Renal Cell CancerPhase 3NCT00738530
A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) Added to Interferon Alfa-2a (Roferon) Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer With Nephrectomy
A Phase 3 study testing Bevacizumab [Avastin] and Interferon alfa 2a [Roferon] in people with Renal Cell Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 104 sites in 18 countries.
Trial summary
This 2-arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Avastin versus placebo in combination with Roferon as first-line treatment in participants with metastatic renal cell cancer (clear cell type) who have had nephrectomy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Renal Cell Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Bevacizumab [Avastin] and Interferon alfa 2a [Roferon]
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 649 participants
- Where
- 104 sitesin 18 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2004to Sep 2008
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- metastatic renal cell cancer (clear cell type);
- nephrectomy;
- absence of proteinuria.
Who cannot join
- prior systemic treatment for metastatic renal cell cancer;
- major surgical procedure, open biopsy or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to study treatment start;
- presence of brain metastases or spinal cord compression;
- ongoing need for full dose anticoagulants;
- uncontrolled hypertension;
- clinically significant cardiovascular disease.
Trial locations and contacts
104 sites in 18 countries.
104 sites in 18 countries
France16 sites
Study site
Angers, 49933
Study site
Bordeaux, 33075
Study site
Caen, 14076
Study site
Clermont-Ferrand, 63011
Study site
Grenoble, 38043
Study site
Lille, 59020
Study site
Limoges, 87042
Study site
Lyon, 69373
Study site
Marseille, 13273
Study site
Nice, 06189
Study site
Poitiers, 86021
Study site
Saint-Herblain, 44805
Study site
Strasbourg, 67091
Study site
Suresnes, 92151
Study site
Toulouse, 31052
Study site
Villejuif, 94805
Spain11 sites
Study site
Barcelona, 08035
Study site
Barcelona, 08036
Study site
Barcelona, 08041
Study site
Granada, 18014
Study site
Madrid, 28040
Study site
Madrid, 28041
Study site
Málaga, 29010
Study site
Pontevedra, 36002
Study site
Santander, 39008
Study site
Valencia, 46009
Study site
Zaragoza, 50009
Australia10 sites
Study site
Adelaide, 5011
Study site
Adelaide, 5041
Study site
Brisbane, 4006
Study site
Canberra, 2606
Study site
Frankston, 3199
Study site
Kurralta Park, 5037
Study site
Melbourne, 3128
Study site
Perth, 6009
Study site
Sydney, 2031
Study site
Sydney, 2139
Italy9 sites
Study site
Livorno, 57100
Study site
Milan, 20133
Study site
Milan, 20162
Study site
Modena, 41100
Study site
Naples, 80131
Study site
Perugia, 06122
Study site
Roma, 00144
Study site
Rozzano, 20089
Study site
Torino, 10126
Russia9 sites
Study site
Moscow, 105229
Study site
Moscow, 107005
Study site
Moscow, 115478
Study site
Moscow, 125284
Study site
Moscow, 129128
Study site
Moscow
Study site
Obninsk, 249020
Study site
Saint Petersburg, 197758
Study site
Saint Petersburg
Germany8 sites
Study site
Berlin
Study site
Darmstadt, 64283
Study site
Hamburg
Study site
Hanover, 30449
Study site
Mannheim, 68167
Study site
Marburg, 35043
Study site
München, 81377
Study site
Planegg
Poland6 sites
Study site
Bydgoszcz, 85-796
Study site
Krakow, 31-826
Study site
Lodz, 94-306
Study site
Olsztyn, 10-228
Study site
Tarnów, 33-100
Study site
Warsaw, 00-909
Israel5 sites
Study site
Holon, 58100
Study site
Ramat Gan, 52621
Study site
Rehovot, 76100
Study site
Tel Aviv, 6423906
Study site
Tsrifin, 70300
Belgium4 sites
Study site
Antwerp, 2020
Study site
Brussels, 1000
Study site
Brussels, 1200
Study site
Wilrijk, 2610
Czechia4 sites
Study site
České Budějovice, 370 87
Study site
Chomutov, 430 12
Study site
Hradec Králové, 500 05
Study site
Pilsen, 305 99
Norway4 sites
Study site
Ålesund, 6026
Study site
Oslo, 0310
Study site
Stavanger, 4068
Study site
Trondheim, 7000
Taiwan4 sites
Study site
Chang Gung
Study site
Kaohsiung City, 807
Study site
Taichung, 407
Study site
Taipei, 00112
Switzerland3 sites
Study site
Basel, 4031
Study site
Bern, 3010
Study site
Geneva, 1205
United Kingdom3 sites
Study site
London, NW3 2QG
Study site
London, SE1 9RT
Study site
Manchester, M2O 4BX
Netherlands2 sites
Study site
Amsterdam, 1081 HV
Study site
Nijmegen, 6525 GA
About this study
Official title: A Randomised, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Avastin Plus Roferon Compared With Placebo Plus Roferon on Overall Survival and Tumor Assessment in Nephrectomised Patients With Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
This 2-arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Avastin versus placebo in combination with Roferon as first-line treatment in participants with metastatic renal cell cancer (clear cell type) who have had nephrectomy. The anticipated time of study treatment is 1-2 years, and the target sample size is greater than (>)500 individuals.
