CholeraNCT00709410
Mass Oral Cholera Vaccination in Zanzibar
A study testing rBS-WC vaccine in people with Cholera and Diarrhea, run by International Vaccine Institute at 1 site in Tanzania.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to conduct cholera vaccinations in high-risk populations in Zanzibar in order to estimate herd protection conferred by the vaccine,estimate effectiveness of the vaccine, and describe the interaction of vaccination and improved water supply on the burden of cholera and diarrhoeal diseases. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- What is being tested?
- rBS-WC vaccine
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 51,151 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTanzania
- Study dates
- Jan 2009to Dec 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Healthy residents of selected vaccination sites
- Aged 2 years and older
- non-pregnant
Who cannot join
- Age less than 2 years
- Pregnant
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Mass Oral Cholera Vaccination in High-risk Populations in Zanzibar: Assessment of Effectiveness and Herd Protection
The purpose of this study is to conduct cholera vaccinations in high-risk populations in Zanzibar in order to estimate herd protection conferred by the vaccine,estimate effectiveness of the vaccine, and describe the interaction of vaccination and improved water supply on the burden of cholera and diarrhoeal diseases.
Read the detailed description
The seventh cholera pandemic began in Indonesia in 1961 and spread quickly to other Asian countries. In 1970, the etiologic agent, Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor, invaded sub-Saharan Africa, whose residents had not experienced cholera for more than 100 years. Outbreaks rapidly occurred and the disease has become endemic in several parts of the continent. In 2006, Africa reported 234,349 cholera cases to the WHO, accounting for 99% of the officially-notified global cholera (1). Between 1995 and 2005, 66% of cholera outbreak reports to ProMed came from sub-Saharan Africa (2). There is growing evidence of the large and increasing burden of cholera in Africa.
One African country that is severely and repeatedly affected by cholera is Zanzibar. After the first case of cholera was confirmed in the country in January 1978, regular outbreaks have been reported (3). These outbreaks cause human suffering, are socially disruptive, and divert resources from other essential services. Cholera control in Zanzibar has focused mainly on case management, water chlorination campaigns, and dissemination of hygiene messages. The Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (MOHSW) is eager to identify new and effective tools, such as oral cholera vaccination, that could be implemented in Zanzibar.
In 2002, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended the potential use of oral cholera vaccines in endemic and epidemic situations, but it was deemed necessary to gain more experience through demonstration projects (4). Since then, mass oral cholera vaccinations have been conducted in Beira, Mozambique (5), in Darfour, Sudan, and in Aceh, Indonesia which demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of vaccination under actual public health conditions. The only oral cholera vaccine available in the market consists of killed whole-cell V. cholerae O1 with purified recombinant B-subunit of cholera toxin (WC/rBS) administered with a buffer solution as two doses, at least a week apart. The vaccine is internationally-licensed (including in Zanzibar) for use in individuals 2 years of age and older. This vaccine, and its predecessor (BS-WC) that contained chemically extracted rather than recombinant cholera toxin B subunit, have been shown to be safe and protective in several trials conducted in cholera-endemic settings in Asia and South America (6-9) and in a sub-Saharan African setting with a high prevalence of HIV (5).
An incompletely answered question regarding this vaccine is its potential to confer herd protection (10). The level of herd immunity would determine the minimum vaccine coverage required to produce widespread protection against cholera in a community. A recent study comparing cholera rates in sites in Asia and Africa has shown that the burden of cholera is greatest in young children (11); herd immunity would provide protection for children too young to receive the vaccine, as well as other unvaccinated members of the community. Although recent re-analysis of data from the large placebo-controlled field trials of the oral cholera vaccine in Bangladesh in the 1980s showed substantial herd protection from vaccination (12,13), there may be limitations to the applicability of these findings to other cholera endemic settings with different living conditions (14). Mathematical modelling of the same Bangladesh data found that cholera transmission could be controlled in endemic areas with 50% vaccine coverage. At this level of coverage, the model predicted that there would be an 89% reduction in cholera cases among the unvaccinated, and a 93% reduction overall in the entire population. A more modest coverage of 30% would result in a 76% reduction in cholera incidence for the population area covered (15). If confirmed in actual field studies, these mathematical predictions have major vaccine cost-effectiveness implications.
