AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple MyelomaPhase 3FIRSTNCT00689936

Study to Determine Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Plus Low-dose Dexamethasone Versus Melphalan, Prednisone, Thalidomide in Patients With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma

A Phase 3 study testing Lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone, Lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone given for 18 four-week cycles and Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Celgene at 288 sites in 19 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of Lenalidomide plus low dose dexamethasone to that of the combination of melphalan, prednisone and thalidomide. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Multiple Myeloma
What is being tested?
Lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone, Lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone given for 18 four-week cycles and Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,623 participants
Where
288 sitesin 19 countries
Study dates
21 Aug 2008to 14 Jul 2016
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Must understand and voluntarily sign informed consent form
  • Age ≥ 18 years at the time of signing consent
  • Previously untreated, symptomatic multiple myeloma as defined by the 3 criteria below:
  • MM diagnostic criteria (all 3 required):
  • Monoclonal plasma cells in the bone marrow ≥10% and/or presence of a biopsy-proven plasmacytoma
  • Monoclonal protein present in the serum and/or urine
Show all 29Show fewer
  • Myeloma-related organ dysfunction (at least one of the following) [C] Calcium elevation in the blood (serum calcium >10.5 mg/dl or upper limit of normal) [R] Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine >2 mg/dl) [A] Anemia (hemoglobin <10 g/dl or 2 g < laboratory normal) [B] Lytic bone lesions or osteoporosis
  • AND have measurable disease by protein electrophoresis analyses as defined by the following:
  • IgG multiple myeloma: Serum monoclonal paraprotein (M-protein) level ≥ 1.0 g/dl or urine M-protein level ≥ 200 mg/24 hours
  • IgA multiple myeloma: Serum M-protein level ≥ 0.5 g/dl or urine M-protein level ≥ 200 mg/24 hours
  • IgM multiple myeloma (IgM M-protein plus lytic bone disease documented by skeletal survey plain films): Serum M-protein level ≥ 1.0 g/dl or urine M-protein level ≥ 200mg/24hours
  • IgD multiple myeloma: Serum M-protein level ≥ 0.05 g/dl or urine M-protein level ≥ 200 mg/24 hours
  • Light chain multiple myeloma: Serum M-protein level ≥ 1.0 g/dl or urine M-protein level ≥ 200 mg/24 hours
  • AND are at least 65 years of age or older or, if younger than 65 years of age, are not candidates for stem cell transplantation because:
  • The patient declines to undergo stem cell transplantation or
  • Stem cell transplantation is not available to the patient due to cost or other reasons
  • ECOG performance status of 0, 1, or 2
  • Able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements
  • Females of child-bearing potential (FCBP)^2:
  • Must agree to undergo two medically supervised pregnancy tests prior to starting study therapy with either Rd or MPT. The first pregnancy test will be performed within 10-14 days prior to the start of Rd or MPT and the second pregnancy test will be performed within 24 hours prior to the start of Rd or MPT. She must also agree to ongoing pregnancy testing during the course of the study and after the end of study therapy. This applies even if the patient practices complete and continued sexual abstinence.
  • Must commit to either continued abstinence from heterosexual intercourse (which must be reviewed on a monthly basis) or agree to use and be able to comply with effective contraception without interruption, 28 days prior to starting study drug, during the study therapy (including during periods of dose interruptions), and for 28 days after discontinuation of study therapy.
  • Male Patients:
  • Must agree to use a condom during sexual contact with a FCBP, even if they have had a vasectomy, throughout study drug therapy, during any dose interruption and after cessation of study therapy.
  • Must agree to not donate semen during study drug therapy and for a period after end of study drug therapy.
  • Must practice complete abstinence or agree to use a condom during sexual contact with a pregnant female or a female of childbearing potential while participating in the study, during dose interruptions and for at least 28 days following study drug discontinuation, even if he has undergone a successful vasectomy.
  • All patients must:
  • Have an understanding that the study drug could have a potential teratogenic risk.
  • Agree to abstain from donating blood while taking study drug therapy and following discontinuation of study drug therapy.
  • Agree not to share study medication with another person. All FCBP and male patients must be counseled about pregnancy precautions and risks of fetal exposure.

Who cannot join

  • Previous treatment with anti-myeloma therapy (does not include radiotherapy, bisphosphonates, or a single short course of steroid [i.e., less than or equal to the equivalent of dexamethasone 40 mg/day for 4 days; such a short course of steroid treatment must not have been given within 14 days of randomization]).
  • Any serious medical condition that places the patient at an unacceptable risk if he or she participates in this study. Examples of such a medical condition are, but are not limited to, patient with unstable cardiac disease as defined by: Cardiac events such as MI within the past 6 months, NYHA heart failure class III-IV, uncontrolled atrial fibrillation or hypertension; patients with conditions requiring chronic steroid or immunosuppressive treatment, such as rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and lupus, that likely need additional steroid or immunosuppressive treatments in addition to the study treatment.
  • Pregnant or lactating females.
  • Any of the following laboratory abnormalities:
  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 1,000/µL (1.0 x 109/L)
  • Untransfused platelet count < 50,000 cells/µL (50 x 10^9/L)
Show all 19Show fewer
  • Serum SGOT/AST or SGPT/ALT > 3.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Renal failure requiring hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis.
  • Prior history of malignancies, other than multiple myeloma, unless the patient has been free of the disease for ≥ 3 years. Exceptions include the following:
  • Basal cell carcinoma of the skin
  • Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
  • Carcinoma in situ of the cervix
  • Carcinoma in situ of the breast
  • Incidental histological finding of prostate cancer (TNM stage of T1a or T1b)
  • Patients who are unable or unwilling to undergo antithrombotic therapy.
  • Peripheral neuropathy of > grade 2 severity.
  • Known HIV positivity or active infectious hepatitis, type A, B, or C. Primary AL (immunoglobulin light chain) amyloidosis and myeloma complicated by amyloidosis.
  • 1 A variety of other types of end organ dysfunctions can occasionally occur and lead to a need for therapy. Such dysfunction is sufficient to support classification as myeloma if proven to be myeloma-related.
  • 2 A FCBP is a sexually mature woman who: 1) has not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy or 2) has not been naturally postmenopausal (i.e., amenorrhea following cancer therapy does not rule out childbearing potential) for at least 24 consecutive months (i.e., has had menses at any time in the preceding 24 consecutive months).

Trial locations and contacts

288 sites in 19 countries.

