NeoplasmsPhase 1NCT00715403
A Phase I/II Open Label Extension Study of BIBF 1120 Administered Orally Once or Twice Daily to Establish Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours and Clinical Benefit From Previous Therapy With BIBF 1120
A Phase 1 study testing BIBF 1120 in people with Neoplasms, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 11 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the long-term safety of BIBF 1120 in terms of incidence and intensity of Adverse Events and changes in safety laboratory parameters. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- BIBF 1120
- How many people
- 41 participants
- Where
- 11 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Oct 2004to Sep 2009
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patients with advanced solid tumours who have completed a previous study with BIBF 1120. The patients should not have progression of their underlying tumour disease unless there is evidence for significant clinical benefit (e.g. symptom improvement) from treatment with BIBF 1120.
- Age 18 years or older
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG, R01-0787) performance score <= 2
- Patients must have given written informed consent (which must be consistent with ICH-GCP and local legislation)
Who cannot join
- Time elapsed from last administration of BIBF 1120 in the previous trial to start of treatment in the present trial exceeds four weeks
- Presence of drug related toxicity > grade 2 CTC from previous therapy with BIBF 1120 or presence of drug related continuous toxicity of grade 2 for seven or more consecutive days which would preclude ongoing chronic therapy with BIBF 1120
- Active ulcers (gastro-intestinal tract, skin)
- Major injuries and surgery within the past three weeks with incomplete wound healing
- Hypersensitivity to BIBF 1120 or the excipients of the trial drug
- Known secondary malignancy requiring therapy
Show all 22Show fewer
- Active infectious disease
- Significant cardiovascular diseases (i.e. uncontrolled severe hypertension, unstable angina pectoris, history of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure > NYHA II)
- Gastrointestinal disorders anticipated to interfere with the resorption of the study drug
- Brain metastases requiring therapy
- Absolute neutrophil count less than 1,500/mm3
- Platelet count less than 100,000/mm3
- Bilirubin greater than 1.5 mg/dl (> 26 µmol/L)
- Aspartate amino transferase (AST) and/or alanine amino transferase (ALT) greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of normal (if related to liver metastases greater than five times the upper limit of normal)
- Serum creatinine greater than 2 mg/dl (> 176 µmol/L)
- Concomitant non-oncological diseases which are considered relevant for the evaluation of the safety of the trial drug
- Chemo-, radio-, or immunotherapy within the past four weeks prior to treatment with the trial drug
- Patients who are sexually active and unwilling to use a medically acceptable method of contraception
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Treatment with other investigational drugs or participation in another clinical trial within the past four weeks before start of therapy (visit 2) or concomitantly with this trial (except for a previous study with BIBF 1120)
- Patients unable to comply with the protocol
- Active alcohol or drug abuse
Trial locations and contacts
11 sites in 2 countries.
11 sites in 2 countries
France7 sites
1199.16.3306A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bordeaux
1199.16.3311A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Clichy
1199.16.3311B Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Clichy
1199.16.3302A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Paris
1199.16.3312A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Paris
1199.16.3313A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Paris
1199.16.3313E Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Paris
Germany4 sites
1199.16.49001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Freiburg/Breisgau
1199.16.49004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Großhansdorf
1199.16.49008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Tübingen
1199.16.49005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Wiesbaden
About this study
Official title: Extension Study to Establish Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of BIBF 1120 in Patients With Previous Clinical Benefit From BIBF 1120
The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the long-term safety of BIBF 1120 in terms of incidence and intensity of Adverse Events and changes in safety laboratory parameters.
Secondary objectives are the collection of further safety data (vital signs), efficacy data and the determination of pharmacokinetic characteristics during long-term therapy with BIBF 1120.
- Conditions
- Neoplasms
- Being tested
- BIBF 1120
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BIBF 1120Drug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Highest CTCAE Grade 1
All patients who had grade 1 adverse events (AEs) as the worst grade of the AE. Incidence and intensity of Adverse Events with grading of Adverse Events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).
