Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 3REALISTICNCT00717236
Certolizumab Pegol for the Treatment of Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
A Phase 3 study testing Certolizumab pegol (CZP) in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by UCB Pharma at 181 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
This is a Phase IIIb multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of certolizumab pegol (CZP) administered to patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Certolizumab pegol (CZP)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 1,648 participants
- Where
- 181 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2008to Mar 2011
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patient with established moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis
Who cannot join
- All concomitant diseases or pathological conditions that could interfere and impact the assessment of the study treatment
- Previous clinical trials and previous biological therapy that could interfere with the results in the present clinical trials
Trial locations and contacts
181 sites in 7 countries.
181 sites in 7 countries
United States101 sites
Study site
Albany, New York
Study site
Amarillo, Texas
Study site
Asheville, North Carolina
Study site
Atlanta, Georgia
Study site
Austin, Texas
Study site
Baltimore, Maryland
Study site
Battle Creek, Michigan
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama
Study site
Boca Raton, Florida
Study site
Boston, Massachusetts
Study site
Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Study site
Charleston, South Carolina
Study site
Charlotte, North Carolina
Study site
Clarksburg, West Virginia
Study site
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
Study site
Columbia, Maryland
Study site
Columbus, Ohio
Study site
Covington, Louisiana
Study site
Dallas, Texas
Study site
Danbury, Connecticut
Study site
Dayton, Ohio
Study site
Delray Beach, Florida
Study site
Denver, Colorado
Study site
Duluth, Minnesota
Study site
Erie, Pennsylvania
Study site
Evansville, Indiana
Study site
Fairfield, Ohio
Study site
Fall River, Massachusetts
Study site
Fort Worth, Texas
Study site
Frederick, Maryland
Study site
Fullerton, California
Study site
Gainesville, Florida
Study site
Glendale, Wisconsin
Study site
Hot Springs, Arkansas
Study site
Houston, Texas
Study site
Idaho Falls, Idaho
Study site
Indianapolis, Indiana
Study site
Jackson, Tennessee
Study site
Jacksonville, Florida
Study site
Kalamazoo, Michigan
Study site
La Jolla, California
Study site
Lake Charles, Louisiana
Study site
Lansing, Michigan
Study site
Lewes, Delaware
Study site
Little Rock, Arkansas
Study site
Los Angeles, California
Study site
Louisville, Kentucky
Study site
Lubbock, Texas
Study site
Mayfield, Ohio
Study site
Maywood, Illinois
Study site
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Study site
Monroe, North Carolina
Study site
Monroe, Wisconsin
Study site
Montgomery, Alabama
Study site
New Brunswick, New Jersey
Study site
New York, New York
Study site
Newark, Delaware
Study site
Newport News, Virginia
Study site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Study site
Orchard Park, New York
Study site
Orlando, Florida
Study site
Palm Desert, California
Study site
Peoria, Illinois
Study site
Petoskey, Michigan
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Study site
Phoenix, Arizona
Study site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Study site
Richmond, Virginia
Study site
Rochester, Minnesota
Study site
Rochester, New York
Study site
Rock Island, Illinois
Study site
Roslyn, New York
Study site
Sacramento, California
Study site
Salt Lake City, Utah
Study site
San Antonio, Texas
Study site
Santa Barbara, California
Study site
Santa Maria, California
Study site
Smithtown, New York
Study site
South Miami, Florida
Study site
Spokane, Washington
Study site
Springfield, Illinois
Study site
St Louis, Missouri
Study site
Sugar Land, Texas
Study site
Syracuse, New York
Study site
Tacoma, Washington
Study site
Tampa, Florida
Study site
Tavares, Florida
Study site
The Bronx, New York
Study site
Trumbull, Connecticut
Study site
Tucson, Arizona
