Carcinoma, Renal CellPhase 3COMPARZNCT00720941
Pazopanib Versus Sunitinib in the Treatment of Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
A Phase 3 study testing Pazopanib and Sunitinib in people with Carcinoma, Renal Cell, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 227 sites in 14 countries.
Trial summary
This was a randomized, open-label, parallel group Phase III non inferiority study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pazopanib compared with sunitinib in subjects with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who had not received prior systemic therapy for advanced or metastatic RCC. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
- What is being tested?
- Pazopanib and Sunitinib
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,110 participants
- Where
- 227 sitesin 14 countries
- Study dates
- 14 Aug 2008to 24 Mar 2021
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Written informed consent
- Diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma with clear-cell component histology.
- Received no prior systemic therapy (interleukin-2, interferon-alpha, chemotherapy, bevacizumab, mTOR inhibitor, sunitinib, sorafenib or other VEGF TKI) for advanced or metastatic RCC
- Locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma
- Measurable disease by CT or MRI
- Karnofsky performance scale status of >=70
Show all 11Show fewer
- Age >=18 years
- A female is eligible to enter and participate in this study if she is of: non-childbearing or agrees to use adequate contraception.
- Adequate organ system function
- Total serum calcium concentration <12.0mg/dL
- Left ventricular ejection fraction >= lower limit of institutional normal.
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or lactating female (unless agrees to refrain from nursing throughout the treatment period and for 14 days following the last dose of study)
- History of another malignancy (unless have been disease-free for 3 years)
- History or clinical evidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases (unless have previously-treated CNS metastases and meet all 3 of the following criteria are: are asymptomatic, have had no evidence of active CNS metastases for >=6 months prior to enrolment, and have no requirement for steroids or enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants)
- Clinically significant gastrointestinal abnormalities including, but not limited to: malabsorption syndrome, major resection of the stomach or small bowel that could affect the absorption of study drug, active peptic ulcer disease, known intraluminal metastatic lesion/s with suspected bleeding, Inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis, or other gastrointestinal conditions with increased risk of perforation, history of abdominal fistula, gastrointestinal perforation, or intra abdominal abscess within 28 days prior to beginning study treatment.
- Presence of uncontrolled infection.
- Prolongation of corrected QT interval (QTc) > 480 milliseconds
Show all 21Show fewer
- History of any one or more of the following cardiovascular conditions within the past 12 months: cardiac angioplasty or stenting, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, coronary artery by-pass graft surgery, symptomatic peripheral vascular disease, Class III or IV congestive heart failure, as defined by the New York Heart Association
- History of cerebrovascular accident including transient ischemic attack within the past 12 months
- History of pulmonary embolism or untreated deep venous thrombosis (DVT) within the past 6 months (unless had recent DVT and have been treated with therapeutic anti-coagulating agents for at least 6 weeks)
- Poorly controlled hypertension (defined as systolic blood pressure of >=150mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of >=90mmHg). Initiation or adjustment of antihypertensive medication(s) is permitted prior to study entry
- Prior major surgery or trauma within 28 days prior to first dose of study drug and/or presence of any non-healing wound, fracture, or ulcer.
- Evidence of active bleeding or bleeding susceptibility
- Spitting/coughing up blood within 6 weeks of first dose of study drug
- Known endobronchial lesions and/or lesions infiltrating major pulmonary vessels
- Any serious and/or unstable pre-existing medical, psychiatric, or other conditions that could interfere with patient's safety, obtaining informed consent or compliance to the study.
- Use any prohibited medications within 14 days of the first dose of study medication.
- Use of an investigational agent, including an investigational anti-cancer agent, within 28 days or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to the first dose of study drug.
- Prior use of an investigational or licensed drug that targets VEGF or VEGF receptors (eg. bevacizumab, sunitinib, sorafenib, etc), or are mTOR inhibitors (eg. temsirolimus, everolimus, etc).
- Is now undergoing and/or has undergone in the 14 days immediately prior to first dose of study drug, any cancer therapy (surgery, tumor embolization, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, biological therapy, or hormonal therapy)
- Any ongoing toxicity from prior anti-cancer therapy that is >Grade 1 and/or that is progressing in severity.
- Known immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reaction or idiosyncrasy to drugs chemically related to pazopanib or sunitinib.
Trial locations and contacts
227 sites in 14 countries.
