Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 4NCT00706797
Study Evaluating Efficacy / Safety of Etanercept + Methotrexate Compared to Usual Treatment in Moderate RA Subjects
A Phase 4 study testing etanercept (EnbrelTM) and methotrexate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer at 45 sites in 9 countries.
Trial summary
To assess comparative radiographic efficacy, clinical efficacy and safety of etanercept (ETN) + methotrexate (MTX) with usual disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment in subjects with moderate RA who were treated with MTX monotherapy, but continue to have moderate disease activity. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- etanercept (EnbrelTM) and methotrexate
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 141 participants
- Where
- 45 sitesin 9 countries
- Study dates
- Sep 2008to May 2010
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Meet the 1987 ACR Revised Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
- Documented evidence, confirmed by a blinded 3rd party assessor, of at least one erosion observed by X-ray at randomization based on X-ray taken at the screening visit.
- Have received MTX as stable dose for 28 days prior to the screening visit.
Who cannot join
- Previous treatment with ETN, infliximab, adalimumab, other Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -a inhibitors, anakinra or other biological agents.
- Receipt of any DMARD, other than MTX, within 28 days before screening.
Trial locations and contacts
45 sites in 9 countries.
45 sites in 9 countries
France8 sites
Study site
Amiens, 80054
Study site
Échirolles, 38130
Study site
Metz, 57077
Study site
Montpellier, 34295
Study site
Paris, 75651
Study site
Paris, 75679
Study site
Rouen, 76031
Study site
Tours, 37044
Spain8 sites
Study site
Barcelona, 08035
Study site
Bilbao, Vizcaya, 48013
Study site
Getafe, Madrid, 28902
Study site
Madrid, Madrid, 28006
Study site
Madrid, Madrid, 28046
Study site
Madrid, 28040
Study site
Santander, Cantabria, 39008
Study site
Valencia, 46010
Germany6 sites
Study site
Berlin, 10117
Study site
Cologne, 50924
Study site
Frankfurt, 60590
Study site
Hamburg-Eilbeck, 22081
Study site
Homburg, 66424
Study site
Mainz, 55131
Hungary6 sites
Study site
Budapest, 1023
Study site
Budapest, 1036
Study site
Miskolc, 3529
Study site
Rijeka, 51000
Study site
Split, 21000
Study site
Zagreb, 10000
Poland6 sites
Study site
Bytom, 41-902
Study site
Krakow, 31-531
Study site
Ustroń, 43-450
Study site
Warsaw, 00-909
Study site
Warsaw, 02-637
Study site
Wroclaw, 50-088
United Kingdom5 sites
Study site
Aintree, L9 7AL
Study site
Birmingham, West Midlands, WS11 5XY
Study site
Cambridge, Cambs, CB2 2QQ
Study site
Metropolitan Borough of Wirral, CH49 5PE
Study site
Newcastle, NE7 7DN
Czechia3 sites
Study site
Ostrava, 722 00
Study site
Prague, 128-50
Study site
Prague, 140-59
About this study
Official title: An Open-Label, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Radiographic Efficacy and Safety of Enbrel™ (Etanercept) Added to Methotrexate in Comparison With Usual Treatment in Subjects With Moderate Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity
To assess comparative radiographic efficacy, clinical efficacy and safety of etanercept (ETN) + methotrexate (MTX) with usual disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment in subjects with moderate RA who were treated with MTX monotherapy, but continue to have moderate disease activity.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- etanercept (EnbrelTM), methotrexate
- Keywords
- Moderate Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
etanercept (EnbrelTM)Drug
methotrexateDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Usual care | Active comparator | Utilized Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) from a list of the 6 most commonly prescribed in the participating countries (Methotrexate, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, leflunomide, cyclosporine A and gold). Receives: Drug: methotrexate |
| ETN + MTX | Active comparator | Etanercept (ETN) 50 milligrams (mg) sub-cutaneous (SC) injection once weekly (pre-filled syringe) plus continuation of current dose of Methotrexate (MTX) either oral (PO), SC, or intramuscular (IM). Receives: Drug: etanercept (EnbrelTM); Drug: methotrexate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (TSS) at Week 52
