AzTrials
AzTrials

Childhood IllnessNCT00678197

Philippine Child Health and Policy Experiment

A study testing Access Intervention and Bonus/Pay-for-Performance Intervention in people with Childhood Illness, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in Philippines.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The long-term consequences of poverty on child health, including cognitive development, are one of the world's great tragedies. In the Philippines, diarrhea, acute lower respiratory infections, and the attendant problems of malnutrition, are the leading causes of childhood illness. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 months to 5 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Childhood Illness
What is being tested?
Access Intervention and Bonus/Pay-for-Performance Intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
Not given
Where
1 sitePhilippines
Study dates
Apr 2003to Sep 2007
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 months to 5 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Children presenting to participating hospitals

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Philippines1 site
  • Study site

    Manila

Other trials in Philippines

About this study

The long-term consequences of poverty on child health, including cognitive development, are one of the world's great tragedies. In the Philippines, diarrhea, acute lower respiratory infections, and the attendant problems of malnutrition, are the leading causes of childhood illness. The Philippine government plans to launch a broad national Health Sector Reform Agenda (HSRA) that will address the problems of poverty and illness in children. The introduction of these reforms provides an exceptional opportunity to conduct a social experiment. Four institutions, already involved in the design and implementation of the HSRA, plus leading experts in international health, government, and health measurement will collaborate on this project to collect longitudinal data and measure the impact of HSRA reforms on child health outcomes in a population. We will measure the health impacts of two experimental interventions: (1) expansion of health insurance coverage, and (2) capitation of providers. Our research will measure the impact of health reforms on the physical and cognitive health outcomes of children age 0-4. We will use a block design of 21 sites throughout the Philippines: seven for each of the two interventions, and seven matched controls. We will measure the quality of clinical practice using vignettes and will measure health outcomes using objective clinical tests. We will also use an advanced sampling strategy and panel data to link clinical practice with population health outcomes. This unparalleled research opportunity will yield significant insights about specific, unanswered questions of tremendous importance: Does health care serve as a social intervention that ameliorates the effects of morbidity and malnutrition on cognitive development? How effective are government policies at creating incentives to improve the quality of clinical practice? Do financial and organizational policies actually lead to better health and developmental outcomes? The results from this study will provide insights into the linkages between increased access, high quality care, and health outcomes in children.

Being tested
Access Intervention, Bonus/Pay-for-Performance Intervention
Keywords
Quality of care, Access to care, Health Outcomes

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Access InterventionOther

  • Bonus/Pay-for-Performance InterventionOther

Study groups in NCT00678197
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: Access Intervention
BExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: Bonus/Pay-for-Performance Intervention
CNo interventionNot described

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 May 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2003
  3. Primary completionSep 2007
  4. Study completionSep 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00678197
Sponsor's protocol ID
R01HD042117
Other IDs
R01HD042117
Status last verified
Apr 2015
First submitted
8 May 2008
Last updated
4 May 2015
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Peabody JW, Florentino J, Shimkhada R, Solon O, Quimbo S. Quality variation and its impact on costs and satisfaction: evidence from the QIDS study. Med Care. 2010 Jan;48(1):25-30. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181bd47b2.

    PubMed 20009777

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Access Intervention and Bonus/Pay-for-Performance Intervention in people with Childhood Illness, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in Philippines.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 May 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Philippines. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00678197, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 May 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in