We propose to carry out mass oral cholera vaccinations in populations at high risk for cholera in Zanzibar followed by an assessment of direct and indirect protection. The WHO was awarded a grant by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation entitled: "Pre-emptive use of a cholera vaccine in vulnerable populations at risk", under which this proposal will be funded. The 6 million US$ grant aims to address issues regarding the potential utilization and mechanism of pre-emptive delivery of the vaccine to prevent outbreaks in endemic regions. An important component is the potential creation of a "revolving" stock of vaccine and the financial sustainability of maintaining such a stockpile.
The lessons learned from this project will be crucial for informed decisions about the potential wider use of cholera vaccination in Zanzibar and other cholera-endemic sub-Saharan African countries. The lessons learned from the effectiveness study will form part of the evidence for the possible establishment of a sustainable vaccine stockpile. The project would provide essential information on the vaccine coverage required to control cholera in endemic areas and additional data on vaccine effectiveness in a different setting in Africa.
- Being tested
- rBS-WC vaccine
- Keywords
- Cholera, Diarrhea, Vaccination, Vaccines
- Medical subject headings
- Cholera, Diarrhea
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
rBS-WC vaccineBiological
Also called Dukoral™
1 mg of recombinant cholera toxin B subunit and approximately 1 x 10^11 of inactivated whole cells of Vibrio cholerae O1 Inaba and Ogawa, classic and El Tor strains (6). The rBS-WC vaccine is supplied as 3 ml single-dose vials each with a sachet of sodium bicarbonate buffer. Buffer solution will be prepared by dissolving the sachets in drinking water (150 ml water for each sachet of sodium bicarbonate). The full dose of vaccine will be mixed with 40, 75, or 150 ml of buffer solution for persons 2 to 4 years, 5 to 11 years, and over 11 years old, respectively. The vaccine is recommended to be given in two doses with an interval of at least seven days and protection is conferred 7 to 10 days after the second dose.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | This is a single arm study. All consenting, eligible participants will receive the oral cholera vaccine. Receives: Biological: rBS-WC vaccine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Receipt of 2 complete or nearly complete swallowed doses of oral cholera vaccine
Measured: after completion of the vaccination campaign
Secondary outcomes (1)
Acute, non-bloody diarrhoea severe enough to seek care at the Primary Health Care Units
Measured: starting 10 days following vaccination campaign
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2009
- Primary completionFeb 2009
- Study completionDec 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CholeraStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 51,151 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- International Vaccine Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Zanzibar, National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, India, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, World Health Organization
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ahmed Khatib, MD, Principal investigator, Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Zanzibar
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00709410
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DK - 02
- Status last verified
- Mar 2012
- First submitted
- 1 Jul 2008
- Last updated
- 30 Mar 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Khatib AM, Ali M, von Seidlein L, Kim DR, Hashim R, Reyburn R, Ley B, Thriemer K, Enwere G, Hutubessy R, Aguado MT, Kieny MP, Lopez AL, Wierzba TF, Ali SM, Saleh AA, Mukhopadhyay AK, Clemens J, Jiddawi MS, Deen J. Effectiveness of an oral cholera vaccine in Zanzibar: findings from a mass vaccination campaign and observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012 Nov;12(11):837-44. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70196-2. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
PubMed 22954655Hashim R, Khatib AM, Enwere G, Park JK, Reyburn R, Ali M, Chang NY, Kim DR, Ley B, Thriemer K, Lopez AL, Clemens JD, Deen JL, Shin S, Schaetti C, Hutubessy R, Aguado MT, Kieny MP, Sack D, Obaro S, Shaame AJ, Ali SM, Saleh AA, von Seidlein L, Jiddawi MS. Safety of the recombinant cholera toxin B subunit, killed whole-cell (rBS-WC) oral cholera vaccine in pregnancy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(7):e1743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001743. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
PubMed 22848772
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Mar 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Mass Oral Cholera Vaccination in High-risk Populations in Zanzibar: Assessment of Effectiveness and Herd Protection
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00709410
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DK - 02
- Keywords
- Cholera, Diarrhea, Vaccination, Vaccines
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 51,151 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- International Vaccine InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Zanzibar, National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, India, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, World Health Organization
- Study start
- Jan 2009
- Primary completion
- Feb 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to conduct cholera vaccinations in high-risk populations in Zanzibar in order to estimate herd protection conferred by the vaccine,estimate effectiveness of the vaccine, and describe the interaction of vaccination and improved water supply on the burden of cholera and diarrhoeal diseases.
