InfectionNCT00698919
Bacterial Infection Diagnosis Using Blood DNA
An observational study of Infection and Sepsis, run by Delafontaine Hospital at 5 sites in France.
Trial summary
Sepsis is a common cause of morbidity and death in intensive care units. Clinical and laboratory signs of systemic inflammation, including changes in body temperature, tachycardia, or leukocytosis, are neither sensitive nor specific enough for the diagnosis of sepsis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- What is being tested?
- Observational study
- How many people
- 400 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Sep 2008to Nov 2010
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All ICU patients older than 18 years old, with a SIRS, severe sepsis or septic shock will be included in this cohort study. SIRS, Severe sepsis and shock septic will be defined according to the definition used by a panel of experts from the American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine
Who may be able to join
- At least SIRS criteria at admission or during ICU stay.
Who cannot join
- age <18 year old.
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
France5 sites
Jacques Cartier Institute
Massy, 91300
Mehran Monchi, MD, 33160136272, m.monchi@free.fr
Mehran Monchi, MD
Saint louis Hospital
Paris, 75011
Elie Azoulay, MD, PhD, 331 42 49 46 60, elie.azoulay@sls.ap-hop-paris.fr
Michael Darmon, MD
Saint Joseph Hospital
Paris, 75674 Cedex14
François Philippart, MD, 33144123415, fphilippart@gmail.com
François Philippart, MD
Pasteur Institute
Paris, 75724 Cedex 15
Jean Marc Cavaillon, ScD, 33145688238, jmcavail@pasteur.fr
Minou Adib-Conquy, PhD
Delafontaine Hospital
Saint-Denis, 93205
Christophe Adrie, MD, 33142356107, christophe.adrie@wanadoo.fr
Antonio Alvarez Gonzalez, MD, 33142356107, pyalvarez@hotmail.com
About this study
Official title: Bacterial DNA Detection as a Diagnostic Tool of Infection in Critical Ill Patients With SIRS
Sepsis is a common cause of morbidity and death in intensive care units. Clinical and laboratory signs of systemic inflammation, including changes in body temperature, tachycardia, or leukocytosis, are neither sensitive nor specific enough for the diagnosis of sepsis. The diagnosis of sepsis is difficult, because clinical signs are unspecific. These signs include tachycardia, leucocytosis, tachypnoea, and pyrexia, which are collectively termed a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). SIRS is very common in critically ill patients, being found in various conditions including trauma, surgery, burns, pancreatitis, post-cardiac arrest syndrome, cardiac surgery. Microbiological culture can be used to distinguish sepsis from non-infectious conditions. However, this method lacks sensitivity and specificity, and there is often a substantial time delay. So these signs can also be misleading because critically ill patients often present with the systemic inflammatory response syndrome without infection. This issue is of paramount importance, since therapy and outcome differ greatly between patients with and those without sepsis; clinicians are often prone to overuse antibiotic therapy being afraid of not treating a potential infection or superinfection. Moreover, the widespread use of antibiotics for all such patients is likely to increase antibiotic resistance, toxicity, and costs. On the opposite, any delay in administration of antibiotics can be extremely detrimental for the infected patient with an exponential increase of the odd ratio for death. Search for early biomarker tools for the diagnosis of infection, initially promising, are quite challenged and controversial nowadays because they can be more related to the inflammation response, irrespective to the insult. Furthermore up to 40% of the infections remain strongly suspected but not bacteriologically documented. Persisting researches are ongoing to find new markers to better discriminate SIRS related to infection process from to SIRS not related to infection. Cytokine profiles using multiplex analysis seems more related to the severity of the SIRS than the trigger of the SIRS (infectious or non infectious diseases). Thus, new tools have been developed to identify bacteria by detecting their DNA by various techniques. These techniques have many potential interests over conventional microbiologic tests by decreasing turnaround time (within a few hours 2-6 hours), reducing inhibitory effects of prior use of antibiotics, detection of slow or fastidious growing organisms. However these tests remain to be validated in a clinical setting.
The goal of the current study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of plasma detection of bacterial DNA in ICU patients with a clinical suspicion of bacterial infection.
