Hepatitis BPhase 2NCT00698555
Comparing Immunogenicity and Safety of Different Formulations of HBV-MPL Vaccine With Engerix™-B in Adults Aged 18-40 y
A Phase 2 study testing HBV-MPL vaccine and Engerix™-B in people with Hepatitis B, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
This study will evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of different formulations of the candidate HBV-MPL vaccine administered according to a 2-dose schedule and compare it to that of Engerix™-B administered according to a 3-dose schedule in order to determine the optimal dose of each component of the candidate… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatitis B
- What is being tested?
- HBV-MPL vaccine and Engerix™-B
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 163 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- Mar 1997to May 1998
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age: between 18 and 40 years old.
- Good physical condition as established by clinical examination and history taking at the time of entry.
- Female participants who are at risk to become pregnant will be on a contraceptive programme if necessary during the study period.
- Written informed consent obtained from the subjects
Who cannot join
- Positive titres at screening for anti-hepatitis antibodies.
- Elevated serum liver enzymes
- History of significant and persisting hematologic, hepatic, renal, cardiac or respiratory disease.
- Any acute disease at the moment of entry.
- Chronic alcohol consumption.
- Hepatomegaly, right upper quadrant abdominal pain or tenderness.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Any chronic drug treatment, including any treatment with immunosuppressive drugs, which in the investigator's opinion, precludes inclusion into the study.
- History of allergic disease likely to be stimulated by any component of the vaccine.
- Simultaneous participation in any other clinical trial.
- Previous vaccination with a hepatitis B vaccine.
- Previous vaccination with an MPL containing vaccine.
- Administration of immunoglobulins in the past 6 months and during the whole study period
- Vaccination one month before and one month after each dose of the study vaccine
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Study Comparing the Immunogenicity and Reactogenicity of Different Formulations of GSK Bio's HBV-MPL Vaccine Injected as a 0, 6 Months Schedule With That of Engerix™-B Injected as a 0, 1, 6 Months Schedule in Healthy Adults Aged 18-40 Years
This study will evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of different formulations of the candidate HBV-MPL vaccine administered according to a 2-dose schedule and compare it to that of Engerix™-B administered according to a 3-dose schedule in order to determine the optimal dose of each component of the candidate HBV-MPL vaccine when administered at 0 and 6 months
Read the detailed description
At the time of conduct of this study, the sponsor GlaxoSmithKline was known by its former name SmithKline Beecham
- Conditions
- Hepatitis B
- Being tested
- HBV-MPL vaccine, Engerix™-B
- Keywords
- Hepatitis B, HBV-MPL, Recombinant hepatitis B vaccine
- Medical subject headings
- Hepatitis B
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HBV-MPL vaccineBiological
5 different formulations, 2-dose intramuscular injection
Engerix™-BBiological
3-dose intramuscular injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: HBV-MPL vaccine |
| Group B | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: HBV-MPL vaccine |
| Group C | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: HBV-MPL vaccine |
| Group D | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: HBV-MPL vaccine |
| Group E | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: HBV-MPL vaccine |
| Group F | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Biological: Engerix™-B |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Anti-HBs antibody concentrations
Measured: Month 7
Secondary outcomes (5)
Anti-HBs antibody concentrations
Measured: Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Cell mediated immunity
Measured: Month 1, 2, 6, 7 and 12
Occurrence and intensity and relationship to vaccination of solicited local and general symptoms
Measured: 4-day follow-up after vaccination
Occurrence and intensity and relationship to vaccination of unsolicited symptoms
Measured: 31-day follow-up after vaccination
Incidence of SAE
Measured: Throughout the study period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jun 2008 (estimated)
- Study startMar 1997
- Primary completionMay 1998
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hepatitis BStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 163 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00698555
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 208129/025
- Status last verified
- Jun 2008
- First submitted
- 13 Jun 2008
- Last updated
- 17 Jun 2008
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jun 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study Comparing the Immunogenicity and Reactogenicity of Different Formulations of GSK Bio's HBV-MPL Vaccine Injected as a 0, 6 Months Schedule With That of Engerix™-B Injected as a 0, 1, 6 Months Schedule in Healthy Adults Aged 18-40 Years
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00698555
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 208129/025
- Conditions
- Hepatitis B
- Keywords
- Hepatitis B, HBV-MPL, Recombinant hepatitis B vaccine
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 163 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 1997
- Primary completion
- May 1998 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jun 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of different formulations of the candidate HBV-MPL vaccine administered according to a 2-dose schedule and compare it to that of Engerix™-B administered according to a 3-dose schedule in order to determine the optimal dose of each component of the candidate HBV-MPL vaccine when administered at 0 and 6 months
Detailed description
At the time of conduct of this study, the sponsor GlaxoSmithKline was known by its former name SmithKline Beecham
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 6
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | Biological: HBV-MPL vaccine |
| Group B | Experimental | Biological: HBV-MPL vaccine |
| Group C | Experimental | Biological: HBV-MPL vaccine |
| Group D | Experimental | Biological: HBV-MPL vaccine |
| Group E | Experimental | Biological: HBV-MPL vaccine |
| Group F | Active comparator | Biological: Engerix™-B |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age: between 18 and 40 years old.
- Good physical condition as established by clinical examination and history taking at the time of entry.
- Female participants who are at risk to become pregnant will be on a contraceptive programme if necessary during the study period.
- Written informed consent obtained from the subjects
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Positive titres at screening for anti-hepatitis antibodies.
- Elevated serum liver enzymes
- History of significant and persisting hematologic, hepatic, renal, cardiac or respiratory disease.
- Any acute disease at the moment of entry.
- Chronic alcohol consumption.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HBV-MPL vaccine5 different formulations, 2-dose intramuscular injection | Biological | Group A, Group B, Group C, Group D, Group E |
| Engerix™-B3-dose intramuscular injection | Biological | Group F |
Primary outcome
Anti-HBs antibody concentrations
Time frame: Month 7
5 secondary outcomes
Anti-HBs antibody concentrations
Time frame: Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Cell mediated immunity
Time frame: Month 1, 2, 6, 7 and 12
Occurrence and intensity and relationship to vaccination of solicited local and general symptoms
Time frame: 4-day follow-up after vaccination
Occurrence and intensity and relationship to vaccination of unsolicited symptoms
Time frame: 31-day follow-up after vaccination
Incidence of SAE
Time frame: Throughout the study period
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jun 2008.
Related trials for Hepatitis B
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Sequential Therapy With Daplusiran/Tomligisiran (DAP/TOM) Followed by Bepirovirsen in Participants Living With Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB)
Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection, Hepatitis B
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With Liver Disease
Hepatitis D, Hepatitis C
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Study of Bepirovirsen in Participants Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection (B-Focus)
Hepatitis B
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Long-term Follow-up Study to Evaluate Durability of Treatment Response in Previous Bepirovirsen Study Participants (B-Sure)
Hepatitis B
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
A Phase I Clinical Trial of CPU-YL01 Injection in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B.
Chronic Hepatitis B
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing HBV-MPL vaccine and Engerix™-B in people with Hepatitis B, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jun 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Anti-HBs antibody concentrations (time frame: Month 7). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jun 2008.