Study site
Tustin, California
Study site
Voorhees Township, New Jersey
Study site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia
Study site
West Reading, Pennsylvania
Study site
Westlake Village, California
Study site
Wexford, Pennsylvania
Study site
Wheaton, Maryland
Study site
Whittier, California
Study site
Wichita, Kansas
Study site
Wilmington, North Carolina
Study site
Yakima, Washington
Germany25 sites
Study site
Bad Neuenahr
Study site
Baden
Study site
Berlin
Study site
Chemnitz
Study site
Cologne
Study site
Dresden
Study site
Duisburg
Study site
Erfurt
Study site
Erlangen
Study site
Freiburg im Breisgau
Study site
Friedrichroda
Study site
Goslar
Study site
Hamburg
Study site
Hildesheim
Study site
Hoyerswerda
Study site
Jena
Study site
Kiel
Study site
Leipzig
Study site
Mainz
Study site
München
Study site
Neuss
Study site
Osnabrück
Study site
Rostock
Study site
Wiesbaden
Study site
Zerbst
Canada17 sites
Study site
Calgary
Study site
Edmonton, Alberta
Study site
Halifax, Nova Scotia
Study site
Hamilton, Ontario
Study site
Kitchener, Ontario
Study site
London, Ontario
Study site
Mississauga
Study site
Montreal, Quebec
Study site
Newmarket
Study site
Rimouski, Quebec
Study site
Sainte-Foy
Study site
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador
Study site
Toronto, Ontario
Study site
Trois-Rivires, Quebec
Study site
Vancouver, British Columbia
Study site
Windsor, Ontario
Study site
Winnipeg, Manitoba
France13 sites
Study site
Amiens
Study site
Cahors
Study site
Corbeil-Essonnes
Study site
Dreux
Study site
Liévin
Study site
Montpellier
Study site
Mulhouse
Study site
Nantes
Study site
Orléans
Study site
Paris
Study site
Pierre-Bénite
Study site
Rennes
Study site
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez
Spain12 sites
Study site
A Coruña
Study site
Barcelona
Study site
Madrid
Study site
Murcia
Study site
Oviedo
Study site
Pontevedra
Study site
Sabadell
Study site
Salamanca
Study site
San Cristóbal de La Laguna
Study site
Santander
Study site
Santiago de Compostela
Study site
Torrelavega
Italy9 sites
Study site
Bologna
Study site
Genova
Study site
Iesi
Study site
Modena
Study site
Palermo
Study site
Pisa
Study site
Prato
Study site
Siena
Study site
Udine
Netherlands4 sites
Study site
Apeldoorn
Study site
Arnhem
Study site
Leiden
Study site
The Hague
About this study
Official title: A Phase IIIb Multicenter Study With a 12-week Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Period Followed by an Open-label, Extension Phase Evaluating Safety/Efficacy of Certolizumab Pegol Given to Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis.
This is a Phase IIIb multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of certolizumab pegol (CZP) administered to patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis.
Read the detailed description
The treatment period starts with a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized period followed by an open-label extension phase. In the double-blind phase, eligible patients are randomized (4:1 ratio) to receive either certolizumab pegol (CZP) or Placebo up to and including Week 10. The randomization will be stratified according to the three factors: concomitant use of methotrexate (MTX, Yes or No), prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) use (Yes or No), and disease duration categories (< 2 years or ≥ 2 years). From Week 12 all patients remaining in the study receive open-label CZP for a minimum 16 additional weeks until CZP is commercially available.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- Certolizumab pegol (CZP), Placebo
- Keywords
- Certolizumab pegol, Cimzia, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Joint Disease, Chronic Arthritis
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Joint Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Certolizumab pegol (CZP)Drug
Also called Cimzia
400 mg CZP given as two 200 mg subcutaneous (sc) injections at Weeks 0, 2, and 4, followed by 200 mg CZP given as 1 sc injection on Weeks 6, 8, and 10. At Week 12 subjects enter the open label phase and receive 200 mg of CZP every other week for a minimum 16 additional weeks until CZP is commercially available.