Read the detailed description
The goal of the current study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of plasma detection of bacterial DNA in ICU patients with a clinical suspicion of bacterial infection.
Definitions of septic syndromes based from the ACCP/SCCM expert panel. Terms Definition criteria Infection Invasion by microorganisms of an normally sterile tissue
Systemic inflammatory response Syndrome (SIRS) At least 2 of 4 following criteria:
- Temperature > 38°C or < 36°C
- Heart Rate > 90 beat/min
- Tachypnea > 20/min or PaCO2 < 32 mmHg
- WBC count > 12 000/mm3 or < 4 000/mm3 Sepsis SIRS related to an infectious process
Severe Sepsis Sepsis with :
- Arterial hypotension (SBP<90 mmHg, MAP<70 or SBP decrease < 40 mmHg)
- Or any other organ dysfunction :
- PaO2/FiO2 < 250 (or < 200 if pneumonia)
- Oliguria (< 0,5 ml/kg/h for at least 2 hours)
- Hyperlactacidemia ( > 3mmol/l)
- Platelet count < 80000/mm3 Septic shock Severe sepsis with persisting hypotension ( > 1 hour) despite adequate fluid resuscitation and requiring vasopressor support (epinephrine or norepinephrine).
SBP: Systemic blood pressure, MAP: Mean arterial blood pressure,
All codes and definitions are established prior to study initiation. The following information are recorded: age and sex, admission category (medical, scheduled surgery, or unscheduled surgery), origin (home, ward, or emergency room), and McCabe score, ICU and hospital mortality. Severity of illness was evaluated on the first ICU day using the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II), Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score. Knaus scale definitions were used to record preexisting chronic organ failures including respiratory, cardiac, hepatic, renal, and immune system failure.
The presence or absence of infections was documented according to the standard definitions developed by the Centers for Disease Control; We will determine three groups: 1. patients with documented infection 2. patients without documented infection and 3. patients with suspected but non documented infection.
Study protocol Four centers will participate (65 beds overall). Along with clinical C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) measurements used in clinical routine lab measurements, two blood samples (4.5 mL each) will be collected. CRP and PCT are collected routinely when patient meet criteria for SIRS in all three ICUs to helps us distinguishing infectious from non-infectious SIRS. One whole blood on EDTA will be rapidly processed for bacterial/fungi DNA detection. (frozen until analysis or within 72 hours the sample kept at 4°C).
The second sample using tubes containing Gel and dipotassium EDTA allowing separation after centrifugation (1500g for 10 minutes at 4°C) of the plasma from (white and red) blood cells without any manipulation and thus lowering risk any nurses' occupational exposure. Then the plasma will be stored at -80°C until analysis. Blood collection will be performed when SIRS criteria will be met either at admission or later on during the ICU stay (suspicion of surperinfection).
Bacterial and Fungal DNA detection The bacterial and Fungal DNA detection will be performed using the Multiplex PCR pathogen detection VYOOTM (SIRS-Lab GmbH, Jena, Germany). VYOOâ combines culture-independent pathogen-derived nucleic acids concentration and multiplex PCR-based species detection. The multiplex PCR delivers results of high therapeutic value within ~6 hours and detects 34 bacterial and 6 fungal species that cause life-threatening infections as well as five most frequent resistance markers. In order to ensure highest clinical validity, the primer selection of the species and the antibiotic resistances bases on international study results on septic infections. The system was proved to be far less susceptible for contaminations than blood cultures or alternative NAT protocols and ensures increased specificity and sensitivity.
VYOOâ achieves its high sensitivity with the included sample preparation system LOOXSTER® which bases on SIRS-Lab's proprietary PUREPROVE® technology. LOOXSTER® specifically concentrates the minute quantity of bacterial and fungal DNA from a huge human DNA background. Total DNA is applied onto an affinity chromatography column with a matrix-immobilized DNA binding protein that recognizes definite motives within the pathogen DNA. More than 90% of the human background DNA is removed. This effect substantially increases the sensitivity of the downstream multiplex PCR protocol and simultaneously reduces the time-to-result.
