AzTrials
AzTrials

Lower Back PainE-STIMNCT00709748

E-STIM Trial: Comparing the Efficacy of the Empi Select TENS to a Control for the Treatment of Chronic Lower Back Pain

A study testing Empi Select TENS Device in people with Lower Back Pain, run by Empi, A DJO Company at 8 sites in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) delivered via the Empi Select TENS device provides relief of chronic lower back pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Lower Back Pain
What is being tested?
Empi Select TENS Device
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
300 participants
Where
8 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Feb 2008to Feb 2009
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects must be 18-65 years of age.
  • Subjects must have reported low back pain of at least 3 months duration.
  • Subjects must report a low back pain score of 4 or greater on the 0-10 point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for average daily pain.
  • Subjects must have been on a stabilized analgesic medication regimen for 3 months or greater.
  • Subjects must be willing to discontinue use of all rescue pain medications for the duration of the trial (all PRN medications for breakthrough pain), except for OTC oral acetaminophen (up to 4 grams per day).
  • Subjects must be willing to refrain from starting any new lower back pain treatments for the duration of the trial.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Subjects must be willing and able to comply with all follow-up procedures (including completion of the daily diary) and return for scheduled follow- up visits.
  • Female subjects must be post-menopausal for at least 1 year, surgically sterile or willing to take a pregnancy test which must be negative prior to study enrollment.
  • Subjects must be willing and able to provide written informed consent and HIPAA authorization prior to enrollment into the study.

Who cannot join

  • Subjects that have a demand type pacemaker or defibrillator.
  • Subjects that have had previous experience with electrotherapy.
  • Subjects that have had any failed back surgeries.
  • Subjects that have spinal stenosis which contributes to, or is the cause of lower back pain.
  • Subjects that have sciatica (lower back pain with radicular symptoms).
  • Subjects that have cauda equina syndrome.
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Subjects that have fibromyalgia.
  • Subjects that have pain secondary to cancer.
  • Subjects who have cancer in the same anatomical location as their back pain.
  • Subjects that have any sensory deprivation or diagnosis of shingles or post- herpetic neuralgia (specifically in the mid-trunk region).
  • Subjects that have planned surgeries during the study period.
  • Subjects that have a history of alcohol or substance abuse in the last 5 years.
  • Subjects on psychoactive medication(s) that:
  • have had a change in dose or a change in medication type during the 3 months prior to screening, or
  • are expected to require a change in dose, or a new medication during the study.
  • Subjects that are seeking worker's compensation or any other legal claims.
  • Subjects that are pregnant or plan to become pregnant during the study period.

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 1 country.

Barbara A. Stegmeier, RAC contact

763-588-9836

barbs@alquest.com

Jim Pomonis, Ph.D. contact

651-415-7311

jpomonis@empi.com

8 sites in 1 country

United States8 sites, 8 recruiting
  • Center for Prospective Outcome Studies

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30327

    Quin L Boynes, B.S., 404-605-0501, qboynes@synapseatlanta.com

    Shelly Shearer, 404-605-0501, sshearer@synapseatlanta.com

    Recruiting
  • Millennium Pain Center

    Bloomington, Illinois, 61701

    Jeffery M Kramer, Ph.D., 309-662-4321, kramer@millenniumpaincenter.com

    Sara Ditchen, BS, CCRC, 309-662-4321, ditchen@millenniumpaincenter.com

    Recruiting
  • MedInvestigations

    Fair Oaks, California, 95628

    Leslie Mellor, CMA, CCRC, 916-966-7452, dewey9638@aol.com

    Sharon Harp, Res. Assist., 916-966-7452, harpsharon@gmail.com

    Recruiting
  • Taylor Research LLC

    Marietta, Georgia, 30060

    Nancy Taylor, RN, MSN, 770-421-8080, clinicaltrials@cpcnopain.com

    Donald R Taylor, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • Pain Consultants of West Florida

    Pensacola, Florida, 32503

    Kendra Keyes, PT, 850-474-4933, kendrakeyes@cox.net

    Kurt A Krueger, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • Clinical Research Source, Inc.

    Perrysburg, Ohio, 43551

    Denise A Coressel, LPN, CCRC, 419-873-1532, thecrsource@aol.com

    Charlotte Patterson, LPN, CCRC, 419-873-1532, thecrsource@aol.com

    Recruiting
  • Spinal Research Foundation

    Reston, Virginia, 20190

    Anne Copay, Ph.D., 703-709-1114 ext. 144, acopay@spinemd.com

    Marcus Martin, Ph.D., 703-709-1114 ext. 140, mmartin@spinerf.org

    Recruiting
  • Suncoast Neuroscience Associates, Inc.

    St. Petersburg, Florida, 33701

    Michele Richardson, B.A., CCRC, 727-824-7135, mrichardson@suncoastmed.com

    Suzanne Lash, B.A., CCRC, 727-824-7135, slash@suncoastmed.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The E-STIM Trial: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing the Efficacy of the Empi Select Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) to a Control for the Treatment of Chronic Lower Back Pain

The purpose of this study is to determine whether transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) delivered via the Empi Select TENS device provides relief of chronic lower back pain.

Read the detailed description

The E-STIM Trial is designed to collect data on the efficacy of the Empi Select Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) device for the treatment of chronic low back pain. This clinical trial is a non-significant risk, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled 12-week trial involving the commercially available Empi Select TENS device for treating subjects with chronic (>90 days) low back pain. Multiple centers located in the United States will enroll approximately 300 subjects in this study. Eligible subjects will be randomized 1:1 to either the treatment group or the placebo group. The subjects and investigational staff are blinded to the treatment assignment. Subjects will return to the investigational center for follow-up assessments at 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks.

