AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 4NCT00706797

Study Evaluating Efficacy / Safety of Etanercept + Methotrexate Compared to Usual Treatment in Moderate RA Subjects

A Phase 4 study testing etanercept (EnbrelTM) and methotrexate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer at 45 sites in 9 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To assess comparative radiographic efficacy, clinical efficacy and safety of etanercept (ETN) + methotrexate (MTX) with usual disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment in subjects with moderate RA who were treated with MTX monotherapy, but continue to have moderate disease activity. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
etanercept (EnbrelTM) and methotrexate
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
141 participants
Where
45 sitesin 9 countries
Study dates
Sep 2008to May 2010
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Meet the 1987 ACR Revised Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
  • Documented evidence, confirmed by a blinded 3rd party assessor, of at least one erosion observed by X-ray at randomization based on X-ray taken at the screening visit.
  • Have received MTX as stable dose for 28 days prior to the screening visit.

Who cannot join

  • Previous treatment with ETN, infliximab, adalimumab, other Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -a inhibitors, anakinra or other biological agents.
  • Receipt of any DMARD, other than MTX, within 28 days before screening.

Trial locations and contacts

45 sites in 9 countries.

45 sites in 9 countries

France8 sites
  • Study site

    Amiens, 80054

  • Study site

    Échirolles, 38130

  • Study site

    Metz, 57077

  • Study site

    Montpellier, 34295

  • Study site

    Paris, 75651

  • Study site

    Paris, 75679

  • Study site

    Rouen, 76031

  • Study site

    Tours, 37044

Other trials in France

Spain8 sites
  • Study site

    Barcelona, 08035

  • Study site

    Bilbao, Vizcaya, 48013

  • Study site

    Getafe, Madrid, 28902

  • Study site

    Madrid, Madrid, 28006

  • Study site

    Madrid, Madrid, 28046

  • Study site

    Madrid, 28040

  • Study site

    Santander, Cantabria, 39008

  • Study site

    Valencia, 46010

Other trials in Spain

Germany6 sites
  • Study site

    Berlin, 10117

  • Study site

    Cologne, 50924

  • Study site

    Frankfurt, 60590

  • Study site

    Hamburg-Eilbeck, 22081

  • Study site

    Homburg, 66424

  • Study site

    Mainz, 55131

Other trials in Germany

Hungary6 sites
  • Study site

    Budapest, 1023

  • Study site

    Budapest, 1036

  • Study site

    Miskolc, 3529

  • Study site

    Rijeka, 51000

  • Study site

    Split, 21000

  • Study site

    Zagreb, 10000

Other trials in Hungary

Poland6 sites
  • Study site

    Bytom, 41-902

  • Study site

    Krakow, 31-531

  • Study site

    Ustroń, 43-450

  • Study site

    Warsaw, 00-909

  • Study site

    Warsaw, 02-637

  • Study site

    Wroclaw, 50-088

Other trials in Poland

United Kingdom5 sites
  • Study site

    Aintree, L9 7AL

  • Study site

    Birmingham, West Midlands, WS11 5XY

  • Study site

    Cambridge, Cambs, CB2 2QQ

  • Study site

    Metropolitan Borough of Wirral, CH49 5PE

  • Study site

    Newcastle, NE7 7DN

Other trials in United Kingdom

Czechia3 sites
  • Study site

    Ostrava, 722 00

  • Study site

    Prague, 128-50

  • Study site

    Prague, 140-59

Other trials in Czechia

Italy2 sites
  • Study site

    Jesi (Ancona), 60035

  • Study site

    Reggio Calabria, 89100

Other trials in Italy

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Study site

    Izmir, 35340

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: An Open-Label, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Radiographic Efficacy and Safety of Enbrel™ (Etanercept) Added to Methotrexate in Comparison With Usual Treatment in Subjects With Moderate Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity

To assess comparative radiographic efficacy, clinical efficacy and safety of etanercept (ETN) + methotrexate (MTX) with usual disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment in subjects with moderate RA who were treated with MTX monotherapy, but continue to have moderate disease activity.

