Hepatitis BPhase 3NCT00737568
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (Tenofovir DF) Versus Emtricitabine/Tenofovir DF in Subjects Resistant to Lamivudine
A Phase 3 study testing TDF and FTC/TDF in people with Hepatitis B, run by Gilead Sciences at 69 sites in 14 countries.
Trial summary
The aim of therapy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) is to maintain suppression of viral replication to prevent the emergence of complications, which requires long-term therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatitis B
- What is being tested?
- TDF and FTC/TDF
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 280 participants
- Where
- 69 sitesin 14 countries
- Study dates
- Sep 2008to Feb 2015
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Chronic HBV infection, defined as positive serum HBsAg for at least 6 months
- 18 through 75 years of age, inclusive
- HBV DNA ≥ 10^3 IU/mL
- Receiving treatment with lamivudine with confirmation of HBV reverse transcriptase mutation(s) known to confer resistance to lamivudine (rtM204I/V with or without rtL180M) by central laboratory assessment prior to randomization; adefovir dipivoxil treatment of ≤ 48 weeks at the time of screening (inclusive of combination adefovir dipivoxil + lamivudine at entry) was allowed
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent
- Negative serum pregnancy test (for females of childbearing potential only)
Show all 10Show fewer
- Calculated creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min
- Hemoglobin ≥ 10 g/dL
- Neutrophils ≥ 1000 /mm^3
- No prior oral HBV therapy with approved nucleotide and/or nucleoside therapy or other investigational agents for HBV infection other than lamivudine or adefovir dipivoxil
Who cannot join
- Pregnant women, women who are breast feeding or who believe they may wish to become pregnant during the course of the study
- Males and females of reproductive potential who are not willing to use an effective method of contraception during the study
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥ 10 × the upper limit of the normal range (ULN)
- Decompensated liver disease
- Interferon or pegylated interferon therapy within 6 months of the screening visit
- Alpha fetoprotein > 50 ng/mL
Show all 13Show fewer
- Evidence of hepatocellular carcinoma
- Coinfection with hepatitis C virus, HIV, or hepatitis D virus
- Significant renal, cardiovascular, pulmonary, or neurological disease
- Received solid organ or bone marrow transplantation
- Receiving therapy with immunomodulators (eg, corticosteroids, etc.), investigational agents, nephrotoxic agents, or agents susceptible of modifying renal excretion
- Proximal tubulopathy
- Known hypersensitivity to the study drugs, the metabolites or formulation excipients
Trial locations and contacts
69 sites in 14 countries.
69 sites in 14 countries
Poland9 sites
Study site
Bialystok, 15-540
Study site
Bydgoszcz, 85-030
Study site
Chorzów, 41-500
Study site
Krakow, 31-351
Study site
Lodz, 91-347
Study site
Szczecin, 71-455
Study site
Warsaw, 01-201
Study site
Warsaw, 02-507
Study site
Wroclaw, 50-220
Canada8 sites
Study site
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5
Study site
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4
Study site
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8
Study site
Toronto, Ontario, M6H 3M1
Study site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z
Study site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6AB46
Study site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 2K5
Study site
Winnepeg, Manitoba, R3E 3P4
Germany8 sites
Study site
Berlin, 13353
Study site
Düsseldorf, 40225
Study site
Essen, 45122
Study site
Frankfurt, 60590
Study site
Hamburg, 20099
Study site
Hanover, 30625
Study site
Stuttgart
Study site
Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, 89081
Romania8 sites
Study site
Bucharest, 020125
Study site
Bucharest, 021105
Study site
Bucharest, 022328
Study site
Bucharest, 030303
Study site
Cluj-Napoca, 400158
Study site
Constanța, 900708
Study site
Lasi, Judetul Lasi, 700111
Study site
Timișoara, Timiș County, 300736
Turkey (Türkiye)6 sites
Study site
Ankara, 06100
Study site
Bursa, 16059
Study site
Izmir, 35100
Study site
Samsun, 55139
Study site
Trabzon, 61080
Study site
Üsküdar, 34668
Czechia5 sites
Study site
Brno, 625 00
Study site
Pilsen, 304 60
Study site
Prague, 14021
Study site
Prague, 160 00
Study site
Ústí nad Labem, 40001
Bulgaria4 sites
Study site
Sofia, 1407
Study site
Sofia, 1527
Study site
Sofia, 1606
Study site
Varna, 9010
Hungary4 sites
Study site
Budapest, 1126
Study site
Debrecen, 4032
Study site
Gyula, H5700
Study site
Kasposvar, H7400
Serbia4 sites
Study site
Belgrade, 11000
Study site
Kragujevac, 34000
Study site
Niš, 18000
Study site
Novi Sad, 21000
United States3 sites
Study site
Bradenton, Florida, 34205
Study site
Flushing, New York, 11355
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Austria3 sites
Study site
Innsbruck, A-6020
Study site
Vienna, A-1090
Study site
Vienna, A-1130
Greece3 sites
Study site
Larissa, 41110
Study site
Pátrai, 25404
Study site
Thessaloniki, 54642
New Zealand3 sites
Study site
Auckland
Study site
Hamilton
Study site