288 sites in 19 countries

France68 sites
  • Clinique Claude BernardOncologie

    Albi, 81000

  • CHU Sud

    Amiens, 80054

  • CHRU Hopital du bocage

    Angers, 49033

  • CH Argenteuil Victor Dupouy

    Argenteuil, 95100

  • Centre Hospitalier de la cote basque

    Bayonne, 64109

  • Centre Hospitalier

    Blois, 41016

  • Hopital Avicenne

    Bobigny, 93009

  • Institut Bergonie Centre Regional de Lutte Contre Le Cancer de Bordeaux Et Sud Ouest

    Bordeaux, 33076

  • Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine

    Bordeaux, 33300

  • Hopital de Fleyriat

    Bourg-en-Bresse, 01012

  • Hopital Augustin Morvan

    Brest, 29609

  • CHU

    Caen, 14033

  • Centre Francois Baclesse

    Caen, 14076

  • CH

    Cannes, 06401

  • CH Rene Dubois

    Cergy-Pontoise, 95303

  • Centre Hospitalier William Morey

    Chalon/Saone Cedex, 71321

  • Hopital Antoine Beclere

    Clamart, 92141

  • Hopital dinstruction des armees Percy

    Clamart, 92141

  • Chu Estaing

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63000

  • CH Louis Pasteur

    Colmar, 68024

  • Hopital Henri Mondor

    Créteil, 94010

  • CHRU Hopital du bocage

    Dijon, 21034

  • Centre Hospitalier General

    Dunkirk, 59385

  • Institut Prive de Cancerologie

    Grenoble, 38034

  • CHRU

    Grenoble, 38043

  • Centre Hospitalier Departemental

    La Roche-sur-Yon, 85925

  • CH

    Le Chesnay, 78157

  • Hopital J MonodRhumato Nord

    Le Havre, 76000

  • Kremlin Bicetre

    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 942975

  • Centre Jean Bernard

    Le Mans, 72000

  • Centre Hospitalier

    Le Mans, 72037

  • GH de Institut Catholique St Vincent

    Lille, 59000

  • CHRU-Hopital Claude Huriez

    Lille, 59037

  • CH - Hôpital Dupuytren

    Limoges, 87042

  • Centre Leon Berard

    Lyon, 69008

  • CHU Hopital Edouard Herriot

    Lyon, 69437

  • Centre Hospitalier de Valence

    Lyon, 69495

  • Institut Paoli-Calmettes

    Marseille, 13009

  • Hopital de Mercy

    Metz, 57085

  • Clinique Pont de chaume Oncologie et Radiotherapie

    Montauban, 82017

  • CHU Montpellier - Hôpital Lapeyronie

    Montpellier, 34295

  • Hopital Emile Muller

    Mulhouse, 68000

  • CHRU - Hotel Dieu

    Nantes, 44035

  • Centre Antoine Lacassagne Oncologie medicale et Hematologie

    Nice, 06050

  • Hopital de lArchet 1

    Nice, 06202

  • CH La Source

    Orléans, 45000

  • Hopital Saint Louis

    Paris, 75010

  • Hopital Necker

    Paris, 75015

  • CHU Hôpital St-Antoine

    Paris, 75571

  • Hopital Cochin

    Paris, 75679

  • CHRU - Hopital du Haut Leveque

    Pessac, 33604

  • CU CHU Clemenceau

    Poitiers, 86021

  • Hopital R. Debre

    Reims, 51032

  • CHU Reims - Hôpital Maison Blanche

    Reims, 51100

  • CHRU Hôpital de Pontchaillou

    Rennes, 35033

  • CHRU Hopital sud Medecine Interne

    Rennes, 35056

  • CHG Rodez

    Rodez, 12027

  • Centre Henri Becquerel

    Rouen, 76038

  • Centre Hospitalier Yves Le Foll

    Saint-Brieuc, 22027

  • Centre Rene Huguenin

    Saint-Cloud, 92210

  • Institut de Cancerologie de Loire

    Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42270

  • CHRU Hôpital de Hautepierre

    Strasbourg, 67098

  • CHRU Hopital Purpan

    Toulouse, TSA 40031-31059

  • CHRU Hopital Bretonneau

    Tours, 37044

  • CHRU Hopital Trousseau

    Tours, 37044

  • CHRU Hôpitaux de Brabois

    Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511

  • CH P. Chubert

    Vannes, 56017

  • Institut Gustave Roussy

    Villejuif, 94805

Other trials in France

United States32 sites
  • St. Luke's Hospital and Health Network

    Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18104

  • Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders

    Bethesda, Maryland, 20817

  • Billings Clinic

    Billings, Montana, 59107

  • University of AL Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

  • Gabrail Cancer Center Research

    Canton, Ohio, 44718

  • Southern Illinois Hematology Oncology

    Centralia, Illinois, 62801

  • Orchard Healthcare Research, Inc.

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • John H Stroger Hospital of Cook County

    Chicago, Illinois, 60612

  • Rush University Medical Center

    Chicago, Illinois, 60612

  • University Hospitals of Cleveland

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

  • Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • The Cancer Center

    Collierville, Tennessee, 38017

  • Dakota Cancer Institute

    Fargo, North Dakota, 58103

  • Gainesville Heme Oncology Associates

    Gainesville, Florida, 32607

  • University of Texas Medical Branch

    Galveston, Texas, 77555-0561

  • Ingalls Cancer Institute

    Harvey, Illinois, 60426-3558

  • Baptist Cancer Institute

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32207

  • Arena Oncology Associates, PC

    Lake Success, New York, 11042

  • Cedar Sinai Medical Center Dept of Medicine

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

  • University of Tennessee Cancer Institute

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38104

  • Integrated Community Oncology Network

    Orange Park, Florida, 32073

  • University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • Kaiser Permanente Northwest Oncology Hematology

