AnesthesiaNCT00723164
Premedication on Sevoflurane Induction
A study testing Fentanyl and Midazolam and NaCl in people with Anesthesia, run by Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of fentanyl-midazolam premedication during sevoflurane induction pertaining to time to loss of eyelash reflex (LER), time and conditions of insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA), as well as cardio-respiratory data. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Anesthesia
- What is being tested?
- Fentanyl and Midazolam and NaCl
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Oct 2005to Dec 2005
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ASA physical status I-II
- Minor elective surgery
- General anesthesia
Who cannot join
- Gastroesophageal reflux
- Exhibited a body mass index > 32 kg/m2
- Took sedative or opioid drugs.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Low Dose Fentanyl/Midazolam Improves Sevoflurane Induction in Adults
The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of fentanyl-midazolam premedication during sevoflurane induction pertaining to time to loss of eyelash reflex (LER), time and conditions of insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA), as well as cardio-respiratory data. Participants' anxiety level was also evaluated.
Read the detailed description
Eighty adult patients undergoing minor surgery were randomized in a double-blind fashion. Each group received either a NaCL placebo (NaCl), or a premedication consisting of fentanyl 0,6 ug/kg and midazolam 9 ug/kg (FM), five minutes before tidal volume sevoflurane 8% induction with 6 L/min O2. Times to LER and LMA insertion were recorded. Adverse events were also noted. Systolic blood pressure (sBP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and tidal volume (Vt) were recorded at one-minute intervals. End-tidal sevoflurane (EtSevo) and end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) were noted immediately following LMA insertion. Anxiety levels (0-10 verbal scale) were registered before and after premedication. Patients were contacted 24 hours postoperatively and were asked if they remembered the mask being applied to their face.
- Conditions
- Anesthesia
- Being tested
- Fentanyl and Midazolam, NaCl
- Keywords
- Sevoflurane induction, Premedication, laryngeal mask airway, Anesthesia, inhalation [E03.155.197.197]
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fentanyl and MidazolamDrug
A combination of fentanyl 0.6 ug/kg and midazolam 9 ug/kg, to which NaCl was added to obtain a volume of 2.5 mL (group FM) injected IV, 5 minutes prior inhalation induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane
NaClDrug
NaCl 0.9% 2.5 ml intravenous (IV), 5 minutes prior inhalation induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| FM | Active comparator | Premedication consisting of fentanyl 0.6 ug/kg and midazolam 9 ug/kg (FM), five minutes before tidal volume sevoflurane 8% induction with 6 L/min O2. Receives: Drug: Fentanyl and Midazolam |
| NaCl | Placebo comparator | A 2.5 ml NaCL placebo (NaCl) IV, five minutes before tidal volume sevoflurane 8% induction with 6 L/min O2. Receives: Drug: NaCl |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Impact of administering a combination of low doses of IV fentanyl and midazolam on time to loss of consciousness, and time of insertion of a laryngeal mask airway during sevoflurane induction.
Measured: 5 minutes after the premedication, each 30 seconds until the insertion of laryngeal mask airway
Secondary outcomes (4)
Participants' cardiorespiratory status
Measured: 5 minutes after the premedication, at each minutes for 10 minutes
Patients' anxiety level
Measured: Before and after premedication and 24 hrs post op
Adverses events
Measured: 5 minutes after the premedication until the end of laryngeal mask insertion
Satisfaction
Measured: 24 hrs post op
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2005
- Primary completionDec 2005
- Study completionDec 2005
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (28)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AnesthesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Pierre Drolet, MD, FRCPC, Study director, Maisonneuve-Rosemont HospitalSandra Lesage, MD, Principal investigator, Université de Montréal
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00723164
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 05041
- Status last verified
- Jul 2008
- First submitted
- 24 Jul 2008
- Last updated
- 28 Jul 2008
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Joo HS, Perks WJ. Sevoflurane versus propofol for anesthetic induction: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2000 Jul;91(1):213-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200007000-00040.
PubMed 10866915Siddik-Sayyid SM, Aouad MT, Taha SK, Daaboul DG, Deeb PG, Massouh FM, Muallem MA, Baraka AS. A comparison of sevoflurane-propofol versus sevoflurane or propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults. Anesth Analg. 2005 Apr;100(4):1204-1209. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000148166.29749.3B.
PubMed 15781547Ganatra SB, D'Mello J, Butani M, Jhamnani P. Conditions for insertion of the laryngeal mask airway: comparisons between sevoflurane and propofol using fentanyl as a co-induction agent. A pilot study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002 May;19(5):371-5. doi: 10.1017/s0265021502000601.
PubMed 12095019Ti LK, Chow MY, Lee TL. Comparison of sevoflurane with propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults. Anesth Analg. 1999 Apr;88(4):908-12. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199904000-00041.
PubMed 10195546Hattori J, Yamakage M, Iwasaki S, Chen X, Tsujiguchi N, Namiki A. Usefulness of midazolam premedication for volatile induction of anesthesia in adults. J Anesth. 2001;15(2):117-9. doi: 10.1007/s005400170041. No abstract available.
