ImmunosuppressionPhase 4TIMELYNCT00731874
Thymoglobulin Induction Therapy With Minimal Immunosuppression and Evaluation of Allograft Status
A Phase 4 study testing Tacrolimus in people with Immunosuppression, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Tacrolimus (Prograf) is a medication that is commonly used in patients who receive a kidney transplant. It is considered to be one of the most important medications that prevent rejection of the transplant kidney by suppressing the immune system. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Immunosuppression
- What is being tested?
- Tacrolimus
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 34 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2008to Jul 2013
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age > 18 years
- Renal allograft recipients who received a steroid-sparing immunosuppression protocol with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin) induction
- Patient must have previously enrolled in protocol entitled "The use of urinary PCR test to help detect rejection in kidney transplant patients"
- Recipients must agree to undergo all standard post-transplant protocol biopsies
- Recipients must be at least 3 months post-transplant and the three most recent urinary profiles must demonstrate immunologic quiescence as determined by measurement of Granzyme B and Perforin copy numbers
- Patient must provide informed consent to participate in the research study
Who cannot join
- Patient is a high-risk recipient (defined as peak or current PRA >50% or a re-transplant recipient who lost prior graft within 1 year due to immunologic reasons)
- Patients who require maintenance steroids for another medical condition (such as asthma)
- Patients who are taking less than 1 gram/day of mycophenolate mofetil
- Multiple organ transplant recipients (such as kidney-pancreas)
- Patients with one or more acute rejection episodes within the first 3 months after transplant
- Three-month protocol biopsy showing clinical acute rejection (BANFF grade 1a or higher)
- Patient with documented or suspected non-compliance with transplant medications in the first 3 months after transplant
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Weill Cornell Medical College/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, 10065
About this study
Official title: Thymoglobulin Induction Therapy With Minimal Immunosuppression and Evaluation of Allograft Status by Biopsy and mRNA Profiles (TIMELY Study)
Tacrolimus (Prograf) is a medication that is commonly used in patients who receive a kidney transplant. It is considered to be one of the most important medications that prevent rejection of the transplant kidney by suppressing the immune system. Although tacrolimus is good at preventing rejection, it does have some unwanted side effects. These side effects include high blood pressure, increase in blood sugar, headache, and tremor. In addition, tacrolimus causes some damage to the transplant kidney over time, by causing healthy tissue to turn into scar tissue that does not function as well as healthy tissue. Therefore, kidney function may be reduced over time. In the first three months after kidney transplant, Prograf levels are kept between 8 to 10 ng/mL. This study will compare two groups of patients that will both have their tacrolimus dose reduced slowly over three months to prevent rejection while decreasing the risk of causing toxic effects to the kidney. One group will have their Prograf levels kept between 6 and 8 ng/mL, while the second group will have their levels kept between 3 and 5 ng/mL. We will then compare the two groups to see if there are any differences in their kidney function over time.
Read the detailed description
The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of an immunosuppression-minimizing regimen consisting initially of Thymoglobulin induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and rapid steroid withdrawal. The protocol will minimize long-term calcineurin inhibitor exposure and toxicity by weaning tacrolimus starting at 3 months after transplantation. Patients will be eligible to participate in this study only if they have already consented to participate in another study entitled "The use of urinary PCR test to help detect rejection in kidney transplant patients". In "The use of urinary PCR test to help detect rejection in kidney transplant patients", kidney allograft status (ie. whether or not there is any immunologic activity in the transplant kidney)is characterized with the use of protocol biopsies, diagnostic biopsies, and urinary PCR profiles. At 3 months after transplant, these patients are on an immunosuppression regimen consisting of tacrolimus (Prograf) and mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept). Prograf dosing is managed through the measurement of trough levels. For the first 3 months after transplant, patients are maintained at a trough level between 8 to 10 ng/ml. After 3 months, this target level is lowered in order to minimize long-term exposure to immunosuppressive agents. However, there is no consensus as to what the proper level should be after the first 3 months. Therefore, this study will randomize patients to 2 groups, one group will have their trough level targeted between 6 to 8 ng/mL while the other group will have their trough targeted between 3 and 5 ng/mL. By doing this study, we hope to determine which trough level is best, both for protecting the patient from rejection and protecting the patient from the adverse effects of the immunosuppressive medications.