Wellington, 6035
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3b, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study Evaluating the Antiviral Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (DF) Monotherapy Versus Emtricitabine Plus Tenofovir DF Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy in Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis B Who Are Resistant to Lamivudine
The aim of therapy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) is to maintain suppression of viral replication to prevent the emergence of complications, which requires long-term therapy. Durable suppression of viral replication is achieved in the treatment of chronic viral diseases by preventing of the emergence of drug-resistant mutations. The clinical guidelines for the management of lamivudine resistant patients are variable. Some recommend switching to another agent without cross-resistance, while others recommend adding on another agent without cross-resistance. Limited clinical data exists to demonstrate whether tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF; TDF) is an effective monotherapy for lamivudine resistant patients or if it should be used as part of a combination therapy regimen.
This study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of tenofovir DF monotherapy versus emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir DF combination therapy in participants with chronic HBV with lamivudine resistance (presence of the rtM204I/V mutation with or without the rtL180M mutation) over a 240-week period. Participants in this study must be receiving lamivudine treatment at the time of enrollment.
- Conditions
- Hepatitis B
- Being tested
- TDF, FTC/TDF, TDF Placebo, FTC/TDF Placebo
- Keywords
- Tenofovir DF, Emtricitabine, Chronic hepatitis B, Combination therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Hepatitis B, Hepatitis B, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TDFDrug
Also called Viread®
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF; TDF) 300 mg tablet administered orally once daily
FTC/TDFDrug
Also called Truvada®
Emtricitabine (FTC)/TDF 200/300 mg fixed-dose combination tablet administered orally once daily
TDF PlaceboDrug
TDF placebo tablet administered orally once daily
FTC/TDF PlaceboDrug
FTC/TDF placebo tablet administered orally once daily
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tenofovir DF | Experimental | TDF plus placebo to match FTC/TDF Receives: Drug: TDF; Drug: FTC/TDF Placebo |
| FTC/TDF | Experimental | FTC/TDF plus placebo to match TDF Receives: Drug: FTC/TDF; Drug: TDF Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 96
Measured: Week 96
Secondary outcomes (12)
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 144, 192, and 240
Measured: Weeks 48, 144, 192, and 240
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Measured: Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
HBV DNA Level at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Measured: Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Percentage of Participants With Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Normal ALT was defined as having a value less than or equal to the ULN. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to < 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.
Measured: Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Percentage of Participants With HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
The percentage of participants who were HBeAg positive at baseline and who had HBeAg Loss at the given time point was summarized. Loss of HBeAg was defined as change of detectable HBeAg from positive to negative.
Measured: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion to Antibody Against HBeAg (Anti-HBe) at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
The percentage of participants who were HBeAg positive at baseline and who had seroconversion to anti-HBe at the given time point was summarized. Seroconversion to anti-HBe was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBeAg from negative to positive.
Measured: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Percentage of Participants With HBV Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
The percentage of participants with HBsAg Loss at the given time point was summarized. Loss of HBsAg was defined as change of detectable HBsAg from positive to negative.
Measured: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion to Antibody Against HBV Surface Antigen (Anti-HBs) at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
The percentage of participants with seroconversion to anti-HBs at the given time point was summarized. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative to positive.
Measured: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Breakthrough at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
The percentage of participants with virologic breakthrough at the given time point was summarized. Virologic breakthrough was defined as having two consecutive 1.0 log10 or greater increases in serum HBV DNA from on-treatment nadir, or two consecutive HBV DNA values ≥ 400 copies/mL after being < 400 copies/mL.