PubMed 14566537Nishiyama T, Matsukawa T, Yokoyama T, Hanaoka K. Rapid inhalation induction with 7% sevoflurane combined with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Anesth. 2002 Jun;14(4):290-5. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00361-6.
PubMed 12088814Sivalingam P, Kandasamy R, Madhavan G, Dhakshinamoorthi P. Conditions for laryngeal mask insertion. A comparison of propofol versus sevoflurane with or without alfentanil. Anaesthesia. 1999 Mar;54(3):271-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00663.x.
PubMed 10364865Nathan N, Vandroux D, Benrhaiem M, Marquet P, Preux PM, Feiss P. Low alfentanil target-concentrations improve hemodynamic and intubating conditions during induction with sevoflurane. Can J Anaesth. 2004 Apr;51(4):382-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03018244.
PubMed 15064269Meaudre E, Boret H, Suppini A, Sallaberry M, Benefice S, Palmier B. Sufentanil supplementation of sevoflurane during induction of anaesthesia: a randomized study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004 Oct;21(10):793-6. doi: 10.1017/s0265021504000079.
PubMed 15678734Muzi M, Colinco MD, Robinson BJ, Ebert TJ. The effects of premedication on inhaled induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane. Anesth Analg. 1997 Nov;85(5):1143-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199711000-00034.
PubMed 9356116Katoh T, Nakajima Y, Moriwaki G, Kobayashi S, Suzuki A, Iwamoto T, Bito H, Ikeda K. Sevoflurane requirements for tracheal intubation with and without fentanyl. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Apr;82(4):561-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/82.4.561.
PubMed 10472223Inagaki Y, Sumikawa K, Yoshiya I. Anesthetic interaction between midazolam and halothane in humans. Anesth Analg. 1993 Mar;76(3):613-7. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199303000-00029.
PubMed 8452276Ben-Shlomo I, abd-el-Khalim H, Ezry J, Zohar S, Tverskoy M. Midazolam acts synergistically with fentanyl for induction of anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1990 Jan;64(1):45-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/64.1.45.
PubMed 2302375Plastow SE, Hall JE, Pugh SC. Fentanyl supplementation of sevoflurane induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2000 May;55(5):475-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01268.x.
PubMed 10792142Hall JE, Stewart JI, Harmer M. Single-breath inhalation induction of sevoflurane anaesthesia with and without nitrous oxide: a feasibility study in adults and comparison with an intravenous bolus of propofol. Anaesthesia. 1997 May;52(5):410-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.091-az0086.x.
PubMed 9165957
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jul 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Low Dose Fentanyl/Midazolam Improves Sevoflurane Induction in Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00723164
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 05041
- Conditions
- Anesthesia
- Keywords
- Sevoflurane induction, Premedication, laryngeal mask airway, Anesthesia, inhalation [E03.155.197.197]
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Maisonneuve-Rosemont HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2005
- Primary completion
- Dec 2005 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2005 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of fentanyl-midazolam premedication during sevoflurane induction pertaining to time to loss of eyelash reflex (LER), time and conditions of insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA), as well as cardio-respiratory data. Participants' anxiety level was also evaluated.
Detailed description
Eighty adult patients undergoing minor surgery were randomized in a double-blind fashion. Each group received either a NaCL placebo (NaCl), or a premedication consisting of fentanyl 0,6 ug/kg and midazolam 9 ug/kg (FM), five minutes before tidal volume sevoflurane 8% induction with 6 L/min O2. Times to LER and LMA insertion were recorded. Adverse events were also noted. Systolic blood pressure (sBP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and tidal volume (Vt) were recorded at one-minute intervals. End-tidal sevoflurane (EtSevo) and end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) were noted immediately following LMA insertion. Anxiety levels (0-10 verbal scale) were registered before and after premedication. Patients were contacted 24 hours postoperatively and were asked if they remembered the mask being applied to their face.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| FM | Active comparator | Drug: Fentanyl and MidazolamPremedication consisting of fentanyl 0.6 ug/kg and midazolam 9 ug/kg (FM), five minutes before tidal volume sevoflurane 8% induction with 6 L/min O2. |
| NaCl | Placebo comparator | Drug: NaClA 2.5 ml NaCL placebo (NaCl) IV, five minutes before tidal volume sevoflurane 8% induction with 6 L/min O2. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- ASA physical status I-II
- Minor elective surgery
- General anesthesia
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Gastroesophageal reflux
- Exhibited a body mass index > 32 kg/m2
- Took sedative or opioid drugs.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fentanyl and MidazolamA combination of fentanyl 0.6 ug/kg and midazolam 9 ug/kg, to which NaCl was added to obtain a volume of 2.5 mL (group FM) injected IV, 5 minutes prior inhalation induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane | Drug | FM |
| NaClNaCl 0.9% 2.5 ml intravenous (IV), 5 minutes prior inhalation induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane. | Drug | NaCl |
Primary outcome
Impact of administering a combination of low doses of IV fentanyl and midazolam on time to loss of consciousness, and time of insertion of a laryngeal mask airway during sevoflurane induction.