At New York Weill Cornell Center, we are in a unique position to attempt immunosuppression minimization due to our ability to non-invasively monitor patients using their urine. Previous investigations performed at this center have demonstrated the diagnostic accuracy of mRNA levels of cytotoxic attack molecules in urinary cells. Preliminary data has shown that during acute rejection, Granzyme B and Perforin are strongly expressed in the urine. The sensitivity of the uPCR test was 88% with a specificity of 79%. All kidney transplant recipients at our center are invited to participate in the research study entitled "The use of urinary PCR test to help detect rejection in kidney transplant patients". In this protocol, serial analyses of urinary cells are performed to determine 1) if changes in mRNA levels will predict clinical acute rejection and 2) if these levels correlate with the presence of subclinical acute rejection. Kidney transplant recipients have serial urinary PCR measurements. In addition, patients undergo protocol biopsies of the transplant kidney at 3, 15, and 36 months after transplant. The biopsies help to show the correlation between the PCR results and the pathology of the kidney. It may also serve to detect rejection when the blood tests or urinary PCR do not show it. In a small subset of patients, urinary gene expression profile of cytotoxic attack molecules was able to predict acute rejection prior to clinical diagnosis by renal allograft biopsy.
Because we have the ability to monitor our transplant recipients using the urinary PCR protocol, we can safely minimize tacrolimus exposure over time by monitoring patients non-invasively on a real-time basis. Minimization of immunosuppression over time in a kidney transplant recipient is important in order to prevent or minimize some of the leading causes of kidney graft loss (defined as return to dialysis). Although immunosuppressive medications are excellent at preventing rejection, they do have detrimental effects on the cardiovascular system as well as to the transplant kidney itself. One major cause of kidney graft loss today is chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Formerly known as "chronic rejection", CAN has been described as the progressive decline in allograft function that occurs months or years after transplantation, and it is the second leading cause of kidney graft loss. Biopsies of kidney allografts with CAN may show inflammation, fibrosis, glomerulosclerosis, tubular atrophy, and vascular smooth muscle proliferation. The scarring and fibrosis associated with CAN is generally irreversible. A new goal within the modern transplant arena is to prevent CAN from occurring by:
- decreasing early acute rejection episodes
- decreasing calcineurin inhibitor-related nephrotoxicity
With the use of modern immunosuppressive agents and induction therapy, we have already decreased early acute rejection episodes significantly. At this time, we now want to begin to study the potentially beneficial effects that calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal may have on kidney function as well as long-term graft survival.
- Conditions
- Immunosuppression
- Being tested
- Tacrolimus
- Keywords
- Kidney transplantation, Immunosuppression, Minimization, Tacrolimus, Prograf, Thymoglobulin
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TacrolimusDrug
Also called Prograf
Dosed to achieve target trough concentrations.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 (6 to 8 ng/mL) | Active comparator | Target tacrolimus trough concentration of 6 to 8 ng/mL Receives: Drug: Tacrolimus |
| Arm 2 (3 to 5 ng.mL) | Active comparator | Target tacrolimus trough concentration of 3 to 5 ng/mL Receives: Drug: Tacrolimus |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection and/or Progression of Histologically Proven Chronic Allograft Nephropathy at 15 Months After Transplantation.
Measured: 15 months post-transplant
Secondary outcomes (9)
Patient Survival
Measured: 36 months post-transplant
Graft Survival
Measured: 36 months post-transplant
Change in Incidence and Severity of Interstitial Fibrosis/Tubular Atrophy (IF/TA) From the Baseline 3-month Biopsy to the 36-month Biopsy
Compared to the baseline biopsy performed at the time of study entry at 3 months, was there new development (incidence) or progression (severity) of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (formerly called chronic allograft nephropathy) in the biopsy performed at 36 months.
Measured: 36 months post-transplant
Renal Function (Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate)
Measured: 36 months post-transplant
Development of Donor Specific Antibody (DSA)
Percent of subjects who developed new donor specific antibody (mean fluorescence intensity > 3,000) after enrollment, within 36 months of transplant
Measured: 36 months post-transplant
Incidence of Acute Rejection
Incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection
Measured: 36 months post-transplant
Severity of Acute Rejection (by Banff Criteria and Need for Anti-lymphocyte Agents to Treat Acute Rejection)
The severity of acute rejection may be assessed by the Banff criteria. The Banff Classification of Allograft Pathology is an international consensus classification for the reporting of renal allograft biopsies, and provides critical information enabling the diagnosis and grading of pathologic changes, can help to predict response to treatment, and can help to determine the long-term prognosis of the organ. Anti-lymphocyte agents (specifically rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin) are used to treat more severe cases of acute rejection, and thus may serve as a surrogate marker of severity.
