AzTrials
AzTrials

Urinary Bladder, OveractivePhase 3SCORPIONCT00689104

Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of the Beta-3 Agonist Mirabegron (YM178) in Patients With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder

A Phase 3 study testing Mirabegron and Tolterodine in people with Urinary Bladder, Overactive, run by Astellas Pharma Inc at 218 sites in 30 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study is intended to test efficacy, safety and tolerability of two doses of Mirabegron against placebo and compare the efficacy and safety with active comparator in patients with symptoms of overactive bladder. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Urinary Bladder, Overactive
What is being tested?
Mirabegron and Tolterodine
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
2,336 participants
Where
218 sitesin 30 countries
Study dates
28 Apr 2008to 24 Mar 2009
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject is willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly
  • Subject has symptoms of overactive bladder (urinary frequency and urgency with or without urge incontinence) for ≥ 3 months
  • Subject experiences frequency of micturition on average ≥ 8 times per 24-hour period during the 3-day micturition diary period
  • Subject must experience at least 3 episodes of urgency (grade 3 or 4) with or without incontinence, during the 3-day micturition diary period

Who cannot join

  • Subject is breastfeeding, pregnant, intends to become pregnant during the study, or of childbearing potential, sexually active and not practicing a highly reliable method of birth control
  • Subject has significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urge incontinence where stress is the predominant factor
  • Subject has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization
  • Subject has diabetic neuropathy
  • Subject has evidence of a symptomatic urinary tract infection, chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs
  • Subject receives non-drug treatment including electro-stimulation therapy
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Subject has severe hypertension
  • Subject has a known or suspected hypersensitivity to tolterodine, other anticholinergics, YM178, other beta-adrenoreceptor (ß-AR) agonists, or lactose or any of the other inactive ingredients
  • Subject has been treated with any investigational drug or device within 30 days (90 days in the UK)
  • Subject had an average total daily urine volume > 3000 mL as recorded in the 3-day micturition diary period
  • Subject has serum creatinine >150 umol/L, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 2x upper limit of normal range (ULN), or gamma glutamyl transferase (γ-GT) > 3x ULN
  • Subject has a clinically significant abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG)

Trial locations and contacts

218 sites in 30 countries.

