AzTrials
AzTrials

Mantle Cell LymphomaPhase 2EMERGENCT00737529

A Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide in Patients With Mantle Cell NHL Who Have Relapsed or Progressed After Treatment With Bortezomib or Are Refractory to Bortezomib. The "EMERGE" Trial

A Phase 2 study testing lenalidomide in people with Mantle Cell Lymphoma, run by Celgene at 70 sites in 14 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Lenalidomide (Revlimid (R)) in subjects with mantle cell lymphoma who have relapsed, progressed or are refractory to bortezomib. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Mantle Cell Lymphoma
What is being tested?
lenalidomide
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
134 participants
Where
70 sitesin 14 countries
Study dates
22 Dec 2008to 8 Nov 2017
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Biopsy proven mantle cell lymphoma
  • Patients must have documents relapsed, refractory or PD after treatment with bortezomib
  • Must have measureable disease on cross sectional imaging by CT
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score 0,1 or 2
  • Willing to follow pregnancy precautions

Who cannot join

  • Any of the following laboratory abnormalities
  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 1,500 cells/mm3 (1.5 x 109/L)
  • Platelet count < 60,000/mm3 (60 x 109/L)
  • Serum aspartate transaminase/Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase(AST/SGOT) or alanine transaminase/Serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (ALT/SGPT) > 3.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN), except in patients with documented liver involvement by lymphoma.
  • Serum total bilirubin > 1.5 x ULN, except in cases of Gilbert's Syndrome and documented liver involvement by lymphoma.
  • Calculated creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault formula) of < 30 mL /min
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Patients who are candidates for high dose chemotherapy/allogeneic stem cell transplant are not eligible
  • History of active central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma within the previous 3 months
  • Subjects not willing or unable to take deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis
  • Prior history of malignancies, other than MCL, unless the patient has been free of the disease for ≥ 3 years
  • Positive Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or active Hepatitis B or C

Trial locations and contacts

70 sites in 14 countries.

70 sites in 14 countries

United States31 sites
  • Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • Alvin and Lois Lapidus Cancer Institute Sinai Hospital of Baltimore

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21215

  • Boca Raton Community Hospital, Inc., Research Dept.

    Boca Raton, Florida, 33486

  • Tufts Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02111

  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • Pasco Hernando Oncology Associates, PA

    Brooksville, Florida, 34613

  • Presbyterian Hospital

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204

  • University of Virginia Cancer Center Clinical Trials Office

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908

  • Northwestern University

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Karmanos Cancer Institute

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201-2014

  • Broward General Medical Center

    Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33316

  • Hackensack University Medical Center

    Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601

  • South Carolina Cancer Specialists

    Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, 29926

  • Indiana University Cancer Center

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

  • UCSD Moores Cancer Center

    La Jolla, California, 92093

  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205

  • Loma Linda University Medical Center

    Loma Linda, California, 92354

  • Tower Cancer Research Foundation

    Los Angeles, California, 90211

  • Loyola University Medical Center - Smith

    Maywood, Illinois, 60153

  • University of Tennessee Cancer Institute

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38104

  • NYU School of Medicine

    New York, New York, 10016

  • University of Nebraska

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68198-7680

  • MD Anderson Cancer Center, Orlando Regional Healthcare

    Orlando, Florida, 32806

  • Temple University School of Medicine

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140

  • Hillman Cancer Institute at UPMC

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232

  • Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

  • University of Rochester Cancer Center, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center

    Rochester, New York, 14642

  • Avera Cancer Institute

    Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57105

  • Washington University Siteman Cancer Center

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Lake County Oncology and Hematology

