AzTrials
AzTrials

Terminal Renal FailureNCT00684372

BK Viremia After Renal Transplantation

A study testing leflunomide in people with Terminal Renal Failure and BK Virus Infection, run by Karolinska University Hospital at 1 site in Sweden.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Hypothesis: Early detection, and treatment, of BK virus infection after kidney transplantation will prevent BK virus associated kidney transplant injury. BK virus associated nephropathy (BKVN) is estimated to cause a progressive kidney transplant injury in 1-10% of renal transplant recipients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Terminal Renal Failure, BK Virus Infection
What is being tested?
leflunomide
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteSweden
Study dates
May 2007to May 2009
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All adult patients undergoing kidney transplantation at Karolinska University Hospital

Who cannot join

  • Absence of informed consent
  • Allergy to leflunomide
  • Pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sweden1 site
  • Karolinska University Hospital

    Stockholm, 14186

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: BK Viremia After Renal Transplantation: Screening, Early Diagnosis, Early Reduction in Immunosuppression and Treatment With Leflunomide (Arava)

Hypothesis: Early detection, and treatment, of BK virus infection after kidney transplantation will prevent BK virus associated kidney transplant injury.

BK virus associated nephropathy (BKVN) is estimated to cause a progressive kidney transplant injury in 1-10% of renal transplant recipients. Diagnostic and monitoring strategies for BKVN is still being developed. Detectable virus in the blood by polymerase change reaction-test (PCR) is predictive of BKVN. Additionally, PCR provides a objective estimate of the degree of infection.

Read more

If early detection and treatment of BK virus infection is effective in preventing subsequent kidney transplant injury has not been studied. However, renal injury and dysfunction develops late in the natural course of BKVN and it seems likely that screening in combination with early treatment would be beneficial for long-term transplant survival.

There is no established treatment for BK virus infection. Nevertheless, in kidney transplanted patients diagnosed with BK virus infection, immunosuppression is reduced to allow the patients own immune system to handle the virus. However, reduction of immunosuppression has not been associated with rejection. This indicate that these patients were over-immunosuppressed, predisposing them to BKVN. Therefore, to compare the degree of immunosuppression in BKVN patients (over-immunosuppressed) to other patients (not over-immunosuppressed) could yield interesting information. One possibility would be to quantify these patients specific cellular immune response to BK virus but also to other viruses (T cell reactivity).

Leflunomide (Arava) is an immunosuppressive drug, approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, and has been used in more than 300,000 patients worldwide. Furthermore, leflunomide has been used safely in humans after clinical kidney and liver transplantation for more than 300 days. In addition to leflunomide's value in preventing rejection, it has been shown to exert inhibitory effects on different viruses. Recently published pilot studies suggest that leflunomide treatment of patients with BKVN significantly reduces the amount of BK virus in blood and prevents recurrence of kidney transplant injury. At Karolinska University Hospital, leflunomide has been used for treatment of BKVN and, in some of the patients, renal function has stabilized and BK virus load has decreased significantly.

Being tested
leflunomide

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • leflunomideDrug

    Screening: If BK viremia (BK PCR >10 000 copies/ml in serum) i. Reduced immunosuppression

    1. MMF / AZA withdrawal
    2. CNI reduction
    3. Tacrolimus 5 ng/ml in serum
    4. Cyclosporin 100 ng/ml in serum
    5. Prednisolone to maintenance level

    If effective => continue

    • Stable renal function (P-Krea)
    • >50% reduction in PCR (copies/ml) at 4 weeks after diagnosis
    • Negative PCR at > 3 months after diagnosis

    If failure => add leflunomide

    • Deteriorating renal function (P-Krea) and positive PAD = BK nephropathy
    • <50% reduction in PCR at 4 weeks after diagnosis
    • Positive PCR at >3 months after diagnosis

    Leflunomide dosing:

    ii. Loading dose of 100 mgx1 PO daily for 5 days can be used or the patient can be directly started on iii. Maintenance dose (from day 1 or day 6)

    1. Starting at 20 mgx1 PO daily
    2. Thereafter adjusted between approximately 20-60 mgx1 PO daily according to serum levels of A77 1726 and the clinical situation a. Recommended level of A77 1726 >40 ug/ml

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Renal function (serum creatinine)

    Measured: 1 year after diagnosis of BK viremia

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Incidence of BK virus associated nephropathy

    Measured: 1 year after diagnosis of BK viremia

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 May 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2007
  3. Primary completionMay 2009 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2009 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00684372
Sponsor's protocol ID
BK study
Status last verified
Feb 2009
First submitted
21 May 2008
Last updated
6 Feb 2009
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing leflunomide in people with Terminal Renal Failure and BK Virus Infection, run by Karolinska University Hospital at 1 site in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Feb 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Renal function (serum creatinine) (time frame: 1 year after diagnosis of BK viremia). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Feb 2009.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in