AutismPhase 2NCT00672360
Folate Rechallenge
A Phase 2 study testing Folic acid in people with Autism, run by Baylor College of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
New evidence suggests that autistic disorder (AD) may be associated with abnormalities in folate metabolism, which is a process that affects genetic expression by facilitating the formation of methyl donors for DNA methylation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Autism
- What is being tested?
- Folic acid
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 13 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2007to Feb 2015
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Child participant has a confirmed diagnosis of AD by Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule and Autism Diagnostic Interview--Revised criteria
- Child participant is in stable condition with relatively good control of seizures and no other significant medical problems, including liver, kidney, or heart problems, at the time of entrance to the study. If the child participant is taking medication for a seizure disorder, the investigators will assess his/her eligibility with particular regard to type of seizure medication and other health-related information gleaned during the medical examination
- Child participant and parents are willing to comply with the proposed treatments
- Child participant is able to take oral medication
- Family is fluent in the English language
- Parent/caregiver agrees to provide behavioral data on participating children at the requested time points
- Family agrees to be contacted weekly by study personnel during the treatment phases
Who cannot join
- Child participant has co-morbid medical and/or genetic disorders, including celiac disease
- Child participant has a history of liver or renal disease
- Child participant is currently being treated for a serious acute illness
- Child participant has a known allergy to any of the proposed supplements
- Child participant has uncontrolled seizures
- Child participant meets criteria for Asperger's syndrome, PDD-NOS, or does not meet strict criteria for AD
- Family is not proficient in the English language
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Folate Rechallenge: A Pilot Study
New evidence suggests that autistic disorder (AD) may be associated with abnormalities in folate metabolism, which is a process that affects genetic expression by facilitating the formation of methyl donors for DNA methylation. Limited data show that some children with AD show behavioral improvements with folic acid (FA) therapy, while others show a worsening effect. If behavioral worsening is linked with abnormalities in folate metabolism, then nutritional modifications could normalize these processes and result in clinical improvements. To address this premise, we propose a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover pilot study with two phases. The first phase will focus on the behavioral and biochemical responses of children with AD to high-dose folic acid supplementation. Because FA is an inactive folate that requires biochemical conversion to become active, and select genotypes impede this conversion, our general hypothesis is that FA will yield behavioral improvements in some children but exacerbate problem behaviors in others. During the second phase, children who had a worsened behavioral response to FA during phase 1 will participate in an open-label trial of high-dose Metafolin® supplementation. The focus here would similarly be on the behavioral and biochemical outcomes of participating children following treatment with the study supplement. Because Metafolin® is an active folate metabolite that should not be affected by genotypes in the folate pathway, our general hypothesis for phase 2 is that Metafolin® would yield behavioral improvements without the risk for behavioral worsening. Results from this project may provide support for continued study of the potential relationship between folate metabolism and problem behaviors among children with AD, potentially justifying the need to examine effects of folate supplementation among a larger sample of affected children.
Read the detailed description
There are limited data on the use of folic acid as a treatment for children with autistic disorder (AD). Most experimentation thus far has focused on the effects of folic acid supplementation in small samples of males with fragile X syndrome (FRAX), and many of these participants did not meet criteria for AD but were said to exhibit autistic-like features. Initial case reports suggested folic acid might be an effective treatment for FRAX, some of which noted a reduced expression of the fragile site Xq27 in blood cultures. Subsequent work found that high doses of folic acid supplementation reduced the percentage of FRAX positive cells and increased plasma-folate concentrations among 9 males with FRAX. Autistic-like behaviors were said to improve for the 5 youngest participants (age range 3 years, 5 months to 9 years, 10 months); however, one adult, aged 49, developed an increase in motor activity and aggressiveness during treatment. His behavior returned to pretreatment levels following discontinuation of folic acid. In similar work, researchers employed a crossover design using 4 boys (ages 6 to 14) with comorbid autism and FRAX to assess efficacy of folic acid supplementation. Favorable behavioral changes were noted for 3 boys; however, for 2 of them, carryover effects of folic acid into the placebo period may have clouded the magnitude of potential differences in folic acid versus placebo effects. No changes throughout the trial were evidenced for the fourth child, who was also the oldest and the only one to have commenced puberty.
