AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 3REALISTICNCT00717236

Certolizumab Pegol for the Treatment of Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Phase 3 study testing Certolizumab pegol (CZP) in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by UCB Pharma at 181 sites in 7 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a Phase IIIb multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of certolizumab pegol (CZP) administered to patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
Certolizumab pegol (CZP)
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
1,648 participants
Where
181 sitesin 7 countries
Study dates
Jul 2008to Mar 2011
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patient with established moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis

Who cannot join

  • All concomitant diseases or pathological conditions that could interfere and impact the assessment of the study treatment
  • Previous clinical trials and previous biological therapy that could interfere with the results in the present clinical trials

Trial locations and contacts

181 sites in 7 countries.

181 sites in 7 countries

United States101 sites
  • Study site

    Albany, New York

  • Study site

    Amarillo, Texas

  • Study site

    Asheville, North Carolina

  • Study site

    Atlanta, Georgia

  • Study site

    Austin, Texas

  • Study site

    Baltimore, Maryland

  • Study site

    Battle Creek, Michigan

  • Study site

    Birmingham, Alabama

  • Study site

    Boca Raton, Florida

  • Study site

    Boston, Massachusetts

  • Study site

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina

  • Study site

    Charleston, South Carolina

  • Study site

    Charlotte, North Carolina

  • Study site

    Clarksburg, West Virginia

  • Study site

    Coeur d'Alene, Idaho

  • Study site

    Columbia, Maryland

  • Study site

    Columbus, Ohio

  • Study site

    Covington, Louisiana

  • Study site

    Dallas, Texas

  • Study site

    Danbury, Connecticut

  • Study site

    Dayton, Ohio

  • Study site

    Delray Beach, Florida

  • Study site

    Denver, Colorado

  • Study site

    Duluth, Minnesota

  • Study site

    Erie, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Evansville, Indiana

  • Study site

    Fairfield, Ohio

  • Study site

    Fall River, Massachusetts

  • Study site

    Fort Worth, Texas

  • Study site

    Frederick, Maryland

  • Study site

    Fullerton, California

  • Study site

    Gainesville, Florida

  • Study site

    Glendale, Wisconsin

  • Study site

    Hot Springs, Arkansas

  • Study site

    Houston, Texas

  • Study site

    Idaho Falls, Idaho

  • Study site

    Indianapolis, Indiana

  • Study site

    Jackson, Tennessee

  • Study site

    Jacksonville, Florida

  • Study site

    Kalamazoo, Michigan

  • Study site

    La Jolla, California

  • Study site

    Lake Charles, Louisiana

  • Study site

    Lansing, Michigan

  • Study site

    Lewes, Delaware

  • Study site

    Little Rock, Arkansas

  • Study site

    Los Angeles, California

  • Study site

    Louisville, Kentucky

  • Study site

    Lubbock, Texas

  • Study site

    Mayfield, Ohio

  • Study site

    Maywood, Illinois

  • Study site

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin

  • Study site

    Monroe, North Carolina

  • Study site

    Monroe, Wisconsin

  • Study site

    Montgomery, Alabama

  • Study site

    New Brunswick, New Jersey

  • Study site

    New York, New York

  • Study site

    Newark, Delaware

  • Study site

    Newport News, Virginia

  • Study site

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

  • Study site

    Orchard Park, New York

  • Study site

    Orlando, Florida

  • Study site

    Palm Desert, California

  • Study site

    Peoria, Illinois

  • Study site

    Petoskey, Michigan

  • Study site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Phoenix, Arizona

  • Study site

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Richmond, Virginia

  • Study site

    Rochester, Minnesota

  • Study site

    Rochester, New York

  • Study site

    Rock Island, Illinois

  • Study site

    Roslyn, New York

  • Study site

    Sacramento, California

  • Study site

    Salt Lake City, Utah

  • Study site

    San Antonio, Texas

  • Study site

    Santa Barbara, California

  • Study site

    Santa Maria, California

  • Study site

    Smithtown, New York

  • Study site

    South Miami, Florida

  • Study site

    Spokane, Washington

  • Study site

    Springfield, Illinois

  • Study site

    St Louis, Missouri

  • Study site

    Sugar Land, Texas

  • Study site

    Syracuse, New York

  • Study site

    Tacoma, Washington

  • Study site

    Tampa, Florida

  • Study site

    Tavares, Florida

  • Study site

    The Bronx, New York

  • Study site

    Trumbull, Connecticut

  • Study site

    Tucson, Arizona

  • Study site

    Tustin, California

  • Study site

    Voorhees Township, New Jersey

  • Study site

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia

  • Study site

    West Reading, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Westlake Village, California

