AzTrials
AzTrials

ImmunosuppressionPhase 4TIMELYNCT00731874

Thymoglobulin Induction Therapy With Minimal Immunosuppression and Evaluation of Allograft Status

A Phase 4 study testing Tacrolimus in people with Immunosuppression, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Tacrolimus (Prograf) is a medication that is commonly used in patients who receive a kidney transplant. It is considered to be one of the most important medications that prevent rejection of the transplant kidney by suppressing the immune system. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Immunosuppression
What is being tested?
Tacrolimus
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
34 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Aug 2008to Jul 2013
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age > 18 years
  • Renal allograft recipients who received a steroid-sparing immunosuppression protocol with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin) induction
  • Patient must have previously enrolled in protocol entitled "The use of urinary PCR test to help detect rejection in kidney transplant patients"
  • Recipients must agree to undergo all standard post-transplant protocol biopsies
  • Recipients must be at least 3 months post-transplant and the three most recent urinary profiles must demonstrate immunologic quiescence as determined by measurement of Granzyme B and Perforin copy numbers
  • Patient must provide informed consent to participate in the research study

Who cannot join

  • Patient is a high-risk recipient (defined as peak or current PRA >50% or a re-transplant recipient who lost prior graft within 1 year due to immunologic reasons)
  • Patients who require maintenance steroids for another medical condition (such as asthma)
  • Patients who are taking less than 1 gram/day of mycophenolate mofetil
  • Multiple organ transplant recipients (such as kidney-pancreas)
  • Patients with one or more acute rejection episodes within the first 3 months after transplant
  • Three-month protocol biopsy showing clinical acute rejection (BANFF grade 1a or higher)
  • Patient with documented or suspected non-compliance with transplant medications in the first 3 months after transplant

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Weill Cornell Medical College/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital

    New York, New York, 10065

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Thymoglobulin Induction Therapy With Minimal Immunosuppression and Evaluation of Allograft Status by Biopsy and mRNA Profiles (TIMELY Study)

Tacrolimus (Prograf) is a medication that is commonly used in patients who receive a kidney transplant. It is considered to be one of the most important medications that prevent rejection of the transplant kidney by suppressing the immune system. Although tacrolimus is good at preventing rejection, it does have some unwanted side effects. These side effects include high blood pressure, increase in blood sugar, headache, and tremor. In addition, tacrolimus causes some damage to the transplant kidney over time, by causing healthy tissue to turn into scar tissue that does not function as well as healthy tissue. Therefore, kidney function may be reduced over time. In the first three months after kidney transplant, Prograf levels are kept between 8 to 10 ng/mL. This study will compare two groups of patients that will both have their tacrolimus dose reduced slowly over three months to prevent rejection while decreasing the risk of causing toxic effects to the kidney. One group will have their Prograf levels kept between 6 and 8 ng/mL, while the second group will have their levels kept between 3 and 5 ng/mL. We will then compare the two groups to see if there are any differences in their kidney function over time.

Read the detailed description

The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of an immunosuppression-minimizing regimen consisting initially of Thymoglobulin induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and rapid steroid withdrawal. The protocol will minimize long-term calcineurin inhibitor exposure and toxicity by weaning tacrolimus starting at 3 months after transplantation. Patients will be eligible to participate in this study only if they have already consented to participate in another study entitled "The use of urinary PCR test to help detect rejection in kidney transplant patients". In "The use of urinary PCR test to help detect rejection in kidney transplant patients", kidney allograft status (ie. whether or not there is any immunologic activity in the transplant kidney)is characterized with the use of protocol biopsies, diagnostic biopsies, and urinary PCR profiles. At 3 months after transplant, these patients are on an immunosuppression regimen consisting of tacrolimus (Prograf) and mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept). Prograf dosing is managed through the measurement of trough levels. For the first 3 months after transplant, patients are maintained at a trough level between 8 to 10 ng/ml. After 3 months, this target level is lowered in order to minimize long-term exposure to immunosuppressive agents. However, there is no consensus as to what the proper level should be after the first 3 months. Therefore, this study will randomize patients to 2 groups, one group will have their trough level targeted between 6 to 8 ng/mL while the other group will have their trough targeted between 3 and 5 ng/mL. By doing this study, we hope to determine which trough level is best, both for protecting the patient from rejection and protecting the patient from the adverse effects of the immunosuppressive medications.