Overall, investigations on folic acid supplementation with small groups of FRAX participants have yielded inconsistent findings, with favorable behavioral and/or biochemical effects for some but not others. Moreover, the findings cannot be generalized to the broader population of children with AD who do not have FRAX. Our search of the literature uncovered only one report of folic acid treatment prescribed for 2 children without FRAX, one of whom was described as psychotic with mental retardation and the other, as having a diagnosis of autism. For both children, behaviors were notably improved with treatment and returned to problematic levels when folic acid therapy stopped.
In addition to these few empirical studies, there are numerous anecdotal reports of families using folate treatments with their children, most of which are promulgated through Internet websites and the Autism Research Institute's (ARI) publication, Autism Research Review International. For the most part, these reports are favorable. Additionally, the ARI recently published findings from their web-based investigation on the parent-reported use and efficacy of a wide range of treatments for children with AD. Of the 1437 families who indicated use of folic acid as a therapeutic supplement, 42% said their children got better, 54% said their children did not exhibit noticeable changes, and 3% said their children got worse. Taken together, these limited data support the possibility for folic acid and other folates to generate favorable outcomes among children with AD; this may hold true particularly for pre-adolescent children.
The lack of empirically sound information about folic-acid efficacy among children with AD, however, also leaves open the possibility that increased supplementation may not be helpful and could, in fact, be harmful. There is some evidence to suggest that high doses of folic acid supplementation produce negative physiological and/or behavioral responses, such as gastrointestinal disturbances, sleep difficulties, malaise/irritability, and excitability/overactivity in a sample of typical adults. Many of these symptoms are similar if not identical to those described more generally in children with AD. Additionally, just as there are favorable anecdotal reports of folic acid treatment, there are negative ones, as well. For example, parents of one teenager with AD told us that, when their son participated in a stepwise-administered supplement program and folic acid was administered as the final supplement, he became extremely agitated, self-injurious, aggressive toward parents, prone to frantic gesturing, and developed sleep difficulties. When the folic acid was withdrawn, his behaviors gradually subsided to a pre-supplementation level (personal communication, September 27, 2003).
As to whether folic acid supplementation might be "good" or "bad," an alternative explanation is that folic acid may be beneficial in some circumstances and harmful in others. This explanation is potentially attractive if one hypothesizes that the conversion of homocysteine to methionine (for which folate is necessary) is beneficial, but that high doses of folic acid can lead to anti-folate effects by accumulation of "free folic acid." For individuals with an imbalanced metabolic profile but adequate levels of B12, it seems that folic acid supplementation would yield favorable effects by normalizing this profile. However, folic acid supplementation could lead to problematic behaviors through any one or combination of biological scenarios, including accumulation of unmetabolized pteroylglutamic acid (PGA) in serum, B12 deficiency, and/or genotypes known to impede the biochemical conversion of folic acid. Given that negative responses to folic acid supplementation have typically been reported among adolescents and adults, it is further possible that this phenomenon is regulated by maturational processes.
