Refractory Partial SeizuresPhase 3NCT00699582
To Evaluate The Efficacy and Safety of E2007 (Perampanel) Given as Adjunctive Therapy in Subjects With Refractory Partial Seizures
A Phase 3 study testing E2007 (perampanel) in people with Refractory Partial Seizures, run by Eisai Inc. at 92 sites in 14 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of perampanel when given as an adjunctive therapy in subjects with refractory partial seizures. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Refractory Partial Seizures
- What is being tested?
- E2007 (perampanel)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 389 participants
- Where
- 92 sitesin 14 countries
- Study dates
- May 2008to Jan 2011
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Each subject must meet all of the following criteria to be enrolled in this study:
- Provide written informed consent signed by the subject or legal guardian prior to entering the study or undergoing any study procedures (If the written informed consent is provided by the legal guardian because the subject is unable to do so, a written or verbal assent from the subject must also be obtained).
- Be considered reliable and willing to be available for the study period and able to record seizures and report Adverse Events (AEs) them self or have a caregiver who can record seizures and report AEs for them.
- Male or female and greater than or equal to 12 years of age (within the course of the study), or greater than or equal to 18 years of age (depending on location) at the time of signing the informed consent.
- Females should be either of non-childbearing potential (defined as having undergone surgical sterilization, or postmenopausal [age 50 and amenorrheic for 12 months]) or of childbearing potential. Females of childbearing potential must have a negative serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) at Visit 1 and a negative urine pregnancy test prior to randomization at Visit 2. Female subjects of childbearing potential must agree to be abstinent or to use at least 1 medically acceptable method of contraception (eg, a double-barrier method [eg, condom + spermicide, condom + diaphragm with spermicide], IUD, or have a vasectomised partner) starting at Visit 1 and throughout the entire study period and for 2 months after the last dose of study drug. Those women using hormonal contraceptives must also be using an additional approved method of contraception (as described previously) starting at Visit 1 and continuing throughout the entire study period and for 2 months after the last dose of study drug. (It is not required for male subjects to use contraceptive measures based on preclinical toxicology data).
- Have a diagnosis of epilepsy with partial seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures according to the International League Against Epilepsy's Classification of Epileptic Seizures (1981). Diagnosis should have been established by clinical history and an electroencephalogram (EEG) that is consistent with localization-related epilepsy; normal interictal EEGs will be allowed provided that the subject meets the other diagnosis criterion (ie, clinical history).
Show all 13Show fewer
- Have had a computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within the last 10 years that ruled out a progressive cause of epilepsy.
- Have uncontrolled partial seizures despite having been treated with at least 2 different anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) within approximately the last 2 years.
- During the 6-week Pre-randomization Phase subjects must have had ≥5 partial seizures (with ≥2 partial seizures per each of 3-week period) and with no 25-day seizure-free period in the 6-week period, as documented via a valid seizure diary. Only simple partial seizures with motor signs, complex partial seizures, and complex partial seizures with secondary generalization are counted toward this inclusion.
- Are currently being treated with stable doses of 1, 2 or a maximum of 3 approved AEDs. Only 1 inducer AED (defined as; carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, or primidone only) out of the maximum of 3 AEDs is allowed.
- Are on a stable dose of the same concomitant AED(s) for 1 month (or no less than 21 days) prior to Visit 1; in the case where a new AED regime has been initiated for a subject, the dose must be stable for 2 months (or no less than 49 days) prior to Visit 1.
- If on a stable dose (other than intermittent rescue use) of benzodiazepines for epilepsy (or for anxiety or sleep disorders) the prescribed dose must be stable for 1 month (or no less than 21 days) prior to Visit 1. (Note: the use of intermittent rescue benzodiazepines is defined in the exclusion criterion #22 below.) When used in these cases (epilepsy, anxiety or sleep disorders), benzodiazepines will be counted as 1 AED; therefore, only 1 or a maximum of 2 additional approved AEDs will be allowed.
- A vagal nerve stimulator (VNS) is allowed but it must have been implanted ≥5 months prior to Visit 1. Stimulator parameters can not be changed for 1 month (or no less than 21 days) prior to Visit 1 or thereafter during the study.
Who cannot join
- Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:
- Participated in a study involving administration of an investigational compound or device within 1 month (or no less than 21 days) prior to Visit 1, or within approximately 5 half-lives of the previous investigational compound, whichever is longer.