227 sites in 14 countries
United States96 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Annapolis, Maryland, 21401
Novartis Investigative Site
Arlington, Texas, 76012
Novartis Investigative Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30318
Novartis Investigative Site
Bedford, Texas, 76022
Novartis Investigative Site
Beverly Hills, California, 90211
Novartis Investigative Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Novartis Investigative Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Novartis Investigative Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Novartis Investigative Site
Buffalo, New York, 14215
Novartis Investigative Site
Carmel, Indiana, 46032
Novartis Investigative Site
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 52403
Novartis Investigative Site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29403
Novartis Investigative Site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Novartis Investigative Site
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903
Novartis Investigative Site
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404
Novartis Investigative Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Novartis Investigative Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242
Novartis Investigative Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Novartis Investigative Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Novartis Investigative Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43219
Novartis Investigative Site
Corpus Christi, Texas, 78463-3069
Novartis Investigative Site
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Novartis Investigative Site
Dayton, Ohio, 45429
Novartis Investigative Site
Denver, Colorado, 80218
Novartis Investigative Site
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Novartis Investigative Site
Duluth, Minnesota, 55805
Novartis Investigative Site
Elk Grove Village, Illinois, 60007
Novartis Investigative Site
Escondido, California, 92025
Novartis Investigative Site
Eugene, Oregon, 97401
Novartis Investigative Site
Fort Myers, Florida, 33916
Novartis Investigative Site
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Novartis Investigative Site
Fresno, California, 93720
Novartis Investigative Site
Greenbrae, California, 94904-2007
Novartis Investigative Site
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605
Novartis Investigative Site
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Novartis Investigative Site
Hampton, Virginia, 23666
Novartis Investigative Site
Hayward, California, 94545
Novartis Investigative Site
Hickory, North Carolina, 28602
Novartis Investigative Site
Huntsville, Alabama, 35805
Novartis Investigative Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Novartis Investigative Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46237
Novartis Investigative Site
Kansas City, Missouri, 64118
Novartis Investigative Site
Kansas City, Missouri, 64131
Novartis Investigative Site
La Jolla, California, 92037
Novartis Investigative Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89135
Novartis Investigative Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89169
Novartis Investigative Site
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
Novartis Investigative Site
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68510
Novartis Investigative Site
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Novartis Investigative Site
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Novartis Investigative Site
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Novartis Investigative Site
Lubbock, Texas, 79410
Novartis Investigative Site
Maywood, Illinois, 60153
Novartis Investigative Site
Miami, Florida, 33136
Novartis Investigative Site
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Novartis Investigative Site
Montebello, California, 90640
Novartis Investigative Site
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464
Novartis Investigative Site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Novartis Investigative Site
New York, New York, 10032
Novartis Investigative Site
New York, New York, 10065
Novartis Investigative Site
Oakland, California, 94611
Novartis Investigative Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73120
Novartis Investigative Site
Orange, California, 92868
Novartis Investigative Site
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Novartis Investigative Site
Paducah, Kentucky, 42003
Novartis Investigative Site
Peoria, Illinois, 61615-7822
Novartis Investigative Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102
Novartis Investigative Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111
Novartis Investigative Site
Portland, Oregon, 97213
Novartis Investigative Site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607
Novartis Investigative Site
Richmond, Virginia, 23230
Novartis Investigative Site
Roseville, California, 95661
Novartis Investigative Site
Round Rock, Texas, 78681
Novartis Investigative Site
Sacramento, California, 95817
Novartis Investigative Site
Sacramento, California, 95825
Novartis Investigative Site
Salem, Virginia, 24153
Novartis Investigative Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Novartis Investigative Site
San Bernardino, California, 92404
Novartis Investigative Site
San Francisco, California, 94115
Novartis Investigative Site
San Jose, California, 95119-1110
Novartis Investigative Site
Santa Clara, California, 95051
Novartis Investigative Site
Seattle, Washington, 98101
Novartis Investigative Site
Seattle, Washington, 98109
Novartis Investigative Site
South San Francisco, California, 94080
Novartis Investigative Site
Southington, Connecticut, 06489
Novartis Investigative Site
Trumbull, Connecticut, 06611
Novartis Investigative Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85710
Novartis Investigative Site
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136
Novartis Investigative Site
Tupelo, Mississippi, 38801
Novartis Investigative Site
Tyler, Texas, 75702
Novartis Investigative Site
Vallejo, California, 94589
Novartis Investigative Site
Walnut Creek, California, 94596
Novartis Investigative Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
Novartis Investigative Site
Webster, Texas, 77598-4420
Novartis Investigative Site
Wichita Falls, Texas, 76310
Novartis Investigative Site
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01608
Germany22 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 52074
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 10117
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 10719
Novartis Investigative Site
Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, 53127
Novartis Investigative Site
Dortmund, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44145
Novartis Investigative Site
Dresden, Saxony, 01307
Novartis Investigative Site
Duisburg, North Rhine-Westphalia, 47053
Novartis Investigative Site
Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, 40225
Novartis Investigative Site
Eisleben Lutherstadt, Saxony-Anhalt, 06295
Novartis Investigative Site
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45122
Novartis Investigative Site
Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30171
Novartis Investigative Site
Homburg, Saarland, 66421