- Conditions
- Renal Cell Cancer
- Being tested
- Bevacizumab [Avastin], Interferon alfa 2a [Roferon], Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bevacizumab [Avastin]Drug
10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks
Interferon alfa 2a [Roferon]Drug
9 MIU SC 3 times/week
PlaceboDrug
IV every 2 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab + IFN-Alfa-2A | Experimental | Bevacizumab infusions will be administered every 2 weeks at a dose of 10 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) for 52 weeks or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Interferon alfa-2a (IFN-Alfa-2A) will be administered 3 times per week as a subcutaneous injection at a dose of 9 million international units (MIU) for 52 weeks or until disease progression or major toxicity. Receives: Drug: Bevacizumab [Avastin]; Drug: Interferon alfa 2a [Roferon] |
| Placebo + IFN-Alfa-2A | Placebo comparator | Placebo matched with Bevacizumab infusions will be administered every 2 weeks for 52 weeks or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. IFN-Alfa-2A will be administered 3 times per week as a subcutaneous injection at a dose of 9 MIU for 52 weeks or until disease progression or major toxicity. Receives: Drug: Interferon alfa 2a [Roferon]; Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Died
Measured: Baseline up to 4.25 years
Overall Survival (OS) Duration
Duration of survival was defined as the time between the date of randomization and date of death due to any cause. Participants still alive at the time of analysis were censored at the date they were last known to be alive. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for analysis.
Measured: Baseline until death (up to 4.25 years)
Secondary outcomes (8)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death
Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)
Progression Free Survival (PFS) According to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)
Progression-free survival was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the first date of documented progression or date of death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Tumor assessment was performed using modified RECIST. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20 percentage(%) increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants without an event were censored at the date of last follow-up for progression or date of last available tumor measurement if no follow-up assessment for progression was performed. Participants who were randomized but not exposed to study drug and had no further follow-up were censored on the day of randomization.
Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)
Time to Progression (TTP) According to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)
Time to progression was defined as the time between date of randomization and date of documented progression. Tumor assessment was performed using mRECIST. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants without an event (including participants who died before progressive disease) were censored at the date of last follow-up for progression or date of last available tumor measurement if no follow-up assessment for progression was performed. Participants who were randomized but not exposed to study drug and had no further follow-up were censored on the day of randomization.
Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure
Treatment failure is defined as insufficient therapeutic response (including disease progression), death, withdrawal of treatment due to adverse events or laboratory abnormality, or withdrawal of informed consent. Tumor assessment was performed using mRECIST. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) According to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)
Time to treatment failure was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of insufficient therapeutic response (including disease progression), death, withdrawal of treatment due to adverse events or laboratory abnormality, or withdrawal of informed consent. Tumor assessment was performed using mRECIST. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants without an event were censored at the date of last tumor assessment or last treatment administration, whichever occurred last. Participants who were randomized but not exposed to study drug and had no further follow-up were censored on the day of randomization.
Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to mRECIST
Objective response referred to participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). CR: disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. PR: greater than or equal to (>=) 30% decrease in sum of the longest diameter (LD) of all target lesions taking as reference the screening sum LD. To be assigned a status of PR or CR, changes in tumor measurements had to be confirmed by repeat assessments that should have been performed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Longer intervals as determined by the study protocol were also appropriate.
Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)
Best response recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression. Based on assessment of CR, PR, stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD), according to mRECIST. CR: disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. PR: >=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of the LD of all target lesions. CR and PR persist on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. Reference is the smallest sum LD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)
Change From Baseline in Karnofsky Performance Status
Karnofsky performance score is used to quantify participant's general well-being and activities of daily life and participants were classified based on their functional impairment. Karnofsky performance score is 11 level score which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (no evidence of disease). Higher score means higher ability to perform daily tasks.