- Pregnant and/or lactating.
- Participated in previous perampanel studies.
- Presence of nonmotor simple partial seizures only.
- Presence of primary generalized epilepsies or seizures, such as absences and or myoclonic epilepsies.
Show all 24Show fewer
- Presence or previous history of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.
- A history of status epilepticus within approximately 12 months prior to Visit 1.
- Seizure clusters where individual seizures cannot be counted.
- A history of psychogenic seizures.
- Evidence of clinically significant disease (eg, cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, renal disease) that in the opinion of the Investigator(s) could affect the subject's safety or the study conduct.
- Scheduled and/or confirmed to have epilepsy surgery within 6 months after Visit 1; however those who have previously documented "failed" epilepsy surgery will be allowed.
- Evidence of significant active hepatic disease. Stable elevations of liver enzymes, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) due to concomitant medication(s) will be allowed if they are less than 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN).
- Evidence of significant active hematological disease; white blood cell (WBC) count <= 2500/µL (2.50 1E+09/L) or an absolute neutrophil count <= 1000/µL (1.00 1E+09/L).
- A clinically significant ECG abnormality, including prolonged QTc defined as >450 msec.
- Suffering from psychotic disorder(s) and/or unstable recurrent affective disorder(s) evident by use of antipsychotics or have had a suicide attempt(s) within approximately the last 2 years.
- Presence of a progressive central nervous system (CNS) disease, including degenerative CNS diseases and progressive tumors.
- History of drug or alcohol dependency or abuse within approximately the last 2 years.
- Have had multiple drug allergies or a severe drug reaction to an AED(s), including dermatological (eg, Stevens-Johnson syndrome), hematological, or organ toxicity reactions.
- If felbamate is used as a concomitant AED, subjects must be on felbamate for at least 2 years, with a stable dose for 2 months (or no less than 49 days) prior to Visit 1. They must not have a history of white blood cell (WBC) count below 2500/µL (2.50 1E+09/L), platelets below 100,000, liver function tests (LFTs) above 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), or other indication of hepatic or bone marrow dysfunction while receiving felbamate. If subjects received felbamate in the past, it must have been discontinued 2 months (or no less than 49 days) prior to Visit 1.
- Concomitant use of vigabatrin. Subjects who took vigabatrin in the past must be off vigabatrin for approximately 5 months prior to Visit 1 and must have documentation showing no evidence of a vigabatrin associated clinically significant abnormality in a visual perimetry test.
- Concomitant use of barbiturates (except for seizure control indication) within 1 month (or no less than 21 days) prior to Visit 1.
- Use of intermittent rescue benzodiazepines (ie, 1-2 doses over a 24-hr period considered one-time rescue) 2 or more times in a 1-month period prior to Visit 1; or
- Any condition(s) that will make the subject, in the opinion of the Investigator, unsuitable for the study.
Trial locations and contacts
92 sites in 14 countries.
92 sites in 14 countries
United States32 sites
Study site
Boston, Massachusetts
Study site
Buffalo, New York
Study site
Burlington, Massachusetts
The Comprehensive Care Center for Children And Adults
Chesterfield, Missouri, 63017
Study site
Chesterfield, Missouri
Study site
Dallas, Texas
Mile High Research Center
Denver, Colorado, 80218
Neurology Associates of Northern Colorado
Fort Collins, Colorado, 80524
Study site
Fort Collins, Colorado
Study site
Fresno, California
Neurological Research Center at Hattiesburg Clinic
Hattiesburg, Mississippi, 39401
Study site
Hattiesburg, Mississippi
North Alabama Neuroscience Research Associates
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Study site
Huntsville, Alabama
Mayo Clinic-Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224
Study site
Jacksonville, Florida
Saint Luke's Comprehensive Epilepsy Center
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
Study site
Kansas City, Missouri
Dean Foundation for Health, Research and Education, Inc.
Madison, Wisconsin, 53715
Study site
Madison, Wisconsin
NYU Comprehensive Epilepsy Center
New York, New York, 10016
Study site
New York, New York
Xenoscience, Inc.
Phoenix, Arizona, 85004
Study site
Phoenix, Arizona
Study site
Sacramento, California
Study site
Salt Lake City, Utah
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, 13210
Study site
Syracuse, New York
University of Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, 85724
Study site
Tucson, Arizona
Neurosearch II, Inc.
