GoiterNCT00692835
Immediate Postoperative Course of Patients With Mini Video Assisted Total Thyroidectomy (miVAT) Versus Classic Total Thyroidectomy (cTT)
A study testing Total Thyroidectomy (Mini Video Assisted Thyroidectomy) and Total Thyroidectomy (Classic Thyroidectomy) in people with Goiter, run by Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki at 1 site in Greece.
Trial summary
Protocol Synopsis Protocol title: Immediate postoperative course of patients with mini Video Assisted Thyroidectomy (miVAT) versus classic Thyroidectomy (cTT) Purpose: Comparison of the immediate postoperative course and complications of the patients using the two techniques Design: Prospective, single-center… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Goiter
- What is being tested?
- Total Thyroidectomy (Mini Video Assisted Thyroidectomy) and Total Thyroidectomy (Classic Thyroidectomy)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGreece
- Study dates
- May 2008to Sep 2012
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient is over 18 years old
- Patient scheduled for a non-emergency operation
- Patient signs and dates a written informed consent form (ICF) and indicates an understanding of the study procedures
Who cannot join
- Patient had a previous operation at the thyroid
- Patient is participating in another clinical trial which may affect this study's outcomes
- Patient in toxic condition (non euthyroid or hypothyroid )
- Patient receiving anticoagulation treatment for other medical condition
- Echographic evidence that the size at least one nodule is more than 4cm
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Greece1 site
3rd Department of Surgery, AHEPA University Hospital
Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, 55236
About this study
Protocol Synopsis
- Protocol title: Immediate postoperative course of patients with mini Video Assisted Thyroidectomy (miVAT) versus classic Thyroidectomy (cTT)
- Purpose: Comparison of the immediate postoperative course and complications of the patients using the two techniques
- Design: Prospective, single-center randomized study
- Patient Population: Male or female subjects 18 years of age or older with nodular goiter who are scheduled for total thyroidectomy (miVAT or T)
- No. of Subjects: 100 patients divided into two groups, estimated up to 1 year to enroll
- Duration of Treatment: During the operation
- Duration of Follow-up: Follow-up will be performed daily while hospitalized, and by phone till the 7th postoperative day
- Endpoints: To evaluate the safety and cost-effectiveness of each technique
Read the detailed description
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Classic articles by Kocher, Halsted, Lahey, Crile and Riddell have provided surgeons with principles that have significantly reduced operative morbidity and mortality from thyroidectomy. Nowadays, surgery of the thyroid gland is considered safe with practically null mortality. Morbidity, although infrequent, is still a reason for concern. The complications directly attributed to total thyroidectomy are hypoparathyroidism, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, hemorrhage, oesophageal perforation and trachea instability and perforation. Furthermore, other complications, related to the surgical technique, such as seroma or wound infection, may also occur.
Several techniques are employed in order to resect the suffering thyroid gland. Classic total thyroidectomy (cTT) is considered today, the golden standard of total thyroid resection for nodular goiter. One the other hand, new technologies and great experience of several surgeons gave recently birth to a new technique named mini Video Assisted Thyroidectomy (miVAT).
This protocol is designed to compare data in regards to cTT versus miVAT in the immediate postoperative period - hospitalization period.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
To compare the immediate postoperative course and complications of the patients using the two techniques (cTT and miVAT).
3.0 DESIGN AND STUDY POPULATION
The study is designed as a prospective randomized single center study. Any patient that is scheduled for a total thyroidectomy for nodular goiter with nodules less that 4cm will be offered participation in this study.