Modified TSS is a measure of change in joint health. TSS is defined as joint space narrowing score (range 0 [no narrowing] to 168 [high narrowing]) plus (+) erosion score (range is from 0 [no erosion] to 280 [high erosion]). The modified TSS range is from 0 (no damage) to 448 (bad joint status). Increase from baseline represents disease progression and / or joint worsening; no change represents halting of disease progression; a decrease represents improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Secondary outcomes (17)
Change From Baseline in Erosions at Week 52
Erosion score (a component of the modified TSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Erosion score range is from 0 (no erosion) to 280 (high erosion). Increase from baseline represents disease progression and / or joint worsening; no change represents halting of disease progression; a decrease represents improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing at Week 52
Joint space narrowing score (a component of the modified TSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Joint space narrowing score range is 0 (no narrowing) to 168 (high narrowing). Increase from baseline represents disease progression and / or joint worsening; no change represents halting of disease progression; a decrease represents improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Percentage of Participants Showing no Radiographic Progression (TSS Change <0.5) at Week 52
Radiographic non-progression determined based on TSS change <0.5 using the dichotomous response Yes / No. The modified TSS range is from 0 (no damage) to 448 (bad joint status). Increase from baseline represents disease progression and / or joint worsening; no change represents halting of disease progression; a decrease represents improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52, Last observation carried forward (LOCF)
Percentage of Participants Achieving >1.2 Improvement in Disease Activity Score Based on a 28-joint Count (DAS28)
Disease activity score based on 28 painful joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in millimeters per hour (mm/hr), and general health (GH) using Visual Analog Scale (VAS); range 0 (very well) to 100 (extremely bad). DAS28 score calculated as 0.56 square root (√) (28 painful joint count) + 0.28 √ (28 swollen joint count) + 0.70 (ln ESR mm/hr) + 0.014 GH; range 0 to 10. DAS28 score >5.1=higher disease activity; <3.2=low disease activity; <2.6=clinical remission. Achievement of >1.2 improvement defined as decrease in DAS28 >1.2 (change in DAS28 < -1.2).
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission (DAS28 <2.60)
Disease activity score based on 28 painful joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) mm/hr, and general health (GH) using a visual analog scale (VAS); VAS range: 0 (very well) to 100 (extremely bad). DAS28 score calculated as 0.56 √ (28 painful joint count) + 0.28 √ (28 swollen joint count) + 0.70 (ln ESR mm/hr) + 0.014 GH; range 0 to 10. DAS28 score >5.10=higher disease activity; <3.20=low disease activity; <2.60=clinical remission.
Measured: Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (DAS28 ≤3.20)
Disease activity score based on 28 painful joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) mm/hr, and general health (GH) using a visual analog scale (VAS); VAS range: 0 (very well) to 100 (extremely bad). DAS28 score calculated as 0.56 √ (28 painful joint count) + 0.28 √ (28 swollen joint count) + 0.70 (ln ESR mm/hr) + 0.014 GH; range 0 to 10. DAS28 score >5.10=higher disease activity; <3.20=low disease activity; <2.60=clinical remission.
Measured: Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving a >0.6 Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 Response
Disease activity score based on 28 painful joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) mm/hr, and participant's assessment of general health (GH) using a visual analog scale (VAS); VAS range: 0 (very well) to 100 (extremely bad). DAS28 score calculated as 0.56 √ (28 painful joint count) + 0.28 √ (28 swollen joint count) + 0.70 (ln ESR mm/hr) + 0.014 GH; range 0 to 10. DAS28 score >5.10=higher disease activity; <3.20=low disease activity; <2.60=clinical remission. DAS28 response of >0.6 defined as decrease in DAS28 >0.6 (change in DAS28 < -0.6).