Ventura, California, 93003
Study site
Ventura, California
Austria8 sites
Study site
Graz, 8036
Study site
Graz
Study site
Innsbruck
Study site
Linz, 4021
Study site
Linz
Study site
Vienna, 1130
Study site
Vienna, 1220
Study site
Vienna
France7 sites
Study site
Angers
Study site
Béthune
Study site
Bron
Study site
Dijon
Study site
Montpellier
Study site
Rennes
Study site
Toulouse
Germany7 sites
Study site
Bad Berka
Study site
Berlin
Study site
Bernau
Study site
Bielefeld
Study site
Bonn
Study site
Erlangen
Study site
Göttingen
Israel6 sites
Study site
Ashkelon
Study site
Haifa
Study site
Holon
Study site
Petah Tikva
Study site
Ramat Gan
Study site
Tel Aviv
Netherlands5 sites
Study site
Haarlem
Study site
Heeze
Study site
Nijmegen
Study site
The Hague
Study site
Zwolle
South Africa5 sites
Study site
Cape Town, Western Cape
Study site
Cape Town
Study site
Johannesburg
Study site
Richards Bay, KwaZulu-Natal
Study site
Rosebank, Gauteng
United Kingdom5 sites
Study site
Bristol
Study site
Liverpool
Study site
London
Study site
Middlesbrough
Study site
Stoke-on-Trent
Belgium4 sites
Study site
Brussels
Study site
Ghent
Study site
Leuven
Study site
Ottignies (lln)
India4 sites
Study site
Mangalore, Karnataka
Study site
Nagpur, Maharashtra
Study site
Nashik, Maharashtra
Study site
New Delhi
About this study
Official title: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalation, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of E2007 (Perampanel) Given as Adjunctive Therapy in Subjects With Refractory Partial Seizures
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of perampanel when given as an adjunctive therapy in subjects with refractory partial seizures.
- Conditions
- Refractory Partial Seizures
- Being tested
- E2007 (perampanel), Placebo
- Keywords
- E2007 (perampanel), refractory partial seizures, adjunctive therapy, seizure frequency, reduction in seizure frequency, partial onset seizures, safety, concomitant AED(s)
- Medical subject headings
- Seizures
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
E2007 (perampanel)Drug
Also called perampanel
8 mg perampanel in a 1:1:1 ratio, 125 subjects/arm. All subjects will take a maximum of 6 tablets daily for the duration of the study and will be up-titrated weekly in 2-mg increments to their randomized dose.
E2007 (perampanel)Drug
Also called perampanel
12 mg perampanel in a 1:1:1 ratio, 125 subjects/arm. All subjects will take a maximum of 6 tablets daily for the duration of the study and will be up-titrated weekly in 2-mg increments to their randomized dose.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo in a 1:1:1 ratio, 125 subjects/arm. All subjects will take a maximum of 6 tablets daily for the duration of the study.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: E2007 (perampanel) |
| 2 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: E2007 (perampanel) |
| 3 | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent Change in the 28-day Seizure Frequency From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Phase (Titration and Maintenance Phases)
Seizure frequency per 28 days was derived from the information recorded in the subject diaries.
Measured: Baseline (Pre-randomization) through Week 19
Secondary outcomes (2)
Responder Rate
The responder rate for the Full ITT Analysis Set from the maintenance LOCF (Last Observation Carried Forward). A responder was a subject who had a 50 percent or greater reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from the Pre-randomization phase.
Measured: Baseline (Pre-randomization) through Week 19
Percent Change in the 28-day Complex Partial Plus Secondarily Generalized Seizure Frequency From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Phase (Titration and Maintenance Phases)
Percent Change in the Seizure frequency per 28 days was derived from the information recorded in the subject diaries.
Measured: Baseline (Pre-randomization) through Week 19
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jun 2008 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2008
- Primary completionDec 2010
- Study completionJan 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Refractory Partial SeizuresStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Eisai Inc.The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 389 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Eisai Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- David Squillacote, M.D., Study director, Eisai Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00699582
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E2007-G000-305
- Other IDs
- 2007-006168-31
- Status last verified
- Oct 2012
- First submitted
- 17 Jun 2008
- Last updated
- 11 Jul 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Bresnahan R, Hill RA, Wang J. Perampanel add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 14;4(4):CD010961. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010961.pub2.
