Diabetic RetinopathyPhase 2DEGASNCT00701181
Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of PF-04523655 Versus Laser in Subjects With Diabetic Macular Edema
A Phase 2 study testing Laser Treatment, PF-04523655 high and PF-04523655 middle in people with Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetes Complications, run by Quark Pharmaceuticals at 53 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
To evaluate the effectiveness of study drug in improving visual acuity compared to laser treatment in the patients with diabetic macular edema Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Retinopathy, Diabetes Complications
- What is being tested?
- Laser Treatment, PF-04523655 high and PF-04523655 middle
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 184 participants
- Where
- 53 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2008to Jan 2011
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with Diabetes Mellitus (Type 1 or Type 2) Showing Diabetic Macular Edema in the Eye.
Who cannot join
- Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy in the Study Eye.
- Subjects Receiving Concomitant Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy.
Trial locations and contacts
53 sites in 8 countries.
53 sites in 8 countries
United States26 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
‘Aiea, Hawaii, 96701
Pfizer Investigational Site
Augusta, Georgia, 30909
Pfizer Investigational Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
Pfizer Investigational Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Pfizer Investigational Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Pfizer Investigational Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210
Pfizer Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Pfizer Investigational Site
Corpus Christi, Texas, 78413
Pfizer Investigational Site
Henderson, Nevada, 89052
Pfizer Investigational Site
Henderson, Nevada, 89074
Pfizer Investigational Site
High Point, North Carolina, 27262
Pfizer Investigational Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46290
Pfizer Investigational Site
Lakeland, Florida, 33805
Pfizer Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89109
Pfizer Investigational Site
Mesa, Arizona, 85210
Pfizer Investigational Site
Meza, Arizona, 85210
Pfizer Investigational Site
Mountain View, California, 94040
Pfizer Investigational Site
New Albany, Indiana, 47150
Pfizer Investigational Site
Peoria, Arizona, 85381
Pfizer Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85014
Pfizer Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016
Pfizer Investigational Site
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 03801
Pfizer Investigational Site
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701
Pfizer Investigational Site
Statesville, North Carolina, 28677
Pfizer Investigational Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
Pfizer Investigational Site
Winter Haven, Florida, 33880
Italy7 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Milan, 20122
Pfizer Investigational Site
Milan, 20132
Pfizer Investigational Site
Milan, 20157
Pfizer Investigational Site
Padova, 35128
Pfizer Investigational Site
Roma, 00168
Pfizer Investigational Site
Roma, 00198
Pfizer Investigational Site
Udine, 33100
United Kingdom6 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Bristol, BS1 2LX
Pfizer Investigational Site
Bristol, BS2 8HW
Pfizer Investigational Site
Frimley, Camberley, Surrey, GU15 3UW
Pfizer Investigational Site
Liverpool, L7 8XP
Pfizer Investigational Site
Sheffield, S10 2JF
Pfizer Investigational Site
Southampton, SO16 6YD
Israel5 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Kfar Saba, 44281
Pfizer Investigational Site
Petah Tikva, 49100
Pfizer Investigational Site
Tel Aviv, 64239
Pfizer Investigational Site
Tel HaShomer, 52621
Pfizer Investigational Site
Tsrifin, 70300
India4 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Ahmedabad, 380 004
Pfizer Investigational Site
Bangalore, 560 085
Pfizer Investigational Site
Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751 024
Pfizer Investigational Site
New Delhi, 110 029
Germany3 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106
Pfizer Investigational Site
Leipzig, 04103
Pfizer Investigational Site
Münster, 48145
About this study
Official title: A Phase II Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center, Diabetic Macular Edema Dose Ranging, Comparator Study Evaluating The Efficacy And Safety Of PF-04523655 Versus Laser Therapy (DEGAS)
To evaluate the effectiveness of study drug in improving visual acuity compared to laser treatment in the patients with diabetic macular edema
Read the detailed description
DEGAS termination decision date was December 17, 2010. Rationale: the objectives of the study could no longer be achieved. The study was not terminated for safety.
- Conditions
- Diabetic Retinopathy, Diabetes Complications
- Being tested
- Laser Treatment, PF-04523655 high, PF-04523655 middle, PF-04523655 low
- Keywords
- Phase II, Prospective, Randomized, Diabetic Macular Edema, PF-04523655, Laser
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetic Retinopathy, Diabetes Complications
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Laser TreatmentProcedure or surgery
Necessity of laser treatment is assessed every three months.
PF-04523655 highDrug
3 mg intravitreal injection
PF-04523655 middleDrug
1 mg intravitreal injection
PF-04523655 lowDrug
0.4 mg intravitreal injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Laser | Active comparator | This is a procedure - not a drug intervention. Receives: Procedure: Laser Treatment |
| PF-04523655 (High) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: PF-04523655 high |
| PF-04523655 middle | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: PF-04523655 middle |
| PF-04523655 low | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: PF-04523655 low |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change from Baseline in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score
Measured: Month 24
Secondary outcomes (9)
Mean Changes in NEI-VFQ-25 Composite Score from Baseline
Measured: Month 24, 36
Plasma Concentration of PF-04523655
Measured: Week 1
Percent of Subjects Gaining Letters in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score from Baseline.
Measured: Month 24, 36
Incidence and Severity of Ocular and Systemic Adverse Events, as Identified by Ophthalmic Examination
Measured: Month 24, 36
Mean Change from Baseline in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score
Measured: Month 36
Mean Changes in Area of Fluorescein Leakage from Baseline
Measured: Month 24, 36
Percent of Subjects Losing Letters in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score from Baseline.