The pathogen cells within 5 ml whole blood are disrupted mechanically using glass beads (0.1/2.5 mm in diameter) and a lysis device (e. g. FastPrep®-24, MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, USA). After a proteolytic digestion step, total DNA is isolated using a short spin column protocol. The total DNA is dissolved in an appropriate buffer and applied to the LOOXSTER® spin column. The final bacterial plus fungal/human DNA ratio is significantly increased and the concentrated pathogen DNA is directly used for multiplex PCR. Generated pathogen specific amplicons are visualized by gel electrophoresis and compared with VYOOâ-specific DNA length markers for the proof of present pathogens or resistances. An alternative amplicon attribution is achieved by hybridization (ATâ system, Clondiag), which ensures a higher degree of specificity and sensitivity.
Cytokines detection by ELISA Dosage of plasma cytokines (IL-6, 8, 10) will be performed by ELISA methods using commercially available kits (R\&D systems, Minneapolis, MN) or by Bio-Plex Multiplex Cytokine Assay (BioRad Lab., Hercules, CA).
Endotoxin \& Peptidoglycan detection For endotoxin dosage, we used Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) reagent water (LRW) (Biowhittaker) and non-pyrogenic pipettes and tips (Costar). The samples will be diluted with LRW in non-pyrogenic 96-well culture plates (Costar). Blood samples will be collected in endotoxin free tubes containing a gel that after centrifugation makes a barrier between the cellular pellet and the plasma (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). The plasma will be then transferred to non-pyrogenic tubes and kept at -20°C until tested. Detection of bacterial endotoxin in plasma is hindered by its yellow coloration that interferes with the Limulus amebocyte lysate test and gives an absorbance at 405 nm, but also by the presence of inhibitors. We overcame the background absorbance of plasma using a Diazo-coupling Limulus amebocyte lysate assay that gives a magenta coloration (Associates of Cape Cod Inc.). Furthermore, in order to inactivate the inhibitors, plasma were diluted 1:4 in LRW and heated for 30 min at 60°C as it has been shown that this dilution and heating procedure allow optimal endotoxin detection in plasma. After heating, 50 μl of diluted plasma were transferred in 96-well culture plate and incubated with the same volume of Limulus amebocyte lysate for 30 min at 37°C. The reaction will be stopped, as specified by the manufacturer, by successive addition of 50 μl of sodium nitrite in HCl, 50 μl of ammonium sulfamate and 50 μl of N-(1-naphthyl)-ethylenediamine (NEDA) that form a diazotized magenta derivative. The optical density will be read at 570 nm and endotoxin concentration will be determined by comparison with an endotoxin standard curve. The detection limit of the test is 0.02 EU/ml of endotoxin.
Peptidoglycan will be measured according to a newly experimental procedure set up in Dr. Cavaillon's laboratory. The technique that detects peptidoglycan from both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria has already been shown to detect peptidoglycan in plasma from patients with sepsis. Because a patent has been applied no further technical information can be presently provided in the present version but will be added as soon as possible.
- Being tested
- Observational study
- Keywords
- Bacterial DNA, Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, Infection, Intensive Care Unit
- Medical subject headings
- Infections, Sepsis, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Observational studyOther
This is not an interventional studies. We will just compare two methods of bacterial diagnosis. Of note the physicians will care of their patients with the classic bacterial analysis tools; so there is no modification of the care.
The new techniques used (DNA detection) will done later on and thus won't modify their decision.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Development cohort | A first group of one hundred patients with SIRS will be included to evaluate the accuracy of this new test. Receives: Other: Observational study | |
| Validation Cohort | Depending on the result of the previous (development) cohort we will more accurately evaluate the need of number of patients with SIRS to include in the second cohort of patients. Receives: Other: Observational study |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Using PCR we will determine the accuracy of these tests in identifying bacteria or fungi responsible of the infection.
Measured: End of the ICU stay
Secondary outcomes (1)
We will examine whether or not cytokines' profile, levels of endotoxin and peptidoglycan help to discriminate infectious from non-infectious SIRS.
