Multiple MyelomaPhase 3FIRSTNCT00689936
Study to Determine Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Plus Low-dose Dexamethasone Versus Melphalan, Prednisone, Thalidomide in Patients With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma
A Phase 3 study testing Lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone, Lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone given for 18 four-week cycles and Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Celgene at 288 sites in 19 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of Lenalidomide plus low dose dexamethasone to that of the combination of melphalan, prednisone and thalidomide. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Myeloma
- What is being tested?
- Lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone, Lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone given for 18 four-week cycles and Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,623 participants
- Where
- 288 sitesin 19 countries
- Study dates
- 21 Aug 2008to 14 Jul 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Must understand and voluntarily sign informed consent form
- Age ≥ 18 years at the time of signing consent
- Previously untreated, symptomatic multiple myeloma as defined by the 3 criteria below:
- MM diagnostic criteria (all 3 required):
- Monoclonal plasma cells in the bone marrow ≥10% and/or presence of a biopsy-proven plasmacytoma
- Monoclonal protein present in the serum and/or urine
Show all 29Show fewer
- Myeloma-related organ dysfunction (at least one of the following) [C] Calcium elevation in the blood (serum calcium >10.5 mg/dl or upper limit of normal) [R] Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine >2 mg/dl) [A] Anemia (hemoglobin <10 g/dl or 2 g < laboratory normal) [B] Lytic bone lesions or osteoporosis
- AND have measurable disease by protein electrophoresis analyses as defined by the following:
- IgG multiple myeloma: Serum monoclonal paraprotein (M-protein) level ≥ 1.0 g/dl or urine M-protein level ≥ 200 mg/24 hours
- IgA multiple myeloma: Serum M-protein level ≥ 0.5 g/dl or urine M-protein level ≥ 200 mg/24 hours
- IgM multiple myeloma (IgM M-protein plus lytic bone disease documented by skeletal survey plain films): Serum M-protein level ≥ 1.0 g/dl or urine M-protein level ≥ 200mg/24hours
- IgD multiple myeloma: Serum M-protein level ≥ 0.05 g/dl or urine M-protein level ≥ 200 mg/24 hours
- Light chain multiple myeloma: Serum M-protein level ≥ 1.0 g/dl or urine M-protein level ≥ 200 mg/24 hours
- AND are at least 65 years of age or older or, if younger than 65 years of age, are not candidates for stem cell transplantation because:
- The patient declines to undergo stem cell transplantation or
- Stem cell transplantation is not available to the patient due to cost or other reasons
- ECOG performance status of 0, 1, or 2
- Able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements
- Females of child-bearing potential (FCBP)^2:
- Must agree to undergo two medically supervised pregnancy tests prior to starting study therapy with either Rd or MPT. The first pregnancy test will be performed within 10-14 days prior to the start of Rd or MPT and the second pregnancy test will be performed within 24 hours prior to the start of Rd or MPT. She must also agree to ongoing pregnancy testing during the course of the study and after the end of study therapy. This applies even if the patient practices complete and continued sexual abstinence.
- Must commit to either continued abstinence from heterosexual intercourse (which must be reviewed on a monthly basis) or agree to use and be able to comply with effective contraception without interruption, 28 days prior to starting study drug, during the study therapy (including during periods of dose interruptions), and for 28 days after discontinuation of study therapy.
- Male Patients:
- Must agree to use a condom during sexual contact with a FCBP, even if they have had a vasectomy, throughout study drug therapy, during any dose interruption and after cessation of study therapy.
- Must agree to not donate semen during study drug therapy and for a period after end of study drug therapy.
- Must practice complete abstinence or agree to use a condom during sexual contact with a pregnant female or a female of childbearing potential while participating in the study, during dose interruptions and for at least 28 days following study drug discontinuation, even if he has undergone a successful vasectomy.
- All patients must:
- Have an understanding that the study drug could have a potential teratogenic risk.
- Agree to abstain from donating blood while taking study drug therapy and following discontinuation of study drug therapy.
- Agree not to share study medication with another person. All FCBP and male patients must be counseled about pregnancy precautions and risks of fetal exposure.
Who cannot join
- Previous treatment with anti-myeloma therapy (does not include radiotherapy, bisphosphonates, or a single short course of steroid [i.e., less than or equal to the equivalent of dexamethasone 40 mg/day for 4 days; such a short course of steroid treatment must not have been given within 14 days of randomization]).
- Any serious medical condition that places the patient at an unacceptable risk if he or she participates in this study. Examples of such a medical condition are, but are not limited to, patient with unstable cardiac disease as defined by: Cardiac events such as MI within the past 6 months, NYHA heart failure class III-IV, uncontrolled atrial fibrillation or hypertension; patients with conditions requiring chronic steroid or immunosuppressive treatment, such as rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and lupus, that likely need additional steroid or immunosuppressive treatments in addition to the study treatment.
- Pregnant or lactating females.
- Any of the following laboratory abnormalities:
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 1,000/µL (1.0 x 109/L)
- Untransfused platelet count < 50,000 cells/µL (50 x 10^9/L)
Show all 19Show fewer
- Serum SGOT/AST or SGPT/ALT > 3.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Renal failure requiring hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis.
- Prior history of malignancies, other than multiple myeloma, unless the patient has been free of the disease for ≥ 3 years. Exceptions include the following:
- Basal cell carcinoma of the skin
- Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
- Carcinoma in situ of the cervix
- Carcinoma in situ of the breast
- Incidental histological finding of prostate cancer (TNM stage of T1a or T1b)
- Patients who are unable or unwilling to undergo antithrombotic therapy.
- Peripheral neuropathy of > grade 2 severity.
- Known HIV positivity or active infectious hepatitis, type A, B, or C. Primary AL (immunoglobulin light chain) amyloidosis and myeloma complicated by amyloidosis.
- 1 A variety of other types of end organ dysfunctions can occasionally occur and lead to a need for therapy. Such dysfunction is sufficient to support classification as myeloma if proven to be myeloma-related.
- 2 A FCBP is a sexually mature woman who: 1) has not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy or 2) has not been naturally postmenopausal (i.e., amenorrhea following cancer therapy does not rule out childbearing potential) for at least 24 consecutive months (i.e., has had menses at any time in the preceding 24 consecutive months).
Trial locations and contacts
288 sites in 19 countries.