Novartis Investigative Site
Kirchheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, 73230
Novartis Investigative Site
Leipzig, Saxony, 04103
Novartis Investigative Site
Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, 39104
Novartis Investigative Site
Marburg, Hesse, 35043
Novartis Investigative Site
Munich, Bavaria, 81377
Novartis Investigative Site
Offenbach, Hesse, 63069
Novartis Investigative Site
Planegg, Bavaria, 82152
Novartis Investigative Site
Plauen, Saxony, 08523
Novartis Investigative Site
Sigmaringen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 72488
Novartis Investigative Site
Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, 70174
Japan20 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Ehime, 791-0280
Novartis Investigative Site
Fukuoka, 812-0033
Novartis Investigative Site
Fukuoka, 812-8582
Novartis Investigative Site
Hokkaido, 060-8543
Novartis Investigative Site
Hokkaido, 060-8648
Novartis Investigative Site
Ibaraki, 305-8576
Novartis Investigative Site
Kanagawa, 236-0004
Novartis Investigative Site
Kyoto, 606-8507
Novartis Investigative Site
Numakunai, 020-8505
Novartis Investigative Site
Okayama, 700-8558
Novartis Investigative Site
Osaka, 565-0871
Novartis Investigative Site
Osaka, 589-8511
Novartis Investigative Site
Shizuoka, 431-3192
Novartis Investigative Site
Tokyo, 104-0045
Novartis Investigative Site
Tokyo, 113-8655
Novartis Investigative Site
Tokyo, 135-8550
Novartis Investigative Site
Tokyo, 160-8582
Novartis Investigative Site
Tokyo, 162-8666
Novartis Investigative Site
Tokyo, 173-8606
Novartis Investigative Site
Yamagata, 990-9585
United Kingdom15 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bebington, Wirral, CH63 4JY
Novartis Investigative Site
Birmingham, B15 2TH
Novartis Investigative Site
Bristol, Gloucestershire, BS2 8ED
Novartis Investigative Site
Cambridge, CB2 0QQ
Novartis Investigative Site
Glasgow, G12 OYN
Novartis Investigative Site
Leeds, LS9 7TF
Novartis Investigative Site
London, EC1A 7BE
Novartis Investigative Site
London, NW3 2QG
Novartis Investigative Site
London, SE1 9RT
Novartis Investigative Site
London, SW3 6JJ
Novartis Investigative Site
Manchester, M20 4BX
Novartis Investigative Site
Northwood, Middlesex, HA6 2RN
Novartis Investigative Site
Nottingham, NG5 1PB
Novartis Investigative Site
Sheffield, S10 2SJ
Novartis Investigative Site
Swansea, SA2 8QA
Canada12 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2
Novartis Investigative Site
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2
Novartis Investigative Site
London, Ontario, N6A 4L6
Novartis Investigative Site
Moncton, New Brunswick, E1C 6Z8
Novartis Investigative Site
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1
Novartis Investigative Site
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2
Novartis Investigative Site
Oshawa, Ontario, L1G 2B9
Novartis Investigative Site
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
Novartis Investigative Site
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
Novartis Investigative Site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6
Novartis Investigative Site
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0V9
Australia9 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042
Novartis Investigative Site
Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050
Novartis Investigative Site
Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084
Novartis Investigative Site
Hobart, Tasmania, 7000
Novartis Investigative Site
Kogarah, New South Wales, 2217
Novartis Investigative Site
Randwick, New South Wales, 2031
Novartis Investigative Site
Waratah, New South Wales, 2298
Novartis Investigative Site
Westmead, New South Wales, 2145
Novartis Investigative Site
Wodonga, Victoria, 3690
China9 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, 100021
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, 100034
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, 100036
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, 100853
Novartis Investigative Site
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060
Novartis Investigative Site
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002
Novartis Investigative Site
Shanghai, 200032
Novartis Investigative Site
Shanghai, 200127
Novartis Investigative Site
Tianjin, 300060
Netherlands8 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Alkmaar, 1815 JD
Novartis Investigative Site
Amsterdam, 1066 CX
Novartis Investigative Site
Breda, 4819 EV
Novartis Investigative Site
Groningen, 9713 GZ
Novartis Investigative Site
Sittard-geleen, 6162 BG
Novartis Investigative Site
The Hague, 2545CH
Novartis Investigative Site
Tilburg, 5022 GC
Novartis Investigative Site
Utrecht, 3584 CX
Spain8 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Badalona, 08916
Novartis Investigative Site
Barakaldo (Vizcaya), 48903
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, 08036
Novartis Investigative Site
Girona, 17007
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28033
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28040
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28041
Novartis Investigative Site
Pamplona, 31008
Italy7 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Arezzo, Tuscany, 52100
Novartis Investigative Site
Meldola (FC), Emilia-Romagna, 47014
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, Lombardy, 20141
Novartis Investigative Site
Naples, Campania, 80131
Novartis Investigative Site
Pordenone, Friuli Venezia Giulia, 33170
Novartis Investigative Site
Ravenna, Emilia-Romagna, 48100
Novartis Investigative Site
Rome, Lazio, 00152
South Korea7 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Daegu, 700-721
Novartis Investigative Site
Daejeon, 301-721
Novartis Investigative Site
Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-Do, 410-769
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 110-744
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 120-752
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 135-710
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 138-736
Taiwan6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Kaohsiung Hsien, 833
Novartis Investigative Site
Taichung, 40402
Novartis Investigative Site
Taichung, 40705
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, 10002
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, 11217
Novartis Investigative Site
Taoyuan, 333
Ireland5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Dublin, 7
Novartis Investigative Site
Dublin, 8
Novartis Investigative Site
Dublin, 9
Novartis Investigative Site
Galway
Novartis Investigative Site
Tallaght, Dublin, 24
Sweden3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Lund, SE-221 85
Novartis Investigative Site
Stockholm, SE-171 76
Novartis Investigative Site
Uppsala, SE-751 85
About this study
Official title: Study VEG108844, A Study of Pazopanib Versus Sunitinib in the Treatment of Subjects With Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
This was a randomized, open-label, parallel group Phase III non inferiority study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pazopanib compared with sunitinib in subjects with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who had not received prior systemic therapy for advanced or metastatic RCC.
