Carcinoma, Renal CellPhase 2NCT00678288
A Study to Assess Sorafenib Alone and in Combination With Low-Dose Interferon Following Unsuccessful Treatment With Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Cancer.
A Phase 2 study testing Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) and Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Interferon in people with Carcinoma, Renal Cell, run by Bayer at 35 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
This study is to assess sorafenib as second treatment for patients that have previously received only sunitinib as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell cancer, and who either responded and then progressed with sunitinib or were intolerant to sunitinib. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
- What is being tested?
- Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) and Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Interferon
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 16 participants
- Where
- 35 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- Apr 2008to Jun 2009
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Disease progression as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria following documented stable disease or better after at least 8 weeks of sunitinib as first-line treatment (or two cycles of 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off treatment)
- And/or patients who have discontinued sunitinib treatment at any point due to toxicity
- Study entry at least 2 weeks after treatment with sunitinib but up to a maximum of 8 weeks
- Memorial Sloane Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) prognostic score low or intermediate
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1
- Patient must have histologically confirmed metastatic renal cell carcinoma with predominant clear cell histology (clear cell component more than 50%).
Who cannot join
- Patient should be excluded if they have unresolved chronic toxicity grade
- > 1 and related to prior therapy with sunitinib.
Trial locations and contacts
35 sites in 7 countries.
35 sites in 7 countries
France12 sites
Study site
Avignon, 84000
Study site
Bayonne, 64100
Study site
Bordeaux, 33000
Study site
Marseille, 13015
Study site
Marseille, 13385
Study site
Nantes, 44020
Study site
Paris, 75014
Study site
Paris, 75651
Study site
Reims, 51100
Study site
Strasbourg, 67000
Study site
Toulouse, 31052
Study site
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54000
Italy6 sites
Study site
Aviano, Pordenone, 33081
Study site
Legnago, Verona, 37045
Study site
Naples, 80131
Study site
Pavia, 27100
Study site
Perugia, 06156
Study site
Reggio Emilia, 42100
Spain6 sites
Study site
Barcelona, Barcelona, 08035
Study site
Madrid, Madrid, 28041
Study site
Madrid, Madrid, 28046
Study site
Oviedo, Oviedo, 33006
Study site
Pamplona, Pamplona, 31008
Study site
Valencia, Valencia, 46009
Poland4 sites
Study site
Gdansk, 80-219
Study site
Lublin, 20-090
Study site
Warsaw, 04-141
Study site
Wroclaw, 50 - 556
United Kingdom3 sites
Study site
London, London, SW3 6JJ
Study site
Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, NE4 6BE
Study site
Northwood, Middlesex, HA6 2RN
Austria2 sites
Study site
Salzburg, 5020
Study site
Vienna, State of Vienna, 1090
About this study
Official title: A Phase II, Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Sorafenib Alone and Sorafenib in Combination With Low Dose Interferon Alpha-2a as Second-line Treatment of Sunitinib Failure in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
This study is to assess sorafenib as second treatment for patients that have previously received only sunitinib as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell cancer, and who either responded and then progressed with sunitinib or were intolerant to sunitinib. This study is to assess if combining the usual dose of sorafenib (200mg twice-daily) with low dose interferon (3 million international unit (MIU) five times a week) can treat kidney cancer more effectively than the current approved dose alone and if it is safe. In addition, for patients that respond to treatment with sorafenib alone or in combination with interferon before progressing, patients may receive sorafenib alone at an increased dose of 300mg twice-daily, provided that toxicities are acceptable and at the discretion of the investigator.
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
- Being tested
- Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006), Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Interferon
- Keywords
- Renal Cell Cancer, Interferon
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)Drug
Sorafenib 400 mg (two 200 mg tablets) BID PO, continuously
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + InterferonDrug
Sorafenib 400 mg (two 200 mg tablets) BID PO, continuously. IFN alpha-2a 3MIU FIW s.c., from Monday to Friday (total weekly dose 15 MIU) s.c., to start one week after commencing sorafenib.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) | Experimental | Sorafenib 400 mg (two 200 mg tablets) twice daily (bid) per os (po), continuously. Receives: Drug: Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) |
| Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Interferon | Experimental | Sorafenib 400 mg (two 200 mg tablets) twice daily (bid) per os (po), continuously plus Interferon (IFN) alpha-2a 3 millions of international unit (MIU) five times a week (FIW) subcutaneous (s.c.), from Monday to Friday (total weekly dose 15 MIU) s.c., to start one week after commencing sorafenib. Receives: Drug: Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Interferon |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-Free Survival
Progression-free Survival (PFS) was the time from the first dose of combination therapy to disease progression (radiological or clinical, whichever is earlier, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST]) or death (if death occurs before progression is documented). PFS for subjects without tumor progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at the date of last tumor evaluation.
Measured: From start of treatment of the first subject until 14 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Secondary outcomes (4)
Response Rate
Response Rate was the best tumor response (confirmed Complete Response [CR], Partial Response [PR] or Stable Disease [SD]) observed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria.
