AzTrials
AzTrials

Type 2 DiabetesPhase 4NCT00699686

Endothelial Effects of Basal Insulin: Detemir Versus Glargine

A Phase 4 study testing Glargine and Detemir in people with Type 2 Diabetes and Endothelial Dysfunction, run by University of Padova at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) level represents a surrogate marker of cardiovascular risk and an indicator of the ongoing vascular damage. Moreover, EPCs are involved in the pathogenesis of virtually all diabetic complications. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 35 to 80 years
What is being tested?
Glargine and Detemir
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
May 2008to Mar 2010
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 35 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Type 2 diabetes
  • Macroangiopathy (coronary, or peripheral, or cerebrovascular)
  • On oral antidiabetic therapy
  • HbA1c > 7.0%

Who cannot join

  • Type 1 diabetes
  • Acute diabetic decompensation
  • Use of glitazones
  • Cancer
  • Acute disease or infection
  • Chronic renal failure (serum creatinin > 2.0 mg/dl)
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Advanced liver disease (Child B-C)
  • Immune disease, organ transplantation, immunosuppression
  • Recent surgery (within 3 months)
  • Recent cardiovascular events (within 3 months)
  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Pregnancy and lactation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Divisione di Malattie del Metabolismo

    Padova, 35100

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Effects of Optimized Glycemic Control Achieved With add-on Basal Insulin Therapy on Indexes of Endothelial Damage and Regeneration in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Macroangiopathy. A Randomized Cross-over Trial Comparing Detemir vs Glargine

Endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) level represents a surrogate marker of cardiovascular risk and an indicator of the ongoing vascular damage. Moreover, EPCs are involved in the pathogenesis of virtually all diabetic complications. Therefore, ways to modulate EPCs are currently considered of utmost importance, especially in high-risk subjects. While many drugs with pleiotropic vasculoprotective effects have shown ability to positively modulate EPCs, there is no data on the effects of specific insulin formulations.

This is a human randomised cross-over comparison trial. The purpose is to compare the effects of two basal insulin analogues (detemir and glargine) added to oral antidiabetic therapy in poorly-controlled type 2 patients with cardiovascular disease on endothelial function and EPC levels.

Read more

The aim is to test whether optimized glycemic control with add-on basal insulin analogues improves endothelial damage and regeneration in type 2 diabetes with macroangiopathy and to compare the effects of glargine vs detemir on markers of endothelial damage and regeneration.

EPC level is the most innovative outcome measure of this study and represents the primary endpoint. Endothelial dysfunction/damage, evaluated using soluble markers, will be the secondary outcome. Given the supposed inverse correlation between EPC and endothelial damage, it is expected that EPC increase reflects amelioration in endothelial biology, a result that may have significant clinical implications in this cohort of high-risk patients.

Read the detailed description

Diabetes mellitus is associated with a strikingly high incidence of cardiovascular events. This is likely attributable to the widespread vascular damage due to uncontrolled hyperglycaemia and associated risk factors. Endothelial dysfunction is universally recognised as the first step in the natural history of atherosclerosis. Therefore, efforts are deserved to the understanding of its pathogenesis and to new strategies to prevent or limit its development. High glucose concentration is one of the most detrimental factors that negatively affect endothelial cell function. Through the classical damage pathways (including oxidative stress, PKC and MAP kinase activation and AGE accumulation), hyperglycaemia hampers the homeostasis of the vascular endothelial layer. Besides favouring endothelial cell damage, hyperglycaemia also prevents endothelial regeneration by negatively modulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) [1]. EPCs are bone marrow-derived cells capable of differentiating into mature endothelial cells and repopulating the damaged endothelial layer, thus contributing to maintain endothelial homeostasis [2]. Consistently, the EPC level is directly correlated to measured of endothelial function [3]. The pool of circulating EPCs is reduced in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors, and EPC level is considered a biomarker of vascular health, which is negatively associated with measures of cardiovascular risk and with the extent of vascular damage [4]. Most importantly, EPC depletion predicts cardiovascular events independently of risk factors and of other relevant hard measures, such as left ventricular function [5]. In fact, a number of clinical and experimental studies indicate that alterations in EPCs contribute to the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease and of virtually all diabetic complications [6]. In this light, ways to expand the EPC pool are actively pursued: for instance, modulation of EPCs has been studied to demonstrate the pleiotropic effects of vasculoprotective drugs, such as statins, glitazones and ACE inhibitors (reviewed in [7]. Diabetes is associated with a profound depletion of circulating EPCs, which is related to the metabolic control (both HbA1c and fasting glucose), adiposity and concomitant risk factors [8, 9]. Short and long-term glycaemic control is probably one of the most important determinant of the EPC pool in diabetes. Actually, advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) have been shown to exert detrimental effects on EPCs in vitro [10]. We have also demonstrated that number and function of EPCs provide a valuable marker of vascular damage in both healthy subjects and in type 2 diabetic patients [11, 12]. Interestingly, a mild EPC depletion is also present in pre-diabetic states [13], an observation that strengthens the link between glucose metabolism and EPC biology. Correction of hyperglycaemia with insulin has the potential to restore the circulating EPC pool, likely through mobilisation from bone marrow. In fact, we have shown that experimental hyperglycaemia (streptozotocin-induced diabetes) impairs ischemia-induced EPC mobilisation, which is corrected by basal insulin therapy [13]. The favourable effects of antidiabetic therapy intensification has been substantiated in a short-term study in humans [14], but the mechanisms responsible for this effect are incompletely understood. One putative mechanism is stimulation of nitric oxide production inside the bone marrow microenvironment. This is in compliance with one recent observation of ours that insulin indeed stimulates production of NO [15]. In the bone marrow, this is followed by activation of MMP9, cleavage of membrane-bound c-kit ligand, which, in turn, weakens cell-matrix interactions and triggers EPC mobilisation [16]. It is currently unknown whether this phenomenon is mediated by insulin per se or by reduction of plasma glucose, and whether there exist differences among insulin formulations. Likely, to act on the central EPC compartment (bone marrow), insulin needs to reach the marrow microenvironment at sufficiently high concentrations, a goal which could be achieved preferentially with specific insulin analogues, such as insulin detemir.