    The Villages, Florida, 32159

  • University of Massachusetts Medical Center

    Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655

Other trials in United States

France9 sites
  • Hopital Sud, CHU d'Amiens

    Amiens, 80054

  • Institut Bergonie

    Bordeaux, 33076

  • Hopital Henri Mondor

    Créteil, 94010

  • Hopital Emile Muller

    Mulhouse, 68070

  • Hopital Cochin

    Paris, 75014

  • Institut Curie

    Paris, 75248

  • Hopital Robert Debre

    Reims, 51092

  • Institut de Cancerologie de la Loire

    Saint Jean Priest En Jarez, 42277

  • Hopital Hautepierre

    Strasbourg, 67098

Other trials in France

Hungary4 sites
  • Debreceni Egyetem Orvos- es Egeszsegtudomanyi Centrum

    Debrecen, 4032

  • University of Debrecen, DEOEC, Institute of Internal Medicine

    Debrecen, 4032

  • Petz Aladar Megyei Oktato Korhaz,II. Belgyogyaszat

    Győr, 9024

  • Kaposi Mor Oktato Korhaz

    Kaposvár, 7400

Other trials in Hungary

Israel4 sites
  • Rambam Medical Center

    Haifa, 35254

  • Hadassah Medical Center

    Jerusalem, 91120

  • Rabin Medical Center

    Petch Tikva, 49100

  • Sheba Medical Center

    Tel HaShomer, 52621

Other trials in Israel

Spain4 sites
  • Hospital General De Elche

    Alicante, 03203

  • Duran i Reynals Institut Catala d'Oncologia

    L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907

  • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Salamanca

    Salamanca, 37003

  • Hospital Universitario La Fe

    Valencia, 46009

Other trials in Spain

Austria3 sites
  • Universitaetsklinik Innsbruck

    Innsbruck, 6020

  • Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg

    Salzburg, 5020

  • Medical University of Vienna

    Vienna, 1090

Other trials in Austria

Belgium3 sites
  • AZ Sint-Jan AV Brugge

    Bruges, 8000

  • UZ Gent

    Ghent, 9000

  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg

    Leuven, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

Italy3 sites
  • Universita Federico II di Napoli Nuovo Policlinico

    Naples, 80131

  • Ospedale Civile dello Spirito Santo

    Pescara, 65124

  • Universita Cattololica del Sacro Cuore

    Roma, 00168

Other trials in Italy

Turkey (Türkiye)3 sites
  • Gazi Universitesi

    Besevler Ankara, 06500

  • Istanbul Universitesi Istanbul

    Istanbul, 34390

  • Ankara Universitesi Tip Fakultesi

    Sihhiye Ankara, 06100

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Colombia2 sites
  • Hospital Universitario San Ignacio

    Bogotá

  • Oncologos del occidente S.A.

    Pereira

Other trials in Colombia

Germany1 site
  • University Hospital Wuerzburg

    Würzburg, 97080

Other trials in Germany

Puerto Rico1 site
  • Centro De Cancer, Hospital Espanol Auxilio De Puerto Rico

    San Juan, 00919

Other trials in Puerto Rico

Singapore1 site
  • Singapore General Hospital

    Singapore, 169608

Other trials in Singapore

United Kingdom1 site
  • Royal Cornwall Hospitals Trust

    Truro, TR1 3LJ

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study To Determine The Efficacy And Safety Of Single-Agent Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) In Patients With Mantel Cell NHL Who Have Relapsed Or Progressed After Treatment With Bortezomib Or Are Refractory To Bortezomib

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Lenalidomide (Revlimid (R)) in subjects with mantle cell lymphoma who have relapsed, progressed or are refractory to bortezomib.

Read the detailed description

Follow up phase will continue until either 100% of the patients have died, are lost to follow up or have withdrawn consent or a maximum of 4 years from the last patient enrolled, whichever comes first. All other efficacy and safety endpoints will be updated at this time. In the unlikely event that the study will be closed and patients are still responding to treatment at this time, Celgene will discuss with the treating physicians options to provide further treatment to the patient after study closure in line with local regulation.

Follow up for second primary malignancies and OS will continue until 100% of the patients have died, are lost to follow up, have withdrawn consent, or a maximum of 5 years from the last patient enrolled, whichever comes first.

10 October 2017: In regard to the last subject last visit date/study completion date, the prolongation of timelines is due to the bridging of a treatment gap for a patient responding to study medication until non-study medication is available.