Measured: Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving Moderate or Good Response on European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Criteria
Response to treatment assessed by EULAR response criteria. Participants were characterized as good, moderate, or non-responders based on both Disease Activity Score (DAS) level attained and change in DAS. Good response defined as >1.2 improvement in DAS from Baseline and DAS attained during follow-up of ≤2.4. Non-responders = participants with improvement of ≤0.6 or participants with improvement of >0.6 but ≤1.2 and DAS attained during follow-up of >5.1. Remaining participants were classified as moderate. Scores of good and moderate were considered to have therapeutic response.
Measured: Week 12, Week 24, Week 52
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response: responder = ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Subjects withdrawing early were non-responders.
Measured: Week 12, Week 24, Week 52
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response: responder = ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Subjects withdrawing early were non-responders.
Measured: Week 12, Week 24, Week 52
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response: responder = ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) . Subjects withdrawing early were non-responders.
Measured: Week 12, Week 24, Week 52
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90% (ACR90) Response
American College of Rheumatology 90% (ACR 90) response: responder = ≥ 90% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 90% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 90% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Subjects withdrawing early were non-responders.
Measured: Week 12, Week 24, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Dose of Corticosteroids to Manage Flare-ups Across the 52-week Treatment Period
Mean daily dose of corticosteroids to manage flare-ups (temporary increases in corticosteroid dose or use of intra-articular steroids) during treatment period. Daily dose of equivalent prednisone derived in mg/day: oral corticosteroids: 5 mg of prednisone = 5 mg of prednisolone = 25 mg of cortisone = 20 mg of hydrocortisone = 4 mg of methylprednisolone = 4 mg of triamcinolone = 2mg of paramethasone = 0.75 mg of betamethasone = 0.75 of dexamethasone = 0.3 of cortivazol.
Measured: Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 40, Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Minimal Clinically Important Improvement (MCII)
Participants were asked how their pain had been during the last 48 hours compared to baseline. Participants that reported improvement assessed how important this improvement was to them; range: very important, moderately important, slightly important, or not at all important. Binary response options: 1=improved very important, or improved moderately important; 2=slightly important, not at all important, no change, or worse-more pain.
Measured: Week 12, Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)
Percentage of participants reporting acceptable symptom state: acceptance to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of pain they had during the last 48 hours; and unacceptable symptom state: not able to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of pain they had during the last 48 hours.
Measured: Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 40, Week 52
Health Related Quality of Life: EuroQol-5D Health Index
EQ-5D is a self-administered questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in 5 domains (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression). Scores from the 5 domains are used to calculate the Health State Profile Score as a single index value; range: 0.0 (death) to 1.0 (perfect health); higher scores indicate a better health state.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52
Health Related Quality of Life: EuroQol-5D Health State Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
EQ-5D: subject rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jun 2008 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2008
- Primary completionDec 2009
- Study completionMay 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 141 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00706797
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0881X1-4437
- Status last verified
- Jun 2011
- First submitted
- 25 Jun 2008
- Last updated
- 21 Jun 2011
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Mandl P, Balint PV, Brault Y, Backhaus M, D'Agostino MA, Grassi W, van der Heijde D, de Miguel E, Wakefield RJ, Logeart I, Dougados M. Clinical and ultrasound-based composite disease activity indices in rheumatoid arthritis: results from a multicenter, randomized study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Jun;65(6):879-87. doi: 10.1002/acr.21913.
