Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 3NCT00699543
The Efficacies of The New Paclitaxel-Eluting CoroflexTM Please Stent in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
A Phase 3 study testing Coroflex Please stent implantation and Taxus stent implantation in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Seoul National University Hospital.
Trial summary
Objectives : To evaluate the clinical efficacy, angiographic outcomes, and safety of the new paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent (CoroflexTM Please, B Braun, Germany), compared with another paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent system (TaxusTM, Boston Scientific, USA) in the treatment of coronary stenosis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- Coroflex Please stent implantation and Taxus stent implantation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 915 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jul 2008to Dec 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- General Inclusion Criteria
- Subject must be at least 18 years of age.
- Subject is able to verbally confirm understandings of risks, benefits and treatment alternatives of receiving the CoroflexTM Please stent and he/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides written informed consent prior to any study related procedure.
- Subject must have coronary artery stenosis (>50% by visual estimate) with evidence of myocardial ischemia (e.g., stable, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, silent ischemia, positive functional study or a reversible changes in the electrocardiogram (ECG) consistent with ischemia.) or Subject must have significant coronary artery stenosis (>70% by visual estimate)
- Angiographic Inclusion Criteria
- Target lesion(s) must be located in a native coronary artery with visually estimated diameter of ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 4.0 mm.
- Target lesion(s) must be amenable for percutaneous coronary intervention
Who cannot join
- General Exclusion Criteria
- The patient has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following medications:
- Heparin
- Aspirin
- Both Clopidogrel and Ticlopidine
- Paclitaxel
Show all 23Show fewer
- Stainless steel
- Contrast media(*) (*)Patients with documented sensitivity to contrast media which can be effectively pre-medicated with steroids and diphenhydramine [e.g. rash] may be enrolled. Those with true anaphylaxis to prior contrast media, however, should not be enrolled.
- Systemic (intravenous) Paclitaxel use within 12 months.
- Female of childbearing potential, unless a recent pregnancy test is negative, who possibly plan to become pregnant any time after enrollment into this study.
- History of bleeding diathesis or known coagulopathy (including heparin- induced thrombocytopenia), or will refuse blood transfusions.
- Gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding within the prior 3 months, or major surgery within 2 months.
- An elective surgical procedure is planned that would necessitate interruption of thienopyridines during the first 6 months post enrollment.
- Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy <1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment).
- Patients who are actively participating in another drug or device investigational study, which have not completed the primary endpoint follow-up period.
- Patients with LVEF<25% or those with cardiogenic shock
- Patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction who requires primary PCI
- Patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction within 48hrs
- Creatinine level ≥ 3.0mg/dL or dependence on dialysis.
- Angiographic Exclusion Criteria
- Patients with significant left main stem stenosis which requires revascularization therapy
- Patients who's target lesion has in-stent restenosis at the stented segment of drug-eluting stents or bare metal stents
- Target lesions with bifurcating disease which require side branch stenting
About this study
Official title: The Efficacies of The New Paclitaxel-Eluting CoroflexTM Please Stent in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Comparison or Efficacy Between COroflex PLEASe ANd TaxusTM Stent
Objectives
: To evaluate the clinical efficacy, angiographic outcomes, and safety of the new paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent (CoroflexTM Please, B Braun, Germany), compared with another paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent system (TaxusTM, Boston Scientific, USA) in the treatment of coronary stenosis.
Read more
Study Design
: Prospective, open label, 2: 1 randomized multi-center trial. Patients will be randomized according to the type of drug eluting stent ( CoroflexTM Please vs. TaxusTM). Randomization will also be stratified per hospital for the presence of DM and the presence of long lesions (lesion length > 28mm)
Patient Enrollment
:915 patients enrolled at 13 centers in Korea.
Patient Follow-Up
:Clinical follow-up will occur at 1, 4, 9, 12 months and 2, 3years after intervention. Investigator or designee may conduct follow-up as telephone contacts or office visits.
Primary Endpoint
:Clinically driven Target vessel Revascularization (TVR) at 9 months.