Measured: The assays will be done later on (within 6 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jun 2008 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2008
- Primary completionSep 2010 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2010 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Delafontaine Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France, Jacques Cartier Institute, Unity Health Toronto, Institut Pasteur
- Investigators
- Christophe Adrie, MD, Principal investigator, Delafontaine HospitalMehran Monchi, MD, Study director, Jacques Cartier Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00698919
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RCB : 2008-A00361-54
- Other IDs
- PF01743
- Status last verified
- Jun 2008
- First submitted
- 13 Jun 2008
- Last updated
- 17 Jun 2008
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jun 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Bacterial DNA Detection as a Diagnostic Tool of Infection in Critical Ill Patients With SIRS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00698919
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RCB : 2008-A00361-54
- Keywords
- Bacterial DNA, Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, Infection, Intensive Care Unit
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Delafontaine HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France, Jacques Cartier Institute, Unity Health Toronto, Institut Pasteur
- Study start
- Sep 2008
- Primary completion
- Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2010 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Jun 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Sepsis is a common cause of morbidity and death in intensive care units. Clinical and laboratory signs of systemic inflammation, including changes in body temperature, tachycardia, or leukocytosis, are neither sensitive nor specific enough for the diagnosis of sepsis. The diagnosis of sepsis is difficult, because clinical signs are unspecific. These signs include tachycardia, leucocytosis, tachypnoea, and pyrexia, which are collectively termed a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). SIRS is very common in critically ill patients, being found in various conditions including trauma, surgery, burns, pancreatitis, post-cardiac arrest syndrome, cardiac surgery. Microbiological culture can be used to distinguish sepsis from non-infectious conditions. However, this method lacks sensitivity and specificity, and there is often a substantial time delay. So these signs can also be misleading because critically ill patients often present with the systemic inflammatory response syndrome without infection. This issue is of paramount importance, since therapy and outcome differ greatly between patients with and those without sepsis; clinicians are often prone to overuse antibiotic therapy being afraid of not treating a potential infection or superinfection. Moreover, the widespread use of antibiotics for all such patients is likely to increase antibiotic resistance, toxicity, and costs. On the opposite, any delay in administration of antibiotics can be extremely detrimental for the infected patient with an exponential increase of the odd ratio for death. Search for early biomarker tools for the diagnosis of infection, initially promising, are quite challenged and controversial nowadays because they can be more related to the inflammation response, irrespective to the insult. Furthermore up to 40% of the infections remain strongly suspected but not bacteriologically documented. Persisting researches are ongoing to find new markers to better discriminate SIRS related to infection process from to SIRS not related to infection. Cytokine profiles using multiplex analysis seems more related to the severity of the SIRS than the trigger of the SIRS (infectious or non infectious diseases). Thus, new tools have been developed to identify bacteria by detecting their DNA by various techniques. These techniques have many potential interests over conventional microbiologic tests by decreasing turnaround time (within a few hours 2-6 hours), reducing inhibitory effects of prior use of antibiotics, detection of slow or fastidious growing organisms. However these tests remain to be validated in a clinical setting.
The goal of the current study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of plasma detection of bacterial DNA in ICU patients with a clinical suspicion of bacterial infection.
Detailed description
The goal of the current study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of plasma detection of bacterial DNA in ICU patients with a clinical suspicion of bacterial infection.
Definitions of septic syndromes based from the ACCP/SCCM expert panel. Terms Definition criteria Infection Invasion by microorganisms of an normally sterile tissue
Systemic inflammatory response Syndrome (SIRS) At least 2 of 4 following criteria:
- Temperature > 38°C or < 36°C
- Heart Rate > 90 beat/min
- Tachypnea > 20/min or PaCO2 < 32 mmHg
- WBC count > 12 000/mm3 or < 4 000/mm3 Sepsis SIRS related to an infectious process
Severe Sepsis Sepsis with :
- Arterial hypotension (SBP<90 mmHg, MAP<70 or SBP decrease < 40 mmHg)
- Or any other organ dysfunction :
- PaO2/FiO2 < 250 (or < 200 if pneumonia)
- Oliguria (< 0,5 ml/kg/h for at least 2 hours)
- Hyperlactacidemia ( > 3mmol/l)
- Platelet count < 80000/mm3 Septic shock Severe sepsis with persisting hypotension ( > 1 hour) despite adequate fluid resuscitation and requiring vasopressor support (epinephrine or norepinephrine).
