Adhesive CapsulitisNCT00742846
Effects of Intra-articular Versus Subacromial Steroid Injections on Clinical Outcomes in Adhesive Capsulitis
A study testing Lidocaine + Kenalog and Lidocaine in people with Adhesive Capsulitis, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective is to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with a clinical diagnosis of Adhesive Capsulitis who receive intra-articular versus subacromial steroid injections. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Adhesive Capsulitis
- What is being tested?
- Lidocaine + Kenalog and Lidocaine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2008to Dec 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Meet clinical diagnosis of primary Adhesive Capsulitis
- Restriction in abduction to less than 130 degrees
- 50% reduction in external rotation as compared with the contralateral side
- An intact rotator cuff
- Between 18-75 years of age
Who cannot join
- Previous shoulder capsular surgery
- History of steroid injection(s) into affected shoulder
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Iodinated contrast dye allergy
- Allergy to lidocaine
- Other suspected shoulder pathology (i.e., tumor, rotator cuff rupture. infection, arthritis)
Show all 10Show fewer
- Known bleeding diathesis
- Cervical spine pathology
- History of trauma to the shoulder
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Penn State College of Medicine, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
About this study
The primary objective is to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with a clinical diagnosis of Adhesive Capsulitis who receive intra-articular versus subacromial steroid injections.
The secondary objective is to verify that steroid injections in combination with physical therapy lead to more favorable outcomes than local anesthetic injections in combination with physical therapy.
Read the detailed description
Current treatment for Adhesive Capsulitis involves physical therapy. Steroid injections have not been shown to be as effective alone without the physical therapy. However, there are multiple studies that document the benefit of adding a steroid injection to the physical therapy. After a review of the literature, there are studies that compare different dosages of intra-articular steroid injections,value and site of the injections, and accuracy of clinical injections. There are currently no studies that compare the results after intra-articular versus subacromial injections in combination with physical therapy. This study would help us determine if location of the injection is a major factor in regaining motion. If it is significantly important to be intra-articular with the steroid, than it may be important to send patients for fluoroscopic guided injections routinely rather than risk the chance of not being within the joint.
- Conditions
- Adhesive Capsulitis
- Being tested
- Lidocaine + Kenalog, Lidocaine
- Keywords
- Adhesive Capsulitis, Subacromial injection, Intraarticular injection
- Medical subject headings
- Bursitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lidocaine + KenalogDrug
Also called Kenalog, Lidocaine
5ml 1% Lidocaine + 1ml 40mg Kenalog®-10 into the shoulder joint
Intra-articular injection with local anesthetic and steroid
Lidocaine + KenalogDrug
Also called Lidocaine, Kenalog
5ml 1% Lidocaine + 1ml 40mg Kenalog-10 into the subacromial space
Local anesthetic and steroid in to the subacromial space
LidocaineDrug
5ml 1% Lidocaine alone into the shoulder joint.
intra-articular local anesthetic injection
LidocaineDrug
5ml 1% Lidocaine alone into the subacromial space.
subacromial local anesthetic injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Active comparator | The patient receives intra-articular steroid and local anesthetic injection under fluoroscopy. Receives: Drug: Lidocaine + Kenalog |
| Group 2 | Active comparator | The patient receives subacromial steroid and local anesthetic injection under fluoroscopy. Receives: Drug: Lidocaine + Kenalog |
| Group 3 | Active comparator | The patient receives intra-articular local anesthetic injection under fluoroscopy. Receives: Drug: Lidocaine |
| Group 4 | Active comparator | The patient receives subacromial local anesthetic injection under fluoroscopy. Receives: Drug: Lidocaine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary goal of this study is to document the return of shoulder motion and resolution of adhesive capsulitis after intra-articular versus subacromial steroid injections versus anesthetic injections in combination with physical therapy.
Measured: 6-8 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Aug 2008 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2008
- Primary completionDec 2010
- Study completionDec 2010
Why it stopped: No enrollment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Adhesive CapsulitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, April Armstrong, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
- Investigators
- April Armstrong, MD, Principal investigator, Penn State College of Medicine, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00742846
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB #26378
- Status last verified
- Feb 2015
- First submitted
- 26 Aug 2008
- Last updated
- 27 Feb 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Alvado A, Pelissier J, Benaim C, Petiot S, Herisson C. [Physical therapy of frozen shoulder: literature review]. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2001 Mar;44(2):59-71. doi: 10.1016/s0168-6054(00)00062-3. French.
PubMed 11587654Andrieu V, Dromer C, Fourcade D, Zabraniecki L, Ginesty E, Marc V, Railhac JJ, Fournie B. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: therapeutic contribution of subacromial bursography. Rev Rhum Engl Ed. 1998 Dec;65(12):771-7.
PubMed 9923046Arslan S, Celiker R. Comparison of the efficacy of local corticosteroid injection and physical therapy for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis. Rheumatol Int. 2001 Sep;21(1):20-3. doi: 10.1007/s002960100127.
PubMed 11678298Bert J. Shoulder injections for subacromial bursitis. Minn Med. 1996 Sep;79(9):6. No abstract available.
