AzTrials
AzTrials

NeoplasmsPhase 1NCT00715403

A Phase I/II Open Label Extension Study of BIBF 1120 Administered Orally Once or Twice Daily to Establish Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours and Clinical Benefit From Previous Therapy With BIBF 1120

A Phase 1 study testing BIBF 1120 in people with Neoplasms, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 11 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the long-term safety of BIBF 1120 in terms of incidence and intensity of Adverse Events and changes in safety laboratory parameters. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Neoplasms
What is being tested?
BIBF 1120
How many people
41 participants
Where
11 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Oct 2004to Sep 2009
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female patients with advanced solid tumours who have completed a previous study with BIBF 1120. The patients should not have progression of their underlying tumour disease unless there is evidence for significant clinical benefit (e.g. symptom improvement) from treatment with BIBF 1120.
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG, R01-0787) performance score <= 2
  • Patients must have given written informed consent (which must be consistent with ICH-GCP and local legislation)

Who cannot join

  • Time elapsed from last administration of BIBF 1120 in the previous trial to start of treatment in the present trial exceeds four weeks
  • Presence of drug related toxicity > grade 2 CTC from previous therapy with BIBF 1120 or presence of drug related continuous toxicity of grade 2 for seven or more consecutive days which would preclude ongoing chronic therapy with BIBF 1120
  • Active ulcers (gastro-intestinal tract, skin)
  • Major injuries and surgery within the past three weeks with incomplete wound healing
  • Hypersensitivity to BIBF 1120 or the excipients of the trial drug
  • Known secondary malignancy requiring therapy
Show all 22Show fewer
  • Active infectious disease
  • Significant cardiovascular diseases (i.e. uncontrolled severe hypertension, unstable angina pectoris, history of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure > NYHA II)
  • Gastrointestinal disorders anticipated to interfere with the resorption of the study drug
  • Brain metastases requiring therapy
  • Absolute neutrophil count less than 1,500/mm3
  • Platelet count less than 100,000/mm3
  • Bilirubin greater than 1.5 mg/dl (> 26 µmol/L)
  • Aspartate amino transferase (AST) and/or alanine amino transferase (ALT) greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of normal (if related to liver metastases greater than five times the upper limit of normal)
  • Serum creatinine greater than 2 mg/dl (> 176 µmol/L)
  • Concomitant non-oncological diseases which are considered relevant for the evaluation of the safety of the trial drug
  • Chemo-, radio-, or immunotherapy within the past four weeks prior to treatment with the trial drug
  • Patients who are sexually active and unwilling to use a medically acceptable method of contraception
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Treatment with other investigational drugs or participation in another clinical trial within the past four weeks before start of therapy (visit 2) or concomitantly with this trial (except for a previous study with BIBF 1120)
  • Patients unable to comply with the protocol
  • Active alcohol or drug abuse

Trial locations and contacts

11 sites in 2 countries.

11 sites in 2 countries

France7 sites
  • 1199.16.3306A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bordeaux

  • 1199.16.3311A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Clichy

  • 1199.16.3311B Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Clichy

  • 1199.16.3302A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Paris

  • 1199.16.3312A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Paris

  • 1199.16.3313A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Paris

  • 1199.16.3313E Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Paris

Other trials in France

Germany4 sites
  • 1199.16.49001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Freiburg/Breisgau

  • 1199.16.49004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Großhansdorf

  • 1199.16.49008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Tübingen

  • 1199.16.49005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Wiesbaden

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Extension Study to Establish Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of BIBF 1120 in Patients With Previous Clinical Benefit From BIBF 1120

The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the long-term safety of BIBF 1120 in terms of incidence and intensity of Adverse Events and changes in safety laboratory parameters.

Secondary objectives are the collection of further safety data (vital signs), efficacy data and the determination of pharmacokinetic characteristics during long-term therapy with BIBF 1120.

Conditions
Neoplasms
Being tested
BIBF 1120
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BIBF 1120Drug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Highest CTCAE Grade 1

    All patients who had grade 1 adverse events (AEs) as the worst grade of the AE. Incidence and intensity of Adverse Events with grading of Adverse Events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).

    Measured: From signing the informed consent until final follow-up, up to 991 days

  2. Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Highest CTCAE Grade 2

    All patients who had grade 2 adverse events (AEs) as the worst grade of the AE. Incidence and intensity of Adverse Events with grading of Adverse Events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).

    Measured: From signing the informed consent until final follow-up, up to 991 days

  3. Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Highest CTCAE Grade 3

    All patients who had grade 3 adverse events (AEs) as the worst grade of the AE. Incidence and intensity of Adverse Events with grading of Adverse Events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).

    Measured: From signing the informed consent until final follow-up, up to 991 days

  4. Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Highest CTCAE Grade 4

    All patients who had grade 4 adverse events (AEs) as the worst grade of the AE. Incidence and intensity of Adverse Events with grading of Adverse Events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).

