Systemic Lupus ErythematosusPhase 2NCT00710021
Vitamin D3 in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
A Phase 2 study testing Vitamin D3 in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and SLE, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 8 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of vitamin D3 on the expression of alpha interferon (IFN alpha) expression in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with vitamin D deficiency. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, SLE, Lupus
- What is being tested?
- Vitamin D3
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 57 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2008to Jul 2011
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of SLE by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria
- Serum 25-OH vitamin D level of 20 ng/mL or less
- Stable disease at screening, defined as a modified Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment SLE Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) of 4 or less
- Interferon (IFN) signature present. More information about this criterion can be found in the protocol
- Positive anti-double-stranded (anti-ds) DNA antibody blood test at screening
- If on corticosteroids, the dose must be less than 20 mg per day and stable for 4 weeks prior to screening and at study entry
Show all 9Show fewer
- If on immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory medication such as azathioprine, methotrexate, leflunomide, mycophenolate, or hydroxychloroquine, the dose must be stable for 3 months prior to screening and at study entry
- If receiving a multivitamin or a vitamin D supplement, the dose of vitamin D must be 800 IU daily or less and stable for the 3 months prior to screening and at study entry
- Agree to use effective contraceptive methods for the duration of the study
Who cannot join
- Unwilling to stop using drugs or substances that may interfere with fat absorption
- Hypercalcemia
- Hypercalciuria
- History of hyperparathyroidism
- History of kidney stones
- History of cancer, except cervical carcinoma in situ and resected basal and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin
Show all 20Show fewer
- Known history of chronic viral infections, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C
- Known active tuberculosis
- Any British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A or B manifestation with the exception of a BILAG B mucocutaneous manifestation
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) liver function tests greater than or equal to two times the upper limit of normal
- Dialysis or serum creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dL
- Expectation by the investigator to increase corticosteroid or immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory medication dose at screening, study entry, or over the course of the study
- Treatment with cyclophosphamide within 3 months of screening
- Treatment with rituximab within 12 months of screening
- Other investigational drug and or treatment during the 4 weeks or seven half lives of the other investigational drug prior to study entry
- Drug or alcohol abuse within 6 months prior to study entry
- Treatment with digoxin
- Treatment with teriparatide
- Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would jeopardize the subject's safety following exposure to the study drug
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 1 country.
8 sites in 1 country
United States8 sites
University of Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Manhassett, New York, 11030
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15261
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14642
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143
About this study
Official title: Effect of Vitamin D3 on the IFN Alpha Signature in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (ALE02)
The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of vitamin D3 on the expression of alpha interferon (IFN alpha) expression in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with vitamin D deficiency.
Read the detailed description
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the production of autoantibodies with subsequent immune complex deposition and tissue inflammation. The role of interferon (IFN) alpha in the development of SLE has been repeatedly documented. Vitamin D deficiency is common among lupus patients. Vitamin D is recognized as a regulator of immune response. This study will explore the impact of vitamin D3 supplementation on IFN alpha expression in SLE patients.
The study will last approximately 12 weeks and consist of three treatment groups: 1.) Participants will receive vitamin D3 2000 IU daily 2.) Participants will receive vitamin D3 4000 IU daily 3.) Participants will receive a vitamin D3 placebo daily. There will be four study visits for each participant. Visits will occur at screening, study entry, and Weeks 6 and 12. Physical examination, vital signs, and blood and urine tests will occur at all visits. For females of childbearing potential, a pregnancy test will be performed at screening and Week 6.