Secondary Endpoints
:A. Clinical safety and efficacy end points
- Major Cardiac Adverse Events (MACE; All Death, cardiac death, Myocardial infarction (Q-wave and non-Q wave), TVR)
- Target Vessel Failure (TVF; cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, clinically driven TVR)
- Stent thrombosis
- Angiographic efficacy end points
- in-stent binary restenosis by QCA
- in-stent and in-lesion late loss by QCA
- in-stent and in-lesion MLD and percentage diameter stenosis by QCA immediately after the index procedure and at 9 months of follow-up
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- Coroflex Please stent implantation, Taxus stent implantation
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Coroflex Please stent implantationDevice
Also called Coroflex Please stent
Use Coroflex Please stent in the treatment of coronary stenosis
Taxus stent implantationDevice
Also called Taxus stent
Use Taxus stent in the treatment of coronary stenosis
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| C | Experimental | Coroflex Please stent implantation Receives: Device: Coroflex Please stent implantation |
| T | Active comparator | Taxus stent implantation Receives: Device: Taxus stent implantation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinically driven Target vessel Revascularization (TVR)
Measured: 9 months.
Secondary outcomes (6)
Major Cardiac Adverse Events (MACE; All Death, cardiac death, Myocardial infarction (Q-wave and non-Q wave), TVR)
Measured: 1, 4, 9, 12 months and 2, 3years
Target Vessel Failure (TVF; cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, clinically driven TVR)
Measured: 1, 4, 9, 12 months and 2, 3years
Stent thrombosis
Measured: 1, 4, 9, 12 months and 2, 3years
In-stent binary restenosis by QCA
Measured: 9 months
In-stent and in-lesion late loss by QCA
Measured: 9 months
In-stent and in-lesion MLD and percentage diameter stenosis by QCA
Measured: Immediately after the index procedure and at 9 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jun 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2008
- Primary completionDec 2013 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2013 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Seoul National University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 915 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- B. Braun Melsungen AG
- Investigators
- Hyo-Soo Kim, MD, PhD, Study chair, Seoul National University HospitalIn-Ho Chae, MD, PhD, Study chair, Seoul National University Bundang HospitalSeung-Ho Hur, MD, Ph, Study chair, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical CenterTae-Jin Youn, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Seoul National University Bundang HospitalSoo-Joong Kim, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Kyunghee University Medical CenterKeum-Soo Park, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Inha University HospitalByung-Ok Kim, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Inje University Sang-gye Paik HospitalMin-Su Hyon, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Soonchunhyang University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00699543
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ECO-PLEASANT
- Status last verified
- Dec 2013
- First submitted
- 16 Jun 2008
- Last updated
- 17 Dec 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Seo JB, Kang SH, Hur SH, Park KW, Youn TJ, Park JS, Yang HM, Lee HY, Kang HJ, Koo BK, Bae JH, Kim SW, Moon KW, Choi JW, Lee SG, Chung WY, Kim SJ, Kim DI, Kim BO, Hyon MS, Park KS, Cha TJ, Yoo CW, Jeon HK, Kim HS. Randomized trial comparing the efficacy between different types of paclitaxel-eluting stents: the comparison of efficacy between COroflex PLEASe ANd Taxus stent (ECO-PLEASANT) randomized controlled trial. Am Heart J. 2013 May;165(5):733-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.02.009. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
PubMed 23622910Seo JB, Jeon HK, Park KW, Park JS, Bae JH, Kim SW, Moon KW, Choi JW, Lee SG, Chung WY, Youn TJ, Kim SJ, Kim DI, Kim BO, Hyon MS, Park KS, Cha TJ, Hwang HK, Hur SH, Kim HS. Efficacies of the new paclitaxel-eluting Coroflex Please stent in percutaneous coronary intervention; comparison of efficacy between Coroflex Please and Taxus (ECO-PLEASANT) trial: study rationale and design. Trials. 2009 Oct 23;10:98. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-98.
PubMed 19849864
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Dec 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Efficacies of The New Paclitaxel-Eluting CoroflexTM Please Stent in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Comparison or Efficacy Between COroflex PLEASe ANd TaxusTM Stent
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00699543
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ECO-PLEASANT
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 915 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- B. Braun Melsungen AG
- Study start
- Jul 2008
- Primary completion
- Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2013 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Jun 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Objectives
: To evaluate the clinical efficacy, angiographic outcomes, and safety of the new paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent (CoroflexTM Please, B Braun, Germany), compared with another paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent system (TaxusTM, Boston Scientific, USA) in the treatment of coronary stenosis.
