Breast NeoplasmsPhase 3READNCT00689156
Epirubicin or Not in Patients With TOP2A (Topoisomerase (DNA) II Alpha (170kD)) Normal Early Breast Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing Epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and docetaxel and docetaxel, cyclophosphamide in people with Breast Neoplasms, run by Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group at 13 sites in Denmark.
Trial summary
The Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) wishes to clarify if recurrence-free and overall life expectancy is longer after docetaxel and cyclophosphamide compared to epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel in patients with TOP2A normal and operable breast cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and docetaxel and docetaxel, cyclophosphamide
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,015 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesDenmark
- Study dates
- Jun 2008to Jan 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Signed informed consent
- Histologically confirmed invasive breast carcinoma which has been micro-radical removed by breast preserving surgery or mastectomy according to DBCG's guideline
- TOP2A normal tumor (score of 0.8 - 2.0)
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding
- Earlier medical cancer treatment, including docetaxel, epirubicin or cyclophosphamide.
- Distant metastases or bilateral breast cancer (excluded after checking by means of chest radiography, bilateral mammography and normal blood samples as a minimum).
- Other active, malign disease in the latest 5 years, except for adequately treated and cured carcinoma in situ cervices uteri or non-melanoma skin cancer.
- Comorbidity score > 3 (patients with a score of 1-2 start at dose level -1).
- Treatment with a non-approved product or test product in the latest 30 days.
- Known severe hypersensitivity to docetaxel, epirubicin or cyclophosphamide or auxiliary agents in these products.
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 1 country.
13 sites in 1 country
Denmark13 sites
Dept. of Oncology; Aalborg Sygehus
Aalborg, DK-9000
Dept. of Oncology; Århus Sygehus
Aarhus, DK-8000
Dept. of Oncology; Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, DK-2100
Dept. of Oncology; Sydvestjysk Sygehus Esbjerg
Esbjerg, DK-6700
Dept. of Oncology; Herlev Hospital
Herlev, DK-2730
Dept. of Oncology; Regionshospitalet Herning
Herning, DK-7400
Dept. of Oncology; Nordsjællands Hospital Hillerød
Hillerød, DK-3400
Dept. of Oncology; Sygehus Syd Næstved
Næstved, DK-4700
Dept. of Oncology; Odense University Hospital
Odense, DK-5000
Dept. of internal medicine; Bornholms Hospital
Rønne, DK-3700
Dept. of Oncology; Sygehus Øst Roskilde
Roskilde, DK-4000
Dept. of Oncology; Vejle Sygehus
Vejle, DK-7100
Dept. of Oncology; Regionshospitalet Viborg
Viborg, DK-8800
About this study
Official title: Randomized Trial of Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Docetaxel Against Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide in Patients With TOP2A Normal Early Breast Cancer
The Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) wishes to clarify if recurrence-free and overall life expectancy is longer after docetaxel and cyclophosphamide compared to epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel in patients with TOP2A normal and operable breast cancer.
Read the detailed description
In DBCG trial 89D we in more than 1,200 patients showed that substitution in CMF chemotherapy of methotrexate with epirubicin improves survival for patients with primary and operable breast cancer. In a retrospective evaluation we have also shown that approximately 20% of all patients in 89D have tumors with numerical changes of the TOP2A gene, and that only patients with abnormal TOP2A benefit from epirubicin. In the current trial the DBCG wishes to clarify if recurrence-free and overall life expectancy is longer after docetaxel and cyclophosphamide compared to epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel in patients with TOP2A normal and operable breast cancer.