Measured: From signing the informed consent until final follow-up, up to 991 days
Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Highest CTCAE Grade 2
All patients who had grade 2 adverse events (AEs) as the worst grade of the AE. Incidence and intensity of Adverse Events with grading of Adverse Events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).
Measured: From signing the informed consent until final follow-up, up to 991 days
Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Highest CTCAE Grade 3
All patients who had grade 3 adverse events (AEs) as the worst grade of the AE. Incidence and intensity of Adverse Events with grading of Adverse Events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).
Measured: From signing the informed consent until final follow-up, up to 991 days
Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Highest CTCAE Grade 4
All patients who had grade 4 adverse events (AEs) as the worst grade of the AE. Incidence and intensity of Adverse Events with grading of Adverse Events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).
Measured: From signing the informed consent until final follow-up, up to 991 days
Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Highest CTCAE Grade 5
All patients who had grade 5 adverse events (AEs) as the worst grade of the AE. Incidence and intensity of Adverse Events with grading of Adverse Events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).
Measured: From signing the informed consent until final follow-up, up to 991 days
Difference From Baseline for Liver Enzymes
Difference from baseline (normalized value). Baseline was defined as the value at the time point closest to but prior to very first administration of trial medication. The standard error is actually the Interquartile Range calculated as P75 minus P25.
Measured: From signing the informed consent until end of treatment, up to 991 days
Difference From Baseline for Bilirubin, Creatinine and Glucose
Difference from baseline (normalized value). Baseline was defined as the value at the time point closest to but prior to very first administration of trial medication. The standard error is actually the Interquartile Range calculated as P75 minus P25.
Measured: From signing the informed consent until end of treatment, up to 991 days
Difference From Baseline for Haemoglobin
Difference from baseline for Haemoglobin (normalized value). Baseline was defined as the value at the time point closest to but prior to very first administration of trial medication. The standard error is actually the Interquartile Range calculated as P75 minus P25.
Measured: From baseline until end of treatment, up to 991 days
Difference From Baseline for Haematology and Differentials Parameters
Difference from baseline (normalized value). Baseline was defined as the value at the time point closest to but prior to very first administration of trial medication. The standard error is actually the Interquartile Range calculated as P75 minus P25.
Measured: From signing the informed consent until end of treatment, up to 991 days
Difference From Baseline for Coagulation Parameters
Difference from baseline (normalized value) in coagulation parameters Prothrombin time, international normalised ratio (PT-INR) and partial thromboplastin time. Baseline was defined as the value at the time point closest to but prior to very first administration of trial medication. The standard error is actually the Interquartile Range calculated as P75 minus P25.
Measured: From signing the informed consent until end of treatment, up to 991 days
Difference From Baseline for Electrolytes
Difference from baseline (normalized value). Baseline was defined as the value at the time point closest to but prior to very first administration of trial medication. The standard error is actually the Interquartile Range calculated as P75 minus P25.
Measured: From signing the informed consent until end of treatment, up to 991 days
Secondary outcomes (7)
Clinically Relevant Abnormalities for Vital Signs
Clinically relevant abnormalities for Vital Signs (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and pulse rate). New abnormal findings or worsening of baseline conditions were reported as Adverse Events.
Measured: From baseline until final follow-up, up to 991 days
Pre-dose Concentration of Nintedanib in Plasma at Steady-state (Cpre,ss)
Cpre,ss represents the pre-dose concentration of Nintedanib in Plasma at steady-state at day 29
Measured: Just before drug administration every 28±7 days after day 29
Unconfirmed Best Overall Response
Unconfirmed best overall response assessed by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours) criteria (version 1.0).
PD = Progressive disease.
Measured: Baseline until end of treatment, up to 991 days
Unconfirmed Best Objective Response
Unconfirmed best objective response assessed by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours) criteria (version 1.0)
Measured: Baseline until end of treatment, up to 991 days
Clinical Benefit
Clinical benefit was defined as the absence of disease progression (no PD or nonevaluable clinically progressive disease) determined by RECIST (version 1.0).