Being tested
lenalidomide
Keywords
Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, CC-5013, Revlimid, Lenalidomide
Medical subject headings
Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell, Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • lenalidomideDrug

    Also called Revlimid

    25mg oral capsules continuous days 1-21 each of a 28 day cycle

Study groups in NCT00737529
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
LenalidomideExperimentalSingle agent Lenalidomide Lenalidomide: 10mg or 25 mg oral capsules on days 1 to 21 of each 28 day cycle and dependent on renal function; Participants with normal renal function (defined as Creatinine Clearance(CrCl)) of ≥ 60 mL/min in this study) received 25 mg of lenalidomide daily, and those with moderate renal insufficiency (CrCl) ≥ 30 mL/min but < 60 mL/min) were started at a 10-mg dose. Participants could continue to receive treatment until disease progression, development of unacceptable AEs, or voluntary withdrawal.
Receives: Drug: lenalidomide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response According to the Independent Review Committee (IRC)

    Overall Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants whose best response was Complete Response, Complete Response unconfirmed or Partial Response. Participants who had discontinued before any response has been observed, or changed to other anti-lymphoma treatments before response had been observed, were considered as non-responders. Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999); CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass >1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined ≥50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses.

    Measured: From Day 1 of study treatment to progession or early treatment discontinuation; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median duration of treatment was 94.5 days.

  2. Kaplan Meier Estimate of Duration of Response (DoR) According to the Independent Review Committee

    Kaplan Meier estimate for the duration of response (DoR) was calculated from the date of the first occurrence of initial response for responders (demonstrating evidence of at least a PR) to the date of first documented disease progression (any new lesion or increase by ≥ 50% of previously involved sites from nadir) or death (without documented progression) for participants who responded; participants who had not progressed (or died) were censored at the last valid assessment.

    Measured: From Day 1 of study drug to progression or early treatment discontinuation; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; Median duration of treatment was 94.5 days.

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) /Complete Response Unconfirmed (CRu) According to the Independent Review Committee

    The percentage of participants whose best response was CR or CRu. Participants who had discontinued before CR/CRu was observed, or changed to other anti-lymphoma treatments before a CR/CRu response had been observed, were considered as non-responders. CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass >1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow.

    Measured: From Day 1 of study drug to progression or early treatment discontinuation; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; Median duration of treatment was 94.5 days

  2. Kaplan Meier Estimate of Duration of Complete Response (DoCR) (CR+CRu) According to the Independent Review Committee

    Kaplan Meier estimates for the duration of CR/CRu was calculated from the date of the first occurrence of CR/CRu to the date of documented disease progression or death (without documented progression) for participants who obtained a CR/CRu; participants who had not progressed (or died) were censored at the last valid assessment.

    Measured: From Day 1 of study drug to progression or early discontinuation; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median time in follow-up was 16.34 months

  3. Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) According to the Independent Review Committee

    Kaplan Meier estimates of PFS was defined as the start of study drug therapy to the first observation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever comes first. If a participant had not progressed or died, PFS was censored at the time of last adequate assessment when the participant was known not to have progressed. For participants who received other anti-lymphoma therapy with no evidence of progression, PFS was censored at time of last adequate tumor assessment with no evidence of progression prior to the start of new anti-lymphoma treatment.

    Measured: From Day 1 of study drug to first documented date of disease progression; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median time in follow-up was 16.34 months

  4. Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Progression (TTP) According to the Independent Review Committee

    Kaplan Meier estimate of time to progression was calculated as time from the start of the study drug therapy to the first observation of disease progression. Participants who died without progression were censored at the date of death; otherwise, the censoring rules presented above for PFS applied to the analysis of TTP. Progressive Disease(PD): Appearance of new lesion or increase by ≥50% from previously involved sites from nadir

    Measured: From Day 1 of study drug to first documented time of progression; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median time in follow-up was 16.34 months

  5. Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) According to the Independent Review Committee

    Time to treatment failure (TTF) was calculated from the start of study drug therapy to early discontinuation from treatment due to any cause, including disease progression, toxicity, or death and was based on site-reported data.

    Measured: From Day 1 of study drug to first documented time of treatment failure; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median duration of treatment was 94.5 days

  6. Time to Response (TTR)

    Time to Response was defined as the time from first dose of study drug to the date of the first response (having at least a PR) and was calculated only for responding participants.