SBP: Systemic blood pressure, MAP: Mean arterial blood pressure,
All codes and definitions are established prior to study initiation. The following information are recorded: age and sex, admission category (medical, scheduled surgery, or unscheduled surgery), origin (home, ward, or emergency room), and McCabe score, ICU and hospital mortality. Severity of illness was evaluated on the first ICU day using the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II), Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score. Knaus scale definitions were used to record preexisting chronic organ failures including respiratory, cardiac, hepatic, renal, and immune system failure.
The presence or absence of infections was documented according to the standard definitions developed by the Centers for Disease Control; We will determine three groups: 1. patients with documented infection 2. patients without documented infection and 3. patients with suspected but non documented infection.
Study protocol Four centers will participate (65 beds overall). Along with clinical C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) measurements used in clinical routine lab measurements, two blood samples (4.5 mL each) will be collected. CRP and PCT are collected routinely when patient meet criteria for SIRS in all three ICUs to helps us distinguishing infectious from non-infectious SIRS. One whole blood on EDTA will be rapidly processed for bacterial/fungi DNA detection. (frozen until analysis or within 72 hours the sample kept at 4°C).
The second sample using tubes containing Gel and dipotassium EDTA allowing separation after centrifugation (1500g for 10 minutes at 4°C) of the plasma from (white and red) blood cells without any manipulation and thus lowering risk any nurses' occupational exposure. Then the plasma will be stored at -80°C until analysis. Blood collection will be performed when SIRS criteria will be met either at admission or later on during the ICU stay (suspicion of surperinfection).
Bacterial and Fungal DNA detection The bacterial and Fungal DNA detection will be performed using the Multiplex PCR pathogen detection VYOOTM (SIRS-Lab GmbH, Jena, Germany). VYOOâ combines culture-independent pathogen-derived nucleic acids concentration and multiplex PCR-based species detection. The multiplex PCR delivers results of high therapeutic value within ~6 hours and detects 34 bacterial and 6 fungal species that cause life-threatening infections as well as five most frequent resistance markers. In order to ensure highest clinical validity, the primer selection of the species and the antibiotic resistances bases on international study results on septic infections. The system was proved to be far less susceptible for contaminations than blood cultures or alternative NAT protocols and ensures increased specificity and sensitivity.
VYOOâ achieves its high sensitivity with the included sample preparation system LOOXSTER® which bases on SIRS-Lab's proprietary PUREPROVE® technology. LOOXSTER® specifically concentrates the minute quantity of bacterial and fungal DNA from a huge human DNA background. Total DNA is applied onto an affinity chromatography column with a matrix-immobilized DNA binding protein that recognizes definite motives within the pathogen DNA. More than 90% of the human background DNA is removed. This effect substantially increases the sensitivity of the downstream multiplex PCR protocol and simultaneously reduces the time-to-result.
The pathogen cells within 5 ml whole blood are disrupted mechanically using glass beads (0.1/2.5 mm in diameter) and a lysis device (e. g. FastPrep®-24, MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, USA). After a proteolytic digestion step, total DNA is isolated using a short spin column protocol. The total DNA is dissolved in an appropriate buffer and applied to the LOOXSTER® spin column. The final bacterial plus fungal/human DNA ratio is significantly increased and the concentrated pathogen DNA is directly used for multiplex PCR. Generated pathogen specific amplicons are visualized by gel electrophoresis and compared with VYOOâ-specific DNA length markers for the proof of present pathogens or resistances. An alternative amplicon attribution is achieved by hybridization (ATâ system, Clondiag), which ensures a higher degree of specificity and sensitivity.
Cytokines detection by ELISA Dosage of plasma cytokines (IL-6, 8, 10) will be performed by ELISA methods using commercially available kits (R\&D systems, Minneapolis, MN) or by Bio-Plex Multiplex Cytokine Assay (BioRad Lab., Hercules, CA).