Measured: Baseline until end of treatment, up to 991 days
Confirmed Objective Response
Confirmed objective response assessed by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours) criteria (version 1.0)
Measured: Baseline until end of treatment, up to 991 days
Progression Free Survival
Percentage of participants that experienced progression free survival (PFS), assessed by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours) (version 1.0), by day 1230. Progression was defined as progressive disease (PD) or non-evaluable clinically progressive disease.
PFS was defined for patients without PD at screening as the time from first treatment with the trial drug in the previous trial until onset of PD or death, whatever comes earlier.
Patients with PD could enter the trial if they showed signs of clinical benefit. For patients with PD at screening, the RECIST assessment at screening was used as a new baseline value and PFS was the time from first treatment with the trial drug in this trial until the onset of progressive disease in this trial or death, whatever comes first.
Measured: First drug administration (in previous trial) until end of treatment, up to 1230 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2004
- Primary completionSep 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boehringer IngelheimThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Enrolment
- 41 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Boehringer Ingelheim, Study chair, Boehringer Ingelheim
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00715403
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1199.16
- Status last verified
- Nov 2014
- First submitted
- 11 Jul 2008
- Last updated
- 2 Dec 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Dec 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Extension Study to Establish Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of BIBF 1120 in Patients With Previous Clinical Benefit From BIBF 1120
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00715403
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1199.16
- Conditions
- Neoplasms
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 41 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer IngelheimIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2004
- Primary completion
- Sep 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 2 Dec 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the long-term safety of BIBF 1120 in terms of incidence and intensity of Adverse Events and changes in safety laboratory parameters.
Secondary objectives are the collection of further safety data (vital signs), efficacy data and the determination of pharmacokinetic characteristics during long-term therapy with BIBF 1120.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Male or female patients with advanced solid tumours who have completed a previous study with BIBF 1120. The patients should not have progression of their underlying tumour disease unless there is evidence for significant clinical benefit (e.g. symptom improvement) from treatment with BIBF 1120.
- Age 18 years or older
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG, R01-0787) performance score <= 2
- Patients must have given written informed consent (which must be consistent with ICH-GCP and local legislation)
Key exclusion criteria (22 listed)
- Time elapsed from last administration of BIBF 1120 in the previous trial to start of treatment in the present trial exceeds four weeks
- Presence of drug related toxicity > grade 2 CTC from previous therapy with BIBF 1120 or presence of drug related continuous toxicity of grade 2 for seven or more consecutive days which would preclude ongoing chronic therapy with BIBF 1120
- Active ulcers (gastro-intestinal tract, skin)
- Major injuries and surgery within the past three weeks with incomplete wound healing
- Hypersensitivity to BIBF 1120 or the excipients of the trial drug
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BIBF 1120 | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Highest CTCAE Grade 1
Time frame: From signing the informed consent until final follow-up, up to 991 days
All patients who had grade 1 adverse events (AEs) as the worst grade of the AE. Incidence and intensity of Adverse Events with grading of Adverse Events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).
Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Highest CTCAE Grade 2
Time frame: From signing the informed consent until final follow-up, up to 991 days
All patients who had grade 2 adverse events (AEs) as the worst grade of the AE. Incidence and intensity of Adverse Events with grading of Adverse Events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).
Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Highest CTCAE Grade 3
Time frame: From signing the informed consent until final follow-up, up to 991 days
All patients who had grade 3 adverse events (AEs) as the worst grade of the AE. Incidence and intensity of Adverse Events with grading of Adverse Events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).
Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Highest CTCAE Grade 4
Time frame: From signing the informed consent until final follow-up, up to 991 days
All patients who had grade 4 adverse events (AEs) as the worst grade of the AE. Incidence and intensity of Adverse Events with grading of Adverse Events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).
Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Highest CTCAE Grade 5
Time frame: From signing the informed consent until final follow-up, up to 991 days
All patients who had grade 5 adverse events (AEs) as the worst grade of the AE. Incidence and intensity of Adverse Events with grading of Adverse Events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).
Difference From Baseline for Liver Enzymes
Time frame: From signing the informed consent until end of treatment, up to 991 days
Difference from baseline (normalized value). Baseline was defined as the value at the time point closest to but prior to very first administration of trial medication. The standard error is actually the Interquartile Range calculated as P75 minus P25.
Difference From Baseline for Bilirubin, Creatinine and Glucose
Time frame: From signing the informed consent until end of treatment, up to 991 days
Difference from baseline (normalized value). Baseline was defined as the value at the time point closest to but prior to very first administration of trial medication. The standard error is actually the Interquartile Range calculated as P75 minus P25.
Difference From Baseline for Haemoglobin
Time frame: From baseline until end of treatment, up to 991 days
Difference from baseline for Haemoglobin (normalized value). Baseline was defined as the value at the time point closest to but prior to very first administration of trial medication. The standard error is actually the Interquartile Range calculated as P75 minus P25.
Difference From Baseline for Haematology and Differentials Parameters
Time frame: From signing the informed consent until end of treatment, up to 991 days
Difference from baseline (normalized value). Baseline was defined as the value at the time point closest to but prior to very first administration of trial medication. The standard error is actually the Interquartile Range calculated as P75 minus P25.
Difference From Baseline for Coagulation Parameters
Time frame: From signing the informed consent until end of treatment, up to 991 days
Difference from baseline (normalized value) in coagulation parameters Prothrombin time, international normalised ratio (PT-INR) and partial thromboplastin time. Baseline was defined as the value at the time point closest to but prior to very first administration of trial medication. The standard error is actually the Interquartile Range calculated as P75 minus P25.
Difference From Baseline for Electrolytes
Time frame: From signing the informed consent until end of treatment, up to 991 days
Difference from baseline (normalized value). Baseline was defined as the value at the time point closest to but prior to very first administration of trial medication. The standard error is actually the Interquartile Range calculated as P75 minus P25.
7 secondary outcomes
Clinically Relevant Abnormalities for Vital Signs
Time frame: From baseline until final follow-up, up to 991 days
Pre-dose Concentration of Nintedanib in Plasma at Steady-state (Cpre,ss)
Time frame: Just before drug administration every 28±7 days after day 29
Unconfirmed Best Overall Response
Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment, up to 991 days
Unconfirmed Best Objective Response
Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment, up to 991 days
Clinical Benefit
Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment, up to 991 days
Confirmed Objective Response
Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment, up to 991 days
Progression Free Survival
Time frame: First drug administration (in previous trial) until end of treatment, up to 1230 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Dec 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Neoplasms
Not yet recruiting
Using e-Technologies to Maximize Physical Activity After Cancer Treatment
Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-12 Genetically Engineered Myeloid Cells in Participants With Relapsed, Refractory Solid Tumors
Relapsed Solid Tumor Malignancies, Refractory Solid Tumor Malignancies
RecruitingObservational study
Pharmacogenetic Determinants Of Treatment Response In Children
All Malignancies, Children Being Treated for Catastrophic Illness
RecruitingObservational study
Cancer in Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes
Diamond Blackfan Anemia, Dyskeratosis Congenita
RecruitingObservational study
Collection of CSF Samples From Participants With Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) and HER2+ Breast Cancer With no Prior History Nor Active Radiographically Detectable Brain Metastases
Breast Cancer, Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Boehringer Ingelheim study chair
Boehringer Ingelheim
11 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing BIBF 1120 in people with Neoplasms, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 11 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 11 sites in France, Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Dec 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Highest CTCAE Grade 1 (time frame: From signing the informed consent until final follow-up, up to 991 days). The study lists 11 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Dec 2014.