288 sites in 19 countries
France68 sites
Clinique Claude BernardOncologie
Albi, 81000
CHU Sud
Amiens, 80054
CHRU Hopital du bocage
Angers, 49033
CH Argenteuil Victor Dupouy
Argenteuil, 95100
Centre Hospitalier de la cote basque
Bayonne, 64109
Centre Hospitalier
Blois, 41016
Hopital Avicenne
Bobigny, 93009
Institut Bergonie Centre Regional de Lutte Contre Le Cancer de Bordeaux Et Sud Ouest
Bordeaux, 33076
Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine
Bordeaux, 33300
Hopital de Fleyriat
Bourg-en-Bresse, 01012
Hopital Augustin Morvan
Brest, 29609
CHU
Caen, 14033
Centre Francois Baclesse
Caen, 14076
CH
Cannes, 06401
CH Rene Dubois
Cergy-Pontoise, 95303
Centre Hospitalier William Morey
Chalon/Saone Cedex, 71321
Hopital Antoine Beclere
Clamart, 92141
Hopital dinstruction des armees Percy
Clamart, 92141
Chu Estaing
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000
CH Louis Pasteur
Colmar, 68024
Hopital Henri Mondor
Créteil, 94010
CHRU Hopital du bocage
Dijon, 21034
Centre Hospitalier General
Dunkirk, 59385
Institut Prive de Cancerologie
Grenoble, 38034
CHRU
Grenoble, 38043
Centre Hospitalier Departemental
La Roche-sur-Yon, 85925
CH
Le Chesnay, 78157
Hopital J MonodRhumato Nord
Le Havre, 76000
Kremlin Bicetre
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 942975
Centre Jean Bernard
Le Mans, 72000
Centre Hospitalier
Le Mans, 72037
GH de Institut Catholique St Vincent
Lille, 59000
CHRU-Hopital Claude Huriez
Lille, 59037
CH - Hôpital Dupuytren
Limoges, 87042
Centre Leon Berard
Lyon, 69008
CHU Hopital Edouard Herriot
Lyon, 69437
Centre Hospitalier de Valence
Lyon, 69495
Institut Paoli-Calmettes
Marseille, 13009
Hopital de Mercy
Metz, 57085
Clinique Pont de chaume Oncologie et Radiotherapie
Montauban, 82017
CHU Montpellier - Hôpital Lapeyronie
Montpellier, 34295
Hopital Emile Muller
Mulhouse, 68000
CHRU - Hotel Dieu
Nantes, 44035
Centre Antoine Lacassagne Oncologie medicale et Hematologie
Nice, 06050
Hopital de lArchet 1
Nice, 06202
CH La Source
Orléans, 45000
Hopital Saint Louis
Paris, 75010
Hopital Necker
Paris, 75015
CHU Hôpital St-Antoine
Paris, 75571
Hopital Cochin
Paris, 75679
CHRU - Hopital du Haut Leveque
Pessac, 33604
CU CHU Clemenceau
Poitiers, 86021
Hopital R. Debre
Reims, 51032
CHU Reims - Hôpital Maison Blanche
Reims, 51100
CHRU Hôpital de Pontchaillou
Rennes, 35033
CHRU Hopital sud Medecine Interne
Rennes, 35056
CHG Rodez
Rodez, 12027
Centre Henri Becquerel
Rouen, 76038
Centre Hospitalier Yves Le Foll
Saint-Brieuc, 22027
Centre Rene Huguenin
Saint-Cloud, 92210
Institut de Cancerologie de Loire
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42270
CHRU Hôpital de Hautepierre
Strasbourg, 67098
CHRU Hopital Purpan
Toulouse, TSA 40031-31059
CHRU Hopital Bretonneau
Tours, 37044
CHRU Hopital Trousseau
Tours, 37044
CHRU Hôpitaux de Brabois
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511
CH P. Chubert
Vannes, 56017
Institut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif, 94805
United States32 sites
St. Luke's Hospital and Health Network
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18104
Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders
Bethesda, Maryland, 20817
Billings Clinic
Billings, Montana, 59107
University of AL Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Gabrail Cancer Center Research
Canton, Ohio, 44718
Southern Illinois Hematology Oncology
Centralia, Illinois, 62801
Orchard Healthcare Research, Inc.
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
John H Stroger Hospital of Cook County
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
University Hospitals of Cleveland
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
The Cancer Center
Collierville, Tennessee, 38017
Dakota Cancer Institute
Fargo, North Dakota, 58103
Gainesville Heme Oncology Associates
Gainesville, Florida, 32607
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas, 77555-0561
Ingalls Cancer Institute
Harvey, Illinois, 60426-3558
Baptist Cancer Institute
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207
Arena Oncology Associates, PC
Lake Success, New York, 11042
Cedar Sinai Medical Center Dept of Medicine
Los Angeles, California, 90048
University of Tennessee Cancer Institute
Memphis, Tennessee, 38104
Integrated Community Oncology Network
Orange Park, Florida, 32073
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Kaiser Permanente Northwest Oncology Hematology
Portland, Oregon, 97227
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
University of California, San Francisco- California
San Francisco, California, 94143
Maine Center for Cancer Medicine Blood Disorders
Scarborough, Maine, 04074
Swedish Cancer Institute
Seattle, Washington, 98104
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Seattle, Washington, 98109
Gulf Coast Oncology
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33705
Stanford University Stanford
Stanford, California, 94305
Palm Beach Cancer Institute, LLC
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33401
Cancer Center of Kansas
Wichita, Kansas, 67124
Canada23 sites
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9
Cross Cancer Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
Hospital Charles LeMoyne
Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2H1
Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H2Y9
Juravinski Cancer Centre
Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2
British Columbia Cancer Agency
Kelowna, British Columbia, V1Y 5L3
Hopital de la Cite-de-la-Sante
Laval, Quebec, H7M 3L9
Hotel-Dieu de Levis
Lévis, Quebec, G5V 3Z1
London Health Science Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 4G5
Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, G4H 1C5
Hospital Maisonneuve - Rosemont
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4
CHUM- Hopital Notre-Dame
Montreal, Quebec, H2L4M1
McGill University
Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1S6
Sir Mortimer B. Davis - Jewish Genl
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2
Royal Columbian Hospital
New Westminster, British Columbia, V3M 1X4
Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
CHUQ - Hotel-Dieu de QuebecHematology - Oncology
Québec, G1R 2J6
Saint John Regional Hospital
Saint John, New Brunswick, E2L 3L6
BC Cancer Agency - Fraser Valley Centre
Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 1Z2
Odette Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
Leukemia/BMT Program of BCDiv of Hem, Vancouver Gen Hosp
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9
Vancouver Island Cancer Center
Victoria, British Columbia, V8R 6V5
Spain20 sites
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona (Barcelona), 8916
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08025
Instituto Catalan de Oncologia-Hospital Duran
Barcelona, 08907
Hospital Reina Sofia
Córdoba, 14004
Hospital de Donosti
Donostia / San Sebastian, 20014
Hospital Univ. Josep Trueta
Girona, 17007
Hospital Clinico San Carlos
Madrid, 28040
Hospital 12 de Octubre
Madrid, 28041
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, 28046
Hospital Clinico Virgen de la Victoria
Málaga, 29010
Hospital General Universitario Morales Messeguer
Murcia, 30008
Hospital Son Llatzer
Palma de Mallorca, 7198
Clinica Universitaria de Navarra,
Pamplona, 31008
Hospital Sant Pau
Reus, 43201
Hospital Universtario Marques de Valdecilla
Santander, 39008
Hospital Clinico Santiago de Compostela
Santiago de Compostela, 15706
Hosptial La Fe
Valencia, 46009
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia
Valencia, 46010
Hospital Clinico Universitario Lozano Blesa
Zaragoza, 50009
Hospital Miguel Servet
Zaragoza, 50009
Italy18 sites
Policlinico S. Orsola
Bologna, 40138
Oncologia Medica, Università della Magna Grecia
Catanzaro, 88100
Clinica Ematologica, A.O.U. San Martino di Genova
Genova, 16132
Ematologia ed Immunologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Vito Fazzi di Lecce
Lecce, 73100
Unità Operativa di Oncoematologia, Ospedale di Matera
Matera, 75100
U.O. di Ematologia e Trapianto di Midollo Osseo
Milan, 20132
Istituto Europeo di Oncologia - IEO
Milan, 20141
Presidio Ospedaliero A. Perrino
Milan, 20141
Policlinico di Modena
Modena, 41100
Oncoematologia, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale
Naples, 80131
Casa di Cura La Maddalena, Divisione di Ematologia
Palermo, 90146
Policlinico San Matteo Universita Di Pavia
Pavia, 27100
Ospedale Civile
Piacenza, 29100
A.O. Universitaria Ospedale S.Chiara Dip.Oncologia, Div. Ematologia
Pisa, 56126
Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova
Reggio Emilia, 42100
Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena, Struttura Complessa Ematologia ed Unita di Cellule Staminali
Roma, 00144
Azienda Policlinico Umberto I, Universita La Sapienzadi Roma