Endotoxin \& Peptidoglycan detection For endotoxin dosage, we used Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) reagent water (LRW) (Biowhittaker) and non-pyrogenic pipettes and tips (Costar). The samples will be diluted with LRW in non-pyrogenic 96-well culture plates (Costar). Blood samples will be collected in endotoxin free tubes containing a gel that after centrifugation makes a barrier between the cellular pellet and the plasma (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). The plasma will be then transferred to non-pyrogenic tubes and kept at -20°C until tested. Detection of bacterial endotoxin in plasma is hindered by its yellow coloration that interferes with the Limulus amebocyte lysate test and gives an absorbance at 405 nm, but also by the presence of inhibitors. We overcame the background absorbance of plasma using a Diazo-coupling Limulus amebocyte lysate assay that gives a magenta coloration (Associates of Cape Cod Inc.). Furthermore, in order to inactivate the inhibitors, plasma were diluted 1:4 in LRW and heated for 30 min at 60°C as it has been shown that this dilution and heating procedure allow optimal endotoxin detection in plasma. After heating, 50 μl of diluted plasma were transferred in 96-well culture plate and incubated with the same volume of Limulus amebocyte lysate for 30 min at 37°C. The reaction will be stopped, as specified by the manufacturer, by successive addition of 50 μl of sodium nitrite in HCl, 50 μl of ammonium sulfamate and 50 μl of N-(1-naphthyl)-ethylenediamine (NEDA) that form a diazotized magenta derivative. The optical density will be read at 570 nm and endotoxin concentration will be determined by comparison with an endotoxin standard curve. The detection limit of the test is 0.02 EU/ml of endotoxin.
Peptidoglycan will be measured according to a newly experimental procedure set up in Dr. Cavaillon's laboratory. The technique that detects peptidoglycan from both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria has already been shown to detect peptidoglycan in plasma from patients with sepsis. Because a patent has been applied no further technical information can be presently provided in the present version but will be added as soon as possible.
Study design
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Development cohort | – | Other: Observational studyA first group of one hundred patients with SIRS will be included to evaluate the accuracy of this new test. |
| Validation Cohort | – | Other: Observational studyDepending on the result of the previous (development) cohort we will more accurately evaluate the need of number of patients with SIRS to include in the second cohort of patients. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All ICU patients older than 18 years old, with a SIRS, severe sepsis or septic shock will be included in this cohort study. SIRS, Severe sepsis and shock septic will be defined according to the definition used by a panel of experts from the American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- At least SIRS criteria at admission or during ICU stay.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- age <18 year old.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Observational studyThis is not an interventional studies. We will just compare two methods of bacterial diagnosis. Of note the physicians will care of their patients with the classic bacterial analysis tools; so there is no modification of the care. The new techniques used (DNA detection) will done later on and thus won't modify their decision. | Other | Development cohort, Validation Cohort |
Primary outcome
Using PCR we will determine the accuracy of these tests in identifying bacteria or fungi responsible of the infection.
Time frame: End of the ICU stay
1 secondary outcome
We will examine whether or not cytokines' profile, levels of endotoxin and peptidoglycan help to discriminate infectious from non-infectious SIRS.
Time frame: The assays will be done later on (within 6 months)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jun 2008.
Related trials for Infection
Recruiting
The Trans-Led Care Study
Substance Abuse, Substance Addiction
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ultrasound-Calibrated Pulse Contour Cardiac Output Monitoring: Value and Accuracy in Hemodynamic Care
Sepsis, Circulatory Instability
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Brenipatide (LY3537031) in Adult Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Study to Learn About the Safety of PREVENAR 20 Vaccine in Infants Aged Between Two to Six Months
Pneumococcal Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Long-term Follow-up Study to Evaluate Durability of Treatment Response in Previous Bepirovirsen Study Participants (B-Sure)
Hepatitis B
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christophe Adrie, MD principal investigator
Delafontaine Hospital
Mehran Monchi, MD study director
Jacques Cartier Institute
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Infection and Sepsis, run by Delafontaine Hospital at 5 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jun 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Christophe Adrie, MD, PhD (33-14-235-6107, christophe.adrie@wanadoo.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Using PCR we will determine the accuracy of these tests in identifying bacteria or fungi responsible of the infection. (time frame: End of the ICU stay). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jun 2008.