Detailed description
The seventh cholera pandemic began in Indonesia in 1961 and spread quickly to other Asian countries. In 1970, the etiologic agent, Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor, invaded sub-Saharan Africa, whose residents had not experienced cholera for more than 100 years. Outbreaks rapidly occurred and the disease has become endemic in several parts of the continent. In 2006, Africa reported 234,349 cholera cases to the WHO, accounting for 99% of the officially-notified global cholera (1). Between 1995 and 2005, 66% of cholera outbreak reports to ProMed came from sub-Saharan Africa (2). There is growing evidence of the large and increasing burden of cholera in Africa.
One African country that is severely and repeatedly affected by cholera is Zanzibar. After the first case of cholera was confirmed in the country in January 1978, regular outbreaks have been reported (3). These outbreaks cause human suffering, are socially disruptive, and divert resources from other essential services. Cholera control in Zanzibar has focused mainly on case management, water chlorination campaigns, and dissemination of hygiene messages. The Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (MOHSW) is eager to identify new and effective tools, such as oral cholera vaccination, that could be implemented in Zanzibar.
In 2002, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended the potential use of oral cholera vaccines in endemic and epidemic situations, but it was deemed necessary to gain more experience through demonstration projects (4). Since then, mass oral cholera vaccinations have been conducted in Beira, Mozambique (5), in Darfour, Sudan, and in Aceh, Indonesia which demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of vaccination under actual public health conditions. The only oral cholera vaccine available in the market consists of killed whole-cell V. cholerae O1 with purified recombinant B-subunit of cholera toxin (WC/rBS) administered with a buffer solution as two doses, at least a week apart. The vaccine is internationally-licensed (including in Zanzibar) for use in individuals 2 years of age and older. This vaccine, and its predecessor (BS-WC) that contained chemically extracted rather than recombinant cholera toxin B subunit, have been shown to be safe and protective in several trials conducted in cholera-endemic settings in Asia and South America (6-9) and in a sub-Saharan African setting with a high prevalence of HIV (5).
An incompletely answered question regarding this vaccine is its potential to confer herd protection (10). The level of herd immunity would determine the minimum vaccine coverage required to produce widespread protection against cholera in a community. A recent study comparing cholera rates in sites in Asia and Africa has shown that the burden of cholera is greatest in young children (11); herd immunity would provide protection for children too young to receive the vaccine, as well as other unvaccinated members of the community. Although recent re-analysis of data from the large placebo-controlled field trials of the oral cholera vaccine in Bangladesh in the 1980s showed substantial herd protection from vaccination (12,13), there may be limitations to the applicability of these findings to other cholera endemic settings with different living conditions (14). Mathematical modelling of the same Bangladesh data found that cholera transmission could be controlled in endemic areas with 50% vaccine coverage. At this level of coverage, the model predicted that there would be an 89% reduction in cholera cases among the unvaccinated, and a 93% reduction overall in the entire population. A more modest coverage of 30% would result in a 76% reduction in cholera incidence for the population area covered (15). If confirmed in actual field studies, these mathematical predictions have major vaccine cost-effectiveness implications.
We propose to carry out mass oral cholera vaccinations in populations at high risk for cholera in Zanzibar followed by an assessment of direct and indirect protection. The WHO was awarded a grant by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation entitled: "Pre-emptive use of a cholera vaccine in vulnerable populations at risk", under which this proposal will be funded. The 6 million US$ grant aims to address issues regarding the potential utilization and mechanism of pre-emptive delivery of the vaccine to prevent outbreaks in endemic regions. An important component is the potential creation of a "revolving" stock of vaccine and the financial sustainability of maintaining such a stockpile.