PlaceboOther
Placebo (0.9% saline) given as 2 subcutaneous (sc) injections at Weeks 0, 2, and 4, followed by placebo given as 1 sc injection on Weeks 6, 8, and 10. At Week 12 subjects enter the open label phase and receive 200 mg of CZP every other week for a minimum 16 additional weeks until CZP is commercially available.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Certolizumab pegol (CZP) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Certolizumab pegol (CZP) |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12
ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Secondary outcomes (39)
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects With Concomitant Methotrexate (MTX) Use.
ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects Without Concomitant Methotrexate (MTX) Use.
ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects With Prior Anti-tumor Necrosis (Anti-TNF) Use
ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects Without Prior Anti-tumor Necrosis (Anti-TNF) Use
ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects With Disease Duration < 2 Years
ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects With Disease Duration ≥ 2 Years.
ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12
ACR50 responders are subjects with at least 50% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12.
ACR70 responders are subjects with at least 70% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive Protein)] at Week 12
DAS28(CRP) is calculated using tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/L), and Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in SDAI (Simplified Disease Activity Index) at Week 12
SDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/dL), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) at Week 12
CDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive Protein)] Remission (<2.6) at Week 12
DAS28(CRP) is calculated using tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/L), and Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm). A lower score indicates less disease activity.
Measured: Week 12
SDAI (Simplified Disease Activity Index) Remission (≤3.3) at Week 12
SDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/dL), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity.
Measured: Week 12
CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) Remission (≤2.8) at Week 12
CDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity.
Measured: Week 12
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Week 12
TJC is calculated based on tenderness response of 28 joints. TJC possible values range from 0 to 28. A lower TJC indicates less joint tenderness. Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Week 12
SJC is calculated based on swelling response of 28 joints. SJC possible values range from 0 to 28. A lower SJC indicates less joint swelling. Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12
HAQ-DI is derived based on the mean of individual scores in 8 categories of daily living actives (using 20 questions). Each question is scored 0-3 (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do). Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 12
Change from baseline in CRP (mg/L) is computed as the ratio of Week 12 value divided by baseline value. A ratio less then 1 indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS) at Week 12
Change from Baseline in PAAP-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no pain and 100 being most severe pain) is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS) at Week 12
Change from Baseline in PtGADA-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no symptoms and 100 being severe symptoms) is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS) at Week 12
Change from Baseline in PhGADA-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no symptoms and 100 being severe symptoms) is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Time to Sustained American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
The time from randomization to sustained ACR20 response at 2 consecutive visits (at the latest on Week 12).
Measured: Baseline up to Week 12
European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 12
EULAR response (good response, moderate response, or no response) is defined based on the present value and improvement from baseline in DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive protein)].
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 28
ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS). This analysis was carried out using imputation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 28
American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 28
ACR50 responders are subjects with at least 50% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS). This analysis was carried out using imputation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 28
American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 28
ACR70 responders are subjects with at least 70% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS). This analysis was carried out using imputation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive Protein)] at Week 28
DAS28(CRP) is calculated using tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/L), and Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from Baseline is computed as the value at Week 28 minus Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
Measured: Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in SDAI (Simplified Disease Activity Index) at Week 28
SDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/dL), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from Baseline is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
Measured: Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) at Week 28
CDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from Baseline is computed as value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
Measured: Baseline, Week 28
DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive Protein)] Remission (<2.6) at Week 28
DAS28(CRP) is calculated using tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/L), and Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. This analysis was carried out using imputation.
Measured: Week 28
SDAI (Simplified Disease Activity Index) Remission (≤3.3) at Week 28
SDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/dL), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. This analysis was carried out using imputation.
Measured: Week 28
CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) Remission (≤2.8) at Week 28
CDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. This analysis was carried out using imputation.