At New York Weill Cornell Center, we are in a unique position to attempt immunosuppression minimization due to our ability to non-invasively monitor patients using their urine. Previous investigations performed at this center have demonstrated the diagnostic accuracy of mRNA levels of cytotoxic attack molecules in urinary cells. Preliminary data has shown that during acute rejection, Granzyme B and Perforin are strongly expressed in the urine. The sensitivity of the uPCR test was 88% with a specificity of 79%. All kidney transplant recipients at our center are invited to participate in the research study entitled "The use of urinary PCR test to help detect rejection in kidney transplant patients". In this protocol, serial analyses of urinary cells are performed to determine 1) if changes in mRNA levels will predict clinical acute rejection and 2) if these levels correlate with the presence of subclinical acute rejection. Kidney transplant recipients have serial urinary PCR measurements. In addition, patients undergo protocol biopsies of the transplant kidney at 3, 15, and 36 months after transplant. The biopsies help to show the correlation between the PCR results and the pathology of the kidney. It may also serve to detect rejection when the blood tests or urinary PCR do not show it. In a small subset of patients, urinary gene expression profile of cytotoxic attack molecules was able to predict acute rejection prior to clinical diagnosis by renal allograft biopsy.

Because we have the ability to monitor our transplant recipients using the urinary PCR protocol, we can safely minimize tacrolimus exposure over time by monitoring patients non-invasively on a real-time basis. Minimization of immunosuppression over time in a kidney transplant recipient is important in order to prevent or minimize some of the leading causes of kidney graft loss (defined as return to dialysis). Although immunosuppressive medications are excellent at preventing rejection, they do have detrimental effects on the cardiovascular system as well as to the transplant kidney itself. One major cause of kidney graft loss today is chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Formerly known as "chronic rejection", CAN has been described as the progressive decline in allograft function that occurs months or years after transplantation, and it is the second leading cause of kidney graft loss. Biopsies of kidney allografts with CAN may show inflammation, fibrosis, glomerulosclerosis, tubular atrophy, and vascular smooth muscle proliferation. The scarring and fibrosis associated with CAN is generally irreversible. A new goal within the modern transplant arena is to prevent CAN from occurring by:

  1. decreasing early acute rejection episodes
  2. decreasing calcineurin inhibitor-related nephrotoxicity

With the use of modern immunosuppressive agents and induction therapy, we have already decreased early acute rejection episodes significantly. At this time, we now want to begin to study the potentially beneficial effects that calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal may have on kidney function as well as long-term graft survival.

Being tested
Tacrolimus
Keywords
Kidney transplantation, Immunosuppression, Minimization, Tacrolimus, Prograf, Thymoglobulin

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TacrolimusDrug

    Also called Prograf

    Dosed to achieve target trough concentrations.

Study groups in NCT00731874
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1 (6 to 8 ng/mL)Active comparatorTarget tacrolimus trough concentration of 6 to 8 ng/mL
Receives: Drug: Tacrolimus
Arm 2 (3 to 5 ng.mL)Active comparatorTarget tacrolimus trough concentration of 3 to 5 ng/mL
Receives: Drug: Tacrolimus

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection and/or Progression of Histologically Proven Chronic Allograft Nephropathy at 15 Months After Transplantation.

    Measured: 15 months post-transplant

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Patient Survival

    Measured: 36 months post-transplant

  2. Graft Survival

    Measured: 36 months post-transplant

  3. Change in Incidence and Severity of Interstitial Fibrosis/Tubular Atrophy (IF/TA) From the Baseline 3-month Biopsy to the 36-month Biopsy

    Compared to the baseline biopsy performed at the time of study entry at 3 months, was there new development (incidence) or progression (severity) of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (formerly called chronic allograft nephropathy) in the biopsy performed at 36 months.

    Measured: 36 months post-transplant

  4. Renal Function (Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate)

    Measured: 36 months post-transplant

  5. Development of Donor Specific Antibody (DSA)

    Percent of subjects who developed new donor specific antibody (mean fluorescence intensity > 3,000) after enrollment, within 36 months of transplant

    Measured: 36 months post-transplant

  6. Incidence of Acute Rejection

    Incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection

    Measured: 36 months post-transplant

  7. Severity of Acute Rejection (by Banff Criteria and Need for Anti-lymphocyte Agents to Treat Acute Rejection)

    The severity of acute rejection may be assessed by the Banff criteria. The Banff Classification of Allograft Pathology is an international consensus classification for the reporting of renal allograft biopsies, and provides critical information enabling the diagnosis and grading of pathologic changes, can help to predict response to treatment, and can help to determine the long-term prognosis of the organ. Anti-lymphocyte agents (specifically rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin) are used to treat more severe cases of acute rejection, and thus may serve as a surrogate marker of severity.

    Measured: 36 months post-transplant

  8. Incidence of Opportunistic Infection

    Measured: 36 months post-transplant

  9. Development of New Onset Diabetes Mellitus

    Measured: 36 months post-transplant

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Aug 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2008
  3. Primary completionJun 2013
  4. Study completionJul 2013

Why it stopped: A higher rate of late rejection was seen in the low tacrolimus arm.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
34 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00731874
Sponsor's protocol ID
0608008711
Acronym
TIMELY
Status last verified
May 2019
First submitted
7 Aug 2008
Last updated
12 Jun 2019
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Tacrolimus in people with Immunosuppression, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Feb 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection and/or Progression of Histologically Proven Chronic Allograft Nephropathy at 15 Months After Transplantation. (time frame: 15 months post-transplant). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in