Measured: 36 months post-transplant
Incidence of Opportunistic Infection
Measured: 36 months post-transplant
Development of New Onset Diabetes Mellitus
Measured: 36 months post-transplant
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Aug 2008 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2008
- Primary completionJun 2013
- Study completionJul 2013
Why it stopped: A higher rate of late rejection was seen in the low tacrolimus arm.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for ImmunosuppressionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Weill Medical College of Cornell University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sandip Kapur, M.D., Principal investigator, Weill Medical College of Cornell University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00731874
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0608008711
- Acronym
- TIMELY
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 7 Aug 2008
- Last updated
- 12 Jun 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jun 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Thymoglobulin Induction Therapy With Minimal Immunosuppression and Evaluation of Allograft Status by Biopsy and mRNA Profiles (TIMELY Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00731874
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TIMELY / 0608008711
- Conditions
- Immunosuppression
- Keywords
- Kidney transplantation, Immunosuppression, Minimization, Tacrolimus, Prograf, Thymoglobulin
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: A higher rate of late rejection was seen in the low tacrolimus arm.
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2008
- Primary completion
- Jun 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Aug 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 1 Feb 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Tacrolimus (Prograf) is a medication that is commonly used in patients who receive a kidney transplant. It is considered to be one of the most important medications that prevent rejection of the transplant kidney by suppressing the immune system. Although tacrolimus is good at preventing rejection, it does have some unwanted side effects. These side effects include high blood pressure, increase in blood sugar, headache, and tremor. In addition, tacrolimus causes some damage to the transplant kidney over time, by causing healthy tissue to turn into scar tissue that does not function as well as healthy tissue. Therefore, kidney function may be reduced over time. In the first three months after kidney transplant, Prograf levels are kept between 8 to 10 ng/mL. This study will compare two groups of patients that will both have their tacrolimus dose reduced slowly over three months to prevent rejection while decreasing the risk of causing toxic effects to the kidney. One group will have their Prograf levels kept between 6 and 8 ng/mL, while the second group will have their levels kept between 3 and 5 ng/mL. We will then compare the two groups to see if there are any differences in their kidney function over time.
Detailed description
The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of an immunosuppression-minimizing regimen consisting initially of Thymoglobulin induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and rapid steroid withdrawal. The protocol will minimize long-term calcineurin inhibitor exposure and toxicity by weaning tacrolimus starting at 3 months after transplantation. Patients will be eligible to participate in this study only if they have already consented to participate in another study entitled "The use of urinary PCR test to help detect rejection in kidney transplant patients". In "The use of urinary PCR test to help detect rejection in kidney transplant patients", kidney allograft status (ie. whether or not there is any immunologic activity in the transplant kidney)is characterized with the use of protocol biopsies, diagnostic biopsies, and urinary PCR profiles. At 3 months after transplant, these patients are on an immunosuppression regimen consisting of tacrolimus (Prograf) and mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept). Prograf dosing is managed through the measurement of trough levels. For the first 3 months after transplant, patients are maintained at a trough level between 8 to 10 ng/ml. After 3 months, this target level is lowered in order to minimize long-term exposure to immunosuppressive agents. However, there is no consensus as to what the proper level should be after the first 3 months. Therefore, this study will randomize patients to 2 groups, one group will have their trough level targeted between 6 to 8 ng/mL while the other group will have their trough targeted between 3 and 5 ng/mL. By doing this study, we hope to determine which trough level is best, both for protecting the patient from rejection and protecting the patient from the adverse effects of the immunosuppressive medications.
At New York Weill Cornell Center, we are in a unique position to attempt immunosuppression minimization due to our ability to non-invasively monitor patients using their urine. Previous investigations performed at this center have demonstrated the diagnostic accuracy of mRNA levels of cytotoxic attack molecules in urinary cells. Preliminary data has shown that during acute rejection, Granzyme B and Perforin are strongly expressed in the urine. The sensitivity of the uPCR test was 88% with a specificity of 79%. All kidney transplant recipients at our center are invited to participate in the research study entitled "The use of urinary PCR test to help detect rejection in kidney transplant patients". In this protocol, serial analyses of urinary cells are performed to determine 1) if changes in mRNA levels will predict clinical acute rejection and 2) if these levels correlate with the presence of subclinical acute rejection. Kidney transplant recipients have serial urinary PCR measurements. In addition, patients undergo protocol biopsies of the transplant kidney at 3, 15, and 36 months after transplant. The biopsies help to show the correlation between the PCR results and the pathology of the kidney. It may also serve to detect rejection when the blood tests or urinary PCR do not show it. In a small subset of patients, urinary gene expression profile of cytotoxic attack molecules was able to predict acute rejection prior to clinical diagnosis by renal allograft biopsy.
