AzTrials
AzTrials

Hospital MortalityNCT00673166

Evaluation of Local Mechanisms for Staff Motivation to Reduce Hospital Mortality

A study testing Staff incentive & supervision and Staff motivation in people with Hospital Mortality and Malaria, run by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine at 1 site in Guinea-Bissau.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

We observed in a randomised intervention trial in Bissau that mortality due to malaria could be reduced by half by adding a small monetary incentive to the staff and strict follow-up of a standard protocol for available drugs. The Government and donors are not able to sustain such incentives. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 59 months
Conditions the study is for
Hospital Mortality, Malaria
What is being tested?
Staff incentive & supervision and Staff motivation
How many people
900 participants
Where
1 siteGuinea-Bissau
Study dates
Jan 2008to Dec 2008
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 59 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Children under five years of age admitted to the ward
  • Parents of these children

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Guinea-Bissau1 site
  • Paediatric department at the national hospital

    Bissau, Bissau Region, 50

Other trials in Guinea-Bissau

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of Local Mechanisms for Staff Motivation to Improve Treatment and Reduce Mortality Due to Malaria at the Paediatric Ward

We observed in a randomised intervention trial in Bissau that mortality due to malaria could be reduced by half by adding a small monetary incentive to the staff and strict follow-up of a standard protocol for available drugs. The Government and donors are not able to sustain such incentives. We intend to evaluate whether strict organisation of a cost recovery system and the use of part of the funds for staff incentives would improve performance of the staff and contribute to reduction of hospital and post-discharge mortality.

Read the detailed description

A committee will organise collection and use of the money, and decide on incentives to be paid to the staff based on performance indicators. All children < 5 years of age admitted to the ward will be registered and followed-up until two months after the consultation. Data on the level of mortality before and after the study period will be collected. Furthermore, interviews on quality perception of the parents will be carried out before and after the study.

Being tested
Staff incentive & supervision, Staff motivation
Keywords
Staff motivation, Hospital mortality, Perception of quality of care
Medical subject headings
Malaria

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Staff incentive & supervisionProcedure or surgery

    Control \& management of funds for incentive of staff; supervision

  • Staff motivationBehavioural

    Supervision, control of funds

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall hospital and malaria mortality

    Measured: One year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Parent's perception of the quality of care received

    Measured: One year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 May 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2008
  3. Primary completionDec 2008
  4. Study completionDec 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
900 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00673166
Sponsor's protocol ID
HMTV
Other IDs
GMP_P_II_5
Status last verified
Jan 2017
First submitted
1 May 2008
Last updated
26 Jan 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Biai S, Rodrigues A, Gomes M, Ribeiro I, Sodemann M, Alves F, Aaby P. Reduced in-hospital mortality after improved management of children under 5 years admitted to hospital with malaria: randomised trial. BMJ. 2007 Oct 27;335(7625):862. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39345.467813.80. Epub 2007 Oct 22.

    PubMed 17954513
  • Sodemann M, Veirum J, Biai S, Nielsen J, Bale C, Skytte Jakobsen M, Gustafson P, Aaby P. Reduced case fatality among hospitalized children during a war in Guinea-Bissau: a lesson in equity. Acta Paediatr. 2004 Jul;93(7):959-64.

    PubMed 15303813

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Staff incentive & supervision and Staff motivation in people with Hospital Mortality and Malaria, run by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine at 1 site in Guinea-Bissau.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Guinea-Bissau. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall hospital and malaria mortality (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00673166, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jan 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in