Being tested
etanercept (EnbrelTM), methotrexate
Keywords
Moderate Rheumatoid Arthritis
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT00706797
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Usual careActive comparatorUtilized Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) from a list of the 6 most commonly prescribed in the participating countries (Methotrexate, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, leflunomide, cyclosporine A and gold).
Receives: Drug: methotrexate
ETN + MTXActive comparatorEtanercept (ETN) 50 milligrams (mg) sub-cutaneous (SC) injection once weekly (pre-filled syringe) plus continuation of current dose of Methotrexate (MTX) either oral (PO), SC, or intramuscular (IM).
Receives: Drug: etanercept (EnbrelTM); Drug: methotrexate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (TSS) at Week 52

    Modified TSS is a measure of change in joint health. TSS is defined as joint space narrowing score (range 0 [no narrowing] to 168 [high narrowing]) plus (+) erosion score (range is from 0 [no erosion] to 280 [high erosion]). The modified TSS range is from 0 (no damage) to 448 (bad joint status). Increase from baseline represents disease progression and / or joint worsening; no change represents halting of disease progression; a decrease represents improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Change From Baseline in Erosions at Week 52

    Erosion score (a component of the modified TSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Erosion score range is from 0 (no erosion) to 280 (high erosion). Increase from baseline represents disease progression and / or joint worsening; no change represents halting of disease progression; a decrease represents improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  2. Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing at Week 52

    Joint space narrowing score (a component of the modified TSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Joint space narrowing score range is 0 (no narrowing) to 168 (high narrowing). Increase from baseline represents disease progression and / or joint worsening; no change represents halting of disease progression; a decrease represents improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  3. Percentage of Participants Showing no Radiographic Progression (TSS Change <0.5) at Week 52

    Radiographic non-progression determined based on TSS change <0.5 using the dichotomous response Yes / No. The modified TSS range is from 0 (no damage) to 448 (bad joint status). Increase from baseline represents disease progression and / or joint worsening; no change represents halting of disease progression; a decrease represents improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52, Last observation carried forward (LOCF)

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving >1.2 Improvement in Disease Activity Score Based on a 28-joint Count (DAS28)

    Disease activity score based on 28 painful joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in millimeters per hour (mm/hr), and general health (GH) using Visual Analog Scale (VAS); range 0 (very well) to 100 (extremely bad). DAS28 score calculated as 0.56 square root (√) (28 painful joint count) + 0.28 √ (28 swollen joint count) + 0.70 (ln ESR mm/hr) + 0.014 GH; range 0 to 10. DAS28 score >5.1=higher disease activity; <3.2=low disease activity; <2.6=clinical remission. Achievement of >1.2 improvement defined as decrease in DAS28 >1.2 (change in DAS28 < -1.2).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission (DAS28 <2.60)

    Disease activity score based on 28 painful joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) mm/hr, and general health (GH) using a visual analog scale (VAS); VAS range: 0 (very well) to 100 (extremely bad). DAS28 score calculated as 0.56 √ (28 painful joint count) + 0.28 √ (28 swollen joint count) + 0.70 (ln ESR mm/hr) + 0.014 GH; range 0 to 10. DAS28 score >5.10=higher disease activity; <3.20=low disease activity; <2.60=clinical remission.

    Measured: Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52

  6. Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (DAS28 ≤3.20)

    Disease activity score based on 28 painful joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) mm/hr, and general health (GH) using a visual analog scale (VAS); VAS range: 0 (very well) to 100 (extremely bad). DAS28 score calculated as 0.56 √ (28 painful joint count) + 0.28 √ (28 swollen joint count) + 0.70 (ln ESR mm/hr) + 0.014 GH; range 0 to 10. DAS28 score >5.10=higher disease activity; <3.20=low disease activity; <2.60=clinical remission.

    Measured: Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52

  7. Percentage of Participants Achieving a >0.6 Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 Response

    Disease activity score based on 28 painful joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) mm/hr, and participant's assessment of general health (GH) using a visual analog scale (VAS); VAS range: 0 (very well) to 100 (extremely bad). DAS28 score calculated as 0.56 √ (28 painful joint count) + 0.28 √ (28 swollen joint count) + 0.70 (ln ESR mm/hr) + 0.014 GH; range 0 to 10. DAS28 score >5.10=higher disease activity; <3.20=low disease activity; <2.60=clinical remission. DAS28 response of >0.6 defined as decrease in DAS28 >0.6 (change in DAS28 < -0.6).