Time frame: 5 minutes after the premedication, each 30 seconds until the insertion of laryngeal mask airway
4 secondary outcomes
Participants' cardiorespiratory status
Time frame: 5 minutes after the premedication, at each minutes for 10 minutes
Patients' anxiety level
Time frame: Before and after premedication and 24 hrs post op
Adverses events
Time frame: 5 minutes after the premedication until the end of laryngeal mask insertion
Satisfaction
Time frame: 24 hrs post op
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jul 2008.
- Results publication: PubMed 10866915Joo HS, Perks WJ. Sevoflurane versus propofol for anesthetic induction: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2000 Jul;91(1):213-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200007000-00040.
- Results publication: PubMed 15781547Siddik-Sayyid SM, Aouad MT, Taha SK, Daaboul DG, Deeb PG, Massouh FM, Muallem MA, Baraka AS. A comparison of sevoflurane-propofol versus sevoflurane or propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults. Anesth Analg. 2005 Apr;100(4):1204-1209. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000148166.29749.3B.
- Results publication: PubMed 12095019Ganatra SB, D'Mello J, Butani M, Jhamnani P. Conditions for insertion of the laryngeal mask airway: comparisons between sevoflurane and propofol using fentanyl as a co-induction agent. A pilot study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002 May;19(5):371-5. doi: 10.1017/s0265021502000601.
- Results publication: PubMed 10195546Ti LK, Chow MY, Lee TL. Comparison of sevoflurane with propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults. Anesth Analg. 1999 Apr;88(4):908-12. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199904000-00041.
- Results publication: PubMed 14566537Hattori J, Yamakage M, Iwasaki S, Chen X, Tsujiguchi N, Namiki A. Usefulness of midazolam premedication for volatile induction of anesthesia in adults. J Anesth. 2001;15(2):117-9. doi: 10.1007/s005400170041. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 12088814Nishiyama T, Matsukawa T, Yokoyama T, Hanaoka K. Rapid inhalation induction with 7% sevoflurane combined with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Anesth. 2002 Jun;14(4):290-5. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00361-6.
- Results publication: PubMed 10364865Sivalingam P, Kandasamy R, Madhavan G, Dhakshinamoorthi P. Conditions for laryngeal mask insertion. A comparison of propofol versus sevoflurane with or without alfentanil. Anaesthesia. 1999 Mar;54(3):271-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00663.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 15064269Nathan N, Vandroux D, Benrhaiem M, Marquet P, Preux PM, Feiss P. Low alfentanil target-concentrations improve hemodynamic and intubating conditions during induction with sevoflurane. Can J Anaesth. 2004 Apr;51(4):382-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03018244.
- Results publication: PubMed 15678734Meaudre E, Boret H, Suppini A, Sallaberry M, Benefice S, Palmier B. Sufentanil supplementation of sevoflurane during induction of anaesthesia: a randomized study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004 Oct;21(10):793-6. doi: 10.1017/s0265021504000079.
- Results publication: PubMed 9356116Muzi M, Colinco MD, Robinson BJ, Ebert TJ. The effects of premedication on inhaled induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane. Anesth Analg. 1997 Nov;85(5):1143-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199711000-00034.
- Results publication: PubMed 10472223Katoh T, Nakajima Y, Moriwaki G, Kobayashi S, Suzuki A, Iwamoto T, Bito H, Ikeda K. Sevoflurane requirements for tracheal intubation with and without fentanyl. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Apr;82(4):561-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/82.4.561.
- Results publication: PubMed 8452276Inagaki Y, Sumikawa K, Yoshiya I. Anesthetic interaction between midazolam and halothane in humans. Anesth Analg. 1993 Mar;76(3):613-7. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199303000-00029.
Related trials for Anesthesia
RecruitingObservational study
Anesthetic Technique and Quality of Recovery After Cesarean Delivery
Ceserean Section, Obstetric Quality of Recovery
Not yet recruiting
Dural Puncture Epidural With 27G vs 26G Needles Versus Standard Epidural for Elective Cesarean Delivery
Cesarean Section, Anesthesia, Obstetrical
Not yet recruiting
Monitored Anesthesia Care and Soft Tissue Infiltration With Local Anesthesia Feasibility Trial
Hip Fracture Surgeries, Intertrochanteric Fracture
Active, not recruiting
Comparison of Prophylactic Continuous Infusion of Norepinephrine, Ephedrine, and Their Combination for Prevention of Hypotension During Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Delivery
Maternal Hypotension After Spinal Anesthesia
RecruitingPhase 4
The Electroencephalographic Mechanisms of Anesthesia and Human Consciousness
Consciousness, Level Altered
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pierre Drolet, MD, FRCPC study director
Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital
Sandra Lesage, MD principal investigator
Université de Montréal
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Fentanyl and Midazolam and NaCl in people with Anesthesia, run by Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Impact of administering a combination of low doses of IV fentanyl and midazolam on time to loss of consciousness, and time of insertion of a laryngeal mask airway during sevoflurane induction. (time frame: 5 minutes after the premedication, each 30 seconds until the insertion of laryngeal mask airway). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00723164, which also lists 28 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2008.