Read the detailed description
Approximately 876 eligible subjects (approximately 438 per treatment arm) were planned to be enrolled over the course of the study. However, due to higher than expected withdrawal rates and discordance rates between independent review committee (IRC) and investigator assessments of progression, the protocol was amended (Protocol Amendment 4) to increase the number of subjects to approximately 1100 total by including all subjects enrolled in CPZP034A2301 (hereafter referred as Study A2301) and CPZP034A2201 (a sub study of CPZP034A2301, hereafter referred as Study A2201 with NCT01147822).
The subjects were centrally randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive either 800mg pazopanib to be administered once daily orally continuous dosing or 50mg sunitinib to be administered in 6-week cycles: 50mg orally daily for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off treatment. Subjects were permitted to receive supportive care throughout the study including transfusion of blood and blood products, treatment with antibiotics, anti-emetics, anti-diarrheal agents, analgesics, erythropoietin, or bisphosphonates, when appropriate. The study treatment continued until subjects experience disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdraw consent, or death.
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
- Being tested
- Pazopanib, Sunitinib
- Keywords
- SUTENT, Locally advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma, Pazopanib, Sunitinib, GW786034, Renal cell carcinoma
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PazopanibDrug
Also called GW786034
800 mg administered once daily orally continuous dosing
SunitinibDrug
50 mg sunitinib to be administered in 6-week cycles: 50mg orally daily for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off treatment
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sunitinib | Active comparator | Control arm Receives: Drug: Sunitinib |
| Pazopanib | Experimental | Experimental arm Receives: Drug: Pazopanib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the earliest date of progressive disease (PD), as defined by the Independent Review Committee (IRC), or death due to any cause. The IRC defined PD per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), Version 1. Per RECIST, PD is defined as a >=20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of >=1 new lesion.
Measured: From randomization until the earliest date of disease progression or date of death from any cause, assessed up to approximately 39 months
Secondary outcomes (17)
Overall Survival
Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization until death due to any cause.
Measured: From randomization until date of death from any cause, assessed up to approximately 62 months
Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Independent Review
The number of participants with evidence of Complete Response (CR) (the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions), Partial Response (PR) (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters [LD] of target lesions, taking as a reference the Baseline sum LD), Stable Disease (small changes that do not meet previously given criteria, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started), or Progressive Disease (a >=20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started) was evaluated by an independent review per RECIST, Version 1.
Measured: From randomization until date of radiographic progression or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first, assessed up to approximately 39 months
Time to Response
Time to response was defined as the time from the start of treatment until the first documented evidence of CR (the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the Baseline sum LD), whichever comes first. CR and PR were evaluated by an independent review per RECIST, Version 1.
Measured: From randomization until date of radiographic progression or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first, assessed up to approximately 39 months
Duration of Response (DOR)
DOR was defined as the time from the first documented evidence of response (CR or PR) until the first documented sign of disease progression (a >=20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of >=1 new lesion) or death, if sooner. CR=the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR=at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the Baseline sum LD.
Measured: From the date of the first documented response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to any cause, assessed up to approximately 39 months
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
The distribution of adverse events was done via the analysis of frequencies for Adverse Event (AEs) and Serious Adverse Event (SAEs), through the monitoring of relevant clinical and laboratory safety parameters.
Measured: From study treatment start date till 28 days safety follow-up, assessed up to approximately 152 months
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scale Scores at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4
FACIT Fatigue Subscale is a short, 13-item, easy to administer tool that measures an individual's level of fatigue during their usual daily activities over the past week. The level of fatigue is measured on a four point Likert scale (4 = not at all fatigued to 0 = very much fatigued). The total score range is from 0-52. The higher the score, the lower the fatigue level.
Measured: Baseline (predose), Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, respectively)
Change From Baseline in the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) Scale Disease-related Symptoms-physical (DRS-P) Domain Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4
Health outcome and quality of life as measured by NCCN/FACT FKSI-19 questionnaire. The FKSI-19 is a disease-specific instrument that measures disease and treatment-related symptoms specifically in renal cancer patients in 4 domains (Disease-Related Symptoms - Physical (FKSI-DRS-P), Disease-Related Symptoms - Emotional (FKSI-DRS-E), Treatment Side-Effects (FKSI-TSE), Function/Well-Being (FKSI-FWB)) experienced in the past 7 days. Participants are asked to respond to a total of 19 questions regarding symptoms, side effects, and well being by using a 5-point scale (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much; possible total score of 0 to 76). A negative mean indicates a worsening of condition.