  • Study site

    Wexford, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Wheaton, Maryland

  • Study site

    Whittier, California

  • Study site

    Wichita, Kansas

  • Study site

    Wilmington, North Carolina

  • Study site

    Yakima, Washington

Other trials in United States

Germany25 sites
  • Study site

    Bad Neuenahr

  • Study site

    Baden

  • Study site

    Berlin

  • Study site

    Chemnitz

  • Study site

    Cologne

  • Study site

    Dresden

  • Study site

    Duisburg

  • Study site

    Erfurt

  • Study site

    Erlangen

  • Study site

    Freiburg im Breisgau

  • Study site

    Friedrichroda

  • Study site

    Goslar

  • Study site

    Hamburg

  • Study site

    Hildesheim

  • Study site

    Hoyerswerda

  • Study site

    Jena

  • Study site

    Kiel

  • Study site

    Leipzig

  • Study site

    Mainz

  • Study site

    München

  • Study site

    Neuss

  • Study site

    Osnabrück

  • Study site

    Rostock

  • Study site

    Wiesbaden

  • Study site

    Zerbst

Other trials in Germany

Canada17 sites
  • Study site

    Calgary

  • Study site

    Edmonton, Alberta

  • Study site

    Halifax, Nova Scotia

  • Study site

    Hamilton, Ontario

  • Study site

    Kitchener, Ontario

  • Study site

    London, Ontario

  • Study site

    Mississauga

  • Study site

    Montreal, Quebec

  • Study site

    Newmarket

  • Study site

    Rimouski, Quebec

  • Study site

    Sainte-Foy

  • Study site

    St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador

  • Study site

    Toronto, Ontario

  • Study site

    Trois-Rivires, Quebec

  • Study site

    Vancouver, British Columbia

  • Study site

    Windsor, Ontario

  • Study site

    Winnipeg, Manitoba

Other trials in Canada

France13 sites
  • Study site

    Amiens

  • Study site

    Cahors

  • Study site

    Corbeil-Essonnes

  • Study site

    Dreux

  • Study site

    Liévin

  • Study site

    Montpellier

  • Study site

    Mulhouse

  • Study site

    Nantes

  • Study site

    Orléans

  • Study site

    Paris

  • Study site

    Pierre-Bénite

  • Study site

    Rennes

  • Study site

    Saint-Priest-en-Jarez

Other trials in France

Spain12 sites
  • Study site

    A Coruña

  • Study site

    Barcelona

  • Study site

    Madrid

  • Study site

    Murcia

  • Study site

    Oviedo

  • Study site

    Pontevedra

  • Study site

    Sabadell

  • Study site

    Salamanca

  • Study site

    San Cristóbal de La Laguna

  • Study site

    Santander

  • Study site

    Santiago de Compostela

  • Study site

    Torrelavega

Other trials in Spain

Italy9 sites
  • Study site

    Bologna

  • Study site

    Genova

  • Study site

    Iesi

  • Study site

    Modena

  • Study site

    Palermo

  • Study site

    Pisa

  • Study site

    Prato

  • Study site

    Siena

  • Study site

    Udine

Other trials in Italy

Netherlands4 sites
  • Study site

    Apeldoorn

  • Study site

    Arnhem

  • Study site

    Leiden

  • Study site

    The Hague

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: A Phase IIIb Multicenter Study With a 12-week Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Period Followed by an Open-label, Extension Phase Evaluating Safety/Efficacy of Certolizumab Pegol Given to Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis.

This is a Phase IIIb multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of certolizumab pegol (CZP) administered to patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis.