- Conditions
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, SLE, Lupus
- Being tested
- Vitamin D3, Vitamin D3 placebo
- Keywords
- Systemic lupus erythematosus, SLE, Vitamin D3, Vitamin D deficiency, IFN alpha expression
- Medical subject headings
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Vitamin D Deficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Vitamin D3Drug
Also called Cholecalciferol
8% vitamin D3 powder, 84% microcrystalline cellulose, 8% fumed silica by weight
Vitamin D3 placeboDrug
Also called Cholecalciferol placebo
86% microcrystalline cellulose, 14% fumed silica by weight
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| vitamin D3 2000 IU | Experimental | Participants in this arm take a vitamin D3 dose of 2000 international units (IU) daily by mouth for a duration of 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Vitamin D3 |
| vitamin D3 4000 IU | Experimental | Participants in this arm take a vitamin D3 dose of 4000 international units (IU) daily by mouth for a duration of 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Vitamin D3 |
| vitamin D3 placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants in this arm take a vitamin D3 placebo daily by mouth for a duration of 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Vitamin D3 placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent of Participants With an IFN Alpha Signature Response at Week 12
Presence of an Interferon (IFN) Alpha signature response is defined as: a reduction in expression from baseline (Screening) of at least 50% for 1 of 3 IFN Alpha responsive genes (Ifit1, Ifi44, Mx1) with concurrent expression in the remaining 2 genes at a level not more than 25% above baseline, or a reduction in expression from baseline of at least 25% for 2 of the 3 IFN Alpha responsive genes with concurrent expression in the third gene at a level of no more than 25% above baseline. Gene expression was measured on peripheral blood samples using qRT-PCR. Missing data were considered as response failures during calculation.
Measured: 0, Week 12
Secondary outcomes (26)
Percent of Participants With an IFN Alpha Signature Response at Week 6
Presence of an Interferon (IFN) Alpha signature response is defined as: a reduction in expression from baseline (Screening) of at least 50% for 1 of 3 IFN Alpha responsive genes (Ifit1, Ifi44, Mx1) with concurrent expression in the remaining 2 genes at a level not more than 25% above baseline, or a reduction in expression from baseline of at least 25% for 2 of the 3 IFN Alpha responsive genes with concurrent expression in the third gene at a level of no more than 25% above baseline. Gene expression was measured on peripheral blood samples using qRT-PCR. Missing data were considered as response failures during calculation.
Measured: 0, Week 6
Percent of Participants With IFN Alpha Signature at Week 12
An Interferon (IFN) Alpha signature is defined as: expression of Mx1, Ifit1, or Ifi44 at a level greater than or equal to 4 standard deviations above the mean of a set of normal controls, or expression of 2 of the 3 genes at a level greater than or equal to 2 standard deviations above the mean of a set of normal controls. Gene expression was measured on peripheral blood samples using qRT-PCR. Missing data were assumed as signatures during calculation.
Measured: 0, Week 12
Percent of Participants With IFN Alpha Signature at Week 6
An Interferon (IFN) Alpha signature is defined as: expression of Mx1, Ifit1, or Ifi44 at a level greater than or equal to 4 standard deviations above the mean of a set of normal controls, or expression of 2 of the 3 genes at a level greater than or equal to 2 standard deviations above the mean of a set of normal controls. Gene expression was measured on peripheral blood samples using qRT-PCR. Missing data were assumed as signatures during calculation.
Measured: Week 6
qRT-PCR Fold Change in Ifit1 Gene Expression From Baseline to Week 12
The Ifit1 gene is one of three genes included in the definition of the alpha-interferon signature used for this study. This gene encodes an interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to measure gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained by blood draw. Gene expression is quantified as "fold change" relative to normal controls and is computed using a comparative CT (threshold cycle) method. A study hypothesis was that expression of alpha-interferon signature genes would decrease with increasing vitamin D levels. A decrease in gene expression from baseline to Week 12 is represented as a negative value (and vice versa).
Measured: 0, Week 12
qRT-PCR Fold Change in Ifit1 Gene Expression From Baseline to Week 6
The Ifit1 gene is one of three genes included in the definition of the alpha-interferon signature used for this study. It encodes an interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to measure gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained by blood draw. Gene expression is quantified as "fold change" relative to normal controls and is computed using a comparative CT (threshold cycle) method. A study hypothesis was that expression of alpha-interferon signature genes would decrease with increasing vitamin D levels. A decrease in gene expression from baseline to Week 6 is represented as a negative value (and vice versa).
Measured: 0, Week 6
qRT-PCR Fold Change in Ifi44 Gene Expression From Baseline to Week 12
The Ifi44 gene is one of three genes included in the definition of the alpha-interferon signature used for this study. It encodes interferon-induced protein 44. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to measure gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained by blood draw. Gene expression is quantified as "fold change" relative to normal controls and is computed using a comparative CT (threshold cycle) method. A study hypothesis was that expression of alpha-interferon signature genes would decrease with increasing vitamin D levels. A decrease in gene expression from baseline to Week 12 is represented as a negative value (and vice versa).