Rome, 00161
Ospedale Molinette
Torino, 10126
Australia17 sites
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, 5000
Flinders Medical Centre
Bedford Park, 5042
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Divsion of Haematology Medical Oncology
East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002
Western Hospital
Footscray, Victoria, 3011
Frankston Hospital
Frankston, Victoria, 3199
Geelong Hospital
Geelong, 3220
Gosford Hospital
Gosford, 2250
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
Herston, 4029
Cabrini Hospital
Malvern, 3144
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Parkville, 3050
Royal Perth Hospital
Perth, 6000
Gold Coast Hospital
Southport, 4215
Royal North Shore Hospital
St Leonards, 2065
Westmead Hospital
Wentworthville, 2145
Border Medical Oncology
Wodonga, 3690
Wollongong Hospital
Wollongong, 2500
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Woolloongabba, 4102
Germany17 sites
Medizinische Kinik und Poliklinik I
Dresden, D-01307
Universitaetsklinikum Dusseldorf Klinik fuer Haematologie
Düsseldorf, 40225
Universitatsklinikum Essen-
Essen, 45122
Staedtische Kliniken Frankfurt am Main Hochst
Frankfurt am Main, 65929
Universitatsklinikum Giessen
Giessen, 35385
Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald
Greifswald, 17487
Askepios Klinik St. Georg
Hamburg, 20099
Universitatsklinikum Jena
Jena, 07740
Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II
Leipzig, 04103
Universitatsklinikum schleswig-Holstein
Lübeck, 23538
Klinikum der Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universtat
München, 81377
Medizinische Klinik III Klinikum der Universität München-Großhadern
München, 81377
Poliklinik A
Münster, 48129
Medizinische Fakultat der Universitat Rostock
Rostock, 18057
Zentrum F. Innere Medizin II Robert- Bosch-Krankenhaus GmBH
Stuttgart, D -70376
Medizinische Klinik - Abteilung II
Tübingen, 72076
Klinik fur Innere Medizin III
Ulm, 89081
United Kingdom17 sites
Gwynedd Hospital
Bangor, LL57 2PW
Royal United Hospital
Bath, BA1 3NG
Belfast City Hospital Haematology Department
Belfast Northern Ireland, BT9 7AB
Birminghman QE
Birmingham West Midlands, B15 2TH
Royal Bournemouth Hosp
Bournemouth Dorset, BH7 7DW
Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre
Bristol, BS2 8ED
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge, CB2 2QQ
University Hospital of Wales - Cardiff
Cardiff, CF14 4XW
The Beatson West of Scotland Centre
Glasgow, G12 0YN
Dept of Haematology St Bartholomews Hospital
London, EC1A 7BE
Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital - London
London, SE1 9RT
Royal Free Hospital
London, W12 0HS
Churchhill Hospital
Oxford, OX3 7LI
Derriford Hospital
Plymouth Crownhill Devon, PL6 8DH
Royal Hallamshire Hospital Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Sheffield, S10 2JF
Pinderfields General Hospital
West Yorkshire, WF1 4DG
New Cross Hospital- Wolverhampton
Wolverhampton, WV10 OPQ
South Korea15 sites
Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital
Anyang, 431-070
Inje University Busan Paik Hospital
Busan, 614-735
Daegu Catholic University Medical Center 3056-6
Daegu, 705-718
Chungnam National University Hospital
Daejeon, 301-721
National Cancer Center
Gyeonggi-do, 410-769
Hwasun Chonnam National University Hospital
Hwasun-goon, 519-803
Gachon University Gil Hospital
Incheon, 405-760
Chonbuk National University Hospital 42
Jeonju, 561-712
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Seongnam, 463-707
Severance Hospital
Seongsanno, 120-752
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, 110-744
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 135-710
The Catholic University of Korea Seoul - Saint Mary's Hospital
Seoul, 137-701
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 138-736
Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital
Seoul, 158-710
Belgium13 sites
ZNA Stuivenberg Centrumziekenhuis
Antwerp, 2069
Les Cliniques du Sud Luxembourg
Arlon, 6700
AZ St-Jan Brugge Oostende AV
Bruges, 8000
Jules Bordet Institut
Brussels, 1000
Hopital Erasme
Brussels, 1070
AZ-VUB
Brussels, 1090
Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc
Brussels, 1200
Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen
Edegem, 2650
UZ Gent
Ghent, 9000
Virga Jesse Ziekenhuis
Hasselt, 3500
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg
Leuven, 3000
H. Hartziekenhuis Roeselare-Menen vzw campus Wilgenstraat
Roeselare, 8800
Cliniques Universitaires UCL de Mont-Godine
Yvoir, 5530
Austria11 sites
Hospital Leoben
Leoben, 8700
Hospital of Barmherzige Schwestern Linz
Linz, 4010
Hospital of Elisabethinen Linz
Linz, 4010
General Hospital Linz
Linz, 4021
MM-015. Salzburger Landkliniken, St. Johanns-Spital, Universitätsklinik fur Innere Medizin III
Salzburg, 5020
Hospital St. Polten
Sankt Pölten, 3100
Hospital of the Barmherzigen Bruder Vienna
Vienna, 1020
MM-015.Wihelminenspital
Vienna, 1160
MM-015. Medizinische Universität Wien
Vienna, A-1090
Hospital Wels
Wels, 4600
Hospital Wiener Neustadt
Wiener Neustadt
Switzerland7 sites
Abteilung Onkologie Haematologie des Kantonsspitals Aarau
Aarau, 5001
UniversitatsSpital Basel
Basel, 4031
Inselsspital Bern
Bern, 3010
Kantonsspital Graubunden
Chur, 7000
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois CHUV
Lausanne, 1011
Kantonsspital Munsterlingen
Münsterlingen, 8596
Kantonsspital Winterthur
Winterthur, 8400
Greece6 sites
Alexandra Hospital, University of Athens
Athens, 11528
Attiko Hospital of Athens
Athens, 124
Evangelismos Hospital of Athens
Athens
University of Athens
Athens
Metaxa Hospital Peiraias
Piraeus, 18537
Theagenio Anticancer Hospital of Thessaloniki
Thessaloniki, 540 07
Portugal6 sites
Hospital de Sao Marcos
Braga
Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra
Coimbra, 3000-075
Instituto Portugues de Oncologia de Lisboa
Lisbon, 1099-023
Hospital de Santa Maria
Lisbon, 1649-035
Instituto Português de Oncologia Porto
Porto, 4200-072
Hospital de Santo Antonio- Porto
Porto
China5 sites
Chaoyang Hospital
Beijing, 100020
Peking University People's Hospital
Beijing, 100044
West China Hospital of Sichuan University
Chengdu, 610041
Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University
Shanghai, 200025
Blood Disease Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College
Tianjin, 300041
Sweden4 sites
Linkoping University Hospital
Linköping, SE 581 85
Karolinska University HospitalSolna
Stockholm, SE 17176
St. Görans Hospital
Stockholm, SE- 11281
Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge
Stockholm, SE-14186
Ireland3 sites
Adelaide and Meath Hospital
Dublin, 24
Mater Misercordiae Hospital
Dublin, 7
University Hospital Galway
Galway, ST46QG
New Zealand3 sites
Auckland City Hospital
Auckland, 1023
Christchurch Hospital
Christchurch, 8011
Wellington Hospital
Newtown, 6021
Taiwan3 sites
China Medical University Hospital
Taichung, 40447
Veteran General Hospital - Taipei
Taipei, 11217
National Taiwan University Hospital
Tapei, 10002
About this study
Official title: A Phase III, Randomized, Open-label, 3-arm Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide(REVLIMID) Plus Low-dose Dexamethasone When Given Until Progressive Disease or for 18 Four-week Cycles Versus the Combination of Melphalan, Prednisone, and Thalidomide Given for 12 Six-week Cycles in Patients With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Who Are Either 65 Years of Age or Older or Not Candidates for Stem Cell Transplantation.
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of Lenalidomide plus low dose dexamethasone to that of the combination of melphalan, prednisone and thalidomide.
Read the detailed description
CC-5013-MM020/IFM 07-01 is a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label, 3-arm study that will compare the efficacy and safety of two Lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone regimens given for two different durations of time (i.e., until progressive disease [PD] or for up to a maximum of 18 four-week cycles) to that of MPT given for a maximum of 12 six-week cycles.
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Being tested
- Lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone, Lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone given for 18 four-week cycles, Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide
- Keywords
- newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, Lenalidomide, Revlimid, phase III
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Myeloma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasoneDrug
Also called Revlimid
Lenalidomide - oral, 2.5mg, 5mg, 10mg, 15mg 20mg, or 25 mg capsules, given either days 1-21 of each 28 day cycles or given every other day for 21 days until documentation of PD.