Read the detailed description

The treatment period starts with a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized period followed by an open-label extension phase. In the double-blind phase, eligible patients are randomized (4:1 ratio) to receive either certolizumab pegol (CZP) or Placebo up to and including Week 10. The randomization will be stratified according to the three factors: concomitant use of methotrexate (MTX, Yes or No), prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) use (Yes or No), and disease duration categories (< 2 years or ≥ 2 years). From Week 12 all patients remaining in the study receive open-label CZP for a minimum 16 additional weeks until CZP is commercially available.

Being tested
Certolizumab pegol (CZP), Placebo
Keywords
Certolizumab pegol, Cimzia, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Joint Disease, Chronic Arthritis
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Joint Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Certolizumab pegol (CZP)Drug

    Also called Cimzia

    400 mg CZP given as two 200 mg subcutaneous (sc) injections at Weeks 0, 2, and 4, followed by 200 mg CZP given as 1 sc injection on Weeks 6, 8, and 10. At Week 12 subjects enter the open label phase and receive 200 mg of CZP every other week for a minimum 16 additional weeks until CZP is commercially available.

  • PlaceboOther

    Placebo (0.9% saline) given as 2 subcutaneous (sc) injections at Weeks 0, 2, and 4, followed by placebo given as 1 sc injection on Weeks 6, 8, and 10. At Week 12 subjects enter the open label phase and receive 200 mg of CZP every other week for a minimum 16 additional weeks until CZP is commercially available.

Study groups in NCT00717236
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Certolizumab pegol (CZP)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Certolizumab pegol (CZP)
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12

    ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

Secondary outcomes (39)
  1. American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects With Concomitant Methotrexate (MTX) Use.

    ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  2. American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects Without Concomitant Methotrexate (MTX) Use.

    ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  3. American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects With Prior Anti-tumor Necrosis (Anti-TNF) Use

    ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  4. American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects Without Prior Anti-tumor Necrosis (Anti-TNF) Use

    ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  5. American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects With Disease Duration < 2 Years

    ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  6. American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects With Disease Duration ≥ 2 Years.

    ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  7. American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12

    ACR50 responders are subjects with at least 50% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  8. American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12.

    ACR70 responders are subjects with at least 70% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  9. Change From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive Protein)] at Week 12

    DAS28(CRP) is calculated using tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/L), and Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  10. Change From Baseline in SDAI (Simplified Disease Activity Index) at Week 12

    SDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/dL), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  11. Change From Baseline in CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) at Week 12

    CDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  12. DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive Protein)] Remission (<2.6) at Week 12

    DAS28(CRP) is calculated using tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/L), and Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm). A lower score indicates less disease activity.

    Measured: Week 12

  13. SDAI (Simplified Disease Activity Index) Remission (≤3.3) at Week 12

    SDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/dL), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity.

    Measured: Week 12

  14. CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) Remission (≤2.8) at Week 12

    CDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity.

    Measured: Week 12

  15. Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Week 12

    TJC is calculated based on tenderness response of 28 joints. TJC possible values range from 0 to 28. A lower TJC indicates less joint tenderness. Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  16. Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Week 12

    SJC is calculated based on swelling response of 28 joints. SJC possible values range from 0 to 28. A lower SJC indicates less joint swelling. Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  17. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12

    HAQ-DI is derived based on the mean of individual scores in 8 categories of daily living actives (using 20 questions). Each question is scored 0-3 (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do). Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  18. Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 12

    Change from baseline in CRP (mg/L) is computed as the ratio of Week 12 value divided by baseline value. A ratio less then 1 indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  19. Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS) at Week 12

    Change from Baseline in PAAP-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no pain and 100 being most severe pain) is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  20. Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS) at Week 12

    Change from Baseline in PtGADA-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no symptoms and 100 being severe symptoms) is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  21. Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS) at Week 12

    Change from Baseline in PhGADA-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no symptoms and 100 being severe symptoms) is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  22. Time to Sustained American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response

    The time from randomization to sustained ACR20 response at 2 consecutive visits (at the latest on Week 12).

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 12

  23. European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 12

    EULAR response (good response, moderate response, or no response) is defined based on the present value and improvement from baseline in DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive protein)].