    Portland, Oregon, 97227

  • Mayo Clinic Cancer Center

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

  • University of California, San Francisco- California

    San Francisco, California, 94143

  • Maine Center for Cancer Medicine Blood Disorders

    Scarborough, Maine, 04074

  • Swedish Cancer Institute

    Seattle, Washington, 98104

  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

    Seattle, Washington, 98109

  • Gulf Coast Oncology

    St. Petersburg, Florida, 33705

  • Stanford University Stanford

    Stanford, California, 94305

  • Palm Beach Cancer Institute, LLC

    West Palm Beach, Florida, 33401

  • Cancer Center of Kansas

    Wichita, Kansas, 67124

Other trials in United States

Canada23 sites
  • University of Calgary

    Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9

  • Cross Cancer Institute

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2

  • Hospital Charles LeMoyne

    Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2H1

  • Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H2Y9

  • Juravinski Cancer Centre

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2

  • British Columbia Cancer Agency

    Kelowna, British Columbia, V1Y 5L3

  • Hopital de la Cite-de-la-Sante

    Laval, Quebec, H7M 3L9

  • Hotel-Dieu de Levis

    Lévis, Quebec, G5V 3Z1

  • London Health Science Centre

    London, Ontario, N6A 4G5

  • Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal

    Montreal, Quebec, G4H 1C5

  • Hospital Maisonneuve - Rosemont

    Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4

  • CHUM- Hopital Notre-Dame

    Montreal, Quebec, H2L4M1

  • McGill University

    Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1S6

  • Sir Mortimer B. Davis - Jewish Genl

    Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2

  • Royal Columbian Hospital

    New Westminster, British Columbia, V3M 1X4

  • Ottawa Hospital

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6

  • CHUQ - Hotel-Dieu de QuebecHematology - Oncology

    Québec, G1R 2J6

  • Saint John Regional Hospital

    Saint John, New Brunswick, E2L 3L6

  • BC Cancer Agency - Fraser Valley Centre

    Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 1Z2

  • Odette Cancer Centre

    Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5

  • Princess Margaret Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9

  • Leukemia/BMT Program of BCDiv of Hem, Vancouver Gen Hosp

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9

  • Vancouver Island Cancer Center

    Victoria, British Columbia, V8R 6V5

Other trials in Canada

Spain20 sites
  • Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol

    Badalona (Barcelona), 8916

  • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

    Barcelona, 08025

  • Instituto Catalan de Oncologia-Hospital Duran

    Barcelona, 08907

  • Hospital Reina Sofia

    Córdoba, 14004

  • Hospital de Donosti

    Donostia / San Sebastian, 20014

  • Hospital Univ. Josep Trueta

    Girona, 17007

  • Hospital Clinico San Carlos

    Madrid, 28040

  • Hospital 12 de Octubre

    Madrid, 28041

  • Hospital Universitario La Paz

    Madrid, 28046

  • Hospital Clinico Virgen de la Victoria

    Málaga, 29010

  • Hospital General Universitario Morales Messeguer

    Murcia, 30008

  • Hospital Son Llatzer

    Palma de Mallorca, 7198

  • Clinica Universitaria de Navarra,

    Pamplona, 31008

  • Hospital Sant Pau

    Reus, 43201

  • Hospital Universtario Marques de Valdecilla

    Santander, 39008

  • Hospital Clinico Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, 15706

  • Hosptial La Fe

    Valencia, 46009

  • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia

    Valencia, 46010

  • Hospital Clinico Universitario Lozano Blesa

    Zaragoza, 50009

  • Hospital Miguel Servet

    Zaragoza, 50009

Other trials in Spain

Italy18 sites
  • Policlinico S. Orsola

    Bologna, 40138

  • Oncologia Medica, Università della Magna Grecia

    Catanzaro, 88100

  • Clinica Ematologica, A.O.U. San Martino di Genova

    Genova, 16132

  • Ematologia ed Immunologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Vito Fazzi di Lecce

    Lecce, 73100

  • Unità Operativa di Oncoematologia, Ospedale di Matera

    Matera, 75100

  • U.O. di Ematologia e Trapianto di Midollo Osseo

    Milan, 20132

  • Istituto Europeo di Oncologia - IEO

    Milan, 20141

  • Presidio Ospedaliero A. Perrino

    Milan, 20141

  • Policlinico di Modena

    Modena, 41100

  • Oncoematologia, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale

    Naples, 80131

  • Casa di Cura La Maddalena, Divisione di Ematologia

    Palermo, 90146

  • Policlinico San Matteo Universita Di Pavia

    Pavia, 27100

  • Ospedale Civile

    Piacenza, 29100

  • A.O. Universitaria Ospedale S.Chiara Dip.Oncologia, Div. Ematologia

    Pisa, 56126

  • Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova

    Reggio Emilia, 42100

  • Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena, Struttura Complessa Ematologia ed Unita di Cellule Staminali

    Roma, 00144

  • Azienda Policlinico Umberto I, Universita La Sapienzadi Roma

    Rome, 00161

  • Ospedale Molinette

    Torino, 10126

Other trials in Italy

Australia17 sites
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital

    Adelaide, South Australia, 5000

  • Flinders Medical Centre

    Bedford Park, 5042

  • Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Divsion of Haematology Medical Oncology

    East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002

  • Western Hospital

    Footscray, Victoria, 3011

  • Frankston Hospital

    Frankston, Victoria, 3199

  • Geelong Hospital

    Geelong, 3220

  • Gosford Hospital

    Gosford, 2250

  • Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

    Herston, 4029

  • Cabrini Hospital

    Malvern, 3144

  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital

    Parkville, 3050

  • Royal Perth Hospital

    Perth, 6000

  • Gold Coast Hospital

    Southport, 4215

  • Royal North Shore Hospital

    St Leonards, 2065

  • Westmead Hospital

    Wentworthville, 2145

  • Border Medical Oncology

    Wodonga, 3690

  • Wollongong Hospital

    Wollongong, 2500

  • Princess Alexandra Hospital

    Woolloongabba, 4102

Other trials in Australia

Germany17 sites
  • Medizinische Kinik und Poliklinik I

    Dresden, D-01307

  • Universitaetsklinikum Dusseldorf Klinik fuer Haematologie

    Düsseldorf, 40225

  • Universitatsklinikum Essen-

    Essen, 45122

  • Staedtische Kliniken Frankfurt am Main Hochst

    Frankfurt am Main, 65929

  • Universitatsklinikum Giessen

    Giessen, 35385

  • Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald

    Greifswald, 17487

  • Askepios Klinik St. Georg

    Hamburg, 20099

  • Universitatsklinikum Jena

    Jena, 07740

  • Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II

    Leipzig, 04103

  • Universitatsklinikum schleswig-Holstein

    Lübeck, 23538

  • Klinikum der Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universtat

    München, 81377

  • Medizinische Klinik III Klinikum der Universität München-Großhadern

    München, 81377

  • Poliklinik A

    Münster, 48129

  • Medizinische Fakultat der Universitat Rostock

    Rostock, 18057

  • Zentrum F. Innere Medizin II Robert- Bosch-Krankenhaus GmBH

    Stuttgart, D -70376

  • Medizinische Klinik - Abteilung II

    Tübingen, 72076

  • Klinik fur Innere Medizin III

    Ulm, 89081

Other trials in Germany

United Kingdom17 sites
  • Gwynedd Hospital

    Bangor, LL57 2PW

  • Royal United Hospital

    Bath, BA1 3NG

  • Belfast City Hospital Haematology Department

    Belfast Northern Ireland, BT9 7AB

  • Birminghman QE

    Birmingham West Midlands, B15 2TH

  • Royal Bournemouth Hosp

    Bournemouth Dorset, BH7 7DW

  • Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre

    Bristol, BS2 8ED

  • Addenbrooke's Hospital

    Cambridge, CB2 2QQ

  • University Hospital of Wales - Cardiff

    Cardiff, CF14 4XW

  • The Beatson West of Scotland Centre

    Glasgow, G12 0YN

  • Dept of Haematology St Bartholomews Hospital

    London, EC1A 7BE

  • Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital - London

    London, SE1 9RT

  • Royal Free Hospital

    London, W12 0HS

  • Churchhill Hospital

    Oxford, OX3 7LI

  • Derriford Hospital

    Plymouth Crownhill Devon, PL6 8DH

  • Royal Hallamshire Hospital Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

