AzTrials
AzTrials

ArthritisNCT00670852

Followup of Glenoid Fix Utilizing Auto Bone Graft in Shoulder Replacement

An observational study of Arthritis, run by University of Nebraska at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a case study to evaluate the adequacy of fixation and functional outcome of the glenoid anchor peg following autologous bone grafting around the prosthesis at the time of implant. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 to 90 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Arthritis
What is being tested?
X-rays and CT scan
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
29 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Apr 2008to 10 Jun 2009
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Maximum number will be 70. Patients who received a total shoulder replacement with an anchor peg glenoid and autologous bone grafting from the investigator of this study will be recruited for this study.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who received a total shoulder replacement with an anchor peg glenoid and autologous bone grafting from the investigator of this study will be recruited for this study.

Who cannot join

  • Patients will be excluded if they are unable to comprehend the consent information.
  • Pregnant women will be excluded from this study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center, Dept Orthopaedic Surgery

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68198-1080

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Computed Tomographic and Functional Follow-up of Glenoid Anchor Peg Component Fixation Utilizing Autologous Bone Graft in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

This is a case study to evaluate the adequacy of fixation and functional outcome of the glenoid anchor peg following autologous bone grafting around the prosthesis at the time of implant.

Read the detailed description

To investigate if the use of autologous bone graft around the anchor-peg glenoid prosthesis correlates with bony apposition on computed tomography scans, decreased radiolucent lines and component loosening, and functional outcomes. We hypothesize that by utilizing autologous bone graft from the resected humeral head, placed around the anchor peg glenoid prosthesis at implantation, there is a low incidence of glenoid loosening. We suggest that the absence of radiolucent lines correlated with excellent shoulder function.

Conditions
Arthritis
Being tested
X-rays and CT scan
Keywords
Glenoid component, radiolucent lines, Glenoid loosening, glenohumeral arthritis, autologous bone graft
Medical subject headings
Arthritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • X-rays and CT scanProcedure or surgery

    Also called No names

    CT Scan x-rays

Study groups in NCT00670852
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Total shoulder replacement with anchor peg glenoid and autologous bone graftingPatients who received a total shoulder replacement with an anchor peg glenoid and autologous bone grafting from the investigator of this study will be recruited for this study.
Receives: Procedure: X-rays and CT scan

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Autologous bone graft, anchor-peg glenoid prosthesis and functional outcomes

    To determine if the use of autologous bone graft around the anchor-peg glenoid prosthesis correlate with bony apposition on computed tomography scans, decreased radiolucent lines and component loosening, and functional outcomes.

    Measured: case study over approximate 3 months time.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 May 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Apr 2008
  3. Primary completion10 Jun 2009
  4. Study completion10 Jun 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
29 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00670852
Sponsor's protocol ID
0391-07-FB
Status last verified
Sep 2023
First submitted
30 Apr 2008
Last updated
26 Sep 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Arthritis, run by University of Nebraska at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Autologous bone graft, anchor-peg glenoid prosthesis and functional outcomes (time frame: case study over approximate 3 months time.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in