Keratoconjunctivitis SiccaNCT00717418
Efficacy Study of Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion in Patients With Dry Eye Disease
An observational study of Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca, run by Allergan at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study will evaluate the efficacy of cyclosporine ophthalmic solution vs. other non-prescription treatments in patients with dry eye disease. Patient and physician assessments completed at baseline, at each follow-up visit (follow-up visits are variable as per physician discretion) and at final follow-up visit. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
- What is being tested?
- cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05%, artificial tears
- How many people
- 781 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2004to Aug 2008
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients can either: 1. be newly diagnosed or changing therapies and require, in the judgment of the treating physician, a prescription treatment 2. have insufficiently controlled dry eye symptoms necessitating use of over-the-counter treatments
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of dry eye disease
- Currently using artificial tears daily
- Male or female of legal age of consent
- Normal lid position and closure
Who cannot join
- Patients currently using cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05%
- Participation in other investigational drug or device study
- Any current or previous topical ophthalmic or oral cyclosporine use within the last three years
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This study will evaluate the efficacy of cyclosporine ophthalmic solution vs. other non-prescription treatments in patients with dry eye disease. Patient and physician assessments completed at baseline, at each follow-up visit (follow-up visits are variable as per physician discretion) and at final follow-up visit.
- Conditions
- Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
- Being tested
- cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05%, artificial tears
- Medical subject headings
- Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05%, artificial tearsDrug
Also called Restasis®
one drop, twice a day in each eye
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | * cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05%
* artificial tears Receives: Drug: cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05%, artificial tears |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Total Score at Baseline
The OSDI consists of 12 questions to assess visual function, ocular symptoms and environmental triggers related to dry eye. Each of the 12 questions is assessed using a 5-point scale (0=none of the time; 4 = all of the time) which is converted to a total score between 0-100. OSDI total scores of 0-12=normal (best), 13-22= mild ocular surface disease, 23-32 =moderate ocular surface disease, and 33-100=severe ocular surface disease (worst).
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2004
- Primary completionAug 2006
- Study completionAug 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Keratoconjunctivitis SiccaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 781 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Allergan
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, Study director, Allergan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00717418
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R.E.S.T.O.R.E.
- Status last verified
- Dec 2011
- First submitted
- 14 Jul 2008
- Last updated
- 12 Jan 2012
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jan 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy Study of Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion in Patients With Dry Eye Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00717418
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R.E.S.T.O.R.E.
- Conditions
- Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 781 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AllerganIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Sep 2004
- Primary completion
- Aug 2006 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 12 Jan 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will evaluate the efficacy of cyclosporine ophthalmic solution vs. other non-prescription treatments in patients with dry eye disease. Patient and physician assessments completed at baseline, at each follow-up visit (follow-up visits are variable as per physician discretion) and at final follow-up visit.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Drug: cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05%, artificial tears* cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% * artificial tears |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients can either: 1. be newly diagnosed or changing therapies and require, in the judgment of the treating physician, a prescription treatment 2. have insufficiently controlled dry eye symptoms necessitating use of over-the-counter treatments
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Diagnosis of dry eye disease
- Currently using artificial tears daily
- Male or female of legal age of consent
- Normal lid position and closure
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients currently using cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05%
- Participation in other investigational drug or device study
- Any current or previous topical ophthalmic or oral cyclosporine use within the last three years
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05%, artificial tearsAlso: Restasis®one drop, twice a day in each eye | Drug | 1 |
Primary outcome
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Total Score at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
The OSDI consists of 12 questions to assess visual function, ocular symptoms and environmental triggers related to dry eye. Each of the 12 questions is assessed using a 5-point scale (0=none of the time; 4 = all of the time) which is converted to a total score between 0-100. OSDI total scores of 0-12=normal (best), 13-22= mild ocular surface disease, 23-32 =moderate ocular surface disease, and 33-100=severe ocular surface disease (worst).
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jan 2012.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingObservational study
The Pathogenesis and Natural History of Sjogren's Disease
Sjogren's Syndrome, Salivary Gland
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Evaluation of Allogenic Mesenchymal Stem Cell (MSC) Injection Therapy for Refractory Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Unresponsive to Conventional Treatments
Dry Eye Disease (DED), Graft-Versus-Host Disease(GVHD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Director study director
Allergan
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca, run by Allergan at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jan 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Jan 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Total Score at Baseline (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jan 2012.