    Sheffield, S10 2JF

  • Pinderfields General Hospital

    West Yorkshire, WF1 4DG

  • New Cross Hospital- Wolverhampton

    Wolverhampton, WV10 OPQ

Other trials in United Kingdom

South Korea15 sites
  • Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital

    Anyang, 431-070

  • Inje University Busan Paik Hospital

    Busan, 614-735

  • Daegu Catholic University Medical Center 3056-6

    Daegu, 705-718

  • Chungnam National University Hospital

    Daejeon, 301-721

  • National Cancer Center

    Gyeonggi-do, 410-769

  • Hwasun Chonnam National University Hospital

    Hwasun-goon, 519-803

  • Gachon University Gil Hospital

    Incheon, 405-760

  • Chonbuk National University Hospital 42

    Jeonju, 561-712

  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

    Seongnam, 463-707

  • Severance Hospital

    Seongsanno, 120-752

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul, 110-744

  • Samsung Medical Center

    Seoul, 135-710

  • The Catholic University of Korea Seoul - Saint Mary's Hospital

    Seoul, 137-701

  • Asan Medical Center

    Seoul, 138-736

  • Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital

    Seoul, 158-710

Other trials in South Korea

Belgium13 sites
  • ZNA Stuivenberg Centrumziekenhuis

    Antwerp, 2069

  • Les Cliniques du Sud Luxembourg

    Arlon, 6700

  • AZ St-Jan Brugge Oostende AV

    Bruges, 8000

  • Jules Bordet Institut

    Brussels, 1000

  • Hopital Erasme

    Brussels, 1070

  • AZ-VUB

    Brussels, 1090

  • Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc

    Brussels, 1200

  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen

    Edegem, 2650

  • UZ Gent

    Ghent, 9000

  • Virga Jesse Ziekenhuis

    Hasselt, 3500

  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg

    Leuven, 3000

  • H. Hartziekenhuis Roeselare-Menen vzw campus Wilgenstraat

    Roeselare, 8800

  • Cliniques Universitaires UCL de Mont-Godine

    Yvoir, 5530

Other trials in Belgium

Austria11 sites
  • Hospital Leoben

    Leoben, 8700

  • Hospital of Barmherzige Schwestern Linz

    Linz, 4010

  • Hospital of Elisabethinen Linz

    Linz, 4010

  • General Hospital Linz

    Linz, 4021

  • MM-015. Salzburger Landkliniken, St. Johanns-Spital, Universitätsklinik fur Innere Medizin III

    Salzburg, 5020

  • Hospital St. Polten

    Sankt Pölten, 3100

  • Hospital of the Barmherzigen Bruder Vienna

    Vienna, 1020

  • MM-015.Wihelminenspital

    Vienna, 1160

  • MM-015. Medizinische Universität Wien

    Vienna, A-1090

  • Hospital Wels

    Wels, 4600

  • Hospital Wiener Neustadt

    Wiener Neustadt

Other trials in Austria

Switzerland7 sites
  • Abteilung Onkologie Haematologie des Kantonsspitals Aarau

    Aarau, 5001

  • UniversitatsSpital Basel

    Basel, 4031

  • Inselsspital Bern

    Bern, 3010

  • Kantonsspital Graubunden

    Chur, 7000

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois CHUV

    Lausanne, 1011

  • Kantonsspital Munsterlingen

    Münsterlingen, 8596

  • Kantonsspital Winterthur

    Winterthur, 8400

Other trials in Switzerland

Greece6 sites
  • Alexandra Hospital, University of Athens

    Athens, 11528

  • Attiko Hospital of Athens

    Athens, 124

  • Evangelismos Hospital of Athens

    Athens

  • University of Athens

    Athens

  • Metaxa Hospital Peiraias

    Piraeus, 18537

  • Theagenio Anticancer Hospital of Thessaloniki

    Thessaloniki, 540 07

Other trials in Greece

Portugal6 sites
  • Hospital de Sao Marcos

    Braga

  • Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra

    Coimbra, 3000-075

  • Instituto Portugues de Oncologia de Lisboa

    Lisbon, 1099-023

  • Hospital de Santa Maria

    Lisbon, 1649-035

  • Instituto Português de Oncologia Porto

    Porto, 4200-072

  • Hospital de Santo Antonio- Porto

    Porto

Other trials in Portugal

China5 sites
  • Chaoyang Hospital

    Beijing, 100020

  • Peking University People's Hospital

    Beijing, 100044

  • West China Hospital of Sichuan University

    Chengdu, 610041

  • Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University

    Shanghai, 200025

  • Blood Disease Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College

    Tianjin, 300041

Other trials in China

Sweden4 sites
  • Linkoping University Hospital

    Linköping, SE 581 85

  • Karolinska University HospitalSolna

    Stockholm, SE 17176

  • St. Görans Hospital

    Stockholm, SE- 11281

  • Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge

    Stockholm, SE-14186

Other trials in Sweden

Ireland3 sites
  • Adelaide and Meath Hospital

    Dublin, 24

  • Mater Misercordiae Hospital

    Dublin, 7

  • University Hospital Galway

    Galway, ST46QG

Other trials in Ireland

New Zealand3 sites
  • Auckland City Hospital

    Auckland, 1023

  • Christchurch Hospital

    Christchurch, 8011

  • Wellington Hospital

    Newtown, 6021

Other trials in New Zealand

Taiwan3 sites
  • China Medical University Hospital

    Taichung, 40447

  • Veteran General Hospital - Taipei

    Taipei, 11217

  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    Tapei, 10002

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: A Phase III, Randomized, Open-label, 3-arm Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide(REVLIMID) Plus Low-dose Dexamethasone When Given Until Progressive Disease or for 18 Four-week Cycles Versus the Combination of Melphalan, Prednisone, and Thalidomide Given for 12 Six-week Cycles in Patients With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Who Are Either 65 Years of Age or Older or Not Candidates for Stem Cell Transplantation.