The study will be conducted until 100 patients are treated (50 in each group). It is estimated that it will take up to 1 year to enroll the patients and an additional one week to obtain the follow-up information
4.0 STUDY PROCEDURE
4.1 Pre-Surgery
Procedures preformed such as routine hospital examinations, antibiotic prophylactic treatment, anticoagulant treatment and diet will be according to the standard management protocol and will be recorded for the study. The following pre-surgery information will be recorded:
- Demographic information including: Age, gender, ethnicity
- Height, weight, BMI and ASA status
- Behavioral history (Smoking, alcohol or drug use)
- Preoperative labs (WBC, Ht, Hgb, SGOT, SGPT, LDH, Glc, Ure, Cre, K+, Na+, Ca2+,Mg2+, TP, ALB, fT3, fT4, TSH, PTH, PT, aPTT, INR)
- Diagnosis including clinical observations and previous imaging results
- FNA results (if any)
- Medications
- Current and past history of surgical and medical comorbidities
- Vocal cord assessment by indirect laryngoscopy
4.2 Intra-operative
The surgeon will perform the preplanned operation. Each recurrent laryngeal nerve has to be identified and its activity has to be recorded with the help of an electrode. The following intraoperative variables will be recorded for all patients:
- Surgery date
- Left laryngeal nerve activity
- Right laryngeal activity
- Method of devascularization of right lobe
- Method of devascularization of left lobe
- Technical complications
- Estimated blood loss
- Duration of surgery
- Difficulty of the operation (1=very difficult to 5=very easy)
- Operation performed
- Procedure related comments
- Usage of drains (number and type)
- Usage of haemostatic material
4.3 Pathology data form
The following pathology data will be recorded for all patients:
- Post-operative diagnosis including pathology report
- Weight of the gland
- Dimensions of the gland
4.4 Postoperative follow-up
Follow-up evaluation will be performed every day while hospitalized. There will be a contact by phone - if the patient is not hospitalized- every day until the 7th postoperative day. The following information will be recorded for all patients while they are hospitalized:
- Temperature (max for 24hour period)
- Wound infection
- Antibiotics
- Oral analgesic
- Parenteral narcotics
- Tolerating liquid and solids
- Average Pain score for patient resting and moving/day
- Postoperative labs (WBC, Ht, Hgb, SGOT, SGPT, LDH, Glc, Ure, Cre, K+, Na+, Ca2+,Mg2+, TP, ALB, fT3, fT4, TSH, PTH, PT, aPTT, INR)
- Date of hospital ready to be discharged and date discharged
- Blood in the drains (if any)
- Sign of hypoparathyroidism (Chvostek and Trousseau)
- Vocal alterations by patient (voice completely altered=10 to voice not altered=1)
- Vocal cord assessment by indirect laryngoscopy
- Comments
5.0 COMPLICATIONS AND ADVERSE EVENTS
The investigator is required to notify the coordinator of any serious adverse events. The coordinator is also required to notify the Ethics Committee according to local regulations and requirements.
Serious Adverse Events include:
- Death regardless of cause
- Any-life-threatening event
- Any hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
- Any event that results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity to the patient.
6.0 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
The objective of this study is to compare the T with the miVAT techniques concerning the immediate postoperative course of the patients in relation to complications during and post procedure.
Statistical analysis included description of these intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, and indication of patient characteristics associated with these outcomes.
In order to efficiently compare the two techniques random allocation of the patients within two groups (Group A=T and Group B=miVAT) was employed. All patient with even number were included in group A, while all patients with odd number were included in group B.
Since the study does not have pre-specified hypotheses all statistical analyses are exploratory and interpretation of results should be within this context.
7.0 DATA MONITORING PLAN
The coordinator will monitor all data accrual. Furthermore, the coordinator will review the progress of the clinical trial including safety data and ensure as possible that it is conducted, recorded and reported in accordance with the protocol, good clinical practice and the applicable regulatory requirements.
8.0 DATA CONFIDENTIALITY
Each patient ill be identified by his/her initials and a unique patient identification number. Source data will be stored with source documents. Only personnel responsible for collecting data and transcribing it into the case report forms will have access to the data. Records will remain on site in secure areas.
10.0 ETHICS
Prior to study institution review board (IRB) approval should be obtained. Any changes in the study protocol, informed consent forms, or investigator must be re-approved by the IRB. All patients enrolled in the study will provide their consent prior to entering the study. An informed consent form shall be signed and dated by the patient. The investigator will retain the forms as part of the study records.