218 sites in 30 countries

Germany22 sites
  • Study site

    Aichach, 86551

  • Study site

    Bad Ems, 56130

  • Study site

    Bautzen, 02625

  • Study site

    Berlin, 13347

  • Study site

    Duisburg, 47051

  • Study site

    Eisleben Lutherstadt, 06295

  • Study site

    Frankfurt, 65933

  • Study site

    Ganderkesee, 27777

  • Study site

    Hagenow, 19230

  • Study site

    Halle, 06132

  • Study site

    Hamburg, 20253

  • Study site

    Henningsdorf, 16761

  • Study site

    Hettstedt, 06333

  • Study site

    Koblenz, 56068

  • Study site

    Leipzig, 04105

  • Study site

    Muenchen-Bogenhausen, 81925

  • Study site

    Neustadt in Sachsen, 01844

  • Study site

    Oranienburg, 16151

  • Study site

    Radebeul, 01445

  • Study site

    Sangerhausen, 06526

  • Study site

    Trier, 54290

  • Study site

    Uetersen, 25436

Other trials in Germany

Italy15 sites
  • Study site

    Bari, 70124

  • Study site

    Catanzaro, 88100

  • Study site

    Florence, 50139

  • Study site

    Florence, 59129

  • Study site

    Genoa, 16128

  • Study site

    Latina, 04100

  • Study site

    Magenta, 20013

  • Study site

    Milan, 20142

  • Study site

    Milan, 20153

  • Study site

    Modena, 41100

  • Study site

    Naples, 80131

  • Study site

    Perugia, 06122

  • Study site

    Teramo, 64100

  • Study site

    Treviglio, 24047

  • Study site

    Varese, 21100

Other trials in Italy

Spain15 sites
  • Study site

    Barcelona, 08020

  • Study site

    Bilbao, 48013

  • Study site

    Esplugues de Llobregat-Barcelo, 08950

  • Study site

    Fuenlabrada, 28942

  • Study site

    Getafe, 28905

  • Study site

    Madrid, 28016

  • Study site

    Madrid, 28046

  • Study site

    Madrid

  • Study site

    Mataró, 8304

  • Study site

    Miranda de Ebro, 09200

  • Study site

    Palma de Mallorca, 07014

  • Study site

    Seville, 41013

  • Study site

    Toledo, 45071

  • Study site

    Valencia, 46010

  • Study site

    Villarreal de Huerva, 12540

Other trials in Spain

France14 sites
  • Study site

    Bordeaux, 33076

  • Study site

    Colmar, 68024

  • Study site

    Marseille, 13274

  • Study site

    Marseille, 13285

  • Study site

    Mulhouse, 68070

  • Study site

    Nantes, 45035

  • Study site

    Nîmes, 30029

  • Study site

    Orléans, 45067

  • Study site

    Paris, 75020

  • Study site

    Paris, 75571

  • Study site

    Rouen, 76031

  • Study site

    Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42055

  • Study site

    Strasbourg, 67000

  • Study site

    Toulouse, 31059

Other trials in France

Hungary13 sites
  • Study site

    Budapest, 1047

  • Study site

    Budapest, 1076

  • Study site

    Budapest, 1204

  • Study site

    Debrecen, 4043

  • Study site

    Eger, 3300

  • Study site

    Nyíregyháza, 4400

  • Study site

    Pápa

  • Study site

    Sopron

  • Study site

    Szeged, 6725

  • Study site

    Székesfehérvár, 8000

  • Study site

    Szekszárd, 7100

  • Study site

    Tatabánya, 2800

  • Study site

    Veszprém, 8200

Other trials in Hungary

United Kingdom13 sites
  • Study site

    Birmingham, B15 2TG

  • Study site

    Chorley, PR7 7NA

  • Study site

    Croydon, CR7 7YE

  • Study site

    Liverpool, L22 OLG

  • Study site

    London, SE5 9RS

  • Study site

    London, W2 2YP

  • Study site

    Manchester, M15 6SX

  • Study site

    Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN

  • Study site

    Northwood, HA6 2RN

  • Study site

    Reading, RG1 5AN

  • Study site

    Reading, RG2 7AG

  • Study site

    Sheffield, S10 2JF

  • Study site

    Swansea, SA6 6NL

Other trials in United Kingdom

Russia12 sites
  • Study site

    Moscow, 101000

  • Study site

    Moscow, 105425

  • Study site

    Moscow, 111020

  • Study site

    Moscow, 111123

  • Study site

    Moscow, 115516

  • Study site

    Moscow, 117049

  • Study site

    Moscow, 117815

  • Study site

    Moscow, 119435

  • Study site

    Moscow, 123836

  • Study site

    Moscow, 125206

  • Study site

    Saint Petersburg, 197089

  • Study site

    Saint Petersburg, 198013

Other trials in Russia

Belgium11 sites
  • Study site

    Antwerp, 2020

  • Study site

    Antwerp, 2030

  • Study site

    Brussels, 1070

  • Study site

    Brussels, 1090

  • Study site

    Edegem, 2650

  • Study site

    Ghent, 9000

  • Study site

    Kortrijk, 8500

  • Study site

    Leper, 8900

  • Study site

    Leuven, 3000

  • Study site

    Liège, 4000

  • Study site

    Sint-Truiden, 3800

Other trials in Belgium

Netherlands11 sites
  • Study site

    Amsterdam, 1105 AZ

  • Study site

    Apeldoorn, 7334 DZ

  • Study site

    Apeldoorn

  • Study site

    Eindhoven, 5623 EJ

  • Study site

    Enschede, 7511 JX

  • Study site

    Leiden, 2334 CK

  • Study site

    Maastricht, 6229 HX

  • Study site

    Nijmegen, 6532 SZ

  • Study site

    Sneek, 8600 BA

  • Study site

    Tilburg, 5022 GC

  • Study site