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of Lenalidomide plus low dose dexamethasone to that of the combination of melphalan, prednisone and thalidomide.

Read the detailed description

CC-5013-MM020/IFM 07-01 is a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label, 3-arm study that will compare the efficacy and safety of two Lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone regimens given for two different durations of time (i.e., until progressive disease [PD] or for up to a maximum of 18 four-week cycles) to that of MPT given for a maximum of 12 six-week cycles.

Being tested
Lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone, Lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone given for 18 four-week cycles, Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide
Keywords
newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, Lenalidomide, Revlimid, phase III
Medical subject headings
Multiple Myeloma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasoneDrug

    Also called Revlimid

    Lenalidomide - oral, 2.5mg, 5mg, 10mg, 15mg 20mg, or 25 mg capsules, given either days 1-21 of each 28 day cycles or given every other day for 21 days until documentation of PD.

    Dexamethasone - oral 4mg tablets for a total dose of 20mg or 40 mg given days 1,8,15 and 22 of each 28 day cycle up to disease progression

  • Lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone given for 18 four-week cyclesDrug

    Also called Revlimid

    lenalidomide - oral, 2.5mg, 5mg, 10mg, 15mg, 20 mg or 25 mg capsules given on days 1-21 of each 28 day cycle or every other day for 21 days for 18 cycles.

    Dexamethasone - oral 4mg tablets for a total dose of 20mg or 40 mg given days 1,8,15 and 22 of each 28 day cycle for 18 cycles

  • Melphalan, Prednisone and ThalidomideDrug

    Also called Prednisone, Thalomid

    Melphalan - oral, 2mg tablets dosed at either 0.25mg/kg, 0.125 mg/kg, 0.20mg/kg or 0.10mg/kg on days 1-4 of each 42 day cycle up to 12 cycles Prednisone - oral, 5mg, 10mg, 20 mg and 50 mg tablets dosed at 2mg/kg daily days 1-4 of each 42 day cycle for up to 12 cycles Thalidomide - oral, 50mg, 100mg and 200 mg capsules dosed at either 100mg or 200 mg daily on days 1-41 of each 42 day cycle for up to 12 cycles

Study groups in NCT00689936
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Lenalidomide / Dexamethasone until disease progressionExperimentalLenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone given until disease progression
Receives: Drug: Lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone
Lenalidomide / Dexamethasone for 18 cyclesExperimentalLenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone given for 18 four-week cycles
Receives: Drug: Lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone given for 18 four-week cycles
Melphalan, Prednisone, and Thalidomide (MPT) for 12 cyclesActive comparatorCombination of Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide given for 12 six-week cycles
Receives: Drug: Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on the Response Assessment by the Independent Review Adjudication Committee (IRAC)

    PFS was calculated as the time from randomization to the first documented PD or death due to any cause during the study, which ever occurred first based on the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria (IMWG). Those who withdrew for any reason or received another anti-myeloma therapy without documented PD were censored on the date of their last response assessment, prior to receiving any other anti-myeloma therapy. Censoring rules for PFS: - No baseline assessments and no progression or death documented within the 2 scheduled assessments; Death within the lst two assessments without any adequate response assessment; Progression documented between scheduled assessments; Death between adequate assessments; no progression; study discontinuations for reasons other than PD or death; new anti-myeloma started prior to PD; death or PD after an extended lost to follow-up time period (2 or more missed scheduled assessment's).

    Measured: From date of randomization until the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013. Median follow-up time for all participants was 17.1 months.

  2. Kaplan-Meier Estimates of PFS Based on the Response Assessment by the Investigator At the Time of Final Analysis

    PFS was calculated as the time from randomization to the first documented PD or death due to any cause during the study, which ever occurred first based on the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria (IMWG). Those who withdrew for any reason or received another anti-myeloma therapy without documented PD were censored on the date of their last response assessment, prior to receiving any other anti-myeloma therapy. Censoring rules for PFS: - No baseline assessments and no progression or death documented within the 2 scheduled assessments; Death within the lst two assessments without any adequate response assessment; Progression documented between scheduled assessments; Death between adequate assessments; no progression; study discontinuations for reasons other than PD or death; new anti-myeloma started prior to PD; death or PD after an extended lost to follow-up time period (2 or more missed scheduled assessment's).

    Measured: From date of randomization to date of data cut-off date of 21 January 2016; median follow-up for all participants was 17.7 months

Secondary outcomes (43)
  1. Kaplan Meier Estimates of Overall Survival at the Time of Final Analysis (OS)

    Overall survival was defined as the time between randomization and death. Participants, who died, regardless of the cause of death, were considered to have had an event. All participants who were lost to follow-up prior to the end of the trial or who were withdrawn from the trial were censored at the time of last contact. Participants who were still being treated were censored at the last available date the participant was known to be alive.

    Measured: From date of randomization to date of data cut-off date of 21 January 2016; median follow-up for all participants was 48.3 months

  2. Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response Based on IRAC Review

    Objective response according to IMWG Uniform Response Criteria was defined as a best overall response including a complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR) based on the IRAC Review. A CR is defined as: negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤5% plasma cells in BM; A VGPR is serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 hours; A PR is: ≥50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg/24 hours. If present at baseline a ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas.

    Measured: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm

  3. Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response Based on Investigator Assessment at Time of Final Analysis

    Objective response according to IMWG Uniform Response Criteria was defined as a best overall response including a complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR) based on the IRAC Review. A CR is defined s: negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤5% plasma cells in BM; A VGPR is serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 hours; A PR is: ≥50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg/24 hours. If present at baseline a ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas.

    Measured: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 21 January 2016; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm

  4. Kaplan Meier Estimates of Duration of Myeloma Response as Determined by the IRAC

    Duration of response was defined as the duration from the time when the response criteria were first met for CR or VGPR or PR based on IMWG criteria until the first date the response criteria were met for progressive disease or until the participant died from any cause, whichever occurred first.

    Measured: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013; median follow-up for responders was 20.1 months

  5. Kaplan Meier Estimates of Duration of Myeloma Response as Determined by an Investigator Assessment at Time of Final Analysis

    Duration of response was defined as the duration from the time when the response criteria were first met for CR or VGPR or PR based on IMWG criteria until the first date the response criteria were met for progressive disease or until the participant died from any cause, whichever occurred first.