This study will be executed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, in agreement with the guidelines for conducting a clinical investigation in accordance with the principles of ICH GCP outlined in the E6 document. By signing the present protocol, participants in the study commit themselves to carry it out in accordance with local legal requirements.
11.0 INFORMED CONSENT
All eligible patients should have the capacity to provide an informed consent. The above described inclusion and exclusion criteria were designed to ensure the entry of the appropriate population of patients to this study and will be approved by the local IRB. Screening for these criteria will be conducted by the coordinator.
Eligible patients will be educated about the research proposal by a study investigator. To determine whether the patient has understood the issues, he/she will be asked to describe what the research entails and whether they have any questions. All questions will be addressed prior to enrollment. The patient can refuse participation in the study at any time.
A written informed consent form will be generated. For each patient, a case report form (CRF) will be completed, providing general medical information and history.
- Conditions
- Goiter
- Being tested
- Total Thyroidectomy (Mini Video Assisted Thyroidectomy), Total Thyroidectomy (Classic Thyroidectomy)
- Keywords
- Goiter [C19.874.283], Thyroid Neoplasms [C19.874.788]
- Medical subject headings
- Goiter
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Total Thyroidectomy (Mini Video Assisted Thyroidectomy)Procedure or surgery
Immediate postoperative course of patients with Thyroidectomy
Total Thyroidectomy (Classic Thyroidectomy)Procedure or surgery
Immediate postoperative course of patients with Thyroidectomy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A | Active comparator | Patients with mini Video Assisted Thyroidectomy (miVAT) Receives: Procedure: Total Thyroidectomy (Mini Video Assisted Thyroidectomy) |
| B | Active comparator | Immediate postoperative course of patients with classic Thyroidectomy (cTT) Receives: Procedure: Total Thyroidectomy (Classic Thyroidectomy) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Postoperative course of patients
Measured: 7 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jun 2008 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2008
- Primary completionDec 2009
- Study completionSep 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for GoiterStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- AHEPA University Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Papavramidis Theodossis, Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00692835
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 333/12-5-2008
- Status last verified
- Sep 2012
- First submitted
- 5 Jun 2008
- Last updated
- 2 Oct 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Oct 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Immediate Postoperative Course of Patients With Mini Video Assisted Total Thyroidectomy (miVAT) Versus Classic Total Thyroidectomy (cTT)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00692835
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 333/12-5-2008
- Conditions
- Goiter
- Keywords
- Goiter [C19.874.283], Thyroid Neoplasms [C19.874.788]
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- AHEPA University Hospital
- Study start
- May 2008
- Primary completion
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jun 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Protocol Synopsis
- Protocol title: Immediate postoperative course of patients with mini Video Assisted Thyroidectomy (miVAT) versus classic Thyroidectomy (cTT)
- Purpose: Comparison of the immediate postoperative course and complications of the patients using the two techniques
- Design: Prospective, single-center randomized study
- Patient Population: Male or female subjects 18 years of age or older with nodular goiter who are scheduled for total thyroidectomy (miVAT or T)
- No. of Subjects: 100 patients divided into two groups, estimated up to 1 year to enroll
- Duration of Treatment: During the operation
- Duration of Follow-up: Follow-up will be performed daily while hospitalized, and by phone till the 7th postoperative day
- Endpoints: To evaluate the safety and cost-effectiveness of each technique
Detailed description
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Classic articles by Kocher, Halsted, Lahey, Crile and Riddell have provided surgeons with principles that have significantly reduced operative morbidity and mortality from thyroidectomy. Nowadays, surgery of the thyroid gland is considered safe with practically null mortality. Morbidity, although infrequent, is still a reason for concern. The complications directly attributed to total thyroidectomy are hypoparathyroidism, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, hemorrhage, oesophageal perforation and trachea instability and perforation. Furthermore, other complications, related to the surgical technique, such as seroma or wound infection, may also occur.