Dexamethasone - oral 4mg tablets for a total dose of 20mg or 40 mg given days 1,8,15 and 22 of each 28 day cycle up to disease progression
Lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone given for 18 four-week cyclesDrug
Also called Revlimid
lenalidomide - oral, 2.5mg, 5mg, 10mg, 15mg, 20 mg or 25 mg capsules given on days 1-21 of each 28 day cycle or every other day for 21 days for 18 cycles.
Dexamethasone - oral 4mg tablets for a total dose of 20mg or 40 mg given days 1,8,15 and 22 of each 28 day cycle for 18 cycles
Melphalan, Prednisone and ThalidomideDrug
Also called Prednisone, Thalomid
Melphalan - oral, 2mg tablets dosed at either 0.25mg/kg, 0.125 mg/kg, 0.20mg/kg or 0.10mg/kg on days 1-4 of each 42 day cycle up to 12 cycles Prednisone - oral, 5mg, 10mg, 20 mg and 50 mg tablets dosed at 2mg/kg daily days 1-4 of each 42 day cycle for up to 12 cycles Thalidomide - oral, 50mg, 100mg and 200 mg capsules dosed at either 100mg or 200 mg daily on days 1-41 of each 42 day cycle for up to 12 cycles
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lenalidomide / Dexamethasone until disease progression | Experimental | Lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone given until disease progression Receives: Drug: Lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone |
| Lenalidomide / Dexamethasone for 18 cycles | Experimental | Lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone given for 18 four-week cycles Receives: Drug: Lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone given for 18 four-week cycles |
| Melphalan, Prednisone, and Thalidomide (MPT) for 12 cycles | Active comparator | Combination of Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide given for 12 six-week cycles Receives: Drug: Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on the Response Assessment by the Independent Review Adjudication Committee (IRAC)
PFS was calculated as the time from randomization to the first documented PD or death due to any cause during the study, which ever occurred first based on the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria (IMWG). Those who withdrew for any reason or received another anti-myeloma therapy without documented PD were censored on the date of their last response assessment, prior to receiving any other anti-myeloma therapy. Censoring rules for PFS: - No baseline assessments and no progression or death documented within the 2 scheduled assessments; Death within the lst two assessments without any adequate response assessment; Progression documented between scheduled assessments; Death between adequate assessments; no progression; study discontinuations for reasons other than PD or death; new anti-myeloma started prior to PD; death or PD after an extended lost to follow-up time period (2 or more missed scheduled assessment's).
Measured: From date of randomization until the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013. Median follow-up time for all participants was 17.1 months.
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of PFS Based on the Response Assessment by the Investigator At the Time of Final Analysis
PFS was calculated as the time from randomization to the first documented PD or death due to any cause during the study, which ever occurred first based on the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria (IMWG). Those who withdrew for any reason or received another anti-myeloma therapy without documented PD were censored on the date of their last response assessment, prior to receiving any other anti-myeloma therapy. Censoring rules for PFS: - No baseline assessments and no progression or death documented within the 2 scheduled assessments; Death within the lst two assessments without any adequate response assessment; Progression documented between scheduled assessments; Death between adequate assessments; no progression; study discontinuations for reasons other than PD or death; new anti-myeloma started prior to PD; death or PD after an extended lost to follow-up time period (2 or more missed scheduled assessment's).
Measured: From date of randomization to date of data cut-off date of 21 January 2016; median follow-up for all participants was 17.7 months
Secondary outcomes (43)
Kaplan Meier Estimates of Overall Survival at the Time of Final Analysis (OS)
Overall survival was defined as the time between randomization and death. Participants, who died, regardless of the cause of death, were considered to have had an event. All participants who were lost to follow-up prior to the end of the trial or who were withdrawn from the trial were censored at the time of last contact. Participants who were still being treated were censored at the last available date the participant was known to be alive.
Measured: From date of randomization to date of data cut-off date of 21 January 2016; median follow-up for all participants was 48.3 months
Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response Based on IRAC Review
Objective response according to IMWG Uniform Response Criteria was defined as a best overall response including a complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR) based on the IRAC Review. A CR is defined as: negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤5% plasma cells in BM; A VGPR is serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 hours; A PR is: ≥50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg/24 hours. If present at baseline a ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas.
Measured: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response Based on Investigator Assessment at Time of Final Analysis
Objective response according to IMWG Uniform Response Criteria was defined as a best overall response including a complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR) based on the IRAC Review. A CR is defined s: negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤5% plasma cells in BM; A VGPR is serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 hours; A PR is: ≥50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg/24 hours. If present at baseline a ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas.
Measured: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 21 January 2016; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Kaplan Meier Estimates of Duration of Myeloma Response as Determined by the IRAC
Duration of response was defined as the duration from the time when the response criteria were first met for CR or VGPR or PR based on IMWG criteria until the first date the response criteria were met for progressive disease or until the participant died from any cause, whichever occurred first.
Measured: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013; median follow-up for responders was 20.1 months
Kaplan Meier Estimates of Duration of Myeloma Response as Determined by an Investigator Assessment at Time of Final Analysis
Duration of response was defined as the duration from the time when the response criteria were first met for CR or VGPR or PR based on IMWG criteria until the first date the response criteria were met for progressive disease or until the participant died from any cause, whichever occurred first.
Measured: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment; data cut-off date of 21 January 2016; median follow-up for responders was 19.9 months
Time to First Response Based on the Review by the IRAC
The time to first myeloma response was defined as the time from randomization to the time when the response criteria for at least a PR was first met based on the IMWG criteria.
Measured: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Time to First Response Based on the Investigator Assessment at the Time of Final Analysis
The time to first myeloma response was defined as the time from randomization to the time when the response criteria for at least a PR was first met based on the IMWG criteria assessed by the investigator.
Measured: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 21 January 2016; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm.
Kaplan Meier Estimates of Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
TTF is defined as the time between the randomization and discontinuation of study treatment for any reason, including disease progression (determined by IRAC based on the IMWG response criteria), treatment toxicity, start of another anti-myeloma therapy (AMT) or death.
Measured: From date of randomization until the data cut-off of 24 May 2013; median follow-up for all participants was 16.1 months.
Kaplan Meier Estimates of Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) at the Time of Final Analysis
TTF is defined as the time between the randomization and discontinuation of study treatment for any reason, including disease progression (determined by the investigators assessment based on the IMWG response criteria), treatment toxicity, start of another anti-myeloma therapy (AMT) or death.
Measured: From date of randomization until the data cut-off date of 21 January 2016; median follow up for all participants was 16.1 months.
Kaplan Meier Estimates for Time to Second-line Anti-myeloma Treatment (AMT)
Time to second-line anti-myeloma therapy was defined as time from randomization to the start of another non-protocol anti-myeloma therapy.
Measured: From date of randomization until the data cut-off of 24 May 2013; median follow-up for all participants was 23.0 months
Kaplan Meier Estimates of Time to Second Line Therapy AMT at the Time of Final Analysis
Time to second-line anti-myeloma therapy is defined as time from randomization to the start of another non-protocol anti-myeloma therapy. Those who do not receive another anti-myeloma therapy were censored at the last assessment or follow-up visit known to have received no new therapy.
Measured: From date of randomization until the data cut-off of date 21 January 2016; median follow-up for all participants was 23.0 months
Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response After Second-line Anti-myeloma Treatment at the Time of Final Analysis
Objective response according to IMWG Uniform Response Criteria was defined as a best overall response including a complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR) based on the IRAC Review. A CR is defined s: negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤5% plasma cells in BM; A VGPR is serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 hours; A PR is: ≥50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg/24 hours. If present at baseline a ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas.
Measured: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment; data cut-off date of 21 January 2016; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Percentage of Participants With a Myeloma Response by Adverse Risk Cytogenetic Risk Category Based on IRAC Review.
Participants were placed in adverse and non-adverse cytogenetic risk categories at baseline and response rates evaluated. Adverse Risk: t(4;14), t(14;16), del(13q) or monosomy 13, del(17p), 1q gain Favorable Hyperdiploidy: : t(11;14), gains of 5/9/15; Normal: a normal result, gains other than 5/9/15, IgH deletion Uncertain risk: probes used for analysis cannot place participant in any of the other risk categories. Objective response = best overall response including CR, VGPR or PR based on the IRAC Review; A CR is negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤5% plasma cells in BM; A VGPRis serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 hours; A PR is ≥50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg/24 hours. If present at baseline a ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas.