Study Design
: Prospective, open label, 2: 1 randomized multi-center trial. Patients will be randomized according to the type of drug eluting stent ( CoroflexTM Please vs. TaxusTM). Randomization will also be stratified per hospital for the presence of DM and the presence of long lesions (lesion length > 28mm)
Patient Enrollment
:915 patients enrolled at 13 centers in Korea.
Patient Follow-Up
:Clinical follow-up will occur at 1, 4, 9, 12 months and 2, 3years after intervention. Investigator or designee may conduct follow-up as telephone contacts or office visits.
Primary Endpoint
:Clinically driven Target vessel Revascularization (TVR) at 9 months.
Secondary Endpoints
:A. Clinical safety and efficacy end points
- Major Cardiac Adverse Events (MACE; All Death, cardiac death, Myocardial infarction (Q-wave and non-Q wave), TVR)
- Target Vessel Failure (TVF; cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, clinically driven TVR)
- Stent thrombosis
- Angiographic efficacy end points
- in-stent binary restenosis by QCA
- in-stent and in-lesion late loss by QCA
- in-stent and in-lesion MLD and percentage diameter stenosis by QCA immediately after the index procedure and at 9 months of follow-up
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| C | Experimental | Device: Coroflex Please stent implantationCoroflex Please stent implantation |
| T | Active comparator | Device: Taxus stent implantationTaxus stent implantation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- General Inclusion Criteria
- Angiographic Inclusion Criteria
Key exclusion criteria (23 listed)
- General Exclusion Criteria
- Angiographic Exclusion Criteria
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Coroflex Please stent implantationAlso: Coroflex Please stentUse Coroflex Please stent in the treatment of coronary stenosis | Device | C |
| Taxus stent implantationAlso: Taxus stentUse Taxus stent in the treatment of coronary stenosis | Device | T |
Primary outcome
Clinically driven Target vessel Revascularization (TVR)
Time frame: 9 months.
6 secondary outcomes
Major Cardiac Adverse Events (MACE; All Death, cardiac death, Myocardial infarction (Q-wave and non-Q wave), TVR)
Time frame: 1, 4, 9, 12 months and 2, 3years
Target Vessel Failure (TVF; cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, clinically driven TVR)
Time frame: 1, 4, 9, 12 months and 2, 3years
Stent thrombosis
Time frame: 1, 4, 9, 12 months and 2, 3years
In-stent binary restenosis by QCA
Time frame: 9 months
In-stent and in-lesion late loss by QCA
Time frame: 9 months
In-stent and in-lesion MLD and percentage diameter stenosis by QCA
Time frame: Immediately after the index procedure and at 9 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Dec 2013.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23622910Seo JB, Kang SH, Hur SH, Park KW, Youn TJ, Park JS, Yang HM, Lee HY, Kang HJ, Koo BK, Bae JH, Kim SW, Moon KW, Choi JW, Lee SG, Chung WY, Kim SJ, Kim DI, Kim BO, Hyon MS, Park KS, Cha TJ, Yoo CW, Jeon HK, Kim HS. Randomized trial comparing the efficacy between different types of paclitaxel-eluting stents: the comparison of efficacy between COroflex PLEASe ANd Taxus stent (ECO-PLEASANT) randomized controlled trial. Am Heart J. 2013 May;165(5):733-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.02.009. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 19849864Seo JB, Jeon HK, Park KW, Park JS, Bae JH, Kim SW, Moon KW, Choi JW, Lee SG, Chung WY, Youn TJ, Kim SJ, Kim DI, Kim BO, Hyon MS, Park KS, Cha TJ, Hwang HK, Hur SH, Kim HS. Efficacies of the new paclitaxel-eluting Coroflex Please stent in percutaneous coronary intervention; comparison of efficacy between Coroflex Please and Taxus (ECO-PLEASANT) trial: study rationale and design. Trials. 2009 Oct 23;10:98. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-98.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hyo-Soo Kim, MD, PhD study chair
Seoul National University Hospital
In-Ho Chae, MD, PhD study chair
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Seung-Ho Hur, MD, Ph study chair
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Coroflex Please stent implantation and Taxus stent implantation in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Seoul National University Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 23 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Dec 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinically driven Target vessel Revascularization (TVR) (time frame: 9 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00699543, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Dec 2013.