AzTrials
AzTrials

Back PainNCT00694018

Veterans Walk to Beat Back Pain

A study testing Internet mediated enhanced pedometer intervention in people with Back Pain, run by US Department of Veterans Affairs at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study was to assess whether an Internet-mediated pedometer based intervention would increase walking and improve function among individuals with chronic back pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Back Pain
What is being tested?
Internet mediated enhanced pedometer intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
229 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
May 2009to Mar 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Veterans receiving care at the VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System
  • Have back pain that has persisted for more than 3 months
  • Have a sedentary lifestyle (less than 150 minutes of physical activity per week)
  • Have access to a computer (with Windows XP or Vista) on at least a weekly basis with an available USB port and Internet access
  • Have a working e-mail address
  • Are competent to provide written informed consent
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Are able to communicate in English
  • Are not institutionalized
  • Can identify a health care provider who can provide medical clearance.

Who cannot join

  • Currently pregnant
  • Cannot walk at least one block
  • Cannot obtain written clearance to start a walking program from a treating healthcare provider

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105

Other trials in United States

About this study

The objective of this study was to assess whether an Internet-mediated pedometer based intervention would increase walking and improve function among individuals with chronic back pain.

Read the detailed description

Project Background/Rationale: Chronic pain, and especially back pain, is common among VA patients, affecting approximately 60% of veterans using VA primary care services. Chronic pain is associated with increased disability, poorer health status, anxiety and depression, decreased quality of life, decreased employment and increased health services use and costs. Current evidence suggests that exercise is one of the most effective strategies for managing chronic pain. However, there are few clinical programs that use generally available tools and a relatively low cost approach to help patients with chronic back pain initiate and maintain an exercise program.

Project Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of an Internet-mediated pedometer based intervention that was designed to increase walking and improve pain-related function among individuals with chronic back pain. The Specific Aims of this randomized, controlled trial were: 1) To determine whether an internet-mediated pedometer based intervention will reduce pain-related functional interference among patients with chronic back pain in the short term and over a 12-month timeframe; 2) To assess the effect of the intervention on walking (measured by step counts), quality of life, pain intensity, pain related fear and self-efficacy for exercise among patients with chronic back pain; and 3) To identify factors associated with a sustained increase in walking over a 12-month timeframe among patients randomized to the intervention.

Project Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of an Internet-mediated, pedometer based intervention to promote walking and improve pain-related function among patients with chronic back pain compared to enhanced usual care. Participants were followed for 12 months to investigate the efficacy of the intervention in assisting patients with initiating and maintaining a regular walking program and improving pain-related function. We recruited patients with chronic back pain (primarily low back pain) receiving care at one VA health care system. Study patients were randomized to one of two groups: 1) enhanced usual care or 2) the Internet-mediated, pedometer based intervention. All participants attended an educational program designed specifically for individuals with chronic back pain. Study participants randomized to the intervention were given an enhanced pedometer and access to a study website that provided step goals and feedback, tailored motivational messages and an e-community. Those in the control group received a pedometer but did not have access to the website. Both groups completed on-line survey assessments at baseline, 6, and 12 months and were asked to report adverse events on a regular basis. The primary outcome for this study was pain-related functional interference. Secondary outcomes included average daily steps at 12 months as measured using the study pedometer, health related quality of life, pain intensity, pain related fear and self-efficacy for exercise. The analysis was conducted based on intention to treat principles and used multivariable modeling procedures to determine the effect of the intervention on our outcomes.

Conditions
Back Pain
Being tested
Education and standard care, Internet mediated enhanced pedometer intervention
Keywords
randomized trial, walking
Medical subject headings
Back Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Education and standard careOther

    Educational program for individuals with chronic back pain.

  • Internet mediated enhanced pedometer interventionBehavioural

    Enhanced pedometer for uploading step information and website that provides step goals and feedback, tailored motivational messages and an online community.

Study groups in NCT00694018
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Education and Standard CareActive comparatorReceived standard care and participated in an educational program for individuals with chronic back pain. Also received an uploading pedometer but no feedback or goals about their walking activity.
Receives: Other: Education and standard care
Internet Mediated Enhanced PedometerExperimentalIn addition to standard care and participating in an educational program, participants received an enhanced pedometer for uploading step information, e-mail messages with weekly step goals and access to a website that provided step goals and feedback, tailored motivational messages and on on-line community for communication asynchronously with staff and other participants.
Receives: Other: Education and standard care; Behavioral: Internet mediated enhanced pedometer intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) Score

    The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire score ranges from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater disability

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Jun 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2009
  3. Primary completionJan 2012
  4. Study completionMar 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
229 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00694018
Sponsor's protocol ID
IIR 07-177
Status last verified
Sep 2014
First submitted
28 May 2008
Last updated
27 Apr 2015
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Krein SL, Kadri R, Hughes M, Kerr EA, Piette JD, Holleman R, Kim HM, Richardson CR. Pedometer-based internet-mediated intervention for adults with chronic low back pain: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 19;15(8):e181. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2605.

    PubMed 23969029
  • Krein SL, Metreger T, Kadri R, Hughes M, Kerr EA, Piette JD, Kim HM, Richardson CR. Veterans walk to beat back pain: study rationale, design and protocol of a randomized trial of a pedometer-based internet mediated intervention for patients with chronic low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Sep 13;11:205. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-205.

    PubMed 20836856
  • Krein SL, Bohnert A, Kim HM, Harris ME, Richardson CR. Opioid use and walking among patients with chronic low back pain. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53(1):107-16. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.08.0190.

    PubMed 26934620

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Internet mediated enhanced pedometer intervention in people with Back Pain, run by US Department of Veterans Affairs at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Oct 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) Score (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00694018, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in