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  24. American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 28

    ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS). This analysis was carried out using imputation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  25. American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 28

    ACR50 responders are subjects with at least 50% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS). This analysis was carried out using imputation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  26. American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 28

    ACR70 responders are subjects with at least 70% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS). This analysis was carried out using imputation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  27. Change From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive Protein)] at Week 28

    DAS28(CRP) is calculated using tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/L), and Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from Baseline is computed as the value at Week 28 minus Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  28. Change From Baseline in SDAI (Simplified Disease Activity Index) at Week 28

    SDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/dL), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from Baseline is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  29. Change From Baseline in CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) at Week 28

    CDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from Baseline is computed as value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  30. DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive Protein)] Remission (<2.6) at Week 28

    DAS28(CRP) is calculated using tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/L), and Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. This analysis was carried out using imputation.

    Measured: Week 28

  31. SDAI (Simplified Disease Activity Index) Remission (≤3.3) at Week 28

    SDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/dL), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. This analysis was carried out using imputation.

    Measured: Week 28

  32. CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) Remission (≤2.8) at Week 28

    CDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. This analysis was carried out using imputation.

    Measured: Week 28

  33. Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Week 28

    TJC is calculated based on tenderness response of 28 joints. TJC possible values range from 0 to 28. A lower TJC indicates less joint tenderness. Change from Baseline is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  34. Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Week 28

    SJC is calculated based on swelling response of 28 joints. SJC possible values range from 0 to 28. A lower SJC indicates less joint swelling. Change from baseline is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  35. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 28

    HAQ-DI is derived based on the mean of individual scores in 8 categories of daily living actives (using 20 questions). Each question is scored 0-3 (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do). Change from baseline is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  36. Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 28

    Change from Baseline in CRP (mg/L) is computed as the ratio of the value at Week 28 divided by Baseline value. A ratio less then 1 indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  37. Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS) at Week 28

    Change from Baseline in PAAP-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no pain and 100 being most severe pain) is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  38. Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS) at Week 28

    Change from Baseline in PtGADA-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no symptoms and 100 being severe symptoms) is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  39. Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS) at Week 28

    Change from Baseline in PhGADA-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no symptoms and 100 being severe symptoms) is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jul 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2008
  3. Primary completionMar 2010
  4. Study completionMar 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
1,648 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00717236
Sponsor's protocol ID
C87094
Other IDs
2008-005427-28, 2008
Acronym
REALISTIC
Status last verified
Mar 2012
First submitted
15 Jul 2008
Last updated
1 Aug 2018
Data monitoring committee
No
Expanded access
Available

Publications

  • Smolen JS, Mikuls TR, Galloway J, Muller-Ladner U, Curtis JR, Hashimoto M, Takeuchi T, Choy E, Tanaka Y, Cara C, Lauwerys B, Tilt N, Ufuktepe B, Taylor PC. Do high rheumatoid factor levels impact response to certolizumab pegol in patients with inadequately controlled rheumatoid arthritis? A post hoc analysis of the phase IIIb REALISTIC trial. RMD Open. 2026 Jan 30;12(1):e006094. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006094.

    PubMed 41617358
  • Pope J, Bingham CO 3rd, Fleischmann RM, Dougados M, Massarotti EM, Wollenhaupt J, Duncan B, Coteur G, Weinblatt ME. Impact of certolizumab pegol on patient-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis and correlation with clinical measures of disease activity. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Nov 27;17:343. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0849-1.

    PubMed 26614481
  • Weinblatt ME, Fleischmann R, van Vollenhoven RF, Emery P, Huizinga TW, Cutolo M, van der Heijde D, Duncan B, Davies O, Luijtens K, Dougados M. Twenty-eight-week results from the REALISTIC phase IIIb randomized trial: efficacy, safety and predictability of response to certolizumab pegol in a diverse rheumatoid arthritis population. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Nov 15;17:325. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0841-9.

    PubMed 26568428
  • Weinblatt ME, Fleischmann R, Huizinga TW, Emery P, Pope J, Massarotti EM, van Vollenhoven RF, Wollenhaupt J, Bingham CO 3rd, Duncan B, Goel N, Davies OR, Dougados M. Efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol in a broad population of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results from the REALISTIC phase IIIb study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Dec;51(12):2204-14. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes150. Epub 2012 Aug 25.

    PubMed 22923753

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Certolizumab pegol (CZP) in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by UCB Pharma at 181 sites in 7 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 181 sites in United States, Germany, Canada, France, Spain and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 May 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 (time frame: Baseline, Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00717236, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in