Measured: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Spine at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 144, 192, and 240
BMD is calculated as grams per cubic centimeter (g/cm^2); the mean (SD) percentage change is presented.
Measured: Baseline; Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Percent Change From Baseline in BMD of the Hip at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 144, 192, and 240
BMD is calculated as g/cm^2; the mean (SD) percentage change is presented.
Measured: Baseline; Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Development of Drug-resistant Mutations (DRMs)
The development of DRMs was summarized, either as development of new DRMs or enrichment of existing DRMs.
Measured: Baseline to Week 240
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Aug 2008 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2008
- Primary completionNov 2011
- Study completionFeb 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hepatitis BStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Gilead SciencesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 280 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Gilead Sciences
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- John Flaherty, PharmD, Study director, Gilead Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00737568
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GS-US-174-0121
- Status last verified
- Feb 2016
- First submitted
- 15 Aug 2008
- Last updated
- 11 Mar 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Corsa AC, Liu Y, Flaherty JF, Mitchell B, Fung SK, Gane E, Miller MD, Kitrinos KM. No resistance to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate through 96 weeks of treatment in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Dec;12(12):2106-12.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.05.024. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
PubMed 24929235Liu Y, Fung S, Gane EJ, Dinh P, Flaherty JF, Svarovskaia ES, Miller MD, Kitrinos KM. Evaluation of HBV DNA decay kinetics in patients containing both rtM204V/I mutant and wild-type HBV subpopulations during tenofovir DF (TDF) monotherapy or combination therapy with emtricitabine (FTC)/TDF. J Med Virol. 2014 Sep;86(9):1473-81. doi: 10.1002/jmv.23982. Epub 2014 May 23.
PubMed 24861361Fung S, Kwan P, Fabri M, Horban A, Pelemis M, Hann HW, Gurel S, Caruntu FA, Flaherty JF, Massetto B, Dinh P, Corsa A, Subramanian GM, McHutchison JG, Husa P, Gane E. Randomized comparison of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2014 Apr;146(4):980-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.12.028. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
PubMed 24368224Fung S, Kwan P, Fabri M, Horban A, Pelemis M, Hann HW, Gurel S, Caruntu FA, Flaherty JF, Massetto B, Kim K, Kitrinos KM, Subramanian GM, McHutchison JG, Yee LJ, Elkhashab M, Berg T, Sporea I, Yurdaydin C, Husa P, Jablkowski MS, Gane E. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) vs. emtricitabine (FTC)/TDF in lamivudine resistant hepatitis B: A 5-year randomised study. J Hepatol. 2017 Jan;66(1):11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
PubMed 27545497
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Mar 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3b, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study Evaluating the Antiviral Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (DF) Monotherapy Versus Emtricitabine Plus Tenofovir DF Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy in Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis B Who Are Resistant to Lamivudine
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00737568
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GS-US-174-0121
- Conditions
- Hepatitis B
- Keywords
- Tenofovir DF, Emtricitabine, Chronic hepatitis B, Combination therapy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 280 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Gilead SciencesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Sep 2008
- Primary completion
- Nov 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Aug 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 11 Apr 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of therapy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) is to maintain suppression of viral replication to prevent the emergence of complications, which requires long-term therapy. Durable suppression of viral replication is achieved in the treatment of chronic viral diseases by preventing of the emergence of drug-resistant mutations. The clinical guidelines for the management of lamivudine resistant patients are variable. Some recommend switching to another agent without cross-resistance, while others recommend adding on another agent without cross-resistance. Limited clinical data exists to demonstrate whether tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF; TDF) is an effective monotherapy for lamivudine resistant patients or if it should be used as part of a combination therapy regimen.
