AzTrials
AzTrials

Kidney DiseaseJJVsPCN08NCT00739284

A Prospective Comparison Between Ureteral Stent and Nephrostomy Tube for an Urgent Drainage of Obstructed Kidney

A study testing nephrostomy tube and ureteral stent in people with Kidney Disease, run by Rabin Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Kidney obstruction might be caused by a stone in the urinary tract. In case of accompanying fever or renal failure, an urgent drainage might be needed. This can be done either by placing an ureteral stent or a nephrotomy tube. Only limited number of studies examined the question which of the two is preferred. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Kidney Disease
What is being tested?
nephrostomy tube and ureteral stent
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteIsrael
Study dates
Aug 2008to Aug 2008
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

None listed.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with medical condition that prevent the use of one of the procedures

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Shay Golan, MD contact

972-3-9376560

shayg@clalit.org.il

Israel1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Rabin medical center

    Petah Tikva

    Shay Golan, MD, 972-3-9376560, shayg@clalit.org.il

    Shay Golan, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Israel

About this study

Kidney obstruction might be caused by a stone in the urinary tract. In case of accompanying fever or renal failure, an urgent drainage might be needed. This can be done either by placing an ureteral stent or a nephrotomy tube. Only limited number of studies examined the question which of the two is preferred. A debate exist regarding the effectiveness of each procedure to improve symptoms, renal function and treating an infection. Our goal is to resolve this debate and to state whether one way is preferred on the other.

Conditions
Kidney Disease
Being tested
nephrostomy tube and ureteral stent
Keywords
preferred, procedure, drainage, obstructed, kidney, stone
Medical subject headings
Kidney Diseases, Calculi

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • nephrostomy tube and ureteral stentDevice

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. quality of life

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Aug 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2008
  3. Primary completionAug 2008 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00739284
Sponsor's protocol ID
JJVsPCN08
Acronym
JJVsPCN08
Status last verified
Aug 2008
First submitted
20 Aug 2008
Last updated
21 Aug 2008
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing nephrostomy tube and ureteral stent in people with Kidney Disease, run by Rabin Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Shay Golan, MD (972-3-9376560, shayg@clalit.org.il), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

quality of life. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2008.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in