Measured: Week 28
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Week 28
TJC is calculated based on tenderness response of 28 joints. TJC possible values range from 0 to 28. A lower TJC indicates less joint tenderness. Change from Baseline is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
Measured: Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Week 28
SJC is calculated based on swelling response of 28 joints. SJC possible values range from 0 to 28. A lower SJC indicates less joint swelling. Change from baseline is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
Measured: Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 28
HAQ-DI is derived based on the mean of individual scores in 8 categories of daily living actives (using 20 questions). Each question is scored 0-3 (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do). Change from baseline is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
Measured: Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 28
Change from Baseline in CRP (mg/L) is computed as the ratio of the value at Week 28 divided by Baseline value. A ratio less then 1 indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
Measured: Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS) at Week 28
Change from Baseline in PAAP-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no pain and 100 being most severe pain) is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
Measured: Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS) at Week 28
Change from Baseline in PtGADA-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no symptoms and 100 being severe symptoms) is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
Measured: Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS) at Week 28
Change from Baseline in PhGADA-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no symptoms and 100 being severe symptoms) is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
Measured: Baseline, Week 28
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2008
- Primary completionMar 2010
- Study completionMar 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,648 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- UCB Pharma
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- UCB Clinical Trial Call Center, Study director, +1 877 822 9493 (UCB)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00717236
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- C87094
- Other IDs
- 2008-005427-28, 2008
- Acronym
- REALISTIC
- Status last verified
- Mar 2012
- First submitted
- 15 Jul 2008
- Last updated
- 1 Aug 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Expanded access
- Available
Publications
Smolen JS, Mikuls TR, Galloway J, Muller-Ladner U, Curtis JR, Hashimoto M, Takeuchi T, Choy E, Tanaka Y, Cara C, Lauwerys B, Tilt N, Ufuktepe B, Taylor PC. Do high rheumatoid factor levels impact response to certolizumab pegol in patients with inadequately controlled rheumatoid arthritis? A post hoc analysis of the phase IIIb REALISTIC trial. RMD Open. 2026 Jan 30;12(1):e006094. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006094.
PubMed 41617358Pope J, Bingham CO 3rd, Fleischmann RM, Dougados M, Massarotti EM, Wollenhaupt J, Duncan B, Coteur G, Weinblatt ME. Impact of certolizumab pegol on patient-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis and correlation with clinical measures of disease activity. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Nov 27;17:343. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0849-1.
PubMed 26614481Weinblatt ME, Fleischmann R, van Vollenhoven RF, Emery P, Huizinga TW, Cutolo M, van der Heijde D, Duncan B, Davies O, Luijtens K, Dougados M. Twenty-eight-week results from the REALISTIC phase IIIb randomized trial: efficacy, safety and predictability of response to certolizumab pegol in a diverse rheumatoid arthritis population. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Nov 15;17:325. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0841-9.
PubMed 26568428Weinblatt ME, Fleischmann R, Huizinga TW, Emery P, Pope J, Massarotti EM, van Vollenhoven RF, Wollenhaupt J, Bingham CO 3rd, Duncan B, Goel N, Davies OR, Dougados M. Efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol in a broad population of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results from the REALISTIC phase IIIb study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Dec;51(12):2204-14. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes150. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
PubMed 22923753
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Aug 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase IIIb Multicenter Study With a 12-week Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Period Followed by an Open-label, Extension Phase Evaluating Safety/Efficacy of Certolizumab Pegol Given to Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00717236
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REALISTIC / C87094
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Keywords
- Certolizumab pegol, Cimzia, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Joint Disease, Chronic Arthritis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,648 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- UCB PharmaIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2008
- Primary completion
- Mar 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 May 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a Phase IIIb multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of certolizumab pegol (CZP) administered to patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis.