PubMed 8854664Carette S, Moffet H, Tardif J, Bessette L, Morin F, Fremont P, Bykerk V, Thorne C, Bell M, Bensen W, Blanchette C. Intraarticular corticosteroids, supervised physiotherapy, or a combination of the two in the treatment of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Mar;48(3):829-38. doi: 10.1002/art.10954.
PubMed 12632439Chen MJ, Lew HL, Hsu TC, Tsai WC, Lin WC, Tang SF, Lee YC, Hsu RC, Chen CP. Ultrasound-guided shoulder injections in the treatment of subacromial bursitis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jan;85(1):31-5. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000184158.85689.5e.
PubMed 16357546Dacre JE, Beeney N, Scott DL. Injections and physiotherapy for the painful stiff shoulder. Ann Rheum Dis. 1989 Apr;48(4):322-5. doi: 10.1136/ard.48.4.322.
PubMed 2712613Dias R, Cutts S, Massoud S. Frozen shoulder. BMJ. 2005 Dec 17;331(7530):1453-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7530.1453.
PubMed 16356983Fouquet B, Griffoul I, Borie MJ, Roger R, Bonnin B, Metivier JC, Pellieux S. [Adhesive capsulitis: evaluation of a treatment coupling capsular distension and intensive rehabilitation]. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2006 Mar;49(2):68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2005.09.001. Epub 2005 Sep 27. French.
PubMed 16229920de Jong BA, Dahmen R, Hogeweg JA, Marti RK. Intra-articular triamcinolone acetonide injection in patients with capsulitis of the shoulder: a comparative study of two dose regimens. Clin Rehabil. 1998 Jun;12(3):211-5. doi: 10.1191/026921598673772420.
PubMed 9688036Hollingworth GR, Ellis RM, Hattersley TS. Comparison of injection techniques for shoulder pain: results of a double blind, randomised study. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Nov 5;287(6402):1339-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6402.1339.
PubMed 6416401Kivimaki J, Pohjolainen T. Manipulation under anesthesia for frozen shoulder with and without steroid injection. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Sep;82(9):1188-90. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.24169.
PubMed 11552189Loyd JA, Loyd HM. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: arthrographic diagnosis and treatment. South Med J. 1983 Jul;76(7):879-83. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198307000-00016.
PubMed 6867799Parlier-Cuau C, Champsaur P, Nizard R, Wybier M, Bacque MC, Laredo JD. Percutaneous treatments of painful shoulder. Radiol Clin North Am. 1998 May;36(3):589-96. doi: 10.1016/s0033-8389(05)70047-6.
PubMed 9597076Richardson AT. Ernest Fletcher Lecture. The painful shoulder. Proc R Soc Med. 1975 Nov;68(11):731-6. doi: 10.1177/003591577506801137. No abstract available.
PubMed 53845
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Feb 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Intra-articular Versus Subacromial Steroid Injections on Clinical Outcomes in Adhesive Capsulitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00742846
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB #26378
- Conditions
- Adhesive Capsulitis
- Keywords
- Adhesive Capsulitis, Subacromial injection, Intraarticular injection
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: No enrollment
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2008
- Primary completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Aug 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective is to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with a clinical diagnosis of Adhesive Capsulitis who receive intra-articular versus subacromial steroid injections.
The secondary objective is to verify that steroid injections in combination with physical therapy lead to more favorable outcomes than local anesthetic injections in combination with physical therapy.
Detailed description
Current treatment for Adhesive Capsulitis involves physical therapy. Steroid injections have not been shown to be as effective alone without the physical therapy. However, there are multiple studies that document the benefit of adding a steroid injection to the physical therapy. After a review of the literature, there are studies that compare different dosages of intra-articular steroid injections,value and site of the injections, and accuracy of clinical injections. There are currently no studies that compare the results after intra-articular versus subacromial injections in combination with physical therapy. This study would help us determine if location of the injection is a major factor in regaining motion. If it is significantly important to be intra-articular with the steroid, than it may be important to send patients for fluoroscopic guided injections routinely rather than risk the chance of not being within the joint.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Active comparator | Drug: Lidocaine + KenalogThe patient receives intra-articular steroid and local anesthetic injection under fluoroscopy. |
| Group 2 | Active comparator | Drug: Lidocaine + KenalogThe patient receives subacromial steroid and local anesthetic injection under fluoroscopy. |
| Group 3 | Active comparator | Drug: LidocaineThe patient receives intra-articular local anesthetic injection under fluoroscopy. |
| Group 4 | Active comparator | Drug: LidocaineThe patient receives subacromial local anesthetic injection under fluoroscopy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Meet clinical diagnosis of primary Adhesive Capsulitis
- Restriction in abduction to less than 130 degrees
- 50% reduction in external rotation as compared with the contralateral side
- An intact rotator cuff
- Between 18-75 years of age
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Previous shoulder capsular surgery
- History of steroid injection(s) into affected shoulder
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Iodinated contrast dye allergy
- Allergy to lidocaine
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lidocaine + KenalogAlso: Kenalog, Lidocaine5ml 1% Lidocaine + 1ml 40mg Kenalog®-10 into the shoulder joint Intra-articular injection with local anesthetic and steroid | Drug | Group 1 |
| Lidocaine + KenalogAlso: Lidocaine, Kenalog5ml 1% Lidocaine + 1ml 40mg Kenalog-10 into the subacromial space Local anesthetic and steroid in to the subacromial space | Drug | Group 2 |
| Lidocaine5ml 1% Lidocaine alone into the shoulder joint. intra-articular local anesthetic injection | Drug | Group 3 |
| Lidocaine5ml 1% Lidocaine alone into the subacromial space. subacromial local anesthetic injection | Drug | Group 4 |
Primary outcome
The primary goal of this study is to document the return of shoulder motion and resolution of adhesive capsulitis after intra-articular versus subacromial steroid injections versus anesthetic injections in combination with physical therapy.
