AzTrials
AzTrials

Actinic KeratosisPhase 2NCT00700063

A Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of PEP005 Topical Gel When Used to Treat Actinic Keratoses on the Head (Face or Scalp)

A Phase 2 study testing PEP005 Topical Gel in people with Actinic Keratosis, run by Peplin at 28 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This Phase IIb study is designed to assess the safety and efficacy of 0.005%, 0.01% and 0.015% PEP005 Topical Gel when applied to an area of skin, containing 4-8 AK lesions on the face or scalp. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Actinic Keratosis
What is being tested?
PEP005 Topical Gel
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
265 participants
Where
28 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Jun 2008to Oct 2008
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Must be male or female
  • Female patients must be of
  • Non-childbearing potential;
  • Childbearing potential, provided negative pregnancy test and using effective contraception
  • 4 to 8 AK lesions on the face or scalp

Who cannot join

  • Cosmetic or therapeutic procedures within 2 weeks and within 2 cm of the selected treatment area.
  • Treatment with immunomodulators, or interferon/ interferon inducers or systemic medications that suppress the immune system: within 4 weeks.
  • Treatment with 5-FU, imiquimod, diclofenac, or photodynamic therapy:
  • within 8 weeks and 2 cm of treatment area

Trial locations and contacts

28 sites in 2 countries.

28 sites in 2 countries

United States25 sites
  • Academic Dermatology Associates

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106

  • Altman Dermatology Associates

    Arlington Heights, Illinois, 60005

  • DermResearch, Inc. 8140 N. MoPac, Bldg. 3, Suite 120,

    Austin, Texas, 78759

  • Northwest Clinical Trial

    Boise, Idaho, 83704

  • Christie Clinic

    Champaign, Illinois, 61820

  • Minnesota Clinical Study Center

    Fridley, Minnesota, 55432

  • Burke Pharmaceutical Research

    Hot Springs, Arizona, 71913

  • Suzanne Bruce and Associates, The Center for Skin Research

    Houston, Texas, 77056

  • Dermatology Research of Arkansas

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205

  • Koppel Dermatology

    Los Angeles, California, 70072

  • Dermatology Research Associates

    Los Angeles, California, 90045

  • Dermatology Research Associates

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37203

  • TKL Research, Inc.

    Paramus, New Jersey, 07652

  • Philadelphia Institute of Dermatology

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19034

  • Oregon Medical Research Center

    Portland, Oregon, 97223

  • Integrated Research Group Inc

    Riverside, California, 92506

  • Dermatology Clinical Research Center of San Antonio

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Progressive Clinical Research

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Skin Surgery Medical Group Inc

    San Diego, California, 92117

  • 470 Castro St Suite 202-204

    San Francisco, California, 94114

  • South Bend Clinic

    South Bend, Indiana, 46617

  • Spencer Derm and Skin Surgery Center

    St. Petersburg, Florida, 33716

  • Dermatology Associates of Tyler

    Tyler, Texas, 75703

  • Solano Clinical Research

    Vallejo, California, 94589

  • Dermatology Specialists Inc

    Vista, California, 92083

Other trials in United States

Australia3 sites
  • The Skin Centre

    Benowa, Queensland, 4217

  • Siller Medical

    Brisbane, Queensland, 4000

  • Southderm Pty Ltd

    Kogarah, New South Wales, 2217

Other trials in Australia

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of 0.005%, 0.01% and 0.015% PEP005 Topical Gel When Used to Treat Actinic Keratoses on the Head (Face or Scalp)

This Phase IIb study is designed to assess the safety and efficacy of 0.005%, 0.01% and 0.015% PEP005 Topical Gel when applied to an area of skin, containing 4-8 AK lesions on the face or scalp.

Being tested
PEP005 Topical Gel, Vehicle gel
Keywords
Peplin, Actinic keratosis, PEP005
Medical subject headings
Keratosis, Actinic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PEP005 Topical GelDrug

    0.005%, two days treatment

  • PEP005 Topical GelDrug

    0.01%, two days treatment

  • PEP005 Topical GelDrug

    0.015%, two days treatment

  • Vehicle gelDrug

    two days treatment

  • PEP005 Topical GelDrug

    0.005%, three days treatment

  • PEP005 Topical GelDrug

    0.01%, three days treatment

  • PEP005 Topical GelDrug

    0.015%, three days treatment

  • Vehicle gelDrug

    three days treatment

Study groups in NCT00700063
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: PEP005 Topical Gel
2ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: PEP005 Topical Gel
3ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: PEP005 Topical Gel
4Placebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Vehicle gel
5ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: PEP005 Topical Gel
6ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: PEP005 Topical Gel
7ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: PEP005 Topical Gel
8Placebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Vehicle gel