Measured: Baseline (predose), Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, respectively)
Change From Baseline in the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) Scale Disease Related Symptoms-emotional (DRS-E) Domain Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4
Health outcome and quality of life as measured by NCCN/FACT FKSI-19 questionnaire. The FKSI-19 is a disease-specific instrument that measures disease and treatment-related symptoms specifically in renal cancer patients in 4 domains (Disease-Related Symptoms - Physical (FKSI-DRS-P), Disease-Related Symptoms - Emotional (FKSI-DRS-E), Treatment Side-Effects (FKSI-TSE), Function/Well-Being (FKSI-FWB)) experienced in the past 7 days. Participants are asked to respond to a total of 19 questions regarding symptoms, side effects, and well being by using a 5-point scale (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much; possible total score of 0 to 76). A negative mean indicates a worsening of condition.
Measured: Baseline (predose), Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, respectively)
Change From Baseline in the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) Scale Treatment Side Effects (TSE) Domain Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4
Health outcome and quality of life as measured by NCCN/FACT FKSI-19 questionnaire. The FKSI-19 is a disease-specific instrument that measures disease and treatment-related symptoms specifically in renal cancer patients in 4 domains (Disease-Related Symptoms - Physical (FKSI-DRS-P), Disease-Related Symptoms - Emotional (FKSI-DRS-E), Treatment Side-Effects (FKSI-TSE), Function/Well-Being (FKSI-FWB)) experienced in the past 7 days. Participants are asked to respond to a total of 19 questions regarding symptoms, side effects, and well being by using a 5-point scale (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much; possible total score of 0 to 76). A negative mean indicates a worsening of condition.
Measured: Baseline (predose), Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, respectively)
Change From Baseline in the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) Scale Functional Well Being (FWB) Domain Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4
Health outcome and quality of life as measured by NCCN/FACT FKSI-19 questionnaire. The FKSI-19 is a disease-specific instrument that measures disease and treatment-related symptoms specifically in renal cancer patients in 4 domains (Disease-Related Symptoms - Physical (FKSI-DRS-P), Disease-Related Symptoms - Emotional (FKSI-DRS-E), Treatment Side-Effects (FKSI-TSE), Function/Well-Being (FKSI-FWB)) experienced in the past 7 days. Participants are asked to respond to a total of 19 questions regarding symptoms, side effects, and well being by using a 5-point scale (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much; possible total score of 0 to 76). A negative mean indicates a worsening of condition.
Measured: Baseline (predose), Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, respectively)
Change From Baseline in the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) Scale Total Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4
Health outcome and quality of life as measured by NCCN/FACT FKSI-19 questionnaire. The FKSI-19 is a disease-specific instrument that measures disease and treatment-related symptoms specifically in renal cancer patients in 4 domains (Disease-Related Symptoms - Physical (FKSI-DRS-P), Disease-Related Symptoms - Emotional (FKSI-DRS-E), Treatment Side-Effects (FKSI-TSE), Function/Well-Being (FKSI-FWB)) experienced in the past 7 days. Participants are asked to respond to a total of 19 questions regarding symptoms, side effects, and well being by using a 5-point scale (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much; possible total score of 0 to 76). A negative mean indicates a worsening of condition.
Measured: Baseline (predose), Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, respectively)
Change From Baseline in the Supplementary Quality of Life Questions (SQLQ) Scale Worst Soreness Scores at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4
The SQLQ scale consists of 5 items that assess the worst mouth and throat, hand, and foot soreness, as well as limitations due to mouth/throat and foot soreness. Participants were asked to assess their worst mouth/throat, hand, and foot soreness by answering the question of " In the past 4 weeks, what was your worst mouth/throat, hand, and foot soreness?" by using the following 4-point scale: 0, I never had any soreness; 1, I had a little bit of soreness; 2, I had quite a lot of soreness; 3, I had severe soreness. A positive mean change from Baseline represents a worsening of condition.
Measured: Baseline (predose), Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, respectively)
Change From Baseline in the Supplementary Quality of Life Questions (SQLQ) Limitations Due to Mouth and Throat Soreness Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4
The SQLQ consists of 5 items assessing the worst mouth/throat, hand, and foot soreness, and limitations due to mouth/throat and foot soreness. Participants assessed the limitations caused by their mouth/throat soreness by answering the question of "In the past 4 weeks, how much did your worst mouth/throat soreness limit you in the following activities: swallowing/eating/drinking/talking/sleeping" by using the following 4-point scale: 0, not limited; 1, limited a little; 2, limited a lot; 3, unable to do. The overall limitation score (15=best; 0=worst), based on the individual scores for the 5 activities, is derived as follows: the actual scores were rescored by subtracting the actual score from "3" for each of the 5 categories. A high score indicates less limitation. Change from Baseline was calculated as the assessment week value minus the Baseline value. A negative mean change from Baseline represents a worsening of condition.
Measured: Baseline (predose), Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, respectively)
Change From Baseline in the Supplementary Quality of Life Questions (SQLQ) Limitations Due to Foot Soreness Scores at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4
The SQLQ consists of 5 items assessing the worst mouth/throat, hand, and foot soreness, and limitations due to mouth/throat and foot soreness. Participants assessed the limitations caused by their foot soreness by answering the question of "In the past 4 weeks, how much did your worst foot soreness limit you in each of the following activities: standing/walking/climbing stairs/sleeping/ability to do usual activities" by using the following 4-point scale: 0, not limited; 1, limited a little; 2, limited a lot; 3, unable to do. The overall limitation score (15=best; 0=worst), based on the individual scores for the 5 activities, is derived as follows: the actual scores were rescored by subtracting the actual score from "3" for each of the 5 categories. A high score indicates less limitation. Change from Baseline was calculated as the assessment week value minus the Baseline value. A negative mean change from Baseline represents a worsening of condition.