Measured: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Percentage of Participants With a Myeloma Response by Favorable Hyperdiploidy Risk Cytogenetic Risk Category Based on IRAC Review
Participants were placed in adverse and non-adverse cytogenetic risk categories at baseline and response rates evaluated. Adverse Risk: t(4;14), t(14;16), del(13q) or monosomy 13, del(17p), 1q gain Favorable Hyperdiploidy: : t(11;14), gains of 5/9/15; Normal: a normal result, gains other than 5/9/15, IgH deletion Uncertain risk: probes used for analysis cannot place participant in any of the other risk categories. Objective response = best overall response including CR, VGPR or PR based on the IRAC Review; A CR is negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤5% plasma cells in BM; A VGPRis serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 hours; A PR is ≥50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg/24 hours. If present at baseline a ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas.
Measured: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Percentage of Participants With a Myeloma Response by Normal Risk Cytogenetic Risk Category Based on IRAC Review
Participants were placed in adverse and non-adverse cytogenetic risk categories at baseline and response rates evaluated. Adverse Risk: t(4;14), t(14;16), del(13q) or monosomy 13, del(17p), 1q gain Favorable Hyperdiploidy: : t(11;14), gains of 5/9/15; Normal: a normal result, gains other than 5/9/15, IgH deletion Uncertain risk: probes used for analysis cannot place participant in any of the other risk categories. Objective response = best overall response including CR, VGPR or PR based on the IRAC Review; A CR is negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤5% plasma cells in BM; A VGPRis serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 hours; A PR is ≥50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg/24 hours. If present at baseline a ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas.
Measured: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Percentage of Participants With a Myeloma Response by Uncertain Risk Cytogenetic Risk Category Based on IRAC Review
Participants were placed in adverse and non-adverse cytogenetic risk categories at baseline and response rates evaluated. Adverse Risk: t(4;14), t(14;16), del(13q) or monosomy 13, del(17p), 1q gain Favorable Hyperdiploidy: : t(11;14), gains of 5/9/15; Normal: a normal result, gains other than 5/9/15, IgH deletion Uncertain risk: probes used for analysis cannot place participant in any of the other risk categories. Objective response = best overall response including CR, VGPR or PR based on the IRAC Review; A CR is negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤5% plasma cells in BM; A VGPRis serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 hours; A PR is ≥50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg/24 hours. If present at baseline a ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas.
Measured: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status Domain
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better Global Health Status/QOL. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in QOL or functioning and positive values indicate improvement.
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning/support. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement.
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning Domain
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning/support. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement.
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Domain
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning/support. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement.
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Cognitive Functioning Domain
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Cognitive Functioning Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning/support. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement.
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1, (Baseline) then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Social Functioning Domain
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Social Functioning Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning/support. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement.
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Domain
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate improvement in symptoms and positive values indicate worsening symptoms.
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Domain
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate improvement in symptoms and positive values indicate worsening symptoms.
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Nausea/Vomiting Domain
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Nausea/Vomiting Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate improvement in symptoms and positive values indicate worsening symptoms.
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnea Domain
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnoea Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate improvement in symptoms and positive values indicate worsening symptoms.
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Insomnia Domain
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Insomnia Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate improvement in symptoms and positive values indicate worsening symptoms.
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss Domain
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of appetite loss. Negative change from Baseline values indicate improvement in appetite and positive values indicate worsening of appetite.
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Constipation Domain
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Constipation Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of constipation. Negative change from Baseline values indicate improvement in constipation and positive values indicate worsening of constipation.
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Diarrhea Domain
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Diarrhea Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of diarrhea. Negative change from Baseline values indicate improvement in diarrhea and positive values indicate worsening of diarrhea.
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Financial Difficulties Domain
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Financial Difficulties Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of financial difficulties. Negative change from Baseline values indicate improvement in financial difficulties and positive values indicate worsening of financial difficulties.
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms Scale
EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma. EORTC QLQ-MY20 includes four scales: disease symptoms, treatment side-effects, future perspective, and body image. Questions used a 4-point scale (from 1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores were averaged, and transformed to a 0-100 scale; a higher score indicates more severe disease symptom(s).
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Side Effects Treatment Scale
EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma. EORTC QLQ-MY20 includes four scales: disease symptoms, treatment side-effects, future perspective, and body image. Questions used a 4-point scale (from 1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores were averaged, and transformed to a 0-100 scale; a higher score represents a more severe overall side effect of treatment.
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Future Perspective Scale
EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma. EORTC QLQ-MY20 includes four scales: disease symptoms, treatment side-effects, future perspective, and body image. Questions used a 4-point scale (from 1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores were averaged, and transformed to a 0-100 scale; for the future perspective scale, a higher score indicates a better perspective of the future.
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Body Image Scale
EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma. EORTC QLQ-MY20 includes four scales: disease symptoms, treatment side-effects, future perspective, and body image. Questions used a 4-point scale (from 1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores were averaged, and transformed to a 0-100 scale; for the body image scale, a higher score indicates a better body image.
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health Utility Index Score
EQ-5D is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D descriptive health profile comprises five dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 3 levels of response: No problem (1), some problems (2), and extreme problems (3). A unique EQ-5D health state is defined by combining one level from each of the five dimensions into a single utility index score. EQ-5D index values range from -0.59 to 1.00 where higher EQ-5D scores represent better health status. A positive change from baseline score indicates improvement in health status and better health state.
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Rate of Inpatient Hospitalizations Per Year
HRU was defined as any consumption of healthcare resources directly or indirectly related to the treatment of the patient. HRU Analysis may help in evaluating potential costs and budget impact of new treatments from a payer perspective. The rate of inpatient hospitalizations per patient year was calculated as the total number of hospitalizations divided by the total number of patient-years followed in the study period. Patient-years (PY) were calculated as the duration from baseline to last available HRQL assessment for each patient.
Measured: Day 1 (randomization) up to last visit completed 25 July 2016
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) During the Active Treatment Phase
A TEAE is any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first treatment of any study drug, and within 30 days after the last dose of the last study drug. Severity grades according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE) on a 1-5 scale: Grade 1= Mild AE, Grade 2= Moderate AE, Grade 3= Severe AE, Grade 4= Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5=Death related to AE. A serious AE is any AE occurring at any dose that: • Results in death; • Is life-threatening; • Requires or prolongs existing inpatient hospitalization; • Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; • Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; • Constitutes an important medical event.
Measured: From first dose of study drug through 28 days following the discontinuation visit from active treatment phase; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Shift From Baseline to Most Extreme Postbaseline Value in Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) During the Active Treatment Phase
Renal function was assessed for participants from baseline to the most extreme value in creatinine clearance calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault estimation.
Measured: Randomization to end of treatment or the data cut off of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Shift From Baseline to Most Extreme Postbaseline Value in Absolute Neutrophil Count During the Active Treatment Phase
Neutrophil counts was assessed for participants from baseline grade to most extreme severity grade using the NCI CTCAE v 3.0 grading scale.
Measured: Randomization to end of treatment or the data cut off of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Shift From Baseline to Most Extreme Postbaseline Value in Hemoglobin During the Active Treatment Phase
Hemoglobin was assessed for participants from baseline grade to most extreme severity grade using the NCI CTCAE v 3.0 grading scale.
Measured: Randomization to end of treatment or the data cut off of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Shift From Baseline to Most Extreme Postbaseline Value in Platelet Count During the Active Treatment Phase.
Improvement in platelets was assessed for participants from baseline grade to most extreme severity grade using the NCI CTCAE v 3.0 grading scale.
Measured: Randomization to end of treatment or the data cut off of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Improvement of Infection Rate by Observing the Historical Data Compared to the Clinical Data Base
Improvement of infection rate by observing historical data compared to the data within clinical database as not analyzed.