One possibility for achieving maximum folate benefit without the risk of anti-folate effects is through supplementation with a form of folate, Metafolin, that can serve directly as a methyl donor. Metafolin is the L-form isomer of 5- methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) and, presumably, a more active compound than folic acid or folinic acid (leucovorin). Metafolin has been approved for use in the U.S. as a dietary supplement since 2001. While studies around the globe have tested the safety of 5-MTHF at doses up to 17mg, there have not yet been any studies to examine its efficacy as a therapeutic agent in specific neurodevelopmental disorders. However, folinic acid (5,10- MTHF), which immediately precedes 5-MTHF in the folate-metabolism cycle, has been investigated repeatedly as a potential therapeutic agent for this population. In one such study, James et al. examined the biochemical effects of folinic acid supplementation in conjunction with betaine and vitamin B12 on the biochemical outcomes of children with imbalanced metabolic profiles. This team initially discovered that, compared with a control group, children with AD had significantly lower baseline concentrations of methionine, S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), and homocysteine and significantly higher concentrations of S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) and adenosine--a metabolic profile that is consistent with impaired capacity for methylation. Following supplementation with the study treatments, the metabolic imbalance within the AD group was normalized. This same research team recently published results from an extension of this work in which they assessed levels of folate-related metabolites and genotypes for select enzymes. Approximately 50% of children with AD had severely abnormal metabolic profiles; additionally, "...several susceptibility alleles that perturb a common metabolic pathway were increased among the autistic children. The hypothesis that a genetic component of autism could involve multiple susceptibility alleles that interact to create a fragile, environmentally sensitive metabolic imbalance is worthy of further pursuit," (electronic copy; no page number available).
- Conditions
- Autism
- Being tested
- Folic acid, Placebo
- Keywords
- Autism Spectrum Disorder
- Medical subject headings
- Autistic Disorder, Autism Spectrum Disorder
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Folic acidDietary supplement
Also called folate
Compounded capsule, 7.6mg, taken orally, twice daily for 4 weeks.
PlaceboDietary supplement
Compounded capsule of NaCl, taken orally, twice daily for 4 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Dietary Supplement: Folic acid |
| 2 | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Dietary Supplement: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Behavior as measured with the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) and the Pervasive Developmental Disorder Behavior Inventory (PDDBI).
Measured: Pre-, mid-, and post-treatment during each phase (folic acid and placebo).
Secondary outcomes (1)
Level of folate metabolites in plasma and site-specific DNA methylation.
Measured: Pre- and post-treatment during each phase (folic acid and placebo).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 May 2008 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2007
- Primary completionFeb 2015
- Study completionFeb 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for AutismStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Baylor College of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Baylor College of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Arthur L. Beaudet, Baylor College of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00672360
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-20959
- Status last verified
- Oct 2020
- First submitted
- 5 May 2008
- Last updated
- 19 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Folate Rechallenge: A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00672360
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H-20959
- Conditions
- Autism
- Keywords
- Autism Spectrum Disorder
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Baylor College of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2007
- Primary completion
- Feb 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 May 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
New evidence suggests that autistic disorder (AD) may be associated with abnormalities in folate metabolism, which is a process that affects genetic expression by facilitating the formation of methyl donors for DNA methylation. Limited data show that some children with AD show behavioral improvements with folic acid (FA) therapy, while others show a worsening effect. If behavioral worsening is linked with abnormalities in folate metabolism, then nutritional modifications could normalize these processes and result in clinical improvements. To address this premise, we propose a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover pilot study with two phases. The first phase will focus on the behavioral and biochemical responses of children with AD to high-dose folic acid supplementation. Because FA is an inactive folate that requires biochemical conversion to become active, and select genotypes impede this conversion, our general hypothesis is that FA will yield behavioral improvements in some children but exacerbate problem behaviors in others. During the second phase, children who had a worsened behavioral response to FA during phase 1 will participate in an open-label trial of high-dose Metafolin® supplementation. The focus here would similarly be on the behavioral and biochemical outcomes of participating children following treatment with the study supplement. Because Metafolin® is an active folate metabolite that should not be affected by genotypes in the folate pathway, our general hypothesis for phase 2 is that Metafolin® would yield behavioral improvements without the risk for behavioral worsening. Results from this project may provide support for continued study of the potential relationship between folate metabolism and problem behaviors among children with AD, potentially justifying the need to examine effects of folate supplementation among a larger sample of affected children.