Measured: Baseline (predose), Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, respectively)
Summary of Analysis for the Cancer Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ) Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4
The CTSQ assesses 3 domains related to the participant's satisfaction with cancer therapy: Expectations of Therapy (ET), Feelings about Side Effects (FSE), and Satisfaction with Therapy (SWT). Participants shared their thoughts on their cancer therapy (9 questions), their satisfaction with their most recently administered cancer therapy (6 questions), and if they would take the same cancer therapy if given the choice to do so again. All questions were assessed on a 5-point scale; 1, never; 5, always. Scores were averaged and transformed to a 0-100 scale; higher scores represent better treatment satisfaction.
Measured: Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, respectively)
Mean Number of Non-study Medical Visits, Telephone Consultations, Hospital Days, and Emergency Room (ER) Visits Per 30 Days Through Week 24
Non-study medical visits were defined as the sum of primary care physician visits, nurse practitioner/physician's assistant/nurse visits, and medical or surgical specialist visits. Days hospitalized were defined as the sum of days in the general ward and days in intensive care. The number of telephone consultations and ER visits was assessed via individual questions on the electronic Case Report Form. The endpoint was totaled through Week 24, divided by the number of days on treatment for each participant, then multiplied by 30 days to get the number of visits per 30 days.
Measured: From Day 1 up to Week 24
Mean Number of Laboratory Visits, Radiology Visits, Home Healthcare Visits, and Medical Procedures at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4
The number of non-study laboratory visits (NSLVs), non-study radiology visits (NSRVs), and home healthcare visits (HHVs) were each collected as a single question on the eCRF. The number of non-study medical or surgical procedures (MSPs) was defined as the sum of procedures performed at outpatient or physician clinics, as well as those performed during any inpatient hospitalization.
Measured: Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, respectively)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Study start14 Aug 2008
- Primary completion21 May 2012
- Study completion24 Mar 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Carcinoma, Renal CellStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,110 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00720941
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 108844
- Other IDs
- 2008-002102-19, CPZP034A2301, VEG108844, 2008
- Acronym
- COMPARZ
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 22 Jul 2008
- Last updated
- 30 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Publications
Aldin A, Besiroglu B, Adams A, Monsef I, Piechotta V, Tomlinson E, Hornbach C, Dressen N, Goldkuhle M, Maisch P, Dahm P, Heidenreich A, Skoetz N. First-line therapy for adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 4;5(5):CD013798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013798.pub2.
PubMed 37146227Sheng X, Jin J, He Z, Huang Y, Zhou A, Wang J, Ren X, Ye D, Zhang X, Qin S, Zhou F, Wang B, Guo J. Pazopanib versus sunitinib in Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: pooled subgroup analysis from the randomized, COMPARZ studies. BMC Cancer. 2020 Mar 14;20(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6708-8.
PubMed 32171288Sternberg CN, Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Choueiri TK, Kollmannsberger C, Bjarnason GA, Paul Nathan, Porta C, Grunwald V, Dezzani L, Han J, Tannir NM. COMPARZ Post Hoc Analysis: Characterizing Pazopanib Responders With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Dec;17(6):425-435.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
PubMed 31601514Guo J, Jin J, Oya M, Uemura H, Takahashi S, Tatsugami K, Rha SY, Lee JL, Chung J, Lim HY, Wu HC, Chang YH, Azad A, Davis ID, Carrasco-Alfonso MJ, Nanua B, Han J, Ahmad Q, Motzer R. Safety of pazopanib and sunitinib in treatment-naive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Asian versus non-Asian subgroup analysis of the COMPARZ trial. J Hematol Oncol. 2018 May 22;11(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0617-1.
PubMed 29788981Grunwald V, Dietrich M, Pond GR. Early tumor shrinkage is independently associated with improved overall survival among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a validation study using the COMPARZ cohort. World J Urol. 2018 Sep;36(9):1423-1429. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2297-4. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
PubMed 29654533Beaumont JL, Salsman JM, Diaz J, Deen KC, McCann L, Powles T, Hackshaw MD, Motzer RJ, Cella D. Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity analysis of pazopanib versus sunitinib in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2016 Apr 1;122(7):1108-15. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29888. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
PubMed 27000445Goldstein D, Rosenberg JE, Figlin RA, Townsend RR, McCann L, Carpenter C, Pandite L. Is change in blood pressure a biomarker of pazopanib and sunitinib efficacy in advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma? Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jan;53:96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
PubMed 26702763Sorich MJ, Kichenadasse G, Rowland A, Woodman RJ, Mangoni AA. Angiotensin system inhibitors and survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with VEGF-targeted therapy: A pooled secondary analysis of clinical trials. Int J Cancer. 2016 May 1;138(9):2293-9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29972. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
PubMed 26685869Lai JS, Beaumont JL, Diaz J, Khan S, Cella D. Validation of a short questionnaire to measure symptoms and functional limitations associated with hand-foot syndrome and mucositis in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2016 Jan 15;122(2):287-95. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29655. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
PubMed 26457466Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Cella D, Reeves J, Hawkins R, Guo J, Nathan P, Staehler M, de Souza P, Merchan JR, Boleti E, Fife K, Jin J, Jones R, Uemura H, De Giorgi U, Harmenberg U, Wang J, Sternberg CN, Deen K, McCann L, Hackshaw MD, Crescenzo R, Pandite LN, Choueiri TK. Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 22;369(8):722-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1303989.