Measured: 0, Week 12
qRT-PCR Fold Change in Ifi44 Gene Expression From Baseline to Week 6
The Ifi44 gene is one of three genes included in the definition of the alpha-interferon signature used for this study. It encodes interferon-induced protein 44. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to measure gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained by blood draw. Gene expression is quantified as "fold change" relative to normal controls and is computed using a comparative CT (threshold cycle) method. A study hypothesis was that expression of alpha-interferon signature genes would decrease with increasing vitamin D levels. A decrease in gene expression from baseline to Week 6 is represented as a negative value (and vice versa).
Measured: 0, Week 6
qRT-PCR Fold Change in Mx1 Gene Expression From Baseline to Week 12
The Mx1 gene is one of three genes included in the definition of the alpha-interferon signature used for this study. It encodes for the homolog of mouse myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 1 protein. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to measure gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained by blood draw. Gene expression is quantified as "fold change" relative to normal controls and is computed using a comparative CT (threshold cycle) method. A study hypothesis was that expression of alpha-interferon signature genes would decrease with increasing vitamin D levels. A decrease in gene expression from baseline to Week 12 is represented as a negative value (and vice versa).
Measured: 0, Week 12
qRT-PCR Fold Change in Mx1 Gene Expression From Baseline to Week 6
The Mx1 gene is one of three genes included in the definition of the alpha-interferon signature used for this study. It encodes for the homolog of mouse myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 1 protein. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to measure gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained by blood draw. Gene expression is quantified as "fold change" relative to normal controls and is computed using a comparative CT (threshold cycle) method. A study hypothesis was that expression of alpha-interferon signature genes would decrease with increasing vitamin D levels. A decrease in gene expression from baseline to Week 6 is represented as a negative value (and vice versa).
Measured: 0, Week 6
Change in Serum C3 Level From Baseline to Week 12
C3 is a blood test that measures the activity of the complement component 3 (C3) protein. The normal C3 range is 75 to 135 mg/dL. Patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus may have a lower-than-normal level of C3. A decrease in C3 level over time may indicate disease activity. An increase in C3 from baseline to Week 12 is represented as a positive value (and vice versa).
Measured: 0, Week 12
Change in Serum C3 Level From Baseline to Week 6
C3 is a blood test that measures the activity of the complement component 3 (C3) protein. The normal C3 range is 75 to 135 mg/dL. Patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus may have a lower-than-normal level of C3. A decrease in C3 level over time may indicate disease activity. An increase in C3 from baseline to Week 6 is represented as a positive value (and vice versa).
Measured: 0, Week 6
Change in Serum C4 Level From Baseline to Week 12
C4 is a blood test that measures the activity of the complement component 4 (C4) protein. The normal range for males is 12 to 72 mg/dL and the normal range for females is 13 to 75 mg/dL. Patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus may have a lower-than-normal level of C4. A decrease in C4 level over time may indicate disease activity. An increase in C4 from baseline to Week 12 is represented as a positive value (and vice versa).
Measured: 0, Week 12
Change in Serum C4 Level From Baseline to Week 6
Outcome measure description: C4 is a blood test that measures the activity of the complement component 4 (C4) protein. The normal range for males is 12 to 72 mg/dL and the normal range for females is 13 to 75 mg/dL. Patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus may have a lower-than-normal level of C4. A decrease in C4 level over time may indicate disease activity. An increase in C4 from baseline to Week 6 is represented as a positive value (and vice versa).
Measured: 0, Week 6
Change in Status for Anti-double-stranded DNA Autoantibody From Baseline to Week 12
Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may have autoantibodies (e.g., self against self) to double-stranded DNA. Double-stranded DNA is one of multiple diagnostic tests for SLE and levels may be associated with disease activity. A positive test for autoantibodies to double-stranded DNA is based on the normal range from the local laboratory. Change in status (+ or -) from baseline is evaluated.