This study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of tenofovir DF monotherapy versus emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir DF combination therapy in participants with chronic HBV with lamivudine resistance (presence of the rtM204I/V mutation with or without the rtL180M mutation) over a 240-week period. Participants in this study must be receiving lamivudine treatment at the time of enrollment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tenofovir DF | Experimental | Drug: TDF, Drug: FTC/TDF PlaceboTDF plus placebo to match FTC/TDF |
| FTC/TDF | Experimental | Drug: FTC/TDF, Drug: TDF PlaceboFTC/TDF plus placebo to match TDF |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Chronic HBV infection, defined as positive serum HBsAg for at least 6 months
- 18 through 75 years of age, inclusive
- HBV DNA ≥ 10^3 IU/mL
- Receiving treatment with lamivudine with confirmation of HBV reverse transcriptase mutation(s) known to confer resistance to lamivudine (rtM204I/V with or without rtL180M) by central laboratory assessment prior to randomization; adefovir dipivoxil treatment of ≤ 48 weeks at the time of screening (inclusive of combination adefovir dipivoxil + lamivudine at entry) was allowed
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Pregnant women, women who are breast feeding or who believe they may wish to become pregnant during the course of the study
- Males and females of reproductive potential who are not willing to use an effective method of contraception during the study
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥ 10 × the upper limit of the normal range (ULN)
- Decompensated liver disease
- Interferon or pegylated interferon therapy within 6 months of the screening visit
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TDFAlso: Viread®Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF; TDF) 300 mg tablet administered orally once daily | Drug | Tenofovir DF |
| FTC/TDFAlso: Truvada®Emtricitabine (FTC)/TDF 200/300 mg fixed-dose combination tablet administered orally once daily | Drug | FTC/TDF |
| TDF PlaceboTDF placebo tablet administered orally once daily | Drug | FTC/TDF |
| FTC/TDF PlaceboFTC/TDF placebo tablet administered orally once daily | Drug | Tenofovir DF |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 96
Time frame: Week 96
12 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 144, 192, and 240
Time frame: Weeks 48, 144, 192, and 240
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Time frame: Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
HBV DNA Level at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Time frame: Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Percentage of Participants With Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Time frame: Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Percentage of Participants With HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion to Antibody Against HBeAg (Anti-HBe) at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Percentage of Participants With HBV Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion to Antibody Against HBV Surface Antigen (Anti-HBs) at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Breakthrough at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Spine at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Percent Change From Baseline in BMD of the Hip at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Development of Drug-resistant Mutations (DRMs)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 240
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Mar 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 24929235Corsa AC, Liu Y, Flaherty JF, Mitchell B, Fung SK, Gane E, Miller MD, Kitrinos KM. No resistance to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate through 96 weeks of treatment in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Dec;12(12):2106-12.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.05.024. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 24861361Liu Y, Fung S, Gane EJ, Dinh P, Flaherty JF, Svarovskaia ES, Miller MD, Kitrinos KM. Evaluation of HBV DNA decay kinetics in patients containing both rtM204V/I mutant and wild-type HBV subpopulations during tenofovir DF (TDF) monotherapy or combination therapy with emtricitabine (FTC)/TDF. J Med Virol. 2014 Sep;86(9):1473-81. doi: 10.1002/jmv.23982. Epub 2014 May 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 24368224Fung S, Kwan P, Fabri M, Horban A, Pelemis M, Hann HW, Gurel S, Caruntu FA, Flaherty JF, Massetto B, Dinh P, Corsa A, Subramanian GM, McHutchison JG, Husa P, Gane E. Randomized comparison of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2014 Apr;146(4):980-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.12.028. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27545497Fung S, Kwan P, Fabri M, Horban A, Pelemis M, Hann HW, Gurel S, Caruntu FA, Flaherty JF, Massetto B, Kim K, Kitrinos KM, Subramanian GM, McHutchison JG, Yee LJ, Elkhashab M, Berg T, Sporea I, Yurdaydin C, Husa P, Jablkowski MS, Gane E. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) vs. emtricitabine (FTC)/TDF in lamivudine resistant hepatitis B: A 5-year randomised study. J Hepatol. 2017 Jan;66(1):11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
Related trials for Hepatitis B
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Sequential Therapy With Daplusiran/Tomligisiran (DAP/TOM) Followed by Bepirovirsen in Participants Living With Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB)
Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection, Hepatitis B
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With Liver Disease
Hepatitis D, Hepatitis C
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Study of Bepirovirsen in Participants Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection (B-Focus)
Hepatitis B
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Long-term Follow-up Study to Evaluate Durability of Treatment Response in Previous Bepirovirsen Study Participants (B-Sure)
Hepatitis B
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
A Phase I Clinical Trial of CPU-YL01 Injection in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B.
Chronic Hepatitis B
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John Flaherty, PharmD study director
Gilead Sciences
69 sites in 14 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing TDF and FTC/TDF in people with Hepatitis B, run by Gilead Sciences at 69 sites in 14 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 69 sites in Poland, Canada, Germany, Romania, Turkey (Türkiye) and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Apr 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 96 (time frame: Week 96). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00737568, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Mar 2016.