PubMed 23964934
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study VEG108844, A Study of Pazopanib Versus Sunitinib in the Treatment of Subjects With Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00720941
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COMPARZ / 108844
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
- Keywords
- SUTENT, Locally advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma, Pazopanib, Sunitinib, GW786034, Renal cell carcinoma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,110 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 14 Aug 2008 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 May 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Mar 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Jun 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This was a randomized, open-label, parallel group Phase III non inferiority study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pazopanib compared with sunitinib in subjects with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who had not received prior systemic therapy for advanced or metastatic RCC.
Detailed description
Approximately 876 eligible subjects (approximately 438 per treatment arm) were planned to be enrolled over the course of the study. However, due to higher than expected withdrawal rates and discordance rates between independent review committee (IRC) and investigator assessments of progression, the protocol was amended (Protocol Amendment 4) to increase the number of subjects to approximately 1100 total by including all subjects enrolled in CPZP034A2301 (hereafter referred as Study A2301) and CPZP034A2201 (a sub study of CPZP034A2301, hereafter referred as Study A2201 with NCT01147822).
The subjects were centrally randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive either 800mg pazopanib to be administered once daily orally continuous dosing or 50mg sunitinib to be administered in 6-week cycles: 50mg orally daily for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off treatment. Subjects were permitted to receive supportive care throughout the study including transfusion of blood and blood products, treatment with antibiotics, anti-emetics, anti-diarrheal agents, analgesics, erythropoietin, or bisphosphonates, when appropriate. The study treatment continued until subjects experience disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdraw consent, or death.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sunitinib | Active comparator | Drug: SunitinibControl arm |
| Pazopanib | Experimental | Drug: PazopanibExperimental arm |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Written informed consent
- Diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma with clear-cell component histology.
- Received no prior systemic therapy (interleukin-2, interferon-alpha, chemotherapy, bevacizumab, mTOR inhibitor, sunitinib, sorafenib or other VEGF TKI) for advanced or metastatic RCC
- Locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma
- Measurable disease by CT or MRI
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Pregnant or lactating female (unless agrees to refrain from nursing throughout the treatment period and for 14 days following the last dose of study)
- History of another malignancy (unless have been disease-free for 3 years)
- History or clinical evidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases (unless have previously-treated CNS metastases and meet all 3 of the following criteria are: are asymptomatic, have had no evidence of active CNS metastases for >=6 months prior to enrolment, and have no requirement for steroids or enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants)
- Clinically significant gastrointestinal abnormalities including, but not limited to: malabsorption syndrome, major resection of the stomach or small bowel that could affect the absorption of study drug, active peptic ulcer disease, known intraluminal metastatic lesion/s with suspected bleeding, Inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis, or other gastrointestinal conditions with increased risk of perforation, history of abdominal fistula, gastrointestinal perforation, or intra abdominal abscess within 28 days prior to beginning study treatment.
- Presence of uncontrolled infection.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PazopanibAlso: GW786034800 mg administered once daily orally continuous dosing | Drug | Pazopanib |
| Sunitinib50 mg sunitinib to be administered in 6-week cycles: 50mg orally daily for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off treatment | Drug | Sunitinib |
Primary outcome
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: From randomization until the earliest date of disease progression or date of death from any cause, assessed up to approximately 39 months
PFS was defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the earliest date of progressive disease (PD), as defined by the Independent Review Committee (IRC), or death due to any cause. The IRC defined PD per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), Version 1. Per RECIST, PD is defined as a >=20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of >=1 new lesion.