Measured: 0, Week 12
Change in Status for Anti-double-stranded DNA Autoantibody From Baseline to Week 6
Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may have autoantibodies (e.g., self against self) to double-stranded DNA. Double-stranded DNA is one of multiple diagnostic tests for SLE and levels may be associated with disease activity. A positive test for autoantibodies to double-stranded DNA is based on the normal range from the local laboratory. Change in status (+ or -) from baseline is evaluated.
Measured: 0, Week 6
Change in SELENA-SLEDAI Total Score From Baseline to Week 12
The modified Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) score is a weighted scale score ranging from 0 to 105 based on the presence or absence of 24 manifestations of SLE. The SELENA-SLEDAI assesses disease activity for 10 days prior to and including the day of assessment. For this study, the SELENA-SLEDAI score was modified to include proteinuria defined by dipstick rather than 24 hour urine. Positive change in the SELENA-SLEDAI score indicate increased disease activity.
Measured: 0, Week 12
Cardiorespiratory BILAG Status at Week 12
The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) assessment gives a grade for each of 9 body systems (e.g., domains). Grades reflect systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity as follows: A (severe), B (moderate), C (mild), D (inactive at present but previously affected), E (inactive and system never involved). To be randomized, subjects had to have mild or inactive disease (C,D,E) in all but the mucocutaneous system in which B(moderate) disease was also allowed. The percent of subjects experiencing A or B level activity at Week 12 is assessed for the "Cardiorespiratory-specific" body system.
Measured: Week 12
Constitutional BILAG Status at Week 12
The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) assessment gives a grade for each of 9 body systems (e.g., domains). Grades reflect systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity as follows: A (severe), B (moderate), C (mild), D (inactive at present but previously affected), E (inactive and system never involved). To be randomized, subjects had to have mild or inactive disease (C,D,E) in all but the mucocutaneous system in which B(moderate) disease was also allowed. The percent of subjects experiencing A or B level activity at Week 12 is assessed for the "Constitutional-specific" body system.
Measured: Week 12
Gastrointestinal BILAG Status at Week 12
The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) assessment gives a grade for each of 9 body systems (e.g., domains). Grades reflect systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity as follows: A (severe), B (moderate), C (mild), D (inactive at present but previously affected), E (inactive and system never involved). To be randomized, subjects had to have mild or inactive disease (C,D,E) in all but the mucocutaneous system in which B(moderate) disease was also allowed. The percent of subjects experiencing A or B level activity at Week 12 is assessed for the "Gastrointestinal-specific" body system.
Measured: Week 12
Hematological BILAG Status at Week 12
The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) assessment gives a grade for each of 9 body systems (e.g., domains). Grades reflect systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity as follows: A (severe), B (moderate), C (mild), D (inactive at present but previously affected), E (inactive and system never involved). To be randomized, subjects had to have mild or inactive disease (C,D,E) in all but the mucocutaneous system in which B(moderate) disease was also allowed. The percent of subjects experiencing A or B level activity at Week 12 is assessed for the "Hematological-specific" body system.
Measured: Week 12
Mucocutaneous BILAG Status at Week 12
The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) assessment gives a grade for each of 9 body systems (e.g., domains). Grades reflect systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity as follows: A (severe), B (moderate), C (mild), D (inactive at present but previously affected), E (inactive and system never involved). To be randomized, subjects had to have mild or inactive disease (C,D,E) in all but the mucocutaneous system in which B(moderate) disease was also allowed. The percent of subjects experiencing A or B level activity at Week 12 is assessed for the "Mucocutaneous-specific" body system.
Measured: Week 12
Musculoskeletal BILAG Status at Week 12
Outcome measure description: The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) assessment gives a grade for each of 9 body systems (e.g., domains). Grades reflect systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity as follows: A (severe), B (moderate), C (mild), D (inactive at present but previously affected), E (inactive and system never involved). To be randomized, subjects had to have mild or inactive disease (C,D,E) in all but the mucocutaneous system in which B(moderate) disease was also allowed. The percent of subjects experiencing A or B level activity at Week 12 is assessed for the "Musculoskeletal-specific" body system.