Conditions
Lower Back Pain
Being tested
Empi Select TENS Device, Placebo
Keywords
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, TENS, Empi, Electrotherapy, Back pain, Lower back pain, Chronic lower back pain
Medical subject headings
Low Back Pain, Back Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Empi Select TENS DeviceDevice

    Also called -Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, -TENS

    The Empi Select TENS device delivers therapeutic electrical currents at various frequencies (intensities) and periods of time for the treatment of pain.

  • PlaceboDevice

    Subjects in this study arm will receive control (not fully active) Empi Select TENS devices.

Study groups in NCT00709748
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Active comparatorSubjects in this study arm will receive treatment (fully active) Empi Select TENS devices.
Receives: Device: Empi Select TENS Device
2Placebo comparatorSubjects in this study arm will receive control (not fully active) Empi Select TENS devices.
Receives: Device: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Relief of lower back pain as measured by a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of Average Daily Pain.

    Measured: Baseline and at 1, 4, 8 and 12 week follow-up

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Improvement of function as measured by the Roland and Morris Back Pain Disability Scale.

    Measured: Baseline and 1, 4, 8 and 12 week follow-up

  2. Improvement of quality of life as measured by the SF-12 Health Survey.

    Measured: Baseline and 1, 4, 8 and 12 week follow-up

  3. Subject satisfaction as measured by the Patient Global Impression of Change scale (PGIC).

    Measured: 1, 4, 8 and 12 week follow-up

  4. Adverse Event Assessment: assess the occurrence and severity of any adverse events.

    Measured: 1, 4, 8 and 12 week follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Jul 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2008
  3. Primary completionFeb 2009 (estimated)
  4. Study completionFeb 2009 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00709748
Sponsor's protocol ID
Empi 07-1-02
Acronym
E-STIM
Status last verified
Jul 2008
First submitted
1 Jul 2008
Last updated
3 Jul 2008
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Johnson M, Martinson M. Efficacy of electrical nerve stimulation for chronic musculoskeletal pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain. 2007 Jul;130(1-2):157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.02.007. Epub 2007 Mar 23.

    PubMed 17383095
  • Deyo RA, Walsh NE, Martin DC, Schoenfeld LS, Ramamurthy S. A controlled trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and exercise for chronic low back pain. N Engl J Med. 1990 Jun 7;322(23):1627-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199006073222303.

    PubMed 2140432
  • Hamza MA, White PF, Ahmed HE, Ghoname EA. Effect of the frequency of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the postoperative opioid analgesic requirement and recovery profile. Anesthesiology. 1999 Nov;91(5):1232-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199911000-00012.

    PubMed 10551571
  • Graff-Radford SB, Reeves JL, Baker RL, Chiu D. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on myofascial pain and trigger point sensitivity. Pain. 1989 Apr;37(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90146-2.

    PubMed 2786179
  • Cheing GL, Hui-Chan CW. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: nonparallel antinociceptive effects on chronic clinical pain and acute experimental pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Mar;80(3):305-12. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90142-9.

    PubMed 10084439
  • Sluka KA, Deacon M, Stibal A, Strissel S, Terpstra A. Spinal blockade of opioid receptors prevents the analgesia produced by TENS in arthritic rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999 May;289(2):840-6.

    PubMed 10215661
  • Han JS, Chen XH, Sun SL, Xu XJ, Yuan Y, Yan SC, Hao JX, Terenius L. Effect of low- and high-frequency TENS on Met-enkephalin-Arg-Phe and dynorphin A immunoreactivity in human lumbar CSF. Pain. 1991 Dec;47(3):295-298. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(91)90218-M.

    PubMed 1686080
  • Lee KH, Chung JM, Willis WD Jr. Inhibition of primate spinothalamic tract cells by TENS. J Neurosurg. 1985 Feb;62(2):276-87. doi: 10.3171/jns.1985.62.2.0276.

    PubMed 3871474
  • Garrison DW, Foreman RD. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on spontaneous and noxiously evoked dorsal horn cell activity in cats with transected spinal cords. Neurosci Lett. 1996 Sep 27;216(2):125-8. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(96)13023-8.

    PubMed 8904799
  • Garrison DW, Foreman RD. Decreased activity of spontaneous and noxiously evoked dorsal horn cells during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Pain. 1994 Sep;58(3):309-315. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90124-4.

    PubMed 7838579
  • Khadilkar A, Milne S, Brosseau L, Wells G, Tugwell P, Robinson V, Shea B, Saginur M. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Dec 1;30(23):2657-66. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000188189.21202.0f.

    PubMed 16319752
  • Brosseau L, Milne S, Robinson V, Marchand S, Shea B, Wells G, Tugwell P. Efficacy of the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Mar 15;27(6):596-603. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200203150-00007.

    PubMed 11884907
  • Ordog GJ. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus oral analgesic: a randomized double-blind controlled study in acute traumatic pain. Am J Emerg Med. 1987 Jan;5(1):6-10. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(87)90281-6.

    PubMed 3545246

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Empi Select TENS Device in people with Lower Back Pain, run by Empi, A DJO Company at 8 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jul 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Barbara A. Stegmeier, RAC (763-588-9836, barbs@alquest.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Relief of lower back pain as measured by a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of Average Daily Pain. (time frame: Baseline and at 1, 4, 8 and 12 week follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00709748, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jul 2008.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in