Because we have the ability to monitor our transplant recipients using the urinary PCR protocol, we can safely minimize tacrolimus exposure over time by monitoring patients non-invasively on a real-time basis. Minimization of immunosuppression over time in a kidney transplant recipient is important in order to prevent or minimize some of the leading causes of kidney graft loss (defined as return to dialysis). Although immunosuppressive medications are excellent at preventing rejection, they do have detrimental effects on the cardiovascular system as well as to the transplant kidney itself. One major cause of kidney graft loss today is chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Formerly known as "chronic rejection", CAN has been described as the progressive decline in allograft function that occurs months or years after transplantation, and it is the second leading cause of kidney graft loss. Biopsies of kidney allografts with CAN may show inflammation, fibrosis, glomerulosclerosis, tubular atrophy, and vascular smooth muscle proliferation. The scarring and fibrosis associated with CAN is generally irreversible. A new goal within the modern transplant arena is to prevent CAN from occurring by:
- decreasing early acute rejection episodes
- decreasing calcineurin inhibitor-related nephrotoxicity
With the use of modern immunosuppressive agents and induction therapy, we have already decreased early acute rejection episodes significantly. At this time, we now want to begin to study the potentially beneficial effects that calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal may have on kidney function as well as long-term graft survival.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 (6 to 8 ng/mL) | Active comparator | Drug: TacrolimusTarget tacrolimus trough concentration of 6 to 8 ng/mL |
| Arm 2 (3 to 5 ng.mL) | Active comparator | Drug: TacrolimusTarget tacrolimus trough concentration of 3 to 5 ng/mL |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age > 18 years
- Renal allograft recipients who received a steroid-sparing immunosuppression protocol with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin) induction
- Patient must have previously enrolled in protocol entitled "The use of urinary PCR test to help detect rejection in kidney transplant patients"
- Recipients must agree to undergo all standard post-transplant protocol biopsies
- Recipients must be at least 3 months post-transplant and the three most recent urinary profiles must demonstrate immunologic quiescence as determined by measurement of Granzyme B and Perforin copy numbers
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patient is a high-risk recipient (defined as peak or current PRA >50% or a re-transplant recipient who lost prior graft within 1 year due to immunologic reasons)
- Patients who require maintenance steroids for another medical condition (such as asthma)
- Patients who are taking less than 1 gram/day of mycophenolate mofetil
- Multiple organ transplant recipients (such as kidney-pancreas)
- Patients with one or more acute rejection episodes within the first 3 months after transplant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TacrolimusAlso: PrografDosed to achieve target trough concentrations. | Drug | Arm 1 (6 to 8 ng/mL), Arm 2 (3 to 5 ng.mL) |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection and/or Progression of Histologically Proven Chronic Allograft Nephropathy at 15 Months After Transplantation.
Time frame: 15 months post-transplant
9 secondary outcomes
Patient Survival
Time frame: 36 months post-transplant
Graft Survival
Time frame: 36 months post-transplant
Change in Incidence and Severity of Interstitial Fibrosis/Tubular Atrophy (IF/TA) From the Baseline 3-month Biopsy to the 36-month Biopsy
Time frame: 36 months post-transplant
Renal Function (Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate)
Time frame: 36 months post-transplant
Development of Donor Specific Antibody (DSA)
Time frame: 36 months post-transplant
Incidence of Acute Rejection
Time frame: 36 months post-transplant
Severity of Acute Rejection (by Banff Criteria and Need for Anti-lymphocyte Agents to Treat Acute Rejection)
Time frame: 36 months post-transplant
Incidence of Opportunistic Infection
Time frame: 36 months post-transplant
Development of New Onset Diabetes Mellitus
Time frame: 36 months post-transplant
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jun 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Immunosuppression
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
(TNX-1500) in Kidney Transplant Recipients
Kidney Transplant, Kidney Transplant Failure and Rejection
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Tacrolimus C:D Ratio Measured in Renal Transplant Recipients Treated With Once-daily Prolonged-release Drugs
Immunosuppression
RecruitingObservational study
Metabolic and Functional Study of γδ T Cells in Critically Ill Patients
Sepsis, Critical Illness
RecruitingObservational study
Oral Bacteria and Immune System Problems Involved in Gum Disease (Periodontitis)
Immunosuppression, Periodontal Disease
Recruiting
Thymalfasin for Immune Recovery in Adults With Sepsis
Sepsis, Immunosuppression
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sandip Kapur, M.D. principal investigator
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Tacrolimus in people with Immunosuppression, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Feb 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection and/or Progression of Histologically Proven Chronic Allograft Nephropathy at 15 Months After Transplantation. (time frame: 15 months post-transplant). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2019.