    Measured: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment; data cut-off date of 21 January 2016; median follow-up for responders was 19.9 months

  6. Time to First Response Based on the Review by the IRAC

    The time to first myeloma response was defined as the time from randomization to the time when the response criteria for at least a PR was first met based on the IMWG criteria.

    Measured: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm

  7. Time to First Response Based on the Investigator Assessment at the Time of Final Analysis

    The time to first myeloma response was defined as the time from randomization to the time when the response criteria for at least a PR was first met based on the IMWG criteria assessed by the investigator.

    Measured: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 21 January 2016; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm.

  8. Kaplan Meier Estimates of Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)

    TTF is defined as the time between the randomization and discontinuation of study treatment for any reason, including disease progression (determined by IRAC based on the IMWG response criteria), treatment toxicity, start of another anti-myeloma therapy (AMT) or death.

    Measured: From date of randomization until the data cut-off of 24 May 2013; median follow-up for all participants was 16.1 months.

  9. Kaplan Meier Estimates of Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) at the Time of Final Analysis

    TTF is defined as the time between the randomization and discontinuation of study treatment for any reason, including disease progression (determined by the investigators assessment based on the IMWG response criteria), treatment toxicity, start of another anti-myeloma therapy (AMT) or death.

    Measured: From date of randomization until the data cut-off date of 21 January 2016; median follow up for all participants was 16.1 months.

  10. Kaplan Meier Estimates for Time to Second-line Anti-myeloma Treatment (AMT)

    Time to second-line anti-myeloma therapy was defined as time from randomization to the start of another non-protocol anti-myeloma therapy.

    Measured: From date of randomization until the data cut-off of 24 May 2013; median follow-up for all participants was 23.0 months

  11. Kaplan Meier Estimates of Time to Second Line Therapy AMT at the Time of Final Analysis

    Time to second-line anti-myeloma therapy is defined as time from randomization to the start of another non-protocol anti-myeloma therapy. Those who do not receive another anti-myeloma therapy were censored at the last assessment or follow-up visit known to have received no new therapy.

    Measured: From date of randomization until the data cut-off of date 21 January 2016; median follow-up for all participants was 23.0 months

  12. Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response After Second-line Anti-myeloma Treatment at the Time of Final Analysis

    Objective response according to IMWG Uniform Response Criteria was defined as a best overall response including a complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR) based on the IRAC Review. A CR is defined s: negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤5% plasma cells in BM; A VGPR is serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 hours; A PR is: ≥50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg/24 hours. If present at baseline a ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas.

    Measured: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment; data cut-off date of 21 January 2016; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm

  13. Percentage of Participants With a Myeloma Response by Adverse Risk Cytogenetic Risk Category Based on IRAC Review.

    Participants were placed in adverse and non-adverse cytogenetic risk categories at baseline and response rates evaluated. Adverse Risk: t(4;14), t(14;16), del(13q) or monosomy 13, del(17p), 1q gain Favorable Hyperdiploidy: : t(11;14), gains of 5/9/15; Normal: a normal result, gains other than 5/9/15, IgH deletion Uncertain risk: probes used for analysis cannot place participant in any of the other risk categories. Objective response = best overall response including CR, VGPR or PR based on the IRAC Review; A CR is negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤5% plasma cells in BM; A VGPRis serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 hours; A PR is ≥50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg/24 hours. If present at baseline a ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas.

    Measured: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm

  14. Percentage of Participants With a Myeloma Response by Favorable Hyperdiploidy Risk Cytogenetic Risk Category Based on IRAC Review

    Participants were placed in adverse and non-adverse cytogenetic risk categories at baseline and response rates evaluated. Adverse Risk: t(4;14), t(14;16), del(13q) or monosomy 13, del(17p), 1q gain Favorable Hyperdiploidy: : t(11;14), gains of 5/9/15; Normal: a normal result, gains other than 5/9/15, IgH deletion Uncertain risk: probes used for analysis cannot place participant in any of the other risk categories. Objective response = best overall response including CR, VGPR or PR based on the IRAC Review; A CR is negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤5% plasma cells in BM; A VGPRis serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 hours; A PR is ≥50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg/24 hours. If present at baseline a ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas.

    Measured: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm

  15. Percentage of Participants With a Myeloma Response by Normal Risk Cytogenetic Risk Category Based on IRAC Review

    Participants were placed in adverse and non-adverse cytogenetic risk categories at baseline and response rates evaluated. Adverse Risk: t(4;14), t(14;16), del(13q) or monosomy 13, del(17p), 1q gain Favorable Hyperdiploidy: : t(11;14), gains of 5/9/15; Normal: a normal result, gains other than 5/9/15, IgH deletion Uncertain risk: probes used for analysis cannot place participant in any of the other risk categories. Objective response = best overall response including CR, VGPR or PR based on the IRAC Review; A CR is negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤5% plasma cells in BM; A VGPRis serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 hours; A PR is ≥50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg/24 hours. If present at baseline a ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas.

    Measured: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm

  16. Percentage of Participants With a Myeloma Response by Uncertain Risk Cytogenetic Risk Category Based on IRAC Review

    Participants were placed in adverse and non-adverse cytogenetic risk categories at baseline and response rates evaluated. Adverse Risk: t(4;14), t(14;16), del(13q) or monosomy 13, del(17p), 1q gain Favorable Hyperdiploidy: : t(11;14), gains of 5/9/15; Normal: a normal result, gains other than 5/9/15, IgH deletion Uncertain risk: probes used for analysis cannot place participant in any of the other risk categories. Objective response = best overall response including CR, VGPR or PR based on the IRAC Review; A CR is negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤5% plasma cells in BM; A VGPRis serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 hours; A PR is ≥50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg/24 hours. If present at baseline a ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas.