Detailed description
The treatment period starts with a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized period followed by an open-label extension phase. In the double-blind phase, eligible patients are randomized (4:1 ratio) to receive either certolizumab pegol (CZP) or Placebo up to and including Week 10. The randomization will be stratified according to the three factors: concomitant use of methotrexate (MTX, Yes or No), prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) use (Yes or No), and disease duration categories (< 2 years or ≥ 2 years). From Week 12 all patients remaining in the study receive open-label CZP for a minimum 16 additional weeks until CZP is commercially available.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Certolizumab pegol (CZP) | Experimental | Drug: Certolizumab pegol (CZP) |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Adult patient with established moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- All concomitant diseases or pathological conditions that could interfere and impact the assessment of the study treatment
- Previous clinical trials and previous biological therapy that could interfere with the results in the present clinical trials
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Certolizumab pegol (CZP)Also: Cimzia400 mg CZP given as two 200 mg subcutaneous (sc) injections at Weeks 0, 2, and 4, followed by 200 mg CZP given as 1 sc injection on Weeks 6, 8, and 10. At Week 12 subjects enter the open label phase and receive 200 mg of CZP every other week for a minimum 16 additional weeks until CZP is commercially available. | Drug | Certolizumab pegol (CZP) |
| PlaceboPlacebo (0.9% saline) given as 2 subcutaneous (sc) injections at Weeks 0, 2, and 4, followed by placebo given as 1 sc injection on Weeks 6, 8, and 10. At Week 12 subjects enter the open label phase and receive 200 mg of CZP every other week for a minimum 16 additional weeks until CZP is commercially available. | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
39 secondary outcomes
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects With Concomitant Methotrexate (MTX) Use.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects Without Concomitant Methotrexate (MTX) Use.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects With Prior Anti-tumor Necrosis (Anti-TNF) Use
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects Without Prior Anti-tumor Necrosis (Anti-TNF) Use
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects With Disease Duration < 2 Years
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects With Disease Duration ≥ 2 Years.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive Protein)] at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in SDAI (Simplified Disease Activity Index) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive Protein)] Remission (<2.6) at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
SDAI (Simplified Disease Activity Index) Remission (≤3.3) at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) Remission (≤2.8) at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Time to Sustained American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 28
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 28
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 28
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive Protein)] at Week 28
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in SDAI (Simplified Disease Activity Index) at Week 28
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) at Week 28
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive Protein)] Remission (<2.6) at Week 28
Time frame: Week 28
SDAI (Simplified Disease Activity Index) Remission (≤3.3) at Week 28
Time frame: Week 28
CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) Remission (≤2.8) at Week 28
Time frame: Week 28
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Week 28
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Week 28
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 28
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 28
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS) at Week 28
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS) at Week 28
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS) at Week 28
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Aug 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41617358Smolen JS, Mikuls TR, Galloway J, Muller-Ladner U, Curtis JR, Hashimoto M, Takeuchi T, Choy E, Tanaka Y, Cara C, Lauwerys B, Tilt N, Ufuktepe B, Taylor PC. Do high rheumatoid factor levels impact response to certolizumab pegol in patients with inadequately controlled rheumatoid arthritis? A post hoc analysis of the phase IIIb REALISTIC trial. RMD Open. 2026 Jan 30;12(1):e006094. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006094.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26614481Pope J, Bingham CO 3rd, Fleischmann RM, Dougados M, Massarotti EM, Wollenhaupt J, Duncan B, Coteur G, Weinblatt ME. Impact of certolizumab pegol on patient-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis and correlation with clinical measures of disease activity. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Nov 27;17:343. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0849-1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26568428Weinblatt ME, Fleischmann R, van Vollenhoven RF, Emery P, Huizinga TW, Cutolo M, van der Heijde D, Duncan B, Davies O, Luijtens K, Dougados M. Twenty-eight-week results from the REALISTIC phase IIIb randomized trial: efficacy, safety and predictability of response to certolizumab pegol in a diverse rheumatoid arthritis population. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Nov 15;17:325. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0841-9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22923753Weinblatt ME, Fleischmann R, Huizinga TW, Emery P, Pope J, Massarotti EM, van Vollenhoven RF, Wollenhaupt J, Bingham CO 3rd, Duncan B, Goel N, Davies OR, Dougados M. Efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol in a broad population of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results from the REALISTIC phase IIIb study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Dec;51(12):2204-14. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes150. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
- FDA Safety Alerts and RecallsLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
UCB Clinical Trial Call Center study director
+1 877 822 9493 (UCB)
181 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Certolizumab pegol (CZP) in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by UCB Pharma at 181 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 181 sites in United States, Germany, Canada, France, Spain and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 May 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 (time frame: Baseline, Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00717236, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2018.