Detailed description
There are limited data on the use of folic acid as a treatment for children with autistic disorder (AD). Most experimentation thus far has focused on the effects of folic acid supplementation in small samples of males with fragile X syndrome (FRAX), and many of these participants did not meet criteria for AD but were said to exhibit autistic-like features. Initial case reports suggested folic acid might be an effective treatment for FRAX, some of which noted a reduced expression of the fragile site Xq27 in blood cultures. Subsequent work found that high doses of folic acid supplementation reduced the percentage of FRAX positive cells and increased plasma-folate concentrations among 9 males with FRAX. Autistic-like behaviors were said to improve for the 5 youngest participants (age range 3 years, 5 months to 9 years, 10 months); however, one adult, aged 49, developed an increase in motor activity and aggressiveness during treatment. His behavior returned to pretreatment levels following discontinuation of folic acid. In similar work, researchers employed a crossover design using 4 boys (ages 6 to 14) with comorbid autism and FRAX to assess efficacy of folic acid supplementation. Favorable behavioral changes were noted for 3 boys; however, for 2 of them, carryover effects of folic acid into the placebo period may have clouded the magnitude of potential differences in folic acid versus placebo effects. No changes throughout the trial were evidenced for the fourth child, who was also the oldest and the only one to have commenced puberty.
Overall, investigations on folic acid supplementation with small groups of FRAX participants have yielded inconsistent findings, with favorable behavioral and/or biochemical effects for some but not others. Moreover, the findings cannot be generalized to the broader population of children with AD who do not have FRAX. Our search of the literature uncovered only one report of folic acid treatment prescribed for 2 children without FRAX, one of whom was described as psychotic with mental retardation and the other, as having a diagnosis of autism. For both children, behaviors were notably improved with treatment and returned to problematic levels when folic acid therapy stopped.
In addition to these few empirical studies, there are numerous anecdotal reports of families using folate treatments with their children, most of which are promulgated through Internet websites and the Autism Research Institute's (ARI) publication, Autism Research Review International. For the most part, these reports are favorable. Additionally, the ARI recently published findings from their web-based investigation on the parent-reported use and efficacy of a wide range of treatments for children with AD. Of the 1437 families who indicated use of folic acid as a therapeutic supplement, 42% said their children got better, 54% said their children did not exhibit noticeable changes, and 3% said their children got worse. Taken together, these limited data support the possibility for folic acid and other folates to generate favorable outcomes among children with AD; this may hold true particularly for pre-adolescent children.
The lack of empirically sound information about folic-acid efficacy among children with AD, however, also leaves open the possibility that increased supplementation may not be helpful and could, in fact, be harmful. There is some evidence to suggest that high doses of folic acid supplementation produce negative physiological and/or behavioral responses, such as gastrointestinal disturbances, sleep difficulties, malaise/irritability, and excitability/overactivity in a sample of typical adults. Many of these symptoms are similar if not identical to those described more generally in children with AD. Additionally, just as there are favorable anecdotal reports of folic acid treatment, there are negative ones, as well. For example, parents of one teenager with AD told us that, when their son participated in a stepwise-administered supplement program and folic acid was administered as the final supplement, he became extremely agitated, self-injurious, aggressive toward parents, prone to frantic gesturing, and developed sleep difficulties. When the folic acid was withdrawn, his behaviors gradually subsided to a pre-supplementation level (personal communication, September 27, 2003).
As to whether folic acid supplementation might be "good" or "bad," an alternative explanation is that folic acid may be beneficial in some circumstances and harmful in others. This explanation is potentially attractive if one hypothesizes that the conversion of homocysteine to methionine (for which folate is necessary) is beneficial, but that high doses of folic acid can lead to anti-folate effects by accumulation of "free folic acid." For individuals with an imbalanced metabolic profile but adequate levels of B12, it seems that folic acid supplementation would yield favorable effects by normalizing this profile. However, folic acid supplementation could lead to problematic behaviors through any one or combination of biological scenarios, including accumulation of unmetabolized pteroylglutamic acid (PGA) in serum, B12 deficiency, and/or genotypes known to impede the biochemical conversion of folic acid. Given that negative responses to folic acid supplementation have typically been reported among adolescents and adults, it is further possible that this phenomenon is regulated by maturational processes.