    Measured: Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52

  8. Percentage of Participants Achieving Moderate or Good Response on European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Criteria

    Response to treatment assessed by EULAR response criteria. Participants were characterized as good, moderate, or non-responders based on both Disease Activity Score (DAS) level attained and change in DAS. Good response defined as >1.2 improvement in DAS from Baseline and DAS attained during follow-up of ≤2.4. Non-responders = participants with improvement of ≤0.6 or participants with improvement of >0.6 but ≤1.2 and DAS attained during follow-up of >5.1. Remaining participants were classified as moderate. Scores of good and moderate were considered to have therapeutic response.

    Measured: Week 12, Week 24, Week 52

  9. Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response

    American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response: responder = ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Subjects withdrawing early were non-responders.

    Measured: Week 12, Week 24, Week 52

  10. Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response

    American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response: responder = ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Subjects withdrawing early were non-responders.

    Measured: Week 12, Week 24, Week 52

  11. Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response

    American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response: responder = ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) . Subjects withdrawing early were non-responders.

    Measured: Week 12, Week 24, Week 52

  12. Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90% (ACR90) Response

    American College of Rheumatology 90% (ACR 90) response: responder = ≥ 90% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 90% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 90% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Subjects withdrawing early were non-responders.

    Measured: Week 12, Week 24, Week 52

  13. Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Dose of Corticosteroids to Manage Flare-ups Across the 52-week Treatment Period

    Mean daily dose of corticosteroids to manage flare-ups (temporary increases in corticosteroid dose or use of intra-articular steroids) during treatment period. Daily dose of equivalent prednisone derived in mg/day: oral corticosteroids: 5 mg of prednisone = 5 mg of prednisolone = 25 mg of cortisone = 20 mg of hydrocortisone = 4 mg of methylprednisolone = 4 mg of triamcinolone = 2mg of paramethasone = 0.75 mg of betamethasone = 0.75 of dexamethasone = 0.3 of cortivazol.

    Measured: Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 40, Week 52

  14. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Minimal Clinically Important Improvement (MCII)

    Participants were asked how their pain had been during the last 48 hours compared to baseline. Participants that reported improvement assessed how important this improvement was to them; range: very important, moderately important, slightly important, or not at all important. Binary response options: 1=improved very important, or improved moderately important; 2=slightly important, not at all important, no change, or worse-more pain.

    Measured: Week 12, Week 52

  15. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)

    Percentage of participants reporting acceptable symptom state: acceptance to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of pain they had during the last 48 hours; and unacceptable symptom state: not able to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of pain they had during the last 48 hours.

    Measured: Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 40, Week 52

  16. Health Related Quality of Life: EuroQol-5D Health Index

    EQ-5D is a self-administered questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in 5 domains (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression). Scores from the 5 domains are used to calculate the Health State Profile Score as a single index value; range: 0.0 (death) to 1.0 (perfect health); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52

  17. Health Related Quality of Life: EuroQol-5D Health State Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    EQ-5D: subject rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Jun 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2008
  3. Primary completionDec 2009
  4. Study completionMay 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
141 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00706797
Sponsor's protocol ID
0881X1-4437
Status last verified
Jun 2011
First submitted
25 Jun 2008
Last updated
21 Jun 2011
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Mandl P, Balint PV, Brault Y, Backhaus M, D'Agostino MA, Grassi W, van der Heijde D, de Miguel E, Wakefield RJ, Logeart I, Dougados M. Clinical and ultrasound-based composite disease activity indices in rheumatoid arthritis: results from a multicenter, randomized study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Jun;65(6):879-87. doi: 10.1002/acr.21913.

    PubMed 23213004
  • Mandl P, Balint PV, Brault Y, Backhaus M, D'Agostino MA, Grassi W, van der Heijde D, de Miguel E, Wakefield RJ, Logeart I, Dougados M. Metrologic properties of ultrasound versus clinical evaluation of synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: results of a multicenter, randomized study. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Apr;64(4):1272-82. doi: 10.1002/art.33491. Epub 2011 Nov 30.

    PubMed 22131049

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing etanercept (EnbrelTM) and methotrexate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer at 45 sites in 9 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jun 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 45 sites in France, Spain, Germany, Hungary, Poland and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Jan 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (TSS) at Week 52 (time frame: Baseline, Week 52). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00706797, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jun 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in