Measured: Week 12
Neuropsychiatric BILAG Status at Week 12
The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) assessment gives a grade for each of 9 body systems (e.g., domains). Grades reflect systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity as follows: A (severe), B (moderate), C (mild), D (inactive at present but previously affected), E (inactive and system never involved). To be randomized, subjects had to have mild or inactive disease (C,D,E) in all but the mucocutaneous system in which B(moderate) disease was also allowed. The percent of subjects experiencing A or B level activity at Week 12 is assessed for the "Neuropsychiatric-specific" body system.
Measured: Week 12
Ophthalmic BILAG Status at Week 12
The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) assessment gives a grade for each of 9 body systems (e.g., domains). Grades reflect systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity as follows: A (severe), B (moderate), C (mild), D (inactive at present but previously affected), E (inactive and system never involved). To be randomized, subjects had to have mild or inactive disease (C,D,E) in all but the mucocutaneous system in which B(moderate) disease was also allowed. The percent of subjects experiencing A or B level activity at Week 12 is assessed for the "Ophthalmic-specific" body system.
Measured: Week 12
Renal BILAG Status at Week 12
The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) assessment gives a grade for each of 9 body systems (e.g., domains). Grades reflect systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity as follows: A (severe), B (moderate), C (mild), D (inactive at present but previously affected), E (inactive and system never involved). To be randomized, subjects had to have mild or inactive disease (C,D,E) in all but the mucocutaneous system in which B(moderate) disease was also allowed. The percent of subjects experiencing A or B level activity at Week 12 is assessed for the "Renal-specific" body system.
Measured: Week 12
Percent of Participants With Adverse Events of Grade 3 or Above
Grades are based on National Cancer Institute--Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Version 3.0 over the duration of the study. Participants who experienced at least one grade 3 or higher adverse event (AE) are counted only once. The adverse events are treatment-emergent, which means that the AE occurred after taking the first dose of study drug.
Measured: From start of study treatment through Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2008
- Primary completionJul 2011
- Study completionJul 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Systemic Lupus ErythematosusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- Autoimmunity Centers of Excellence
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Cynthia Aranow, MD, Study chair, Northwell HealthDiane Kamen, MD, Study chair, Medical University of South Carolina
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00710021
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DAIT ALE02
- Status last verified
- Mar 2017
- First submitted
- 1 Jul 2008
- Last updated
- 26 Apr 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data access is provided to the public in the Immunology Database and Analysis Portal (ImmPort), a long-term archive of clinical and mechanistic data from DAIT-funded grants and contracts that also provides data analysis tools available to researchers.
Publications
Kamen DL, Cooper GS, Bouali H, Shaftman SR, Hollis BW, Gilkeson GS. Vitamin D deficiency in systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmun Rev. 2006 Feb;5(2):114-7. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2005.05.009. Epub 2005 Jun 21.
PubMed 16431339Mangini AJ, Lafyatis R, Van Seventer JM. Type I interferons inhibition of inflammatory T helper cell responses in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Jun;1108:11-23. doi: 10.1196/annals.1422.002.
PubMed 17893966Tan EM, Cohen AS, Fries JF, Masi AT, McShane DJ, Rothfield NF, Schaller JG, Talal N, Winchester RJ. The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1982 Nov;25(11):1271-7. doi: 10.1002/art.1780251101.
PubMed 7138600Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1997 Sep;40(9):1725. doi: 10.1002/art.1780400928. No abstract available.
PubMed 9324032Isenberg DA, Rahman A, Allen E, Farewell V, Akil M, Bruce IN, D'Cruz D, Griffiths B, Khamashta M, Maddison P, McHugh N, Snaith M, Teh LS, Yee CS, Zoma A, Gordon C. BILAG 2004. Development and initial validation of an updated version of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group's disease activity index for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Jul;44(7):902-6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh624. Epub 2005 Apr 6.
PubMed 15814577Aranow C, Kamen DL, Dall'Era M, Massarotti EM, Mackay MC, Koumpouras F, Coca A, Chatham WW, Clowse ME, Criscione-Schreiber LG, Callahan S, Goldmuntz EA, Keyes-Elstein L, Oswald M, Gregersen PK, Diamond B. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of the Effect of Vitamin D3 on the Interferon Signature in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Jul;67(7):1848-57. doi: 10.1002/art.39108.