17 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival
Time frame: From randomization until date of death from any cause, assessed up to approximately 62 months
Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Independent Review
Time frame: From randomization until date of radiographic progression or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first, assessed up to approximately 39 months
Time to Response
Time frame: From randomization until date of radiographic progression or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first, assessed up to approximately 39 months
Duration of Response (DOR)
Time frame: From the date of the first documented response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to any cause, assessed up to approximately 39 months
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time frame: From study treatment start date till 28 days safety follow-up, assessed up to approximately 152 months
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scale Scores at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4
Time frame: Baseline (predose), Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, respectively)
Change From Baseline in the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) Scale Disease-related Symptoms-physical (DRS-P) Domain Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4
Time frame: Baseline (predose), Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, respectively)
Change From Baseline in the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) Scale Disease Related Symptoms-emotional (DRS-E) Domain Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4
Time frame: Baseline (predose), Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, respectively)
Change From Baseline in the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) Scale Treatment Side Effects (TSE) Domain Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4
Time frame: Baseline (predose), Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, respectively)
Change From Baseline in the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) Scale Functional Well Being (FWB) Domain Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4
Time frame: Baseline (predose), Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, respectively)
Change From Baseline in the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) Scale Total Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4
Time frame: Baseline (predose), Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, respectively)
Change From Baseline in the Supplementary Quality of Life Questions (SQLQ) Scale Worst Soreness Scores at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4
Time frame: Baseline (predose), Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, respectively)
Change From Baseline in the Supplementary Quality of Life Questions (SQLQ) Limitations Due to Mouth and Throat Soreness Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4
Time frame: Baseline (predose), Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, respectively)
Change From Baseline in the Supplementary Quality of Life Questions (SQLQ) Limitations Due to Foot Soreness Scores at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4
Time frame: Baseline (predose), Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, respectively)
Summary of Analysis for the Cancer Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ) Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4
Time frame: Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, respectively)
Mean Number of Non-study Medical Visits, Telephone Consultations, Hospital Days, and Emergency Room (ER) Visits Per 30 Days Through Week 24
Time frame: From Day 1 up to Week 24
Mean Number of Laboratory Visits, Radiology Visits, Home Healthcare Visits, and Medical Procedures at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4
Time frame: Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, respectively)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Mar 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37146227Aldin A, Besiroglu B, Adams A, Monsef I, Piechotta V, Tomlinson E, Hornbach C, Dressen N, Goldkuhle M, Maisch P, Dahm P, Heidenreich A, Skoetz N. First-line therapy for adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 4;5(5):CD013798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013798.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32171288Sheng X, Jin J, He Z, Huang Y, Zhou A, Wang J, Ren X, Ye D, Zhang X, Qin S, Zhou F, Wang B, Guo J. Pazopanib versus sunitinib in Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: pooled subgroup analysis from the randomized, COMPARZ studies. BMC Cancer. 2020 Mar 14;20(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6708-8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31601514Sternberg CN, Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Choueiri TK, Kollmannsberger C, Bjarnason GA, Paul Nathan, Porta C, Grunwald V, Dezzani L, Han J, Tannir NM. COMPARZ Post Hoc Analysis: Characterizing Pazopanib Responders With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Dec;17(6):425-435.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29788981Guo J, Jin J, Oya M, Uemura H, Takahashi S, Tatsugami K, Rha SY, Lee JL, Chung J, Lim HY, Wu HC, Chang YH, Azad A, Davis ID, Carrasco-Alfonso MJ, Nanua B, Han J, Ahmad Q, Motzer R. Safety of pazopanib and sunitinib in treatment-naive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Asian versus non-Asian subgroup analysis of the COMPARZ trial. J Hematol Oncol. 2018 May 22;11(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0617-1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29654533Grunwald V, Dietrich M, Pond GR. Early tumor shrinkage is independently associated with improved overall survival among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a validation study using the COMPARZ cohort. World J Urol. 2018 Sep;36(9):1423-1429. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2297-4. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27000445Beaumont JL, Salsman JM, Diaz J, Deen KC, McCann L, Powles T, Hackshaw MD, Motzer RJ, Cella D. Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity analysis of pazopanib versus sunitinib in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2016 Apr 1;122(7):1108-15. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29888. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26702763Goldstein D, Rosenberg JE, Figlin RA, Townsend RR, McCann L, Carpenter C, Pandite L. Is change in blood pressure a biomarker of pazopanib and sunitinib efficacy in advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma? Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jan;53:96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26685869Sorich MJ, Kichenadasse G, Rowland A, Woodman RJ, Mangoni AA. Angiotensin system inhibitors and survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with VEGF-targeted therapy: A pooled secondary analysis of clinical trials. Int J Cancer. 2016 May 1;138(9):2293-9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29972. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26457466Lai JS, Beaumont JL, Diaz J, Khan S, Cella D. Validation of a short questionnaire to measure symptoms and functional limitations associated with hand-foot syndrome and mucositis in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2016 Jan 15;122(2):287-95. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29655. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23964934Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Cella D, Reeves J, Hawkins R, Guo J, Nathan P, Staehler M, de Souza P, Merchan JR, Boleti E, Fife K, Jin J, Jones R, Uemura H, De Giorgi U, Harmenberg U, Wang J, Sternberg CN, Deen K, McCann L, Hackshaw MD, Crescenzo R, Pandite LN, Choueiri TK. Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 22;369(8):722-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1303989.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Related trials for Carcinoma, Renal Cell
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) in Combination With Lenvatinib Versus Cabozantinib for Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-011)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Toripalimab and Lenvatinib With or Without SBRT Before Surgery for Non-Clear Cell Kidney Cancer
Nonmetastatic Locally Advanced Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Pucotenlimab, Lenvatinib, and SBRT Before Surgery for Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
227 sites in 14 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Pazopanib and Sunitinib in people with Carcinoma, Renal Cell, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 227 sites in 14 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 227 sites in United States, Germany, Japan, United Kingdom, Canada and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Jun 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-free Survival (PFS) (time frame: From randomization until the earliest date of disease progression or date of death from any cause, assessed up to approximately 39 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00720941, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.