AzTrials
AzTrials

Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorNCT00735943

Macugen Observational Study

An observational study of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Macular Degeneration, run by Pfizer at 5 sites in India.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this observational study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Macugen for treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in Indian patients.Prospective, Observational, Non-interventional Study. The period of observation for the study will be 1 year Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
How many people
22 participants
Where
5 sitesIndia
Study dates
Nov 2008to Aug 2010
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: To be eligible for enrollment in this study, patients must receive the first injection of Macugen intravitreal in at least one eye for treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Who may be able to join

  • To be eligible for enrollment in this study, patients must receive the first injection of Macugen intravitreal in at least one eye for treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Who cannot join

  • Active or suspected ocular or periocular infection.
  • Known hypersensitivity to pegaptanib sodium or any other excipient in this product.

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

India5 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Gurgaon, Haryana, 122 002

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302 004

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Kochi, Kerala, 682 015

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400 054

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Navrangpura, Ahemdabad, Gujarat, 380009

Other trials in India

About this study

The objective of this observational study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Macugen for treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in Indian patients.Prospective, Observational, Non-interventional Study. The period of observation for the study will be 1 year

Read the detailed description

To be eligible for enrollment in this study, patients must receive the first injection of Macugen intravitreal in at least one eye for treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The decision to prescribe Macugen will necessarily precede and will be independent of the decision to enroll patient into the study.

If both eyes of a patient receive injection Macugen, only one eye will be included in the study. If both eyes receive first injection Macugen after initiation of the study, only the first treated eye will be included in the analysis. If one eye has already received Macugen when the study starts and the second eye receives injection after the study initiation, the second eye will be included in the analysis.

The study was prematurely discontinued due to delay in meeting pre-defined protocol recruitment milestones on August 30, 2010. There were no safety concerns regarding the study in the decision to terminate the trial.

Being tested
No intervention
Keywords
Pegaptanib, macular degeneration, vascular endothelial growth factor
Medical subject headings
Macular Degeneration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • No interventionOther

    No intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Showing Stabilization, Improvement or Deterioration of Visual Acuity (VA)

    VA was measured using ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) chart at 4 meter distance, at 1 meter distance (if participant's VA was poor) or verifying if the participant was able only to count fingers, to perceive hand motion or light. VA was assessed as the number of ETDRS letters correctly read. VA statuses were defined as: Stabilization: loss of less than 15 letters in the best corrected VA (BCVA); Improvement: gain of more than or equal to 15 letters in the BCVA; Deterioration: loss of more than or equal to 15 letters in the BCVA.

    Measured: Baseline through 12 months or last follow-up visit before study termination

  2. Average Number of Injections to Achieve Stabilization of VA

    Stabilization of VA was defined as loss of less than 15 letters in the BCVA. For each participant, number of injections before reaching the first "stabilization in VA" (considered as an event) was counted. For participant having no event, the time to the number of injections to reach an event was unobserved at the number of injections before the last follow up.

    Measured: 12 months or last follow-up visit before study termination

  3. Median Number of Injections to Achieve Stabilization of VA

    Stabilization of VA was defined as loss of less than 15 letters in the BCVA. Median number of injections to achieve stabilization of VA was estimated via the Kaplan Meier method. For each participant, number of injections before reaching the first "stabilization in VA" (considered as an event) was counted. For participant having no event, the time to the number of injections to reach an event was unobserved at the number of injections before the last follow up.

    Measured: 12 months or last follow-up visit before study termination

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Percentage of Participants Receiving Macugen Monotherapy Versus Those Receiving a Combination Therapy

    Macugen monotherapy: referred to participants receiving Macugen in the study eye during the study that is (i.e.) participants without any concomitant drug treatment or nondrug treatment for the study eye during the study. Combination therapy: referred to participants receiving combination therapy in the study eye (during the study) i.e. participants with any concomitant drug treatment or nondrug treatment for the study eye during the study.

    Measured: 12 months or last follow-up visit before study termination

  2. Percentage of Participants Showing Improvement in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Parameters

    OCT, a noninvasive, noncontact, transpupillary imaging technology, was utilized to image retinal structures in vivo with a resolution of 10 to 17 microns. The anatomic layers within the retina, retinal thickness could be measured. Improvement in OCT parameters was defined as a reduction of more than or equal to 100 microns in the central macular thickness (Center subfield).

    Measured: 12 months or last follow-up visit before study termination

  3. Percentage of Participants Showing Improvement in Fundus Fluorescein Angiography (FFA) Parameters

    A fluorescein angiogram provides information about the condition of the retina. Improvement in FFA parameters was defined as absence of progression of the lesion or decrease in the size of the lesion and absence of new lesions on FFA i.e. change in lesion size from baseline must be less than or equal to 0 disc area(DA) and no new lesions.