One possibility for achieving maximum folate benefit without the risk of anti-folate effects is through supplementation with a form of folate, Metafolin, that can serve directly as a methyl donor. Metafolin is the L-form isomer of 5- methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) and, presumably, a more active compound than folic acid or folinic acid (leucovorin). Metafolin has been approved for use in the U.S. as a dietary supplement since 2001. While studies around the globe have tested the safety of 5-MTHF at doses up to 17mg, there have not yet been any studies to examine its efficacy as a therapeutic agent in specific neurodevelopmental disorders. However, folinic acid (5,10- MTHF), which immediately precedes 5-MTHF in the folate-metabolism cycle, has been investigated repeatedly as a potential therapeutic agent for this population. In one such study, James et al. examined the biochemical effects of folinic acid supplementation in conjunction with betaine and vitamin B12 on the biochemical outcomes of children with imbalanced metabolic profiles. This team initially discovered that, compared with a control group, children with AD had significantly lower baseline concentrations of methionine, S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), and homocysteine and significantly higher concentrations of S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) and adenosine--a metabolic profile that is consistent with impaired capacity for methylation. Following supplementation with the study treatments, the metabolic imbalance within the AD group was normalized. This same research team recently published results from an extension of this work in which they assessed levels of folate-related metabolites and genotypes for select enzymes. Approximately 50% of children with AD had severely abnormal metabolic profiles; additionally, "...several susceptibility alleles that perturb a common metabolic pathway were increased among the autistic children. The hypothesis that a genetic component of autism could involve multiple susceptibility alleles that interact to create a fragile, environmentally sensitive metabolic imbalance is worthy of further pursuit," (electronic copy; no page number available).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Folic acid |
| 2 | Placebo comparator | Dietary Supplement: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Child participant has a confirmed diagnosis of AD by Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule and Autism Diagnostic Interview--Revised criteria
- Child participant is in stable condition with relatively good control of seizures and no other significant medical problems, including liver, kidney, or heart problems, at the time of entrance to the study. If the child participant is taking medication for a seizure disorder, the investigators will assess his/her eligibility with particular regard to type of seizure medication and other health-related information gleaned during the medical examination
- Child participant and parents are willing to comply with the proposed treatments
- Child participant is able to take oral medication
- Family is fluent in the English language
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Child participant has co-morbid medical and/or genetic disorders, including celiac disease
- Child participant has a history of liver or renal disease
- Child participant is currently being treated for a serious acute illness
- Child participant has a known allergy to any of the proposed supplements
- Child participant has uncontrolled seizures
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Folic acidAlso: folateCompounded capsule, 7.6mg, taken orally, twice daily for 4 weeks. | Dietary supplement | 1 |
| PlaceboCompounded capsule of NaCl, taken orally, twice daily for 4 weeks. | Dietary supplement | 2 |
Primary outcome
Behavior as measured with the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) and the Pervasive Developmental Disorder Behavior Inventory (PDDBI).
Time frame: Pre-, mid-, and post-treatment during each phase (folic acid and placebo).
1 secondary outcome
Level of folate metabolites in plasma and site-specific DNA methylation.
Time frame: Pre- and post-treatment during each phase (folic acid and placebo).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Oct 2020.
Related trials for Autism
Recruiting
Smith Magenis Syndrome and Autism Spectrum Disorders
Smith-Magenis Syndrome, Autism Spectrum Disorder
Recruiting
Strategies for Toddler ASD With Remote-therapy (STAR) Model for ASD
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Therapy
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Psilocybin for Treatment-Resistant Depression in Autism
Treatment Resistant Depression, Autism Spectrum Disorder
RecruitingPhase 2
TRIal of PPF3 vs. PlaCEbo in the TReatment of Children and AdolescenTs With NeurOdeveloPmental DisorderS
Autism Disorder
Not yet recruitingObservational study
EEG As a Genetic Selection Lever in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Folic acid in people with Autism, run by Baylor College of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Behavior as measured with the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) and the Pervasive Developmental Disorder Behavior Inventory (PDDBI). (time frame: Pre-, mid-, and post-treatment during each phase (folic acid and placebo).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Oct 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.