Measured: Month 24, 36
Mean Changes in Retinal Thickness from Baseline
Measured: Month 24, 36
Mean Changes in Macular Volume from Baseline
Measured: Month 24, 36
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jun 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2008
- Primary completionJan 2011
- Study completionJan 2011
Why it stopped: See termination reason in detailed description.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetic RetinopathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 184 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Quark Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Pfizer
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00701181
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B0451004
- Acronym
- DEGAS
- Status last verified
- Oct 2012
- First submitted
- 17 Jun 2008
- Last updated
- 11 Oct 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Nguyen QD, Schachar RA, Nduaka CI, Sperling M, Basile AS, Klamerus KJ, Chi-Burris K, Yan E, Paggiarino DA, Rosenblatt I, Aitchison R, Erlich SS; DEGAS Clinical Study Group. Dose-ranging evaluation of intravitreal siRNA PF-04523655 for diabetic macular edema (the DEGAS study). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Nov 15;53(12):7666-74. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9961.
PubMed 23074206
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Oct 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center, Diabetic Macular Edema Dose Ranging, Comparator Study Evaluating The Efficacy And Safety Of PF-04523655 Versus Laser Therapy (DEGAS)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00701181
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DEGAS / B0451004
- Conditions
- Diabetic Retinopathy, Diabetes Complications
- Keywords
- Phase II, Prospective, Randomized, Diabetic Macular Edema, PF-04523655, Laser
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: See termination reason in detailed description.
- Enrolment
- 184 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Quark PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Pfizer
- Study start
- Jun 2008
- Primary completion
- Jan 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Jun 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To evaluate the effectiveness of study drug in improving visual acuity compared to laser treatment in the patients with diabetic macular edema
Detailed description
DEGAS termination decision date was December 17, 2010. Rationale: the objectives of the study could no longer be achieved. The study was not terminated for safety.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Laser | Active comparator | Procedure: Laser TreatmentThis is a procedure - not a drug intervention. |
| PF-04523655 (High) | Experimental | Drug: PF-04523655 high |
| PF-04523655 middle | Experimental | Drug: PF-04523655 middle |
| PF-04523655 low | Experimental | Drug: PF-04523655 low |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with Diabetes Mellitus (Type 1 or Type 2) Showing Diabetic Macular Edema in the Eye.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy in the Study Eye.
- Subjects Receiving Concomitant Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Laser TreatmentNecessity of laser treatment is assessed every three months. | Procedure or surgery | Laser |
| PF-04523655 high3 mg intravitreal injection | Drug | PF-04523655 (High) |
| PF-04523655 middle1 mg intravitreal injection | Drug | PF-04523655 middle |
| PF-04523655 low0.4 mg intravitreal injection | Drug | PF-04523655 low |
Primary outcome
Mean Change from Baseline in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score
Time frame: Month 24
9 secondary outcomes
Mean Changes in NEI-VFQ-25 Composite Score from Baseline
Time frame: Month 24, 36
Plasma Concentration of PF-04523655
Time frame: Week 1
Percent of Subjects Gaining Letters in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score from Baseline.
Time frame: Month 24, 36
Incidence and Severity of Ocular and Systemic Adverse Events, as Identified by Ophthalmic Examination
Time frame: Month 24, 36
Mean Change from Baseline in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score
Time frame: Month 36
Mean Changes in Area of Fluorescein Leakage from Baseline
Time frame: Month 24, 36
Percent of Subjects Losing Letters in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score from Baseline.
Time frame: Month 24, 36
Mean Changes in Retinal Thickness from Baseline
Time frame: Month 24, 36
Mean Changes in Macular Volume from Baseline
Time frame: Month 24, 36
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: See termination reason in detailed description.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Oct 2012.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23074206Nguyen QD, Schachar RA, Nduaka CI, Sperling M, Basile AS, Klamerus KJ, Chi-Burris K, Yan E, Paggiarino DA, Rosenblatt I, Aitchison R, Erlich SS; DEGAS Clinical Study Group. Dose-ranging evaluation of intravitreal siRNA PF-04523655 for diabetic macular edema (the DEGAS study). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Nov 15;53(12):7666-74. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9961.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Diabetic Retinopathy
Recruiting
Implementing AI-based Glaucoma Screening Within Federally Qualified Health Centers
Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence in China: Faricimab Use in Diabetic Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion, and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (The Farseeing Study)
Diabetic Macular Edema, Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Long-Term Follow-Up Study of RGX-314 Administered in the Suprachoroidal Space for Participants With and Without Diabetic Retinopathy
Diabetic Retinopathy, DR
Recruiting
To Investigate the Feasibility and Acceptability of Trained Non-medical Professionals Performing Laser Treatment for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR), and the Potential Impact on Service Capacity. Assess Feasibility of Conducting a Full Trial Comparing Trained ECPs With Ophthalmologists
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR)
RecruitingPhase 2
Oral N-Acetylcysteine on Diabetic Macular Edema
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
53 sites in 8 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Laser Treatment, PF-04523655 high and PF-04523655 middle in people with Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetes Complications, run by Quark Pharmaceuticals at 53 sites in 8 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Oct 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 53 sites in United States, Italy, United Kingdom, Israel, India and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: See termination reason in detailed description.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change from Baseline in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score (time frame: Month 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00701181, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Oct 2012.