Time frame: 6-8 months
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Feb 2015.
- Background: PubMed 11587654Alvado A, Pelissier J, Benaim C, Petiot S, Herisson C. [Physical therapy of frozen shoulder: literature review]. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2001 Mar;44(2):59-71. doi: 10.1016/s0168-6054(00)00062-3. French.
- Background: PubMed 9923046Andrieu V, Dromer C, Fourcade D, Zabraniecki L, Ginesty E, Marc V, Railhac JJ, Fournie B. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: therapeutic contribution of subacromial bursography. Rev Rhum Engl Ed. 1998 Dec;65(12):771-7.
- Background: PubMed 11678298Arslan S, Celiker R. Comparison of the efficacy of local corticosteroid injection and physical therapy for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis. Rheumatol Int. 2001 Sep;21(1):20-3. doi: 10.1007/s002960100127.
- Background: PubMed 8854664Bert J. Shoulder injections for subacromial bursitis. Minn Med. 1996 Sep;79(9):6. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 12632439Carette S, Moffet H, Tardif J, Bessette L, Morin F, Fremont P, Bykerk V, Thorne C, Bell M, Bensen W, Blanchette C. Intraarticular corticosteroids, supervised physiotherapy, or a combination of the two in the treatment of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Mar;48(3):829-38. doi: 10.1002/art.10954.
- Background: PubMed 16357546Chen MJ, Lew HL, Hsu TC, Tsai WC, Lin WC, Tang SF, Lee YC, Hsu RC, Chen CP. Ultrasound-guided shoulder injections in the treatment of subacromial bursitis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jan;85(1):31-5. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000184158.85689.5e.
- Background: PubMed 2712613Dacre JE, Beeney N, Scott DL. Injections and physiotherapy for the painful stiff shoulder. Ann Rheum Dis. 1989 Apr;48(4):322-5. doi: 10.1136/ard.48.4.322.
- Background: PubMed 16356983Dias R, Cutts S, Massoud S. Frozen shoulder. BMJ. 2005 Dec 17;331(7530):1453-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7530.1453.
- Background: PubMed 16229920Fouquet B, Griffoul I, Borie MJ, Roger R, Bonnin B, Metivier JC, Pellieux S. [Adhesive capsulitis: evaluation of a treatment coupling capsular distension and intensive rehabilitation]. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2006 Mar;49(2):68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2005.09.001. Epub 2005 Sep 27. French.
- Background: PubMed 9688036de Jong BA, Dahmen R, Hogeweg JA, Marti RK. Intra-articular triamcinolone acetonide injection in patients with capsulitis of the shoulder: a comparative study of two dose regimens. Clin Rehabil. 1998 Jun;12(3):211-5. doi: 10.1191/026921598673772420.
- Background: PubMed 6416401Hollingworth GR, Ellis RM, Hattersley TS. Comparison of injection techniques for shoulder pain: results of a double blind, randomised study. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Nov 5;287(6402):1339-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6402.1339.
- Background: PubMed 11552189Kivimaki J, Pohjolainen T. Manipulation under anesthesia for frozen shoulder with and without steroid injection. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Sep;82(9):1188-90. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.24169.
Related trials for Adhesive Capsulitis
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Clinic Versus mHealth Application-Based Shoulder Rehabilitation in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis
Adhesive Capsulitis
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Hormone Replacement Therapy on Physiotherapy Outcomes in Postmenopausal Women With Frozen Shoulder
Frozen Shoulder, Adhesive Capsulitis
Active, not recruiting
Spencer vs. Ola Grimsby Techniques With Scapular Motor Training in Idiopathic Adhesive Capsulitis
Idiopathic Adhesive Capsulitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
OMT for Adhesive Capsulitis
Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder, Frozen Shoulder
Recruiting
Maitland Mobilization With and Without Stroking Release Technique of Rotator Cuff Muscle in Frozen Shoulder
Adhesive Capsulitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
April Armstrong, MD principal investigator
Penn State College of Medicine, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Lidocaine + Kenalog and Lidocaine in people with Adhesive Capsulitis, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary goal of this study is to document the return of shoulder motion and resolution of adhesive capsulitis after intra-articular versus subacromial steroid injections versus anesthetic injections in combination with physical therapy. (time frame: 6-8 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00742846, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2015; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.