    Measured: 12 months or last follow-up visit before study termination

  4. Percentage of Participants With Early Lesions Showing Stabilization and Improvement of VA

    Early lesions were defined by any 2 of the following criteria: occult lesion diagnosed on FFA; baseline VA of more than or equal to 54 ETDRS letters; lesion size of less than 2DA on FFA. Stabilization of VA was defined as loss of less than 15 letters in the BCVA. Improvement in the VA was defined as gain of more than or equal to 15 letters in the BCVA.

    Measured: 12 months or last follow-up visit before study termination

  5. Average Number of Injections to Achieve Stabilization of VA in Participants With Early Lesions

    Stabilization of VA was defined as loss of less than 15 letters in the BCVA. For each participant, number of injections before reaching the first "stabilization in VA" (considered as an event) was counted. For participant having no event, the time to the number of injections to reach an event was unobserved at the number of injections before the last follow up.

    Measured: 12 months or last follow-up visit before study termination

  6. Median Number of Injections to Achieve Stabilization of VA in Participants With Early Lesions

    Stabilization of VA was defined as loss of less than 15 letters in the BCVA. Median number of injections to achieve stabilization of VA in participants with early lesions was estimated via the Kaplan Meier method. For each participant, number of injections before reaching the first "stabilization in VA" (considered as an event) was counted. For participant having no event, the time to the number of injections to reach an event was unobserved at the number of injections before the last follow up.

    Measured: 12 months or last follow-up visit before study termination

  7. Percentage of Participants With Occult or Minimally Classic and Classic Lesions Showing Stabilization and Improvement in VA

    FFA was utilized to characterize the lesions as follows: Classic lesion: more than 50% of the lesion had a well-demarcated area of hyperfluorescence; minimally classic lesion: less than or equal to 50% of lesion had well-demarcated area of hyperfluorescence; occult lesion: lesion with no well demarcated borders. VA statuses were defined as: stabilization: loss of less than 15 letters in the BCVA; improvement: gain of more than or equal to 15 letters in the BCVA.

    Measured: 12 months or last follow-up visit before study termination

  8. Percentage of Participants Who Were Treatment Naive When Started on Macugen Versus Those Previously Treated by Any Other Therapy Except Macugen

    Participants were considered treatment naive when started on Macugen and without any previous drug or non drug treatment administered to the study eye. Participants were considered previously treated by any other therapy if received any other drug or non drug treatment to the study eye except Macugen.

    Measured: 12 months or last follow-up visit before study termination

  9. Percentage of Participants Showing Stabilization or Improvement in VA in the Subgroup Previously Treated by Other Therapy

    VA was measured using ETDRS chart at 4 meter distance, at 1 meter distance (if patient's VA was poor) or verifying if the patient was able only to count fingers, to perceive hand motion or light. VA was measured as the number of ETDRS letters correctly read. VA statuses were defined as: stabilization: loss of less than 15 letters in the BCVA; improvement: gain of more than 15 letters in the BCVA.

    Measured: 12 months or last follow-up visit before study termination

  10. Percentage of Participants Showing Improvement in OCT in the Subgroup Previously Treated by Other Therapy

    OCT, a noninvasive, noncontact, transpupillary imaging technology, was utilized to image retinal structures in vivo with a resolution of 10 to 17 microns. The anatomic layers within the retina, retinal thickness could be measured. Improvement in OCT parameters was defined as a reduction of more than or equal to 100 microns in the central macular thickness (Center subfield). Improvement in OCT parameters was measured based on this single parameter.

    Measured: 12 months or last follow-up visit before study termination

  11. Percentage of Participants Showing Improvement in OCT in the Subgroup Which Were Not Treatment Naive

    OCT, a noninvasive, noncontact, transpupillary imaging technology, was utilized to image retinal structures in vivo with a resolution of 10 to 17 microns. The anatomic layers within the retina, retinal thickness could be measured. Improvement in OCT parameters was defined as a reduction of more than or equal to 100 microns in the central macular thickness (Center subfield). Improvement in OCT parameters was measured based on this single parameter.

    Measured: 12 months or last follow-up visit before study termination

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Aug 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2008
  3. Primary completionAug 2010
  4. Study completionAug 2010

Why it stopped: See termination reason in detailed description.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
22 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00735943
Sponsor's protocol ID
A5751031
Status last verified
Aug 2011
First submitted
14 Aug 2008
Last updated
29 Aug 2011
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Macular Degeneration, run by Pfizer at 5 sites in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Aug 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Aug 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Showing Stabilization, Improvement or Deterioration of Visual Acuity (VA) (time frame: Baseline through 12 months or last follow-up visit before study termination). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Aug 2011.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in