    Measured: From signing the informed consent until final follow-up, up to 991 days

  5. Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Highest CTCAE Grade 5

    All patients who had grade 5 adverse events (AEs) as the worst grade of the AE. Incidence and intensity of Adverse Events with grading of Adverse Events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).

    Measured: From signing the informed consent until final follow-up, up to 991 days

  6. Difference From Baseline for Liver Enzymes

    Difference from baseline (normalized value). Baseline was defined as the value at the time point closest to but prior to very first administration of trial medication. The standard error is actually the Interquartile Range calculated as P75 minus P25.

    Measured: From signing the informed consent until end of treatment, up to 991 days

  7. Difference From Baseline for Bilirubin, Creatinine and Glucose

    Difference from baseline (normalized value). Baseline was defined as the value at the time point closest to but prior to very first administration of trial medication. The standard error is actually the Interquartile Range calculated as P75 minus P25.

    Measured: From signing the informed consent until end of treatment, up to 991 days

  8. Difference From Baseline for Haemoglobin

    Difference from baseline for Haemoglobin (normalized value). Baseline was defined as the value at the time point closest to but prior to very first administration of trial medication. The standard error is actually the Interquartile Range calculated as P75 minus P25.

    Measured: From baseline until end of treatment, up to 991 days

  9. Difference From Baseline for Haematology and Differentials Parameters

    Difference from baseline (normalized value). Baseline was defined as the value at the time point closest to but prior to very first administration of trial medication. The standard error is actually the Interquartile Range calculated as P75 minus P25.

    Measured: From signing the informed consent until end of treatment, up to 991 days

  10. Difference From Baseline for Coagulation Parameters

    Difference from baseline (normalized value) in coagulation parameters Prothrombin time, international normalised ratio (PT-INR) and partial thromboplastin time. Baseline was defined as the value at the time point closest to but prior to very first administration of trial medication. The standard error is actually the Interquartile Range calculated as P75 minus P25.

    Measured: From signing the informed consent until end of treatment, up to 991 days

  11. Difference From Baseline for Electrolytes

    Difference from baseline (normalized value). Baseline was defined as the value at the time point closest to but prior to very first administration of trial medication. The standard error is actually the Interquartile Range calculated as P75 minus P25.

    Measured: From signing the informed consent until end of treatment, up to 991 days

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Clinically Relevant Abnormalities for Vital Signs

    Clinically relevant abnormalities for Vital Signs (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and pulse rate). New abnormal findings or worsening of baseline conditions were reported as Adverse Events.

    Measured: From baseline until final follow-up, up to 991 days

  2. Pre-dose Concentration of Nintedanib in Plasma at Steady-state (Cpre,ss)

    Cpre,ss represents the pre-dose concentration of Nintedanib in Plasma at steady-state at day 29

    Measured: Just before drug administration every 28±7 days after day 29

  3. Unconfirmed Best Overall Response

    Unconfirmed best overall response assessed by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours) criteria (version 1.0).

    PD = Progressive disease.

    Measured: Baseline until end of treatment, up to 991 days

  4. Unconfirmed Best Objective Response

    Unconfirmed best objective response assessed by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours) criteria (version 1.0)

    Measured: Baseline until end of treatment, up to 991 days

  5. Clinical Benefit

    Clinical benefit was defined as the absence of disease progression (no PD or nonevaluable clinically progressive disease) determined by RECIST (version 1.0).

    Measured: Baseline until end of treatment, up to 991 days

  6. Confirmed Objective Response

    Confirmed objective response assessed by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours) criteria (version 1.0)

    Measured: Baseline until end of treatment, up to 991 days

  7. Progression Free Survival

    Percentage of participants that experienced progression free survival (PFS), assessed by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours) (version 1.0), by day 1230. Progression was defined as progressive disease (PD) or non-evaluable clinically progressive disease.

    PFS was defined for patients without PD at screening as the time from first treatment with the trial drug in the previous trial until onset of PD or death, whatever comes earlier.

    Patients with PD could enter the trial if they showed signs of clinical benefit. For patients with PD at screening, the RECIST assessment at screening was used as a new baseline value and PFS was the time from first treatment with the trial drug in this trial until the onset of progressive disease in this trial or death, whatever comes first.

    Measured: First drug administration (in previous trial) until end of treatment, up to 1230 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jul 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2004
  3. Primary completionSep 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Enrolment
41 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00715403
Sponsor's protocol ID
1199.16
Status last verified
Nov 2014
First submitted
11 Jul 2008
Last updated
2 Dec 2014

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing BIBF 1120 in people with Neoplasms, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 11 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 11 sites in France, Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Dec 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Highest CTCAE Grade 1 (time frame: From signing the informed consent until final follow-up, up to 991 days). The study lists 11 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Dec 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in