It has been suggested that weight gain, which follows initiation of insulin therapy, may exert negative effects on major cardiovascular outcomes. Related to this notion, not only the EPC pool reflects the global cardiometabolic profile, but it is also negatively related to visceral adiposity [4]. In a mouse model of obesity and diabetes, generation and function of EPC are profoundly altered [17], while it has been suggested that leptin and other adipokines may mediate this effect [18]. Hence, the net modulation of EPCs by insulin therapy may result from the balance between marrow mobilisation and the negative impact of increased adiposity. Therefore, the use of a weight-neutral insulin, such as insulin detemir, may provide additional benefits in increasing the EPC pool.

Study design Randomised cross-over trial comparing insulin detemir and insulin glargine added to current oral antidiabetic regimen in poorly-controlled (HbA1c≥8.5%) type 2 diabetic patients with cardiovascular disease.

The crossover design will allow to control for previous treatment and provide a more thorough comparison between the two treatments under investigation.

Recruitment and randomization will be performed during 6 months.

  1. Basal measurements (at time zero)
  2. Randomization to receive insulin detemir or glargine (at time zero)
  3. First 3 months of treatment
  4. Ad interim measurements (at 3 months)
  5. Shift to the other insulin for 3 months
  6. Final measurements (at 6 months)Initial results will be available between 6 and 12 months from the beginning of the study, depending upon time needed for recruitment.

Drop-out in case of acute illnesses or infection, acute cardiovascular events, or hospitalisation during the study period. Expected drop-out rate <10%.

Treatment protocol A protocol similar to that described by [19] will be implemented. Once-daily subcutaneous insulin detemir or insulin glargine will be added to current oral glucose lowering drugs. Doses of oral agents will remain unchanged during the study period. Based on self-measured fasting plasma glucose levels (average records from 3 consecutive days), insulin doses will be titrated, aiming at fasting concentrations of <110 mg/dl. Starting daily dose will be 10 U and then titrated individually by clinic or telephone contacts on a weekly basis, using the algorithm described in [19]. HbA1c will be measured at the end of the 3-month treatment period. Shifting from the one to the other insulin regimen, current daily insulin units will be maintained and then re-titrated as necessary

Being tested
Glargine, Detemir
Keywords
Diabetes, Insulin, Endothelium, Cardiovascular disease, Stem cells
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin Resistance

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GlargineDrug

    Also called Lantus

    Daily bedtime subcutaneous insulin Glargine in individualized doses.

  • DetemirDrug

    Also called Levemir

    Daily bedtime subcutaneous insulin Detemir in individualized doses.

Study groups in NCT00699686
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
GlargineActive comparatorDuring this arm/phase patients take subcutaneous glargine daily for 3 months.
Receives: Drug: Glargine
DetemirExperimentalDuring this arm/phase, patients take insulin Detemir subcutaneously for 3 months.
Receives: Drug: Detemir

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in endothelial progenitor cell count

    Measured: Basal, 3 months, 6 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Change in markers of endothelial damage

    Measured: Basal, 3 months, 6 months

  2. Frequence of hypoglycemias

    The frequency of hypoglycemia will be reported for patients on glargine or detemir during the 1st and 2nd period of treatment.

    Measured: during 1st and 2nd arms

  3. Change in body weight

    Change in body weight will be assessed after each arm during treatment with glargine or detemir

    Measured: After the 1st and 2nd arms

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jun 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2008
  3. Primary completionMar 2010
  4. Study completionMar 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00699686
Sponsor's protocol ID
LIBRA
Status last verified
Aug 2010
First submitted
17 Jun 2008
Last updated
17 Aug 2010
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Fadini GP. An underlying principle for the study of circulating progenitor cells in diabetes and its complications. Diabetologia. 2008 Jul;51(7):1091-4. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-1021-0. No abstract available.