Measured: From start of treatment of the first subject until 14 months later, assessed every 8 Weeks
Time to Progression
Time to progression was the time from treatment start date to disease progression. Subjects without progression at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation.
Measured: From start of treatment of the first subject until 14 months later, assessed every 8 Weeks
Duration of Response
Duration of Response was the time from date of first response (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]) to the date when Progressive Disease (PD) is first documented or to the date of death, whichever occurs first. Subjects still having CR or PR at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of last contact.
Measured: From start of treatment of the first subject until 14 months later, assessed every 8 Weeks
Overall Survival
Overall Survival was the time from treatment start date to death due to any cause. Subjects still alive at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of last contact.
Measured: From start of treatment of the first subject until 14 months later, assessed every 8 Weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 May 2008 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2008
- Primary completionJun 2009
- Study completionJun 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Carcinoma, Renal CellStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by BayerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bayer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bayer Study Director, Study director, Bayer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00678288
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 12782
- Other IDs
- 2007-005083-28, CONCERT
- Status last verified
- Nov 2014
- First submitted
- 14 May 2008
- Last updated
- 11 Dec 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Dec 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II, Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Sorafenib Alone and Sorafenib in Combination With Low Dose Interferon Alpha-2a as Second-line Treatment of Sunitinib Failure in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00678288
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 12782
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
- Keywords
- Renal Cell Cancer, Interferon
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- BayerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2008
- Primary completion
- Jun 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 May 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 1 Oct 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is to assess sorafenib as second treatment for patients that have previously received only sunitinib as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell cancer, and who either responded and then progressed with sunitinib or were intolerant to sunitinib. This study is to assess if combining the usual dose of sorafenib (200mg twice-daily) with low dose interferon (3 million international unit (MIU) five times a week) can treat kidney cancer more effectively than the current approved dose alone and if it is safe. In addition, for patients that respond to treatment with sorafenib alone or in combination with interferon before progressing, patients may receive sorafenib alone at an increased dose of 300mg twice-daily, provided that toxicities are acceptable and at the discretion of the investigator.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) | Experimental | Drug: Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)Sorafenib 400 mg (two 200 mg tablets) twice daily (bid) per os (po), continuously. |
| Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Interferon | Experimental | Drug: Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + InterferonSorafenib 400 mg (two 200 mg tablets) twice daily (bid) per os (po), continuously plus Interferon (IFN) alpha-2a 3 millions of international unit (MIU) five times a week (FIW) subcutaneous (s.c.), from Monday to Friday (total weekly dose 15 MIU) s.c., to start one week after commencing sorafenib. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Disease progression as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria following documented stable disease or better after at least 8 weeks of sunitinib as first-line treatment (or two cycles of 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off treatment)
- And/or patients who have discontinued sunitinib treatment at any point due to toxicity
- Study entry at least 2 weeks after treatment with sunitinib but up to a maximum of 8 weeks
- Memorial Sloane Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) prognostic score low or intermediate
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patient should be excluded if they have unresolved chronic toxicity grade
- > 1 and related to prior therapy with sunitinib.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)Sorafenib 400 mg (two 200 mg tablets) BID PO, continuously | Drug | Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) |
| Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + InterferonSorafenib 400 mg (two 200 mg tablets) BID PO, continuously. IFN alpha-2a 3MIU FIW s.c., from Monday to Friday (total weekly dose 15 MIU) s.c., to start one week after commencing sorafenib. | Drug | Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Interferon |
Primary outcome
Progression-Free Survival
Time frame: From start of treatment of the first subject until 14 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Progression-free Survival (PFS) was the time from the first dose of combination therapy to disease progression (radiological or clinical, whichever is earlier, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST]) or death (if death occurs before progression is documented). PFS for subjects without tumor progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at the date of last tumor evaluation.
4 secondary outcomes
Response Rate
Time frame: From start of treatment of the first subject until 14 months later, assessed every 8 Weeks
Time to Progression
Time frame: From start of treatment of the first subject until 14 months later, assessed every 8 Weeks
Duration of Response
Time frame: From start of treatment of the first subject until 14 months later, assessed every 8 Weeks
Overall Survival
Time frame: From start of treatment of the first subject until 14 months later, assessed every 8 Weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Dec 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Click here and search for EudraCT infomation of Bayer ProductLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Carcinoma, Renal Cell
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) in Combination With Lenvatinib Versus Cabozantinib for Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-011)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Toripalimab and Lenvatinib With or Without SBRT Before Surgery for Non-Clear Cell Kidney Cancer
Nonmetastatic Locally Advanced Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Pucotenlimab, Lenvatinib, and SBRT Before Surgery for Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bayer Study Director study director
Bayer
35 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) and Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Interferon in people with Carcinoma, Renal Cell, run by Bayer at 35 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 35 sites in France, Italy, Spain, Poland, United Kingdom and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Oct 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-Free Survival (time frame: From start of treatment of the first subject until 14 months later, assessed every 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Dec 2014.