    Winterswijk, 7101 BN

Other trials in Netherlands

Czechia10 sites
  • Study site

    Brno, 60200

  • Study site

    Mělník, 27601

  • Study site

    Olomouc, 77200

  • Study site

    Ostrava-Poruba, 70853

  • Study site

    Pilsen, 30599

  • Study site

    Prague, 12851

  • Study site

    Prague, 14056

  • Study site

    Prague, 18081

  • Study site

    Štětí, 41108

  • Study site

    Ústí nad Labem, 40001

Other trials in Czechia

Sweden10 sites
  • Study site

    Borås, 50182

  • Study site

    Helsingborg, 25187

  • Study site

    Örebro, 70185

  • Study site

    Skövde, 54130

  • Study site

    Stockholm, 11883

  • Study site

    Stockholm, 14186

  • Study site

    Stockholm, 17176

  • Study site

    Stockholm, 18288

  • Study site

    Umeå, 90185

  • Study site

    Uppsala, 75185

Other trials in Sweden

Poland9 sites
  • Study site

    Bialystok, 15-278

  • Study site

    Chorzów, 41-500

  • Study site

    Lodz, 93-338

  • Study site

    Lodz, 93-513

  • Study site

    Lublin, 20-954

  • Study site

    Warsaw, 00-846

  • Study site

    Warsaw, 02-005

  • Study site

    Warsaw, 02-507

  • Study site

    Wroclaw, 50-556

Other trials in Poland

Australia5 sites
  • Study site

    Auchenflower

  • Study site

    Clayton

  • Study site

    Kogarah

  • Study site

    Randwick

  • Study site

    Woolloongabba

Other trials in Australia

Norway5 sites
  • Study site

    Bergen, 5021

  • Study site

    Drammen, 3016

  • Study site

    Hamar, 2317

  • Study site

    Oslo, 0257

  • Study site

    Tønsberg, 3103

Other trials in Norway

Romania5 sites
  • Study site

    Bucharest, 22328

  • Study site

    Bucharest

  • Study site

    Lasi

  • Study site

    Oradea

  • Study site

    Timișoara

Other trials in Romania

Slovakia5 sites
  • Study site

    Martin, 03659

  • Study site

    Poprad, 05801

  • Study site

    Skalica, 90982

  • Study site

    Trenčín, 91101

  • Study site

    Žilina, 01207

Other trials in Slovakia

South Africa5 sites
  • Study site

    Bloemfontein

  • Study site

    Hatfield

  • Study site

    Lyttelton

  • Study site

    Paarl

  • Study site

    Pietermaritzburg

Other trials in South Africa

Denmark4 sites
  • Study site

    Aalborg, 9100

  • Study site

    Aarhus, 8200

  • Study site

    Glostrup Municipality, 2600

  • Study site

    Roskilde

Other trials in Denmark

Finland4 sites
  • Study site

    Helsinki, 00029

  • Study site

    Oulu, 90220

  • Study site

    Tampere, 33521

  • Study site

    Turku, 20100

Other trials in Finland

Greece4 sites
  • Study site

    Athens

  • Study site

    Nikaias-Piraeus

  • Study site

    Pátrai

  • Study site

    Thessaloniki

Other trials in Greece

Ireland4 sites
  • Study site

    Cork

  • Study site

    Dublin

  • Study site

    Mullingar

  • Study site

    Tralee

Other trials in Ireland

Portugal4 sites
  • Study site

    Amadora, 2700

  • Study site

    Porto, 4099-005

  • Study site

    Tomar, 2304-909

  • Study site

    Viana do Castelo, 4900-858

Other trials in Portugal

Austria3 sites
  • Study site

    Graz, 8036

  • Study site

    Innsbruck, 6020

  • Study site

    Linz, 4020

Other trials in Austria

Belarus3 sites
  • Study site

    Minsk, 220036

  • Study site

    Minsk, 220119

  • Study site

    Minsk, 223041

Other trials in Belarus

Bulgaria3 sites
  • Study site

    Pleven

  • Study site

    Sofia

  • Study site

    Varna

Other trials in Bulgaria

Latvia2 sites
  • Study site

    Liepāja

  • Study site

    Riga

Other trials in Latvia

Lithuania2 sites
  • Study site

    Kaunas

  • Study site

    Vilnius

Other trials in Lithuania

Switzerland2 sites
  • Study site

    Frauenfeld, 8501

  • Study site

    Lucerne, 6000

Other trials in Switzerland

Ukraine2 sites
  • Study site

    Kiev, 01023

  • Study site

    Kiev, 04053

Other trials in Ukraine

Iceland1 site
  • Study site

    Reykjavik, 101

Other trials in Iceland

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo and Active Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron in Subjects With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder

The study is intended to test efficacy, safety and tolerability of two doses of Mirabegron against placebo and compare the efficacy and safety with active comparator in patients with symptoms of overactive bladder.

Being tested
Mirabegron, Tolterodine, Placebo to Mirabegron, Placebo to Tolterodine
Keywords
Micturition, Urinary incontinence, Urinary urge incontinence, Overactive bladder (OAB), Urgency, YM178, Frequency
Medical subject headings
Urinary Bladder, Overactive, Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MirabegronDrug

    Also called Myrbetriq, YM178

    Tablets

  • TolterodineDrug

    Capsules

  • Placebo to MirabegronDrug

    Matching mirabegron placebo tablets.

  • Placebo to TolterodineDrug

    Matching tolterodine placebo capsules.

Study groups in NCT00689104