Measured: From randomization to 24 May 2013
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Jun 2008 (estimated)
- Study start21 Aug 2008
- Primary completion14 Jul 2016
- Study completion14 Jul 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Multiple MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by CelgeneThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,623 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Celgene
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Christian Jacques, MD, Study director, Celgene Corporation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00689936
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CC-5013-MM-020
- Other IDs
- 2007-004823-39
- Acronym
- FIRST
- Status last verified
- Nov 2019
- First submitted
- 2 Jun 2008
- Last updated
- 20 Nov 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Dimopoulos MA, Cheung MC, Roussel M, Liu T, Gamberi B, Kolb B, Derigs HG, Eom H, Belhadj K, Lenain P, Van der Jagt R, Rigaudeau S, Dib M, Hall R, Jardel H, Jaccard A, Tosikyan A, Karlin L, Bensinger W, Schots R, Leupin N, Chen G, Marek J, Ervin-Haynes A, Facon T. Impact of renal impairment on outcomes with lenalidomide and dexamethasone treatment in the FIRST trial, a randomized, open-label phase 3 trial in transplant-ineligible patients with multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2016 Mar;101(3):363-70. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2015.133629. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
PubMed 26659916Hulin C, Belch A, Shustik C, Petrucci MT, Duhrsen U, Lu J, Song K, Rodon P, Pegourie B, Garderet L, Hunter H, Azais I, Eek R, Gisslinger H, Macro M, Dakhil S, Goncalves C, LeBlanc R, Romeril K, Royer B, Doyen C, Leleu X, Offner F, Leupin N, Houck V, Chen G, Ervin-Haynes A, Dimopoulos MA, Facon T. Updated Outcomes and Impact of Age With Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone or Melphalan, Prednisone, and Thalidomide in the Randomized, Phase III FIRST Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct 20;34(30):3609-3617. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.7295.
PubMed 27325857Delforge M, Minuk L, Eisenmann JC, Arnulf B, Canepa L, Fragasso A, Leyvraz S, Langer C, Ezaydi Y, Vogl DT, Giraldo-Castellano P, Yoon SS, Zarnitsky C, Escoffre-Barbe M, Lemieux B, Song K, Bahlis NJ, Guo S, Monzini MS, Ervin-Haynes A, Houck V, Facon T. Health-related quality-of-life in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the FIRST trial: lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus melphalan, prednisone, thalidomide. Haematologica. 2015 Jun;100(6):826-33. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.120121. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
PubMed 25769541Benboubker L, Dimopoulos MA, Dispenzieri A, Catalano J, Belch AR, Cavo M, Pinto A, Weisel K, Ludwig H, Bahlis N, Banos A, Tiab M, Delforge M, Cavenagh J, Geraldes C, Lee JJ, Chen C, Oriol A, de la Rubia J, Qiu L, White DJ, Binder D, Anderson K, Fermand JP, Moreau P, Attal M, Knight R, Chen G, Van Oostendorp J, Jacques C, Ervin-Haynes A, Avet-Loiseau H, Hulin C, Facon T; FIRST Trial Team. Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 4;371(10):906-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1402551.
PubMed 25184863Vogl DT, Delforge M, Song K, Guo S, Gibson CJ, Ervin-Haynes A, Facon T. Long-term health-related quality of life in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma receiving lenalidomide and dexamethasone. Leuk Lymphoma. 2018 Feb;59(2):398-405. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1334125. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
PubMed 28641472Dumontet C, Hulin C, Dimopoulos MA, Belch A, Dispenzieri A, Ludwig H, Rodon P, Van Droogenbroeck J, Qiu L, Cavo M, Van de Velde A, Lahuerta JJ, Allangba O, Lee JH, Boyle E, Perrot A, Moreau P, Manier S, Attal M, Roussel M, Mohty M, Mary JY, Civet A, Costa B, Tinel A, Gaston-Mathe Y, Facon T. A predictive model for risk of early grade >/= 3 infection in patients with multiple myeloma not eligible for transplant: analysis of the FIRST trial. Leukemia. 2018 Jun;32(6):1404-1413. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0133-x. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
PubMed 29784907Ailawadhi S, Jacobus S, Sexton R, Stewart AK, Dispenzieri A, Hussein MA, Zonder JA, Crowley J, Hoering A, Barlogie B, Orlowski RZ, Rajkumar SV. Disease and outcome disparities in multiple myeloma: exploring the role of race/ethnicity in the Cooperative Group clinical trials. Blood Cancer J. 2018 Jul 6;8(7):67. doi: 10.1038/s41408-018-0102-7.
PubMed 29980678Jain T, Sonbol MB, Firwana B, Kolla KR, Almader-Douglas D, Palmer J, Fonseca R. High-Dose Chemotherapy with Early Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Compared to Standard Dose Chemotherapy or Delayed Transplantation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Feb;25(2):239-247. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.09.021. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
PubMed 30244101Facon T, Dimopoulos MA, Dispenzieri A, Catalano JV, Belch A, Cavo M, Pinto A, Weisel K, Ludwig H, Bahlis NJ, Banos A, Tiab M, Delforge M, Cavenagh JD, Geraldes C, Lee JJ, Chen C, Oriol A, De La Rubia J, White D, Binder D, Lu J, Anderson KC, Moreau P, Attal M, Perrot A, Arnulf B, Qiu L, Roussel M, Boyle E, Manier S, Mohty M, Avet-Loiseau H, Leleu X, Ervin-Haynes A, Chen G, Houck V, Benboubker L, Hulin C. Final analysis of survival outcomes in the phase 3 FIRST trial of up-front treatment for multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018 Jan 18;131(3):301-310. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-07-795047. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
PubMed 29150421Ailawadhi S, DerSarkissian M, Duh MS, Lafeuille MH, Posner G, Ralston S, Zagadailov E, Ba-Mancini A, Rifkin R. Cost Offsets in the Treatment Journeys of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Clin Ther. 2019 Mar;41(3):477-493.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
PubMed 30773308Pegourie B, Karlin L, Benboubker L, Orsini-Piocelle F, Tiab M, Auger-Quittet S, Rodon P, Royer B, Leleu X, Bareau B, Cliquennois M, Fuzibet JG, Voog E, Belhadj-Merzoug K, Decaux O, Rey P, Slama B, Leyronnas C, Zarnitsky C, Boyle E, Bosson JL, Pernod G; IFM Group. Apixaban for the prevention of thromboembolism in immunomodulatory-treated myeloma patients: Myelaxat, a phase 2 pilot study. Am J Hematol. 2019 Jun;94(6):635-640. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25459. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
PubMed 30859608Bahlis NJ, Corso A, Mugge LO, Shen ZX, Desjardins P, Stoppa AM, Decaux O, de Revel T, Granell M, Marit G, Nahi H, Demuynck H, Huang SY, Basu S, Guthrie TH, Ervin-Haynes A, Marek J, Chen G, Facon T. Benefit of continuous treatment for responders with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the randomized FIRST trial. Leukemia. 2017 Nov;31(11):2435-2442. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.111. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
PubMed 28373701Lu J, Lee JH, Huang SY, Qiu L, Lee JJ, Liu T, Yoon SS, Kim K, Shen ZX, Eom HS, Chen WM, Min CK, Kim HJ, Lee JO, Kwak JY, Yiu W, Chen G, Ervin-Haynes A, Hulin C, Facon T. Continuous treatment with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in Asia: subanalysis of the FIRST trial. Br J Haematol. 2017 Mar;176(5):743-749. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14465. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
PubMed 28106903
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Nov 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III, Randomized, Open-label, 3-arm Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide(REVLIMID) Plus Low-dose Dexamethasone When Given Until Progressive Disease or for 18 Four-week Cycles Versus the Combination of Melphalan, Prednisone, and Thalidomide Given for 12 Six-week Cycles in Patients With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Who Are Either 65 Years of Age or Older or Not Candidates for Stem Cell Transplantation.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00689936
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FIRST / CC-5013-MM-020
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Keywords
- newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, Lenalidomide, Revlimid, phase III
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,623 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CelgeneIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 21 Aug 2008 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Jul 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 Jul 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Jun 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 11 Aug 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of Lenalidomide plus low dose dexamethasone to that of the combination of melphalan, prednisone and thalidomide.