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of AEs Recorded Throughout the Study

    Incidence of AEs recorded throughout the study

    Measured: 57 days

  2. Incidence of SAE Recorded Throughout the Study

    Incidence of SAE recorded throughout the study

    Measured: 57 days

  3. Incidence Rate and Severity of LSRs Following Study Medication Application

    The treatment area was assessed at baseline, Day 1 (pre-dose), and at each subsequent study visit for the presence and grade (0 to 4) of the following LSRs: erythema; flaking/scaling, crusting, swelling, vesiculation/pustulation, and erosion/ulceration. A composite LSR score (0 to 24), reflecting the sum of each individual LSR grade, was calculated for each patient at each visit.

    The actual value and change from baseline in the composite LSR score were also summarized.

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Incidence Rate and Severity of LSRs Following Study Medication Application

    The treatment area was assessed at baseline, Day 1 (pre-dose), and at each subsequent study visit for the presence and grade (0 to 4) of the following LSRs: erythema; flaking/scaling, crusting, swelling, vesiculation/pustulation, and erosion/ulceration. A composite LSR score (0 to 24), reflecting the sum of each individual LSR grade, was calculated for each patient at each visit.

    The actual value and change from baseline in the composite LSR score were also summarized.

    Measured: Day 57

  5. Incidence of Hyperpigmentation Following Study Medication Application

    The selected treatment area was assessed for hyperpigmentation at baseline (Day 1 pre-dose), Day 57, and at each poststudy followup visit as warranted.

    Measured: Baseline

  6. Incidence of Hyperpigmentation Following Study Medication Application

    The selected treatment area was assessed for hyperpigmentation at baseline (Day 1 pre-dose), Day 57, and at each poststudy followup visit as warranted. If any pigmentation was present, the significance and extent of pigmentation and scarring was recorded. At all timepoints, pigmentation evaluations were performed by a board certified Dermatologist (or equivalent)

    Measured: Day 57

  7. Incidence of Hypopigmentation Following Study Medication Application

    The selected treatment area was assessed for hypopigmentation at baseline (Day 1 pre-dose), Day 57, and at each poststudy followup visit as warranted. If any pigmentation was present, the significance and extent of pigmentation and scarring was recorded. At all timepoints, pigmentation evaluations were performed by a board certified Dermatologist (or equivalent)

    Measured: Baseline

  8. Incidence of Hypopigmentation Following Study Medication Application

    The selected treatment area was assessed for hypopigmentation at baseline (Day 1 pre-dose), Day 57, and at each poststudy followup visit as warranted. If any pigmentation was present, the significance and extent of pigmentation and scarring was recorded. At all timepoints, pigmentation evaluations were performed by a board certified Dermatologist (or equivalent)

    Measured: Day 57

  9. Incidence of Scarring Following Study Medication Application

    The selected treatment area was assessed for scarring at baseline (Day 1 pre-dose), Day 57, and at each poststudy followup visit as warranted. If any scarring was present, the significance and extent of scarring was recorded. At all timepoints, pigmentation evaluations were performed by a board certified Dermatologist (or equivalent)

    Measured: Baseline

  10. Incidence of Scarring Following Study Medication Application

    The selected treatment area was assessed for scarring at baseline (Day 1 pre-dose), Day 57, and at each poststudy followup visit as warranted. If any scarring was present, the significance and extent of scarring was recorded. At all timepoints, pigmentation evaluations were performed by a board certified Dermatologist (or equivalent).

    Measured: Day 57

  11. Complete Clearance Rate of AK Lesions;

    Defined as the number of patients at the day 57 post-treatment visit with no clinically visible AK lesions in the selected treatment area

    Measured: Day 57

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Efficacy (Clearance of AK Lesions) Partial Clearance Rate

    Partial clearence rate, defined as the number of patients at the Day 57 visit with a 75% or greater reduction in the number of AK lesions identified at baseline, in the Face and Scalp

    Measured: 57 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jun 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2008
  3. Primary completionOct 2008
  4. Study completionOct 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
265 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00700063
Sponsor's protocol ID
PEP005-015
Status last verified
Mar 2015
First submitted
15 Jun 2008
Last updated
14 Apr 2015
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing PEP005 Topical Gel in people with Actinic Keratosis, run by Peplin at 28 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 28 sites in United States, Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Aug 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of AEs Recorded Throughout the Study (time frame: 57 days). The study lists 11 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Apr 2015.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in