Age-related Macular DegenerationPhase 1/2NCT00712491
Phase 1/2 Study of an Ocular Sirolimus (Rapamycin) Formulation in Patients With Age-Related Macular Degeneration
A Phase 1/2 study testing Sirolimus in people with Age-related Macular Degeneration and Choroidal Neovascularization, run by Santen Inc. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of an ocular sirolimus (rapamycin) formulation via different injection routes in patients with treatment-naive sub-foveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Age-related Macular Degeneration, Choroidal Neovascularization
- What is being tested?
- Sirolimus
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2008to Mar 2010
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosed with sub-foveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration
- Visual acuity of 20/50 to 20/200 in study eye
Who cannot join
- Any other ocular disease that could compromise vision in the study eye
- History of any prior treatment for choroidal neovascularization in the study eye
- Presence of other causes of choroidal neovascularization other than secondary to age-related macular degeneration
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Retinal Consultants of Arizona
Phoenix, Arizona, 85044
About this study
Official title: A Phase 1/2, Randomized Clinical Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Sirolimus in Patients With Newly Diagnosed, Treatment-Naive Sub-Foveal Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of an ocular sirolimus (rapamycin) formulation via different injection routes in patients with treatment-naive sub-foveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration.
- Being tested
- Sirolimus
- Keywords
- wet AMD, CNV
- Medical subject headings
- Macular Degeneration, Choroidal Neovascularization
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SirolimusDrug
Also called MS-R002, rapamycin
Three subconjunctival injections of 1320 micrograms sirolimus each.
SirolimusDrug
Also called MS-R001, rapamycin
Three intravitreal injections of 352 micrograms sirolimus each.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Sirolimus |
| 2 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Sirolimus |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Best-corrected visual acuity by ETDRS
Measured: 180 days
Secondary outcomes (2)
Best-corrected visual acuity by ETDRS
Measured: 60 days, 120 days
Safety across injection routes
Measured: Through 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2008
- Primary completionNov 2009
- Study completionMar 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Age-related Macular DegenerationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Santen Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- MacuSight, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Joel Naor, MD, Study director, MacuSight, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00712491
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AMD-002
- Status last verified
- Jul 2010
- First submitted
- 8 Jul 2008
- Last updated
- 10 Jan 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jan 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 1/2, Randomized Clinical Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Sirolimus in Patients With Newly Diagnosed, Treatment-Naive Sub-Foveal Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00712491
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AMD-002
- Keywords
- wet AMD, CNV
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Santen Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- MacuSight, Inc.
- Study start
- Sep 2008
- Primary completion
- Nov 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of an ocular sirolimus (rapamycin) formulation via different injection routes in patients with treatment-naive sub-foveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Drug: Sirolimus |
| 2 | Experimental | Drug: Sirolimus |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Diagnosed with sub-foveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration
- Visual acuity of 20/50 to 20/200 in study eye
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Any other ocular disease that could compromise vision in the study eye
- History of any prior treatment for choroidal neovascularization in the study eye
- Presence of other causes of choroidal neovascularization other than secondary to age-related macular degeneration
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SirolimusAlso: MS-R002, rapamycinThree subconjunctival injections of 1320 micrograms sirolimus each. | Drug | 1 |
| SirolimusAlso: MS-R001, rapamycinThree intravitreal injections of 352 micrograms sirolimus each. | Drug | 2 |
Primary outcome
Best-corrected visual acuity by ETDRS
Time frame: 180 days
2 secondary outcomes
Best-corrected visual acuity by ETDRS
Time frame: 60 days, 120 days
Safety across injection routes
Time frame: Through 1 year
Results and safety
The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jan 2013.
Related trials for Age-related Macular Degeneration
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of VIS-101 in Participants With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration(nAMD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Investigating Subcutaneously Administered Pozelimab in Combination With Cemdisiran or Cemdisiran Alone in Adult Participants With Geographic Atrophy
Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD), Geographic Atrophy (GA)
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Phase 1/2 Study of VOY-101 in Patients With Advanced Non-Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Geographic Atrophy
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tarcocimab Tedromer and Tabirafusp Tedromer Compared to Aflibercept in Participants With Neovascular (Wet) Age-related Macular Degeneration (wAMD) - DAYBREAK
Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Autologous Transplantation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Retinal Pigment Epithelium for Geographic Atrophy Associated With Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Geographic Atrophy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Joel Naor, MD study director
MacuSight, Inc.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Sirolimus in people with Age-related Macular Degeneration and Choroidal Neovascularization, run by Santen Inc. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jan 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Best-corrected visual acuity by ETDRS (time frame: 180 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jan 2013.