    Measured: From Day 1 of study drug to time of first documented PR or better; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median duration of treatment was 94.5 days

  7. Time to Complete Response (CR+CRu) According to the Independent Review Committee

    Time to Complete Response (CR+CRu) was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug to the date of the first occurrence of at least CRu and was calculated only for participants with CR or CRu.

    Measured: From Day 1 of study drug to first documented CR/CRu or better; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median duration of treatment was 94.5 days

  8. Overall Survival (OS)

    Kaplan Meier estimate of overall survival was calculated from the time the first dose of study drug to death from any cause. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive.

    Measured: From Day 1 of study drug to first documented date of progressive disease or death; up to the final data cut-off date of 30 March 2017; median duration of follow-up for surviving participants was 62.94 months

  9. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Adverse events were assessed using National Cancer Institute, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), Version 3: according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild Adverse Event (AE), Grade 2 = Moderate AE, Grade 3 = Severe and Undesirable AE, Grade 4 = Life-threatening or Disabling AE, and Grade 5 = Death; Serious AEs (SAEs) are those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly, or resulted in an important medical event that may have jeopardized the patient or required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. after the first dose of study drug and within 28 days after the last dose. A TEAE is defined as any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first dose of study drug and within 28 days after the last dose of study drug.

    Measured: From the first dose of lenalidomide through 28 days after the last dose during the follow-up phase; median (minimum, maximum) duration of treatment was 94.0 (1.0, 1950 days)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Aug 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study start22 Dec 2008
  3. Primary completion6 Apr 2016
  4. Study completion8 Nov 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
134 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00737529
Sponsor's protocol ID
CC-5013-MCL-001
Acronym
EMERGE
Status last verified
Dec 2018
First submitted
15 Aug 2008
Last updated
13 Dec 2018
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Goy A, Sinha R, Williams ME, Kalayoglu Besisik S, Drach J, Ramchandren R, Zhang L, Cicero S, Fu T, Witzig TE. Single-agent lenalidomide in patients with mantle-cell lymphoma who relapsed or progressed after or were refractory to bortezomib: phase II MCL-001 (EMERGE) study. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct 10;31(29):3688-95. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.2835. Epub 2013 Sep 3.

    PubMed 24002500
  • Goy A, Kalayoglu Besisik S, Drach J, Ramchandren R, Robertson MJ, Avivi I, Rowe JM, Herbrecht R, Van Hoof A, Zhang L, Cicero S, Fu T, Witzig T. Longer-term follow-up and outcome by tumour cell proliferation rate (Ki-67) in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma treated with lenalidomide on MCL-001(EMERGE) pivotal trial. Br J Haematol. 2015 Aug;170(4):496-503. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13456. Epub 2015 Apr 28.

    PubMed 25921098
  • Witzig TE, Luigi Zinzani P, Habermann TM, Tuscano JM, Drach J, Ramchandren R, Kalayoglu Besisik S, Takeshita K, Casadebaig Bravo ML, Zhang L, Fu T, Goy A. Long-term analysis of phase II studies of single-agent lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma. Am J Hematol. 2017 Oct;92(10):E575-E583. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24854. Epub 2017 Aug 28.

    PubMed 28699256
  • San-Miguel JF, Richardson PG, Gunther A, Sezer O, Siegel D, Blade J, LeBlanc R, Sutherland H, Sopala M, Mishra KK, Mu S, Bourquelot PM, Victoria Mateos M, Anderson KC. Phase Ib study of panobinostat and bortezomib in relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct 10;31(29):3696-703. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.7068. Epub 2013 Sep 9.

    PubMed 24019544

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing lenalidomide in people with Mantle Cell Lymphoma, run by Celgene at 70 sites in 14 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 70 sites in United States, France, Hungary, Israel, Spain and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Sep 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response According to the Independent Review Committee (IRC) (time frame: From Day 1 of study treatment to progession or early treatment discontinuation; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median duration of treatment was 94.5 days.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00737529, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Dec 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in