PubMed 25777546
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Apr 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Vitamin D3 on the IFN Alpha Signature in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (ALE02)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00710021
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DAIT ALE02
- Conditions
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, SLE, Lupus
- Keywords
- Systemic lupus erythematosus, SLE, Vitamin D3, Vitamin D deficiency, IFN alpha expression
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- Autoimmunity Centers of Excellence
- Study start
- Nov 2008
- Primary completion
- Jul 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 25 Apr 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of vitamin D3 on the expression of alpha interferon (IFN alpha) expression in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with vitamin D deficiency.
Detailed description
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the production of autoantibodies with subsequent immune complex deposition and tissue inflammation. The role of interferon (IFN) alpha in the development of SLE has been repeatedly documented. Vitamin D deficiency is common among lupus patients. Vitamin D is recognized as a regulator of immune response. This study will explore the impact of vitamin D3 supplementation on IFN alpha expression in SLE patients.
The study will last approximately 12 weeks and consist of three treatment groups: 1.) Participants will receive vitamin D3 2000 IU daily 2.) Participants will receive vitamin D3 4000 IU daily 3.) Participants will receive a vitamin D3 placebo daily. There will be four study visits for each participant. Visits will occur at screening, study entry, and Weeks 6 and 12. Physical examination, vital signs, and blood and urine tests will occur at all visits. For females of childbearing potential, a pregnancy test will be performed at screening and Week 6.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| vitamin D3 2000 IU | Experimental | Drug: Vitamin D3Participants in this arm take a vitamin D3 dose of 2000 international units (IU) daily by mouth for a duration of 12 weeks. |
| vitamin D3 4000 IU | Experimental | Drug: Vitamin D3Participants in this arm take a vitamin D3 dose of 4000 international units (IU) daily by mouth for a duration of 12 weeks. |
| vitamin D3 placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Vitamin D3 placeboParticipants in this arm take a vitamin D3 placebo daily by mouth for a duration of 12 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Diagnosis of SLE by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria
- Serum 25-OH vitamin D level of 20 ng/mL or less
- Stable disease at screening, defined as a modified Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment SLE Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) of 4 or less
- Interferon (IFN) signature present. More information about this criterion can be found in the protocol
- Positive anti-double-stranded (anti-ds) DNA antibody blood test at screening
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Unwilling to stop using drugs or substances that may interfere with fat absorption
- Hypercalcemia
- Hypercalciuria
- History of hyperparathyroidism
- History of kidney stones
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D3Also: Cholecalciferol8% vitamin D3 powder, 84% microcrystalline cellulose, 8% fumed silica by weight | Drug | vitamin D3 2000 IU, vitamin D3 4000 IU |
| Vitamin D3 placeboAlso: Cholecalciferol placebo86% microcrystalline cellulose, 14% fumed silica by weight | Drug | vitamin D3 placebo |
Primary outcome
Percent of Participants With an IFN Alpha Signature Response at Week 12
Time frame: 0, Week 12
Presence of an Interferon (IFN) Alpha signature response is defined as: a reduction in expression from baseline (Screening) of at least 50% for 1 of 3 IFN Alpha responsive genes (Ifit1, Ifi44, Mx1) with concurrent expression in the remaining 2 genes at a level not more than 25% above baseline, or a reduction in expression from baseline of at least 25% for 2 of the 3 IFN Alpha responsive genes with concurrent expression in the third gene at a level of no more than 25% above baseline. Gene expression was measured on peripheral blood samples using qRT-PCR. Missing data were considered as response failures during calculation.