PubMed 37059702Maguire M. Response to "Perampanel and pregnancy: Could experience be a gloomy lantern that does not even illuminate its bearer?". Epilepsy Behav. 2022 Apr;129:108654. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108654. Epub 2022 Mar 16. No abstract available.
PubMed 35305920French JA, Gil-Nagel A, Malerba S, Kramer L, Kumar D, Bagiella E. Time to prerandomization monthly seizure count in perampanel trials: A novel epilepsy endpoint. Neurology. 2015 May 19;84(20):2014-20. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001585. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
PubMed 25878175Rosenfeld W, Conry J, Lagae L, Rozentals G, Yang H, Fain R, Williams B, Kumar D, Zhu J, Laurenza A. Efficacy and safety of perampanel in adolescent patients with drug-resistant partial seizures in three double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III randomized clinical studies and a combined extension study. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2015 Jul;19(4):435-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
PubMed 25823975Steinhoff BJ, Ben-Menachem E, Ryvlin P, Shorvon S, Kramer L, Satlin A, Squillacote D, Yang H, Zhu J, Laurenza A. Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel for the treatment of refractory partial seizures: a pooled analysis of three phase III studies. Epilepsia. 2013 Aug;54(8):1481-9. doi: 10.1111/epi.12212. Epub 2013 May 10.
PubMed 23663001French JA, Krauss GL, Steinhoff BJ, Squillacote D, Yang H, Kumar D, Laurenza A. Evaluation of adjunctive perampanel in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures: results of randomized global phase III study 305. Epilepsia. 2013 Jan;54(1):117-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03638.x. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
PubMed 22905857
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jul 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalation, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of E2007 (Perampanel) Given as Adjunctive Therapy in Subjects With Refractory Partial Seizures
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00699582
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- E2007-G000-305
- Conditions
- Refractory Partial Seizures
- Keywords
- E2007 (perampanel), refractory partial seizures, adjunctive therapy, seizure frequency, reduction in seizure frequency, partial onset seizures, safety, concomitant AED(s)
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 389 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Eisai Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- May 2008
- Primary completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jun 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 22 Nov 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of perampanel when given as an adjunctive therapy in subjects with refractory partial seizures.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Drug: E2007 (perampanel) |
| 2 | Experimental | Drug: E2007 (perampanel) |
| 3 | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Provide written informed consent signed by the subject or legal guardian prior to entering the study or undergoing any study procedures (If the written informed consent is provided by the legal guardian because the subject is unable to do so, a written or verbal assent from the subject must also be obtained).
- Be considered reliable and willing to be available for the study period and able to record seizures and report Adverse Events (AEs) them self or have a caregiver who can record seizures and report AEs for them.
- Male or female and greater than or equal to 12 years of age (within the course of the study), or greater than or equal to 18 years of age (depending on location) at the time of signing the informed consent.
- Females should be either of non-childbearing potential (defined as having undergone surgical sterilization, or postmenopausal [age 50 and amenorrheic for 12 months]) or of childbearing potential. Females of childbearing potential must have a negative serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) at Visit 1 and a negative urine pregnancy test prior to randomization at Visit 2. Female subjects of childbearing potential must agree to be abstinent or to use at least 1 medically acceptable method of contraception (eg, a double-barrier method [eg, condom + spermicide, condom + diaphragm with spermicide], IUD, or have a vasectomised partner) starting at Visit 1 and throughout the entire study period and for 2 months after the last dose of study drug. Those women using hormonal contraceptives must also be using an additional approved method of contraception (as described previously) starting at Visit 1 and continuing throughout the entire study period and for 2 months after the last dose of study drug. (It is not required for male subjects to use contraceptive measures based on preclinical toxicology data).
- Have a diagnosis of epilepsy with partial seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures according to the International League Against Epilepsy's Classification of Epileptic Seizures (1981). Diagnosis should have been established by clinical history and an electroencephalogram (EEG) that is consistent with localization-related epilepsy; normal interictal EEGs will be allowed provided that the subject meets the other diagnosis criterion (ie, clinical history).
Key exclusion criteria (24 listed)
- Participated in a study involving administration of an investigational compound or device within 1 month (or no less than 21 days) prior to Visit 1, or within approximately 5 half-lives of the previous investigational compound, whichever is longer.