Measured: Baseline, Week 7, 15, 23, 31, 43
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Aug 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2004
- Primary completionSep 2008
- Study completionSep 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Renal Cell CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 649 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00738530
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BO17705
- Other IDs
- 2004-000282-35, 2004
- Status last verified
- May 2016
- First submitted
- 19 Aug 2008
- Last updated
- 23 Jun 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Aldin A, Besiroglu B, Adams A, Monsef I, Piechotta V, Tomlinson E, Hornbach C, Dressen N, Goldkuhle M, Maisch P, Dahm P, Heidenreich A, Skoetz N. First-line therapy for adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 4;5(5):CD013798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013798.pub2.
PubMed 37146227
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jun 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Avastin Plus Roferon Compared With Placebo Plus Roferon on Overall Survival and Tumor Assessment in Nephrectomised Patients With Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00738530
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BO17705
- Conditions
- Renal Cell Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 649 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2004
- Primary completion
- Sep 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Aug 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Jun 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This 2-arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Avastin versus placebo in combination with Roferon as first-line treatment in participants with metastatic renal cell cancer (clear cell type) who have had nephrectomy. The anticipated time of study treatment is 1-2 years, and the target sample size is greater than (>)500 individuals.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab + IFN-Alfa-2A | Experimental | Drug: Bevacizumab [Avastin], Drug: Interferon alfa 2a [Roferon]Bevacizumab infusions will be administered every 2 weeks at a dose of 10 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) for 52 weeks or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Interferon alfa-2a (IFN-Alfa-2A) will be administered 3 times per week as a subcutaneous injection at a dose of 9 million international units (MIU) for 52 weeks or until disease progression or major toxicity. |
| Placebo + IFN-Alfa-2A | Placebo comparator | Drug: Interferon alfa 2a [Roferon], Drug: PlaceboPlacebo matched with Bevacizumab infusions will be administered every 2 weeks for 52 weeks or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. IFN-Alfa-2A will be administered 3 times per week as a subcutaneous injection at a dose of 9 MIU for 52 weeks or until disease progression or major toxicity. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- metastatic renal cell cancer (clear cell type);
- nephrectomy;
- absence of proteinuria.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- prior systemic treatment for metastatic renal cell cancer;
- major surgical procedure, open biopsy or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to study treatment start;
- presence of brain metastases or spinal cord compression;
- ongoing need for full dose anticoagulants;
- uncontrolled hypertension;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab [Avastin]10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks | Drug | Bevacizumab + IFN-Alfa-2A |
| Interferon alfa 2a [Roferon]9 MIU SC 3 times/week | Drug | Bevacizumab + IFN-Alfa-2A, Placebo + IFN-Alfa-2A |
| PlaceboIV every 2 weeks | Drug | Placebo + IFN-Alfa-2A |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Died
Time frame: Baseline up to 4.25 years
Overall Survival (OS) Duration
Time frame: Baseline until death (up to 4.25 years)
Duration of survival was defined as the time between the date of randomization and date of death due to any cause. Participants still alive at the time of analysis were censored at the date they were last known to be alive. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for analysis.
8 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)
Progression Free Survival (PFS) According to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)
Time to Progression (TTP) According to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) According to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to mRECIST
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)
Change From Baseline in Karnofsky Performance Status
Time frame: Baseline, Week 7, 15, 23, 31, 43
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jun 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37146227Aldin A, Besiroglu B, Adams A, Monsef I, Piechotta V, Tomlinson E, Hornbach C, Dressen N, Goldkuhle M, Maisch P, Dahm P, Heidenreich A, Skoetz N. First-line therapy for adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 4;5(5):CD013798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013798.pub2.
Related trials for Renal Cell Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) in Combination With Lenvatinib Versus Cabozantinib for Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-011)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Toripalimab and Lenvatinib With or Without SBRT Before Surgery for Non-Clear Cell Kidney Cancer
Nonmetastatic Locally Advanced Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Revumenib in Participants With Advanced Cancer and Hepatic or Renal Impairment
Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Hematologic Malignancies, Acute Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
104 sites in 18 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Bevacizumab [Avastin] and Interferon alfa 2a [Roferon] in people with Renal Cell Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 104 sites in 18 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 104 sites in France, Spain, Australia, Italy, Russia and 13 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Jun 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Died (time frame: Baseline up to 4.25 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00738530, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2016.