    Measured: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm

  17. Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status Domain

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better Global Health Status/QOL. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in QOL or functioning and positive values indicate improvement.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit

  18. Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning/support. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit

  19. Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning Domain

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning/support. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit

  20. Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Domain

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning/support. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit

  21. Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Cognitive Functioning Domain

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Cognitive Functioning Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning/support. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1, (Baseline) then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit

  22. Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Social Functioning Domain

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Social Functioning Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning/support. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit

  23. Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Domain

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate improvement in symptoms and positive values indicate worsening symptoms.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation

  24. Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Domain

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate improvement in symptoms and positive values indicate worsening symptoms.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit

  25. Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Nausea/Vomiting Domain

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Nausea/Vomiting Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate improvement in symptoms and positive values indicate worsening symptoms.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit

  26. Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnea Domain

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnoea Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate improvement in symptoms and positive values indicate worsening symptoms.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit

  27. Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Insomnia Domain

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Insomnia Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate improvement in symptoms and positive values indicate worsening symptoms.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit

  28. Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss Domain

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of appetite loss. Negative change from Baseline values indicate improvement in appetite and positive values indicate worsening of appetite.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit

  29. Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Constipation Domain

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Constipation Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of constipation. Negative change from Baseline values indicate improvement in constipation and positive values indicate worsening of constipation.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit

  30. Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Diarrhea Domain

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Diarrhea Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of diarrhea. Negative change from Baseline values indicate improvement in diarrhea and positive values indicate worsening of diarrhea.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit

  31. Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Financial Difficulties Domain

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Financial Difficulties Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of financial difficulties. Negative change from Baseline values indicate improvement in financial difficulties and positive values indicate worsening of financial difficulties.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit

  32. Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms Scale

    EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma. EORTC QLQ-MY20 includes four scales: disease symptoms, treatment side-effects, future perspective, and body image. Questions used a 4-point scale (from 1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores were averaged, and transformed to a 0-100 scale; a higher score indicates more severe disease symptom(s).

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit

  33. Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Side Effects Treatment Scale

    EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma. EORTC QLQ-MY20 includes four scales: disease symptoms, treatment side-effects, future perspective, and body image. Questions used a 4-point scale (from 1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores were averaged, and transformed to a 0-100 scale; a higher score represents a more severe overall side effect of treatment.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit

  34. Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Future Perspective Scale

    EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma. EORTC QLQ-MY20 includes four scales: disease symptoms, treatment side-effects, future perspective, and body image. Questions used a 4-point scale (from 1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores were averaged, and transformed to a 0-100 scale; for the future perspective scale, a higher score indicates a better perspective of the future.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit

  35. Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Body Image Scale

    EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma. EORTC QLQ-MY20 includes four scales: disease symptoms, treatment side-effects, future perspective, and body image. Questions used a 4-point scale (from 1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores were averaged, and transformed to a 0-100 scale; for the body image scale, a higher score indicates a better body image.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit

  36. Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health Utility Index Score

    EQ-5D is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D descriptive health profile comprises five dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 3 levels of response: No problem (1), some problems (2), and extreme problems (3). A unique EQ-5D health state is defined by combining one level from each of the five dimensions into a single utility index score. EQ-5D index values range from -0.59 to 1.00 where higher EQ-5D scores represent better health status. A positive change from baseline score indicates improvement in health status and better health state.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), then Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and Discontinuation visit

  37. Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Rate of Inpatient Hospitalizations Per Year

    HRU was defined as any consumption of healthcare resources directly or indirectly related to the treatment of the patient. HRU Analysis may help in evaluating potential costs and budget impact of new treatments from a payer perspective. The rate of inpatient hospitalizations per patient year was calculated as the total number of hospitalizations divided by the total number of patient-years followed in the study period. Patient-years (PY) were calculated as the duration from baseline to last available HRQL assessment for each patient.

    Measured: Day 1 (randomization) up to last visit completed 25 July 2016

  38. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) During the Active Treatment Phase

    A TEAE is any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first treatment of any study drug, and within 30 days after the last dose of the last study drug. Severity grades according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE) on a 1-5 scale: Grade 1= Mild AE, Grade 2= Moderate AE, Grade 3= Severe AE, Grade 4= Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5=Death related to AE. A serious AE is any AE occurring at any dose that: • Results in death; • Is life-threatening; • Requires or prolongs existing inpatient hospitalization; • Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; • Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; • Constitutes an important medical event.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug through 28 days following the discontinuation visit from active treatment phase; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm

  39. Shift From Baseline to Most Extreme Postbaseline Value in Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) During the Active Treatment Phase

    Renal function was assessed for participants from baseline to the most extreme value in creatinine clearance calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault estimation.

    Measured: Randomization to end of treatment or the data cut off of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm

  40. Shift From Baseline to Most Extreme Postbaseline Value in Absolute Neutrophil Count During the Active Treatment Phase

    Neutrophil counts was assessed for participants from baseline grade to most extreme severity grade using the NCI CTCAE v 3.0 grading scale.

    Measured: Randomization to end of treatment or the data cut off of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm

  41. Shift From Baseline to Most Extreme Postbaseline Value in Hemoglobin During the Active Treatment Phase

    Hemoglobin was assessed for participants from baseline grade to most extreme severity grade using the NCI CTCAE v 3.0 grading scale.

    Measured: Randomization to end of treatment or the data cut off of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm

  42. Shift From Baseline to Most Extreme Postbaseline Value in Platelet Count During the Active Treatment Phase.

    Improvement in platelets was assessed for participants from baseline grade to most extreme severity grade using the NCI CTCAE v 3.0 grading scale.

    Measured: Randomization to end of treatment or the data cut off of 24 May 2013; median duration of treatment was 80.2 weeks in the Rd arm; 72 weeks in the Rd18 arm and 67.1 weeks in the MPT arm

  43. Improvement of Infection Rate by Observing the Historical Data Compared to the Clinical Data Base

    Improvement of infection rate by observing historical data compared to the data within clinical database as not analyzed.

    Measured: From randomization to 24 May 2013

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Jun 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study start21 Aug 2008
  3. Primary completion14 Jul 2016
  4. Study completion14 Jul 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,623 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00689936
Sponsor's protocol ID
CC-5013-MM-020
Other IDs
2007-004823-39
Acronym
FIRST
Status last verified
Nov 2019
First submitted
2 Jun 2008
Last updated
20 Nov 2019
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Dimopoulos MA, Cheung MC, Roussel M, Liu T, Gamberi B, Kolb B, Derigs HG, Eom H, Belhadj K, Lenain P, Van der Jagt R, Rigaudeau S, Dib M, Hall R, Jardel H, Jaccard A, Tosikyan A, Karlin L, Bensinger W, Schots R, Leupin N, Chen G, Marek J, Ervin-Haynes A, Facon T. Impact of renal impairment on outcomes with lenalidomide and dexamethasone treatment in the FIRST trial, a randomized, open-label phase 3 trial in transplant-ineligible patients with multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2016 Mar;101(3):363-70. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2015.133629. Epub 2015 Dec 11.

    PubMed 26659916
  • Hulin C, Belch A, Shustik C, Petrucci MT, Duhrsen U, Lu J, Song K, Rodon P, Pegourie B, Garderet L, Hunter H, Azais I, Eek R, Gisslinger H, Macro M, Dakhil S, Goncalves C, LeBlanc R, Romeril K, Royer B, Doyen C, Leleu X, Offner F, Leupin N, Houck V, Chen G, Ervin-Haynes A, Dimopoulos MA, Facon T. Updated Outcomes and Impact of Age With Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone or Melphalan, Prednisone, and Thalidomide in the Randomized, Phase III FIRST Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct 20;34(30):3609-3617. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.7295.