- Pregnant and/or lactating.
- Participated in previous perampanel studies.
- Presence of nonmotor simple partial seizures only.
- Presence of primary generalized epilepsies or seizures, such as absences and or myoclonic epilepsies.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| E2007 (perampanel)Also: perampanel8 mg perampanel in a 1:1:1 ratio, 125 subjects/arm. All subjects will take a maximum of 6 tablets daily for the duration of the study and will be up-titrated weekly in 2-mg increments to their randomized dose. | Drug | 1 |
| E2007 (perampanel)Also: perampanel12 mg perampanel in a 1:1:1 ratio, 125 subjects/arm. All subjects will take a maximum of 6 tablets daily for the duration of the study and will be up-titrated weekly in 2-mg increments to their randomized dose. | Drug | 2 |
| PlaceboPlacebo in a 1:1:1 ratio, 125 subjects/arm. All subjects will take a maximum of 6 tablets daily for the duration of the study. | Drug | 3 |
Primary outcome
Percent Change in the 28-day Seizure Frequency From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Phase (Titration and Maintenance Phases)
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-randomization) through Week 19
Seizure frequency per 28 days was derived from the information recorded in the subject diaries.
2 secondary outcomes
Responder Rate
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-randomization) through Week 19
Percent Change in the 28-day Complex Partial Plus Secondarily Generalized Seizure Frequency From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Phase (Titration and Maintenance Phases)
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-randomization) through Week 19
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jul 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37059702Bresnahan R, Hill RA, Wang J. Perampanel add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 14;4(4):CD010961. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010961.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35305920Maguire M. Response to "Perampanel and pregnancy: Could experience be a gloomy lantern that does not even illuminate its bearer?". Epilepsy Behav. 2022 Apr;129:108654. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108654. Epub 2022 Mar 16. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25878175French JA, Gil-Nagel A, Malerba S, Kramer L, Kumar D, Bagiella E. Time to prerandomization monthly seizure count in perampanel trials: A novel epilepsy endpoint. Neurology. 2015 May 19;84(20):2014-20. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001585. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25823975Rosenfeld W, Conry J, Lagae L, Rozentals G, Yang H, Fain R, Williams B, Kumar D, Zhu J, Laurenza A. Efficacy and safety of perampanel in adolescent patients with drug-resistant partial seizures in three double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III randomized clinical studies and a combined extension study. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2015 Jul;19(4):435-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23663001Steinhoff BJ, Ben-Menachem E, Ryvlin P, Shorvon S, Kramer L, Satlin A, Squillacote D, Yang H, Zhu J, Laurenza A. Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel for the treatment of refractory partial seizures: a pooled analysis of three phase III studies. Epilepsia. 2013 Aug;54(8):1481-9. doi: 10.1111/epi.12212. Epub 2013 May 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22905857French JA, Krauss GL, Steinhoff BJ, Squillacote D, Yang H, Kumar D, Laurenza A. Evaluation of adjunctive perampanel in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures: results of randomized global phase III study 305. Epilepsia. 2013 Jan;54(1):117-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03638.x. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
Related trials for Refractory Partial Seizures
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
A Study to Determine if BHV-7000 is Effective and Safe in Adults With Refractory Focal Onset Epilepsy
Focal Epilepsy
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Optimizing Therapy in Epilepsy Using Seizure Forecasts Via EEG and Wearables
Focal Epilepsy, Generalized Seizure
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Study to Determine if BHV-7000 is Effective and Safe in Adults With Refractory Focal Onset Epilepsy
Focal Epilepsy
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Perampanel Administered as an Adjunctive Therapy in Pediatric Participants With Childhood Epilepsy
Pediatric Epileptic Syndrome, Partial-onset Seizures
Recruiting
Non-Invasive Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound Stimulation for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy
Drug-Resistant Epilepsy, Epilepsy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David Squillacote, M.D. study director
Eisai Inc.
92 sites in 14 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing E2007 (perampanel) in people with Refractory Partial Seizures, run by Eisai Inc. at 92 sites in 14 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jul 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 92 sites in United States, Austria, France, Germany, Israel and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Nov 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent Change in the 28-day Seizure Frequency From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Phase (Titration and Maintenance Phases) (time frame: Baseline (Pre-randomization) through Week 19). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00699582, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jul 2014.