ 10 units) in the remaining domain.

    Measured: Week 12

Secondary outcomes (18)
  1. Number of Subjects Achieving ASAS 20

    ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) subjects. ASAS has 4 domains: patient global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 20 = 20% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute improvement ≥ 10 units on a 0-100 scale (0 = no disease activity; 100 = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening (defined as a worsening of ≥ 20% and a net worsening of ≥ 10 units) in the remaining domain.

    Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and Final Visit

  2. Number of Subjects Achieving ASAS 50

    ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) subjects. ASAS has 4 domains: patient global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 50 = at least 50% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute improvement ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 scale (0 = no disease activity; 100 = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening (defined as a worsening of ≥ 20% and a net worsening of ≥ 10 units) in the remaining domain.

    Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and Final Visit

  3. Number of Subjects Achieving ASAS 70

    ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) subjects. ASAS has 4 domains: patient global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 70 = at least 70% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute improvement ≥ 30 units on a 0-100 scale (0 = no disease activity; 100 = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening (defined as a worsening of ≥ 20% and a net worsening of ≥ 10 units) in the remaining domain.

    Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and Final Visit

  4. Number of Subjects Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI 50)

    BASDAI is a validated self assessment tool used to determine disease activity in subjects with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS). Utilizing a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0-10 (0=none and 10=very severe) subjects answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain, fatigue, and morning stiffness. BASDAI 50 = at least 50% improvement (vs. baseline) in BASDAI.

    Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and Final Visit

  5. Mean Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity

    Subject's assessment of disease activity using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0 - 100 mm (0 = none and 100 = severe).

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and Final Visit

  6. Mean Change From Baseline in Total Back Pain

    Subject assessed his/her back pain by using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0 - 100 mm (0 = no pain and 100 = most severe pain).

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and Final Visit

  7. Mean Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)

    BASFI is a validated self assessment tool that determines the degree of functional limitation in AS subjects. Utilizing a VAS of 0-100 mm (0=easy, 100=impossible), subjects answered 10 questions assessing their ability in completing normal daily activities or physically demanding activities. The BASFI score is a mean score of the 10 questions.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and Final Visit

  8. Mean Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

    CRP is a marker of inflammation and measured in mg/dL. A higher level is consistent with inflammation.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and Final Visit

  9. Number of Subjects Achieving Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 5/6.

    ASAS 5/6 consists of 6 domains: the 4 used in ASAS 20 (patient global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation) plus spinal mobility and an acute phase reactant, C Reactive Protein (CRP). Achieving ASAS 5/6 requires a 20% improvement compared to baseline in ≥ 5 domains (each domain measured on a 0 - 100 scale [0 = no disease activity; 100 = high disease activity]).

    Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and Final Visit

  10. Number of Subjects Achieving Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 40 (ASAS 40)

    ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) subjects. ASAS = 4 domains: patient global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 40 = at least 40% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute improvement ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 scale (0 = no disease activity; 100 = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain.

    Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and Final Visit

  11. Number of Subjects Achieving Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis Partial Remission

    Partial remission is defined as a score of less than 20 units (on a scale of 0-100; 0=no disease activity and 100=high disease activity) in each of the 4 Assessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) domains: patient global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation.

    Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and Final Visit

  12. Mean Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)

    BASMI is an objective measure of spinal mobility. The BASMI score is composed of 5 measures: tragus to wall distance, lumbar flexion, cervical rotation, lumbar side flexion, and intermalleolar distance. Each measure was scored 0-2 (0=normal mobility/mild disease involvement, 1=moderate disease involvement, 2=severe disease involvement) to give a final total score ranging from 0 to 10. The higher the BASMI score, the more severe was the subject's limitation of movement due to their AS.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and Final Visit

  13. Mean Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion

    Chest expansion is the difference in centimeters between full expiration and full inspiration, measured at the 4th inter-costal space. An increase in chest expansion represents improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and Final Visit

  14. Mean Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)

    Assessment of enthesitis was performed in the following 7 domains: 1) 1st costochondral joint left and right, 2) 7th costochondral joint left and right, 3) posterior superior iliac spine left and right, 4) anterior superior iliac spine left and right, 5) iliac crest left and right, 6) 5th lumbar spinous process and 7) proximal insertion of Achilles tendon left and right. Each domain was graded for the presence (1) and absence (0) of tenderness yielding total MASES ranging from 0 (no tenderness) to 13 (worst possible score; severe tenderness).

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and Final Visit

  15. Mean Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Pain

    Nocturnal pain assessed by subjects using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0 - 100 mm (0 = no pain and 100 = worst possible pain).

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and Final Visit

  16. Mean Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count for 44 Joints (SJC 44)

    The number of swollen joints among 22 anatomical joints for both the right and left side of the body were assessed by a joint evaluator where the presence of a swollen joint was scored as 1 and absence as 0. The total SJC was derived by the sum of the scores for a range of SJC from 0 (best possible score; no swollen joints) to 44 (worse possible score; all joints swollen).

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and Final Visit

  17. Mean Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count for 46 Joints (TJC 46)

    The number of tender or painful joints among 23 anatomical joints for both the right and left side of the body were assessed by a joint evaluator where the presence of a tender or painful joint was scored as 1 and absence as 0. The total TJC was derived by the sum of the scores for a range of TJC from 0 (best possible score; no tender or painful joints) to 46 (worst possible score; all joints tender or painful).

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and Final Visit

  18. Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Questionnaire

    SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These are summarized in a physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) score. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (0=lowest level of functioning; 100=highest level of functioning).

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and Final Visit

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Apr 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2008
  3. Primary completionMay 2009
  4. Study completionJan 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
41 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00667355
Sponsor's protocol ID
M10-239
Status last verified
Jan 2012
First submitted
24 Apr 2008
Last updated
26 Jan 2012
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing adalimumab in people with Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by Abbott at 19 sites in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jan 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 19 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Aug 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Subjects Achieving Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20 (ASAS 20) at Week 12 (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jan 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in