Detailed description
CC-5013-MM020/IFM 07-01 is a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label, 3-arm study that will compare the efficacy and safety of two Lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone regimens given for two different durations of time (i.e., until progressive disease [PD] or for up to a maximum of 18 four-week cycles) to that of MPT given for a maximum of 12 six-week cycles.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lenalidomide / Dexamethasone until disease progression | Experimental | Drug: Lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasoneLenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone given until disease progression |
| Lenalidomide / Dexamethasone for 18 cycles | Experimental | Drug: Lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone given for 18 four-week cyclesLenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone given for 18 four-week cycles |
| Melphalan, Prednisone, and Thalidomide (MPT) for 12 cycles | Active comparator | Drug: Melphalan, Prednisone and ThalidomideCombination of Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide given for 12 six-week cycles |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (29 listed)
- Must understand and voluntarily sign informed consent form
- Age ≥ 18 years at the time of signing consent
- Previously untreated, symptomatic multiple myeloma as defined by the 3 criteria below:
- AND have measurable disease by protein electrophoresis analyses as defined by the following:
- AND are at least 65 years of age or older or, if younger than 65 years of age, are not candidates for stem cell transplantation because:
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Previous treatment with anti-myeloma therapy (does not include radiotherapy, bisphosphonates, or a single short course of steroid [i.e., less than or equal to the equivalent of dexamethasone 40 mg/day for 4 days; such a short course of steroid treatment must not have been given within 14 days of randomization]).
- Any serious medical condition that places the patient at an unacceptable risk if he or she participates in this study. Examples of such a medical condition are, but are not limited to, patient with unstable cardiac disease as defined by: Cardiac events such as MI within the past 6 months, NYHA heart failure class III-IV, uncontrolled atrial fibrillation or hypertension; patients with conditions requiring chronic steroid or immunosuppressive treatment, such as rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and lupus, that likely need additional steroid or immunosuppressive treatments in addition to the study treatment.
- Pregnant or lactating females.
- Any of the following laboratory abnormalities:
- Renal failure requiring hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasoneAlso: RevlimidLenalidomide - oral, 2.5mg, 5mg, 10mg, 15mg 20mg, or 25 mg capsules, given either days 1-21 of each 28 day cycles or given every other day for 21 days until documentation of PD. Dexamethasone - oral 4mg tablets for a total dose of 20mg or 40 mg given days 1,8,15 and 22 of each 28 day cycle up to disease progression | Drug | Lenalidomide / Dexamethasone until disease progression |
| Lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone given for 18 four-week cyclesAlso: Revlimidlenalidomide - oral, 2.5mg, 5mg, 10mg, 15mg, 20 mg or 25 mg capsules given on days 1-21 of each 28 day cycle or every other day for 21 days for 18 cycles. Dexamethasone - oral 4mg tablets for a total dose of 20mg or 40 mg given days 1,8,15 and 22 of each 28 day cycle for 18 cycles | Drug | Lenalidomide / Dexamethasone for 18 cycles |
| Melphalan, Prednisone and ThalidomideAlso: Prednisone, ThalomidMelphalan - oral, 2mg tablets dosed at either 0.25mg/kg, 0.125 mg/kg, 0.20mg/kg or 0.10mg/kg on days 1-4 of each 42 day cycle up to 12 cycles Prednisone - oral, 5mg, 10mg, 20 mg and 50 mg tablets dosed at 2mg/kg daily days 1-4 of each 42 day cycle for up to 12 cycles Thalidomide - oral, 50mg, 100mg and 200 mg capsules dosed at either 100mg or 200 mg daily on days 1-41 of each 42 day cycle for up to 12 cycles | Drug | Melphalan, Prednisone, and Thalidomide (MPT) for 12 cycles |
Primary outcome
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on the Response Assessment by the Independent Review Adjudication Committee (IRAC)
Time frame: From date of randomization until the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013. Median follow-up time for all participants was 17.1 months.
PFS was calculated as the time from randomization to the first documented PD or death due to any cause during the study, which ever occurred first based on the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria (IMWG). Those who withdrew for any reason or received another anti-myeloma therapy without documented PD were censored on the date of their last response assessment, prior to receiving any other anti-myeloma therapy. Censoring rules for PFS: - No baseline assessments and no progression or death documented within the 2 scheduled assessments; Death within the lst two assessments without any adequate response assessment; Progression documented between scheduled assessments; Death between adequate assessments; no progression; study discontinuations for reasons other than PD or death; new anti-myeloma started prior to PD; death or PD after an extended lost to follow-up time period (2 or more missed scheduled assessment's).
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of PFS Based on the Response Assessment by the Investigator At the Time of Final Analysis
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of data cut-off date of 21 January 2016; median follow-up for all participants was 17.7 months
PFS was calculated as the time from randomization to the first documented PD or death due to any cause during the study, which ever occurred first based on the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria (IMWG). Those who withdrew for any reason or received another anti-myeloma therapy without documented PD were censored on the date of their last response assessment, prior to receiving any other anti-myeloma therapy. Censoring rules for PFS: - No baseline assessments and no progression or death documented within the 2 scheduled assessments; Death within the lst two assessments without any adequate response assessment; Progression documented between scheduled assessments; Death between adequate assessments; no progression; study discontinuations for reasons other than PD or death; new anti-myeloma started prior to PD; death or PD after an extended lost to follow-up time period (2 or more missed scheduled assessment's).
43 secondary outcomes
Kaplan Meier Estimates of Overall Survival at the Time of Final Analysis (OS)
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of data cut-off date of 21 January 2016; median follow-up for all participants was 48.3 months
Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response Based on IRAC Review
Time frame: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response Based on Investigator Assessment at Time of Final Analysis
Time frame: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 21 January 2016; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Kaplan Meier Estimates of Duration of Myeloma Response as Determined by the IRAC
Time frame: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013; median follow-up for responders was 20.1 months
Kaplan Meier Estimates of Duration of Myeloma Response as Determined by an Investigator Assessment at Time of Final Analysis
Time frame: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment; data cut-off date of 21 January 2016; median follow-up for responders was 19.9 months
Time to First Response Based on the Review by the IRAC
Time frame: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Time to First Response Based on the Investigator Assessment at the Time of Final Analysis
Time frame: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 21 January 2016; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm.
Kaplan Meier Estimates of Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
Time frame: From date of randomization until the data cut-off of 24 May 2013; median follow-up for all participants was 16.1 months.
Kaplan Meier Estimates of Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) at the Time of Final Analysis
Time frame: From date of randomization until the data cut-off date of 21 January 2016; median follow up for all participants was 16.1 months.
Kaplan Meier Estimates for Time to Second-line Anti-myeloma Treatment (AMT)
Time frame: From date of randomization until the data cut-off of 24 May 2013; median follow-up for all participants was 23.0 months
Kaplan Meier Estimates of Time to Second Line Therapy AMT at the Time of Final Analysis
Time frame: From date of randomization until the data cut-off of date 21 January 2016; median follow-up for all participants was 23.0 months
Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response After Second-line Anti-myeloma Treatment at the Time of Final Analysis
Time frame: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment; data cut-off date of 21 January 2016; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Percentage of Participants With a Myeloma Response by Adverse Risk Cytogenetic Risk Category Based on IRAC Review.