The lessons learned from this project will be crucial for informed decisions about the potential wider use of cholera vaccination in Zanzibar and other cholera-endemic sub-Saharan African countries. The lessons learned from the effectiveness study will form part of the evidence for the possible establishment of a sustainable vaccine stockpile. The project would provide essential information on the vaccine coverage required to control cholera in endemic areas and additional data on vaccine effectiveness in a different setting in Africa.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Biological: rBS-WC vaccineThis is a single arm study. All consenting, eligible participants will receive the oral cholera vaccine. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Healthy residents of selected vaccination sites
- Aged 2 years and older
- non-pregnant
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Age less than 2 years
- Pregnant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| rBS-WC vaccineAlso: Dukoral™1 mg of recombinant cholera toxin B subunit and approximately 1 x 10^11 of inactivated whole cells of Vibrio cholerae O1 Inaba and Ogawa, classic and El Tor strains (6). The rBS-WC vaccine is supplied as 3 ml single-dose vials each with a sachet of sodium bicarbonate buffer. Buffer solution will be prepared by dissolving the sachets in drinking water (150 ml water for each sachet of sodium bicarbonate). The full dose of vaccine will be mixed with 40, 75, or 150 ml of buffer solution for persons 2 to 4 years, 5 to 11 years, and over 11 years old, respectively. The vaccine is recommended to be given in two doses with an interval of at least seven days and protection is conferred 7 to 10 days after the second dose. | Biological | 1 |
Primary outcome
Receipt of 2 complete or nearly complete swallowed doses of oral cholera vaccine
Time frame: after completion of the vaccination campaign
1 secondary outcome
Acute, non-bloody diarrhoea severe enough to seek care at the Primary Health Care Units
Time frame: starting 10 days following vaccination campaign
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Mar 2012.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22954655Khatib AM, Ali M, von Seidlein L, Kim DR, Hashim R, Reyburn R, Ley B, Thriemer K, Enwere G, Hutubessy R, Aguado MT, Kieny MP, Lopez AL, Wierzba TF, Ali SM, Saleh AA, Mukhopadhyay AK, Clemens J, Jiddawi MS, Deen J. Effectiveness of an oral cholera vaccine in Zanzibar: findings from a mass vaccination campaign and observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012 Nov;12(11):837-44. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70196-2. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22848772Hashim R, Khatib AM, Enwere G, Park JK, Reyburn R, Ali M, Chang NY, Kim DR, Ley B, Thriemer K, Lopez AL, Clemens JD, Deen JL, Shin S, Schaetti C, Hutubessy R, Aguado MT, Kieny MP, Sack D, Obaro S, Shaame AJ, Ali SM, Saleh AA, von Seidlein L, Jiddawi MS. Safety of the recombinant cholera toxin B subunit, killed whole-cell (rBS-WC) oral cholera vaccine in pregnancy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(7):e1743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001743. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
Related trials for Cholera
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Ondansetron to Prevent Oral Rehydration Failure in Children With Cholera
Cholera (Disorder)
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Study on Changes in Gut Microbiota, Inflammatory Factors, and Bowel Habits Following Oral Administration of Recombinant B-subunit/Whole Cell Cholera Vaccine in a Community Population
Bowel Habits, Gut Microbiomes
RecruitingPhase 1
Phase 1b Ascending Dose Study of PanChol in Healthy Volunteers
Cholera Vaccination Reaction
RecruitingPhase 4
CVD 38000: Study of Responses to Vaccination With Typhoid and/or Cholera
Typhoid and/or Cholera Vaccination
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
A Post-marketing Observational Study of Oral Cholera Vaccine
Diarrhea
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ahmed Khatib, MD principal investigator
Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Zanzibar
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing rBS-WC vaccine in people with Cholera and Diarrhea, run by International Vaccine Institute at 1 site in Tanzania.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Tanzania. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Receipt of 2 complete or nearly complete swallowed doses of oral cholera vaccine (time frame: after completion of the vaccination campaign). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00709410, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2012.