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets and matching tolterodine slow release (SR) placebo capsules orally once a day for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Placebo to Mirabegron; Drug: Placebo to Tolterodine
Mirabegron 50 mgExperimentalParticipants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets and matching tolterodine SR placebo capsules orally once a day for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Mirabegron; Drug: Placebo to Tolterodine
Mirabegron 100 mgExperimentalParticipants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets and matching tolterodine SR placebo capsules orally once a day for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Mirabegron; Drug: Placebo to Tolterodine
Tolterodine SR 4 mgActive comparatorParticipants received tolterodine SR 4 mg capsules and matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Tolterodine; Drug: Placebo to Mirabegron

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

    The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per day was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Least Squares (LS) Means were generated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12 (final visit)

  2. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

    The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was derived from the number of times a patient urinates (excluding incontinence only episodes) per day recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

Secondary outcomes (29)
  1. Change From Baseline to Final Visit in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition

    The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  2. Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

    The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 4

  3. Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

    The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 4

  4. Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

    The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12

  5. Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

    The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12

  6. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition

    The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 4, 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  7. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

    The involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency, derived from the number of incontinence episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0 = No urgency; 1 = Mild urgency; 2 = Moderate urgency, could postpone voiding a short while; 3 = Severe urgency, could not postpone voiding; 4 = Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  8. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours

    The average number of urgency episodes (the sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer), derived from urgency episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as grade 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  9. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of Urgency

    Average of patients' ratings on the degree of urgency associated with each micturition and/or incontinence episode recorded in a 3-day micturition diary according to the following 5-point categorical scale (Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale): 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  10. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours

    Nocturia is defined as waking at night one or more times to void. The average number of times a patient urinated (excluding incontinence only episodes) during sleeping time per day was derived from the 3-day patient micturition diary.

    LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  11. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours

    The average number of times a patient records a new pad used per day during the 3-day micturition diary period.

    LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  12. Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and the Final Visit

    The percentage of participants with no incontinence episodes for the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the micturition diary recorded by the patient.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  13. Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit

    The percentage of participants with at least 50% decrease from baseline in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours during the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the patient micturition diary.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  14. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score

    Overactive bladder symptoms were assessed using the symptom bother scale of the overactive bladder questionnaire. The symptom bother scale consists of 8 questions answered by the participant on a scale from 1-6. The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating worst severity. A negative change from Baseline in symptom bother score indicates improvements.

    LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  15. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score

    Health-related quality of life was assessed by the HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social interaction) of the overactive bladder questionnaire (OABq). The HRQL total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQL subscale scores, and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline in HRQL score indicates improvements.

    LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  16. Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time Missed

    The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent of work time missed is derived from the number of hours of work missed due to OAB symptoms as a percentage of total hours that should have been worked. A higher percentage indicates more hours missed. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  17. Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While Working

    The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent impairment while working was derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  18. Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work Impairment

    The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent overall work impairment takes into account both hours missed due to OAB symptoms and the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  19. Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity Impairment

    The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with daily activities over the last 7 days. Percent activity impairment is derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their regular daily activities. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  20. Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score

    The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:

    I have no problems in walking about; I have some problems in walking about; I am confined to bed.

    In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  21. Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care Score

    The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:

    I have no problems with self-care; I have some problems washing or dressing myself; I am unable to wash or dress myself. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  22. Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score

    The EQ-5D is a standardized, nondisease-specific instrument for describing health status. Participants were asked which statement best describes their health state with regard to usual activities (work, study or leisure): I have no problems performing my usual activities; I have some problems performing my usual activities; I am unable to perform my usual activities. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available at that Visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  23. Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score

    The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:

    I have no pain or discomfort; I have moderate pain or discomfort; I have extreme pain or discomfort. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  24. Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression Score

    The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:

    I am not anxious or depressed; I am moderately anxious or depressed; I am extremely anxious or depressed. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  25. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, generic instrument for describing and evaluating health status. Health status is assessed by patients evaluating their health on a vertical, visual analog scale from 0 to 100 where the endpoints are labeled 'Worst imaginable health state' (=0) and 'Best imaginable health state' (=100). On the EQ-5D VAS, a positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  26. Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)

    The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  27. Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)

    The TS-VAS is a visual analog scale (VAS) that asks patients to rate their satisfaction with treatment by placing a vertical mark on a 10 cm line where the endpoints are labeled 'No, not at all' on the left (=0) to 'Yes, completely satisfied' on the right (=10). LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  28. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician

    The number of times the patient visited a physician's office during the 4 weeks prior to each study visit (excluding study visits) because of the patient's bladder condition.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  29. Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit

    The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. Improvement was defined as at least a 1 point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline and a major improvement was defined as at least a 2 point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline in PPBC score.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Jun 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study start28 Apr 2008
  3. Primary completion24 Mar 2009
  4. Study completion24 Mar 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
2,336 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00689104
Sponsor's protocol ID
178-CL-046
Other IDs
2007-001451-19
Acronym
SCORPIO
Status last verified
Oct 2024
First submitted
29 May 2008
Last updated
20 Nov 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as products terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.

Publications

  • Khullar V, Amarenco G, Angulo JC, Cambronero J, Hoye K, Milsom I, Radziszewski P, Rechberger T, Boerrigter P, Drogendijk T, Wooning M, Chapple C. Efficacy and tolerability of mirabegron, a beta(3)-adrenoceptor agonist, in patients with overactive bladder: results from a randomised European-Australian phase 3 trial. Eur Urol. 2013 Feb;63(2):283-95. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.10.016. Epub 2012 Nov 6.

    PubMed 23182126
  • Stoniute A, Madhuvrata P, Still M, Barron-Millar E, Nabi G, Omar MI. Oral anticholinergic drugs versus placebo or no treatment for managing overactive bladder syndrome in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 9;5(5):CD003781. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003781.pub3.

    PubMed 37160401
  • Desroziers K, Aballea S, Maman K, Nazir J, Odeyemi I, Hakimi Z. Estimating EQ-5D and OAB-5D health state utilities for patients with overactive bladder. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Nov 19;11:200. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-200.

    PubMed 24246044

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Mirabegron and Tolterodine in people with Urinary Bladder, Overactive, run by Astellas Pharma Inc at 218 sites in 30 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 218 sites in Germany, Italy, Spain, France, Hungary and 25 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Oct 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours (time frame: Baseline and Week 12 (final visit)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00689104, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in