    PubMed 18478199
  • Fadini GP, Agostini C, Avogaro A. Endothelial progenitor cells and vascular biology in diabetes mellitus: current knowledge and future perspectives. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2005 Feb;1(1):41-58. doi: 10.2174/1573399052952640.

    PubMed 18220581
  • Fadini GP, Baesso I, Agostini C, Cuccato E, Nardelli GB, Lapolla A, Avogaro A. Maternal insulin therapy increases fetal endothelial progenitor cells during diabetic pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2008 Apr;31(4):808-10. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1996. Epub 2007 Dec 27. No abstract available.

    PubMed 18162496
  • Fadini GP, Pucci L, Vanacore R, Baesso I, Penno G, Balbarini A, Di Stefano R, Miccoli R, de Kreutzenberg S, Coracina A, Tiengo A, Agostini C, Del Prato S, Avogaro A. Glucose tolerance is negatively associated with circulating progenitor cell levels. Diabetologia. 2007 Oct;50(10):2156-63. doi: 10.1007/s00125-007-0732-y. Epub 2007 Jun 20.

    PubMed 17579827
  • Fadini GP, Sartore S, Agostini C, Avogaro A. Significance of endothelial progenitor cells in subjects with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007 May;30(5):1305-13. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2305. Epub 2007 Feb 2. No abstract available.

    PubMed 17277037
  • Fadini GP, Sartore S, Schiavon M, Albiero M, Baesso I, Cabrelle A, Agostini C, Avogaro A. Diabetes impairs progenitor cell mobilisation after hindlimb ischaemia-reperfusion injury in rats. Diabetologia. 2006 Dec;49(12):3075-84. doi: 10.1007/s00125-006-0401-6. Epub 2006 Oct 27.

    PubMed 17072586
  • Fadini GP, de Kreutzenberg SV, Coracina A, Baesso I, Agostini C, Tiengo A, Avogaro A. Circulating CD34+ cells, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J. 2006 Sep;27(18):2247-55. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl198. Epub 2006 Aug 15.

    PubMed 16912055
  • Fadini GP, Coracina A, Baesso I, Agostini C, Tiengo A, Avogaro A, de Kreutzenberg SV. Peripheral blood CD34+KDR+ endothelial progenitor cells are determinants of subclinical atherosclerosis in a middle-aged general population. Stroke. 2006 Sep;37(9):2277-82. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000236064.19293.79. Epub 2006 Jul 27.

    PubMed 16873710
  • Avogaro A, Fadini GP, Gallo A, Pagnin E, de Kreutzenberg S. Endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2006 Mar;16 Suppl 1:S39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2005.10.015. Epub 2006 Feb 8.

    PubMed 16530129
  • Fadini GP, Miorin M, Facco M, Bonamico S, Baesso I, Grego F, Menegolo M, de Kreutzenberg SV, Tiengo A, Agostini C, Avogaro A. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells are reduced in peripheral vascular complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 May 3;45(9):1449-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.067.

    PubMed 15862417
  • Fadini GP, Sartore S, Albiero M, Baesso I, Murphy E, Menegolo M, Grego F, Vigili de Kreutzenberg S, Tiengo A, Agostini C, Avogaro A. Number and function of endothelial progenitor cells as a marker of severity for diabetic vasculopathy. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006 Sep;26(9):2140-6. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000237750.44469.88. Epub 2006 Jul 20.

    PubMed 16857948
  • Werner N, Kosiol S, Schiegl T, Ahlers P, Walenta K, Link A, Bohm M, Nickenig G. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells and cardiovascular outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 8;353(10):999-1007. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043814.

    PubMed 16148285
  • Humpert PM, Neuwirth R, Battista MJ, Voronko O, von Eynatten M, Konrade I, Rudofsky G Jr, Wendt T, Hamann A, Morcos M, Nawroth PP, Bierhaus A. SDF-1 genotype influences insulin-dependent mobilization of adult progenitor cells in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005 Apr;28(4):934-6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.4.934. No abstract available.

    PubMed 15793201
  • Fadini GP, Albiero M, Vigili de Kreutzenberg S, Avogaro A. Hypoglycemia affects the changes in endothelial progenitor cell levels during insulin therapy in type 2 diabetic patients. J Endocrinol Invest. 2015 Jul;38(7):733-8. doi: 10.1007/s40618-015-0247-1. Epub 2015 Feb 27.

    PubMed 25722222
  • Fadini GP, Iori E, Marescotti MC, Vigili de Kreutzenberg S, Avogaro A. Insulin-induced glucose control improves HDL cholesterol levels but not reverse cholesterol transport in type 2 diabetic patients. Atherosclerosis. 2014 Aug;235(2):415-7. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.05.942. Epub 2014 Jun 4.

    PubMed 24933032

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Glargine and Detemir in people with Type 2 Diabetes and Endothelial Dysfunction, run by University of Padova at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in endothelial progenitor cell count (time frame: Basal, 3 months, 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00699686, which also lists 16 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2010; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in