- Conditions
- Breast Neoplasms
- Being tested
- Epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and docetaxel, docetaxel, cyclophosphamide
- Keywords
- Epirubicin, docetaxel, Adjuvant chemotherapy, DNA Topoisomerases, Type II
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and docetaxelDrug
Also called Ellence, Taxotere
Epirubicin 90 mg/m2 iv day 1 every 3 weeks plus Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 iv day 1 every 3 weeks times 3 followed by Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 iv day 1 every 3 weeks times 3
docetaxel, cyclophosphamideDrug
Also called Taxotere
Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 intravenously day 1 every 3 weeks times six
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Regimen 1 | Active comparator | Epirubicin 90 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 intravenously day 1 every 3 weeks times three followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m2 intravenously day 1 every 3 weeks times three Receives: Drug: Epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and docetaxel |
| Regimen 2 | Experimental | Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 intravenously day 1 every 3 weeks times six Receives: Drug: docetaxel, cyclophosphamide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
IDFS; invasive disease-free survival
Measured: Within 10-yeras
Secondary outcomes (3)
Overall survival
Measured: Life-long observation
DDFS; distant disease-free survival
Measured: Within 10-years
Serious adverse events
Measured: Within 10-years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jun 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2008
- Primary completionJan 2013
- Study completionJan 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 2,015 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fonden Til Fremme af Klinisk- Eksperimentel Cancerforskning, Sanofi, Dako
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Bent Ejlertsen, Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group
- Investigators
- Bent Ejlertsen, M.D., Principal investigator, Copenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletHenning T. Mouridsen, M.D., Study director, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00689156
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DBCG 07-READ
- Acronym
- READ
- Status last verified
- Jan 2013
- First submitted
- 29 May 2008
- Last updated
- 5 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Moller S, Jensen MB, Ejlertsen B, Bjerre KD, Larsen M, Hansen HB, Christiansen P, Mouridsen HT; Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. The clinical database and the treatment guidelines of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG); its 30-years experience and future promise. Acta Oncol. 2008;47(4):506-24. doi: 10.1080/02841860802059259.
PubMed 18465317Knoop AS, Knudsen H, Balslev E, Rasmussen BB, Overgaard J, Nielsen KV, Schonau A, Gunnarsdottir K, Olsen KE, Mouridsen H, Ejlertsen B; Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. retrospective analysis of topoisomerase IIa amplifications and deletions as predictive markers in primary breast cancer patients randomly assigned to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 20;23(30):7483-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.11.007.
PubMed 16234514Ejlertsen B, Tuxen MK, Jakobsen EH, Jensen MB, Knoop AS, Hojris I, Ewertz M, Balslev E, Dano H, Vestlev PM, Kenholm J, Nielsen DL, Bechmann T, Andersson M, Cold S, Nielsen HM, Maae E, Carlsen D, Mouridsen HT. Adjuvant Cyclophosphamide and Docetaxel With or Without Epirubicin for Early TOP2A-Normal Breast Cancer: DBCG 07-READ, an Open-Label, Phase III, Randomized Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 10;35(23):2639-2646. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.3494. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
PubMed 28661759Jensen MB, Balslev E, Knoop AS, Tuxen MK, Hojris I, Jakobsen EH, Cold S, Dano H, Glavicic V, Kenholm J, Ejlertsen B. Adjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide With or Without Epirubicin for Early Breast Cancer: Final Analysis of the Randomized DBCG 07-READ Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2025 Feb;43(4):373-380. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00836. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
PubMed 39442040Fei F, Messina C, Slaets L, Chakiba C, Cameron D, Bogaerts J, Bonnefoi H. Tumour size is the only predictive factor of distant recurrence after pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with large operable or locally advanced breast cancers: a sub-study of EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00 phase III trial. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Feb;51(3):301-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.11.023. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
PubMed 25578377Eckhoff L, Knoop A, Jensen MB, Ewertz M. Persistence of docetaxel-induced neuropathy and impact on quality of life among breast cancer survivors. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Feb;51(3):292-300. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.11.024. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
PubMed 25541155
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Trial of Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Docetaxel Against Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide in Patients With TOP2A Normal Early Breast Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00689156
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- READ / DBCG 07-READ
- Conditions
- Breast Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Epirubicin, docetaxel, Adjuvant chemotherapy, DNA Topoisomerases, Type II
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,015 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative GroupUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fonden Til Fremme af Klinisk- Eksperimentel Cancerforskning, Sanofi, Dako
- Study start
- Jun 2008
- Primary completion
- Jan 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Jun 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) wishes to clarify if recurrence-free and overall life expectancy is longer after docetaxel and cyclophosphamide compared to epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel in patients with TOP2A normal and operable breast cancer.