Several techniques are employed in order to resect the suffering thyroid gland. Classic total thyroidectomy (cTT) is considered today, the golden standard of total thyroid resection for nodular goiter. One the other hand, new technologies and great experience of several surgeons gave recently birth to a new technique named mini Video Assisted Thyroidectomy (miVAT).
This protocol is designed to compare data in regards to cTT versus miVAT in the immediate postoperative period - hospitalization period.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
To compare the immediate postoperative course and complications of the patients using the two techniques (cTT and miVAT).
3.0 DESIGN AND STUDY POPULATION
The study is designed as a prospective randomized single center study. Any patient that is scheduled for a total thyroidectomy for nodular goiter with nodules less that 4cm will be offered participation in this study.
The study will be conducted until 100 patients are treated (50 in each group). It is estimated that it will take up to 1 year to enroll the patients and an additional one week to obtain the follow-up information
4.0 STUDY PROCEDURE
4.1 Pre-Surgery
Procedures preformed such as routine hospital examinations, antibiotic prophylactic treatment, anticoagulant treatment and diet will be according to the standard management protocol and will be recorded for the study. The following pre-surgery information will be recorded:
- Demographic information including: Age, gender, ethnicity
- Height, weight, BMI and ASA status
- Behavioral history (Smoking, alcohol or drug use)
- Preoperative labs (WBC, Ht, Hgb, SGOT, SGPT, LDH, Glc, Ure, Cre, K+, Na+, Ca2+,Mg2+, TP, ALB, fT3, fT4, TSH, PTH, PT, aPTT, INR)
- Diagnosis including clinical observations and previous imaging results
- FNA results (if any)
- Medications
- Current and past history of surgical and medical comorbidities
- Vocal cord assessment by indirect laryngoscopy
4.2 Intra-operative
The surgeon will perform the preplanned operation. Each recurrent laryngeal nerve has to be identified and its activity has to be recorded with the help of an electrode. The following intraoperative variables will be recorded for all patients:
- Surgery date
- Left laryngeal nerve activity
- Right laryngeal activity
- Method of devascularization of right lobe
- Method of devascularization of left lobe
- Technical complications
- Estimated blood loss
- Duration of surgery
- Difficulty of the operation (1=very difficult to 5=very easy)
- Operation performed
- Procedure related comments
- Usage of drains (number and type)
- Usage of haemostatic material
4.3 Pathology data form
The following pathology data will be recorded for all patients:
- Post-operative diagnosis including pathology report
- Weight of the gland
- Dimensions of the gland
4.4 Postoperative follow-up
Follow-up evaluation will be performed every day while hospitalized. There will be a contact by phone - if the patient is not hospitalized- every day until the 7th postoperative day. The following information will be recorded for all patients while they are hospitalized:
- Temperature (max for 24hour period)
- Wound infection
- Antibiotics
- Oral analgesic
- Parenteral narcotics
- Tolerating liquid and solids
- Average Pain score for patient resting and moving/day
- Postoperative labs (WBC, Ht, Hgb, SGOT, SGPT, LDH, Glc, Ure, Cre, K+, Na+, Ca2+,Mg2+, TP, ALB, fT3, fT4, TSH, PTH, PT, aPTT, INR)
- Date of hospital ready to be discharged and date discharged
- Blood in the drains (if any)
- Sign of hypoparathyroidism (Chvostek and Trousseau)
- Vocal alterations by patient (voice completely altered=10 to voice not altered=1)
- Vocal cord assessment by indirect laryngoscopy
- Comments
5.0 COMPLICATIONS AND ADVERSE EVENTS
The investigator is required to notify the coordinator of any serious adverse events. The coordinator is also required to notify the Ethics Committee according to local regulations and requirements.
Serious Adverse Events include:
- Death regardless of cause
- Any-life-threatening event
- Any hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
- Any event that results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity to the patient.
6.0 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
The objective of this study is to compare the T with the miVAT techniques concerning the immediate postoperative course of the patients in relation to complications during and post procedure.
Statistical analysis included description of these intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, and indication of patient characteristics associated with these outcomes.