PubMed 23213004Mandl P, Balint PV, Brault Y, Backhaus M, D'Agostino MA, Grassi W, van der Heijde D, de Miguel E, Wakefield RJ, Logeart I, Dougados M. Metrologic properties of ultrasound versus clinical evaluation of synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: results of a multicenter, randomized study. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Apr;64(4):1272-82. doi: 10.1002/art.33491. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
PubMed 22131049
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jun 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-Label, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Radiographic Efficacy and Safety of Enbrel™ (Etanercept) Added to Methotrexate in Comparison With Usual Treatment in Subjects With Moderate Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00706797
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0881X1-4437
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Keywords
- Moderate Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Enrolment
- 141 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Sep 2008
- Primary completion
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jun 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Jan 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To assess comparative radiographic efficacy, clinical efficacy and safety of etanercept (ETN) + methotrexate (MTX) with usual disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment in subjects with moderate RA who were treated with MTX monotherapy, but continue to have moderate disease activity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Usual care | Active comparator | Drug: methotrexateUtilized Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) from a list of the 6 most commonly prescribed in the participating countries (Methotrexate, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, leflunomide, cyclosporine A and gold). |
| ETN + MTX | Active comparator | Drug: etanercept (EnbrelTM), Drug: methotrexateEtanercept (ETN) 50 milligrams (mg) sub-cutaneous (SC) injection once weekly (pre-filled syringe) plus continuation of current dose of Methotrexate (MTX) either oral (PO), SC, or intramuscular (IM). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Meet the 1987 ACR Revised Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
- Documented evidence, confirmed by a blinded 3rd party assessor, of at least one erosion observed by X-ray at randomization based on X-ray taken at the screening visit.
- Have received MTX as stable dose for 28 days prior to the screening visit.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Previous treatment with ETN, infliximab, adalimumab, other Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -a inhibitors, anakinra or other biological agents.
- Receipt of any DMARD, other than MTX, within 28 days before screening.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| etanercept (EnbrelTM) | Drug | ETN + MTX |
| methotrexate | Drug | ETN + MTX, Usual care |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (TSS) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Modified TSS is a measure of change in joint health. TSS is defined as joint space narrowing score (range 0 [no narrowing] to 168 [high narrowing]) plus (+) erosion score (range is from 0 [no erosion] to 280 [high erosion]). The modified TSS range is from 0 (no damage) to 448 (bad joint status). Increase from baseline represents disease progression and / or joint worsening; no change represents halting of disease progression; a decrease represents improvement.
17 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Erosions at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Percentage of Participants Showing no Radiographic Progression (TSS Change <0.5) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, Last observation carried forward (LOCF)
Percentage of Participants Achieving >1.2 Improvement in Disease Activity Score Based on a 28-joint Count (DAS28)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission (DAS28 <2.60)
Time frame: Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (DAS28 ≤3.20)
Time frame: Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving a >0.6 Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 Response
Time frame: Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving Moderate or Good Response on European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Criteria
Time frame: Week 12, Week 24, Week 52
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Time frame: Week 12, Week 24, Week 52
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Time frame: Week 12, Week 24, Week 52
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Time frame: Week 12, Week 24, Week 52
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90% (ACR90) Response
Time frame: Week 12, Week 24, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Dose of Corticosteroids to Manage Flare-ups Across the 52-week Treatment Period
Time frame: Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 40, Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Minimal Clinically Important Improvement (MCII)
Time frame: Week 12, Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)
Time frame: Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 40, Week 52
Health Related Quality of Life: EuroQol-5D Health Index
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52
Health Related Quality of Life: EuroQol-5D Health State Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jun 2011.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23213004Mandl P, Balint PV, Brault Y, Backhaus M, D'Agostino MA, Grassi W, van der Heijde D, de Miguel E, Wakefield RJ, Logeart I, Dougados M. Clinical and ultrasound-based composite disease activity indices in rheumatoid arthritis: results from a multicenter, randomized study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Jun;65(6):879-87. doi: 10.1002/acr.21913.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22131049Mandl P, Balint PV, Brault Y, Backhaus M, D'Agostino MA, Grassi W, van der Heijde D, de Miguel E, Wakefield RJ, Logeart I, Dougados M. Metrologic properties of ultrasound versus clinical evaluation of synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: results of a multicenter, randomized study. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Apr;64(4):1272-82. doi: 10.1002/art.33491. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
45 sites in 9 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing etanercept (EnbrelTM) and methotrexate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer at 45 sites in 9 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jun 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 45 sites in France, Spain, Germany, Hungary, Poland and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Jan 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (TSS) at Week 52 (time frame: Baseline, Week 52). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00706797, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jun 2011.