Detailed description
In DBCG trial 89D we in more than 1,200 patients showed that substitution in CMF chemotherapy of methotrexate with epirubicin improves survival for patients with primary and operable breast cancer. In a retrospective evaluation we have also shown that approximately 20% of all patients in 89D have tumors with numerical changes of the TOP2A gene, and that only patients with abnormal TOP2A benefit from epirubicin. In the current trial the DBCG wishes to clarify if recurrence-free and overall life expectancy is longer after docetaxel and cyclophosphamide compared to epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel in patients with TOP2A normal and operable breast cancer.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Regimen 1 | Active comparator | Drug: Epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and docetaxelEpirubicin 90 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 intravenously day 1 every 3 weeks times three followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m2 intravenously day 1 every 3 weeks times three |
| Regimen 2 | Experimental | Drug: docetaxel, cyclophosphamideDocetaxel 75 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 intravenously day 1 every 3 weeks times six |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Signed informed consent
- Histologically confirmed invasive breast carcinoma which has been micro-radical removed by breast preserving surgery or mastectomy according to DBCG's guideline
- TOP2A normal tumor (score of 0.8 - 2.0)
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding
- Earlier medical cancer treatment, including docetaxel, epirubicin or cyclophosphamide.
- Distant metastases or bilateral breast cancer (excluded after checking by means of chest radiography, bilateral mammography and normal blood samples as a minimum).
- Other active, malign disease in the latest 5 years, except for adequately treated and cured carcinoma in situ cervices uteri or non-melanoma skin cancer.
- Comorbidity score > 3 (patients with a score of 1-2 start at dose level -1).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and docetaxelAlso: Ellence, TaxotereEpirubicin 90 mg/m2 iv day 1 every 3 weeks plus Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 iv day 1 every 3 weeks times 3 followed by Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 iv day 1 every 3 weeks times 3 | Drug | Regimen 1 |
| docetaxel, cyclophosphamideAlso: TaxotereDocetaxel 75 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 intravenously day 1 every 3 weeks times six | Drug | Regimen 2 |
Primary outcome
IDFS; invasive disease-free survival
Time frame: Within 10-yeras
3 secondary outcomes
Overall survival
Time frame: Life-long observation
DDFS; distant disease-free survival
Time frame: Within 10-years
Serious adverse events
Time frame: Within 10-years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Apr 2018.
- Background: PubMed 18465317Moller S, Jensen MB, Ejlertsen B, Bjerre KD, Larsen M, Hansen HB, Christiansen P, Mouridsen HT; Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. The clinical database and the treatment guidelines of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG); its 30-years experience and future promise. Acta Oncol. 2008;47(4):506-24. doi: 10.1080/02841860802059259.
- Background: PubMed 16234514Knoop AS, Knudsen H, Balslev E, Rasmussen BB, Overgaard J, Nielsen KV, Schonau A, Gunnarsdottir K, Olsen KE, Mouridsen H, Ejlertsen B; Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. retrospective analysis of topoisomerase IIa amplifications and deletions as predictive markers in primary breast cancer patients randomly assigned to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 20;23(30):7483-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.11.007.
- Background: PubMed 28661759Ejlertsen B, Tuxen MK, Jakobsen EH, Jensen MB, Knoop AS, Hojris I, Ewertz M, Balslev E, Dano H, Vestlev PM, Kenholm J, Nielsen DL, Bechmann T, Andersson M, Cold S, Nielsen HM, Maae E, Carlsen D, Mouridsen HT. Adjuvant Cyclophosphamide and Docetaxel With or Without Epirubicin for Early TOP2A-Normal Breast Cancer: DBCG 07-READ, an Open-Label, Phase III, Randomized Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 10;35(23):2639-2646. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.3494. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39442040Jensen MB, Balslev E, Knoop AS, Tuxen MK, Hojris I, Jakobsen EH, Cold S, Dano H, Glavicic V, Kenholm J, Ejlertsen B. Adjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide With or Without Epirubicin for Early Breast Cancer: Final Analysis of the Randomized DBCG 07-READ Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2025 Feb;43(4):373-380. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00836. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25578377Fei F, Messina C, Slaets L, Chakiba C, Cameron D, Bogaerts J, Bonnefoi H. Tumour size is the only predictive factor of distant recurrence after pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with large operable or locally advanced breast cancers: a sub-study of EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00 phase III trial. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Feb;51(3):301-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.11.023. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25541155Eckhoff L, Knoop A, Jensen MB, Ewertz M. Persistence of docetaxel-induced neuropathy and impact on quality of life among breast cancer survivors. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Feb;51(3):292-300. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.11.024. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
- Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative GroupLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Breast Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bent Ejlertsen, M.D. principal investigator
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
Henning T. Mouridsen, M.D. study director
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
13 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and docetaxel and docetaxel, cyclophosphamide in people with Breast Neoplasms, run by Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group at 13 sites in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
IDFS; invasive disease-free survival (time frame: Within 10-yeras). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00689156, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Apr 2018.