In order to efficiently compare the two techniques random allocation of the patients within two groups (Group A=T and Group B=miVAT) was employed. All patient with even number were included in group A, while all patients with odd number were included in group B.
Since the study does not have pre-specified hypotheses all statistical analyses are exploratory and interpretation of results should be within this context.
7.0 DATA MONITORING PLAN
The coordinator will monitor all data accrual. Furthermore, the coordinator will review the progress of the clinical trial including safety data and ensure as possible that it is conducted, recorded and reported in accordance with the protocol, good clinical practice and the applicable regulatory requirements.
8.0 DATA CONFIDENTIALITY
Each patient ill be identified by his/her initials and a unique patient identification number. Source data will be stored with source documents. Only personnel responsible for collecting data and transcribing it into the case report forms will have access to the data. Records will remain on site in secure areas.
10.0 ETHICS
Prior to study institution review board (IRB) approval should be obtained. Any changes in the study protocol, informed consent forms, or investigator must be re-approved by the IRB. All patients enrolled in the study will provide their consent prior to entering the study. An informed consent form shall be signed and dated by the patient. The investigator will retain the forms as part of the study records.
This study will be executed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, in agreement with the guidelines for conducting a clinical investigation in accordance with the principles of ICH GCP outlined in the E6 document. By signing the present protocol, participants in the study commit themselves to carry it out in accordance with local legal requirements.
11.0 INFORMED CONSENT
All eligible patients should have the capacity to provide an informed consent. The above described inclusion and exclusion criteria were designed to ensure the entry of the appropriate population of patients to this study and will be approved by the local IRB. Screening for these criteria will be conducted by the coordinator.
Eligible patients will be educated about the research proposal by a study investigator. To determine whether the patient has understood the issues, he/she will be asked to describe what the research entails and whether they have any questions. All questions will be addressed prior to enrollment. The patient can refuse participation in the study at any time.
A written informed consent form will be generated. For each patient, a case report form (CRF) will be completed, providing general medical information and history.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A | Active comparator | Procedure: Total Thyroidectomy (Mini Video Assisted Thyroidectomy)Patients with mini Video Assisted Thyroidectomy (miVAT) |
| B | Active comparator | Procedure: Total Thyroidectomy (Classic Thyroidectomy)Immediate postoperative course of patients with classic Thyroidectomy (cTT) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patient is over 18 years old
- Patient scheduled for a non-emergency operation
- Patient signs and dates a written informed consent form (ICF) and indicates an understanding of the study procedures
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patient had a previous operation at the thyroid
- Patient is participating in another clinical trial which may affect this study's outcomes
- Patient in toxic condition (non euthyroid or hypothyroid )
- Patient receiving anticoagulation treatment for other medical condition
- Echographic evidence that the size at least one nodule is more than 4cm
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Total Thyroidectomy (Mini Video Assisted Thyroidectomy)Immediate postoperative course of patients with Thyroidectomy | Procedure or surgery | A |
| Total Thyroidectomy (Classic Thyroidectomy)Immediate postoperative course of patients with Thyroidectomy | Procedure or surgery | B |
Primary outcome
Postoperative course of patients
Time frame: 7 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Oct 2012.
Related trials for Goiter
Recruiting
NIRAF-Guided Parathyroid Identification During Thyroidectomy
Hypocalcemia, Hypoparathyroidism
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Restrictive Diets on Inflammation and Quality of Life in Autoimmune Thyroiditis
Thyroid Autoimmune Disease, Hashimoto's Thyroiditis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Efgartigimod PH20 SC PFS in Adult Participants With Graves' Disease
Graves' Disease, Graves Disease
Recruiting
Thyroid Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Compressive Goiters.
Thyroid Nodules
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Efgartigimod PH20 SC PFS in Adult Participants With Graves' Disease.
Graves Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Total Thyroidectomy (Mini Video Assisted Thyroidectomy) and Total Thyroidectomy (Classic Thyroidectomy) in people with Goiter, run by Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki at 1 site in Greece.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Postoperative course of patients (time frame: 7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2012.