Time frame: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Percentage of Participants With a Myeloma Response by Favorable Hyperdiploidy Risk Cytogenetic Risk Category Based on IRAC Review
Time frame: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Percentage of Participants With a Myeloma Response by Normal Risk Cytogenetic Risk Category Based on IRAC Review
Time frame: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Percentage of Participants With a Myeloma Response by Uncertain Risk Cytogenetic Risk Category Based on IRAC Review
Time frame: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status Domain
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning Domain
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Domain
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Cognitive Functioning Domain
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1, (Baseline) then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Social Functioning Domain
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Domain
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Domain
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Nausea/Vomiting Domain
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnea Domain
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Insomnia Domain
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss Domain
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Constipation Domain
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Diarrhea Domain
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Financial Difficulties Domain
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms Scale
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Side Effects Treatment Scale
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Future Perspective Scale
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Body Image Scale
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health Utility Index Score
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit
Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Rate of Inpatient Hospitalizations Per Year
Time frame: Day 1 (randomization) up to last visit completed 25 July 2016
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) During the Active Treatment Phase
Time frame: From first dose of study drug through 28 days following the discontinuation visit from active treatment phase; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Shift From Baseline to Most Extreme Postbaseline Value in Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) During the Active Treatment Phase
Time frame: Randomization to end of treatment or the data cut off of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Shift From Baseline to Most Extreme Postbaseline Value in Absolute Neutrophil Count During the Active Treatment Phase
Time frame: Randomization to end of treatment or the data cut off of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Nov 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 26659916Dimopoulos MA, Cheung MC, Roussel M, Liu T, Gamberi B, Kolb B, Derigs HG, Eom H, Belhadj K, Lenain P, Van der Jagt R, Rigaudeau S, Dib M, Hall R, Jardel H, Jaccard A, Tosikyan A, Karlin L, Bensinger W, Schots R, Leupin N, Chen G, Marek J, Ervin-Haynes A, Facon T. Impact of renal impairment on outcomes with lenalidomide and dexamethasone treatment in the FIRST trial, a randomized, open-label phase 3 trial in transplant-ineligible patients with multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2016 Mar;101(3):363-70. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2015.133629. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
- Background: PubMed 27325857Hulin C, Belch A, Shustik C, Petrucci MT, Duhrsen U, Lu J, Song K, Rodon P, Pegourie B, Garderet L, Hunter H, Azais I, Eek R, Gisslinger H, Macro M, Dakhil S, Goncalves C, LeBlanc R, Romeril K, Royer B, Doyen C, Leleu X, Offner F, Leupin N, Houck V, Chen G, Ervin-Haynes A, Dimopoulos MA, Facon T. Updated Outcomes and Impact of Age With Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone or Melphalan, Prednisone, and Thalidomide in the Randomized, Phase III FIRST Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct 20;34(30):3609-3617. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.7295.
- Background: PubMed 25769541Delforge M, Minuk L, Eisenmann JC, Arnulf B, Canepa L, Fragasso A, Leyvraz S, Langer C, Ezaydi Y, Vogl DT, Giraldo-Castellano P, Yoon SS, Zarnitsky C, Escoffre-Barbe M, Lemieux B, Song K, Bahlis NJ, Guo S, Monzini MS, Ervin-Haynes A, Houck V, Facon T. Health-related quality-of-life in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the FIRST trial: lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus melphalan, prednisone, thalidomide. Haematologica. 2015 Jun;100(6):826-33. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.120121. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
- Background: PubMed 25184863Benboubker L, Dimopoulos MA, Dispenzieri A, Catalano J, Belch AR, Cavo M, Pinto A, Weisel K, Ludwig H, Bahlis N, Banos A, Tiab M, Delforge M, Cavenagh J, Geraldes C, Lee JJ, Chen C, Oriol A, de la Rubia J, Qiu L, White DJ, Binder D, Anderson K, Fermand JP, Moreau P, Attal M, Knight R, Chen G, Van Oostendorp J, Jacques C, Ervin-Haynes A, Avet-Loiseau H, Hulin C, Facon T; FIRST Trial Team. Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 4;371(10):906-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1402551.
- Background: PubMed 28641472Vogl DT, Delforge M, Song K, Guo S, Gibson CJ, Ervin-Haynes A, Facon T. Long-term health-related quality of life in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma receiving lenalidomide and dexamethasone. Leuk Lymphoma. 2018 Feb;59(2):398-405. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1334125. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
- Background: PubMed 29784907Dumontet C, Hulin C, Dimopoulos MA, Belch A, Dispenzieri A, Ludwig H, Rodon P, Van Droogenbroeck J, Qiu L, Cavo M, Van de Velde A, Lahuerta JJ, Allangba O, Lee JH, Boyle E, Perrot A, Moreau P, Manier S, Attal M, Roussel M, Mohty M, Mary JY, Civet A, Costa B, Tinel A, Gaston-Mathe Y, Facon T. A predictive model for risk of early grade >/= 3 infection in patients with multiple myeloma not eligible for transplant: analysis of the FIRST trial. Leukemia. 2018 Jun;32(6):1404-1413. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0133-x. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
- Background: PubMed 29980678Ailawadhi S, Jacobus S, Sexton R, Stewart AK, Dispenzieri A, Hussein MA, Zonder JA, Crowley J, Hoering A, Barlogie B, Orlowski RZ, Rajkumar SV. Disease and outcome disparities in multiple myeloma: exploring the role of race/ethnicity in the Cooperative Group clinical trials. Blood Cancer J. 2018 Jul 6;8(7):67. doi: 10.1038/s41408-018-0102-7.
- Background: PubMed 30244101Jain T, Sonbol MB, Firwana B, Kolla KR, Almader-Douglas D, Palmer J, Fonseca R. High-Dose Chemotherapy with Early Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Compared to Standard Dose Chemotherapy or Delayed Transplantation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Feb;25(2):239-247. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.09.021. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
- Background: PubMed 29150421Facon T, Dimopoulos MA, Dispenzieri A, Catalano JV, Belch A, Cavo M, Pinto A, Weisel K, Ludwig H, Bahlis NJ, Banos A, Tiab M, Delforge M, Cavenagh JD, Geraldes C, Lee JJ, Chen C, Oriol A, De La Rubia J, White D, Binder D, Lu J, Anderson KC, Moreau P, Attal M, Perrot A, Arnulf B, Qiu L, Roussel M, Boyle E, Manier S, Mohty M, Avet-Loiseau H, Leleu X, Ervin-Haynes A, Chen G, Houck V, Benboubker L, Hulin C. Final analysis of survival outcomes in the phase 3 FIRST trial of up-front treatment for multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018 Jan 18;131(3):301-310. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-07-795047. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
- Background: PubMed 30773308Ailawadhi S, DerSarkissian M, Duh MS, Lafeuille MH, Posner G, Ralston S, Zagadailov E, Ba-Mancini A, Rifkin R. Cost Offsets in the Treatment Journeys of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Clin Ther. 2019 Mar;41(3):477-493.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
- Background: PubMed 30859608Pegourie B, Karlin L, Benboubker L, Orsini-Piocelle F, Tiab M, Auger-Quittet S, Rodon P, Royer B, Leleu X, Bareau B, Cliquennois M, Fuzibet JG, Voog E, Belhadj-Merzoug K, Decaux O, Rey P, Slama B, Leyronnas C, Zarnitsky C, Boyle E, Bosson JL, Pernod G; IFM Group. Apixaban for the prevention of thromboembolism in immunomodulatory-treated myeloma patients: Myelaxat, a phase 2 pilot study. Am J Hematol. 2019 Jun;94(6):635-640. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25459. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 28373701Bahlis NJ, Corso A, Mugge LO, Shen ZX, Desjardins P, Stoppa AM, Decaux O, de Revel T, Granell M, Marit G, Nahi H, Demuynck H, Huang SY, Basu S, Guthrie TH, Ervin-Haynes A, Marek J, Chen G, Facon T. Benefit of continuous treatment for responders with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the randomized FIRST trial. Leukemia. 2017 Nov;31(11):2435-2442. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.111. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
- Link to CSR synopsisLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Multiple Myeloma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase III Study of Eque-cel in Subjects With Len-refractory RRMM (FUMANBA-03)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Window of Opportunity Trial to Learn if Linvoseltamab is Safe and Well Tolerated, and How Well it Works in Adult Participants With Recently Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Have Not Already Received Treatment
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing AZD5363 as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With AKT Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol Y)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christian Jacques, MD study director
Celgene Corporation
288 sites in 19 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone, Lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone given for 18 four-week cycles and Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Celgene at 288 sites in 19 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 29 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 288 sites in France, United States, Canada, Spain, Italy and 14 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Aug 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on the Response Assessment by the Independent Review Adjudication Committee (IRAC) (time frame: From date of randomization until the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013. Median follow-up time for all participants was 17.1 months.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00689936, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2019.