    PubMed 27325857
  • Delforge M, Minuk L, Eisenmann JC, Arnulf B, Canepa L, Fragasso A, Leyvraz S, Langer C, Ezaydi Y, Vogl DT, Giraldo-Castellano P, Yoon SS, Zarnitsky C, Escoffre-Barbe M, Lemieux B, Song K, Bahlis NJ, Guo S, Monzini MS, Ervin-Haynes A, Houck V, Facon T. Health-related quality-of-life in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the FIRST trial: lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus melphalan, prednisone, thalidomide. Haematologica. 2015 Jun;100(6):826-33. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.120121. Epub 2015 Mar 13.

    PubMed 25769541
  • Benboubker L, Dimopoulos MA, Dispenzieri A, Catalano J, Belch AR, Cavo M, Pinto A, Weisel K, Ludwig H, Bahlis N, Banos A, Tiab M, Delforge M, Cavenagh J, Geraldes C, Lee JJ, Chen C, Oriol A, de la Rubia J, Qiu L, White DJ, Binder D, Anderson K, Fermand JP, Moreau P, Attal M, Knight R, Chen G, Van Oostendorp J, Jacques C, Ervin-Haynes A, Avet-Loiseau H, Hulin C, Facon T; FIRST Trial Team. Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 4;371(10):906-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1402551.

    PubMed 25184863
  • Vogl DT, Delforge M, Song K, Guo S, Gibson CJ, Ervin-Haynes A, Facon T. Long-term health-related quality of life in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma receiving lenalidomide and dexamethasone. Leuk Lymphoma. 2018 Feb;59(2):398-405. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1334125. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

    PubMed 28641472
  • Dumontet C, Hulin C, Dimopoulos MA, Belch A, Dispenzieri A, Ludwig H, Rodon P, Van Droogenbroeck J, Qiu L, Cavo M, Van de Velde A, Lahuerta JJ, Allangba O, Lee JH, Boyle E, Perrot A, Moreau P, Manier S, Attal M, Roussel M, Mohty M, Mary JY, Civet A, Costa B, Tinel A, Gaston-Mathe Y, Facon T. A predictive model for risk of early grade >/= 3 infection in patients with multiple myeloma not eligible for transplant: analysis of the FIRST trial. Leukemia. 2018 Jun;32(6):1404-1413. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0133-x. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

    PubMed 29784907
  • Ailawadhi S, Jacobus S, Sexton R, Stewart AK, Dispenzieri A, Hussein MA, Zonder JA, Crowley J, Hoering A, Barlogie B, Orlowski RZ, Rajkumar SV. Disease and outcome disparities in multiple myeloma: exploring the role of race/ethnicity in the Cooperative Group clinical trials. Blood Cancer J. 2018 Jul 6;8(7):67. doi: 10.1038/s41408-018-0102-7.

    PubMed 29980678
  • Jain T, Sonbol MB, Firwana B, Kolla KR, Almader-Douglas D, Palmer J, Fonseca R. High-Dose Chemotherapy with Early Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Compared to Standard Dose Chemotherapy or Delayed Transplantation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Feb;25(2):239-247. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.09.021. Epub 2018 Sep 20.

    PubMed 30244101
  • Facon T, Dimopoulos MA, Dispenzieri A, Catalano JV, Belch A, Cavo M, Pinto A, Weisel K, Ludwig H, Bahlis NJ, Banos A, Tiab M, Delforge M, Cavenagh JD, Geraldes C, Lee JJ, Chen C, Oriol A, De La Rubia J, White D, Binder D, Lu J, Anderson KC, Moreau P, Attal M, Perrot A, Arnulf B, Qiu L, Roussel M, Boyle E, Manier S, Mohty M, Avet-Loiseau H, Leleu X, Ervin-Haynes A, Chen G, Houck V, Benboubker L, Hulin C. Final analysis of survival outcomes in the phase 3 FIRST trial of up-front treatment for multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018 Jan 18;131(3):301-310. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-07-795047. Epub 2017 Nov 17.

    PubMed 29150421
  • Ailawadhi S, DerSarkissian M, Duh MS, Lafeuille MH, Posner G, Ralston S, Zagadailov E, Ba-Mancini A, Rifkin R. Cost Offsets in the Treatment Journeys of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Clin Ther. 2019 Mar;41(3):477-493.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Feb 14.

    PubMed 30773308
  • Pegourie B, Karlin L, Benboubker L, Orsini-Piocelle F, Tiab M, Auger-Quittet S, Rodon P, Royer B, Leleu X, Bareau B, Cliquennois M, Fuzibet JG, Voog E, Belhadj-Merzoug K, Decaux O, Rey P, Slama B, Leyronnas C, Zarnitsky C, Boyle E, Bosson JL, Pernod G; IFM Group. Apixaban for the prevention of thromboembolism in immunomodulatory-treated myeloma patients: Myelaxat, a phase 2 pilot study. Am J Hematol. 2019 Jun;94(6):635-640. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25459. Epub 2019 Apr 1.

    PubMed 30859608
  • Bahlis NJ, Corso A, Mugge LO, Shen ZX, Desjardins P, Stoppa AM, Decaux O, de Revel T, Granell M, Marit G, Nahi H, Demuynck H, Huang SY, Basu S, Guthrie TH, Ervin-Haynes A, Marek J, Chen G, Facon T. Benefit of continuous treatment for responders with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the randomized FIRST trial. Leukemia. 2017 Nov;31(11):2435-2442. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.111. Epub 2017 Apr 4.

    PubMed 28373701
  • Lu J, Lee JH, Huang SY, Qiu L, Lee JJ, Liu T, Yoon SS, Kim K, Shen ZX, Eom HS, Chen WM, Min CK, Kim HJ, Lee JO, Kwak JY, Yiu W, Chen G, Ervin-Haynes A, Hulin C, Facon T. Continuous treatment with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in Asia: subanalysis of the FIRST trial. Br J Haematol. 2017 Mar;176(5):743-749. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14465. Epub 2017 Jan 20.

    PubMed 28106903

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone, Lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone given for 18 four-week cycles and Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Celgene at 288 sites in 19 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 29 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 288 sites in France, United States, Canada, Spain, Italy and 14 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Aug 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on the Response Assessment by the Independent Review Adjudication Committee (IRAC) (time frame: From date of randomization until the data cut-off date of 24 May 2013. Median follow-up time for all participants was 17.1 months.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00689936, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in