26 secondary outcomes
Percent of Participants With an IFN Alpha Signature Response at Week 6
Time frame: 0, Week 6
Percent of Participants With IFN Alpha Signature at Week 12
Time frame: 0, Week 12
Percent of Participants With IFN Alpha Signature at Week 6
Time frame: Week 6
qRT-PCR Fold Change in Ifit1 Gene Expression From Baseline to Week 12
Time frame: 0, Week 12
qRT-PCR Fold Change in Ifit1 Gene Expression From Baseline to Week 6
Time frame: 0, Week 6
qRT-PCR Fold Change in Ifi44 Gene Expression From Baseline to Week 12
Time frame: 0, Week 12
qRT-PCR Fold Change in Ifi44 Gene Expression From Baseline to Week 6
Time frame: 0, Week 6
qRT-PCR Fold Change in Mx1 Gene Expression From Baseline to Week 12
Time frame: 0, Week 12
qRT-PCR Fold Change in Mx1 Gene Expression From Baseline to Week 6
Time frame: 0, Week 6
Change in Serum C3 Level From Baseline to Week 12
Time frame: 0, Week 12
Change in Serum C3 Level From Baseline to Week 6
Time frame: 0, Week 6
Change in Serum C4 Level From Baseline to Week 12
Time frame: 0, Week 12
Change in Serum C4 Level From Baseline to Week 6
Time frame: 0, Week 6
Change in Status for Anti-double-stranded DNA Autoantibody From Baseline to Week 12
Time frame: 0, Week 12
Change in Status for Anti-double-stranded DNA Autoantibody From Baseline to Week 6
Time frame: 0, Week 6
Change in SELENA-SLEDAI Total Score From Baseline to Week 12
Time frame: 0, Week 12
Cardiorespiratory BILAG Status at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Constitutional BILAG Status at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Gastrointestinal BILAG Status at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Hematological BILAG Status at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Mucocutaneous BILAG Status at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Musculoskeletal BILAG Status at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Neuropsychiatric BILAG Status at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Ophthalmic BILAG Status at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Renal BILAG Status at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percent of Participants With Adverse Events of Grade 3 or Above
Time frame: From start of study treatment through Week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Apr 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 16431339Kamen DL, Cooper GS, Bouali H, Shaftman SR, Hollis BW, Gilkeson GS. Vitamin D deficiency in systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmun Rev. 2006 Feb;5(2):114-7. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2005.05.009. Epub 2005 Jun 21.
- Background: PubMed 17893966Mangini AJ, Lafyatis R, Van Seventer JM. Type I interferons inhibition of inflammatory T helper cell responses in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Jun;1108:11-23. doi: 10.1196/annals.1422.002.
- Background: PubMed 7138600Tan EM, Cohen AS, Fries JF, Masi AT, McShane DJ, Rothfield NF, Schaller JG, Talal N, Winchester RJ. The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1982 Nov;25(11):1271-7. doi: 10.1002/art.1780251101.
- Background: PubMed 9324032Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1997 Sep;40(9):1725. doi: 10.1002/art.1780400928. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 15814577Isenberg DA, Rahman A, Allen E, Farewell V, Akil M, Bruce IN, D'Cruz D, Griffiths B, Khamashta M, Maddison P, McHugh N, Snaith M, Teh LS, Yee CS, Zoma A, Gordon C. BILAG 2004. Development and initial validation of an updated version of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group's disease activity index for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Jul;44(7):902-6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh624. Epub 2005 Apr 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 25777546Aranow C, Kamen DL, Dall'Era M, Massarotti EM, Mackay MC, Koumpouras F, Coca A, Chatham WW, Clowse ME, Criscione-Schreiber LG, Callahan S, Goldmuntz EA, Keyes-Elstein L, Oswald M, Gregersen PK, Diamond B. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of the Effect of Vitamin D3 on the Interferon Signature in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Jul;67(7):1848-57. doi: 10.1002/art.39108.
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases: Handout on Health-System Lupus ErythematosusLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data access is provided to the public in the Immunology Database and Analysis Portal (ImmPort), a long-term archive of clinical and mechanistic data from DAIT-funded grants and contracts that also provides data analysis tools available to researchers.
Related trials for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingObservational study
Deciphering the Genetic Architecture of Autoimmune Diseases
Autoimmune Diseases
RecruitingObservational study
Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRHa) in Ovarian Preservation in SLE Subjects Receiving Cyclophosphamide as Determined by Questionnaires
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (Sle), Primary Ovarian Insufficiency (Poi)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Active, not recruiting
Fatigue in Lupus Intervention Programmes (FLIP)
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CLN-978, a Subcutaneously Administered CD19-directed T Cell Engager, in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
SLE, SLE (Systemic Lupus)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Cynthia Aranow, MD study chair
Northwell Health
Diane Kamen, MD study chair
Medical University of South Carolina
8 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Vitamin D3 in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and SLE, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 8 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Apr 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent of Participants With an IFN Alpha Signature Response at Week 12 (time frame: 0, Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00710021, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Apr 2017.