CancerPhase 4NCT00747916
Safety, Efficacy, and Side Effects Study of Interventional Cryotherapy in the Pleural Space("ICE PLS")
A Phase 4 study testing CryoSpray Ablation (TM) System in people with Cancer and Pleural Neoplasms, run by CSA Medical, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and side effects of the CryoSpray Ablation(TM) System (CSA(TM) System) to treat neoplastic lesions on the parietal pleural surface. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer, Pleural Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- CryoSpray Ablation (TM) System
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 3 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2008to Aug 2009
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years of age
- Deemed a candidate for cryotherapy based on physician physical or medical history review
- Deemed operable based on institutional criteria
- Able to sign informed consent
- Documented lung or other visceral cancer with pleural involvement.
- WBC > 4,000/mm3, platelets >100,000mm3
Show all 9Show fewer
- Physically well enough to undergo moderate sedation and pleuroscopy
- Female patients must be HCG negative
- There should be direct evidence of disease progression despite treatment in previously treated patients
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or nursing
- Planning to sire a child while enrolled in the study
- Known history of unresolved drug or alcohol dependency that would limit ability to comprehend or follow instructions related to informed consent, post-treatment instructions, or follow-up guidelines.
- Refusal or inability to give consent.
- Concurrent chemotherapy.
- Medical contraindication or potential problem that would preclude study participation
Show all 13Show fewer
- Concurrent participation in other experimental studies
- Uncontrolled coagulopathy or bleeding diathesis
- Serious medical illness, including:
- Uncontrolled congestive heart failure
- Uncontrolled angina
- Myocardial infarction
- Cerebrovascular accident within 6 months prior to study entry
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Texas Health Center at Tyler - Titus Regional Hospital
Tyler, Texas, 75702
About this study
Official title: A Pilot Study of the Safety, Efficacy, and Side Effects of Interventional Cryotherapy for the Eradication of Disease in the Pleural Space ("ICE PLS")
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and side effects of the CryoSpray Ablation(TM) System (CSA(TM) System) to treat neoplastic lesions on the parietal pleural surface.
Read the detailed description
The proposed study is a pilot study consisting of an estimated 10 subjects with biopsy-proven metastatic cancer in the parietal pleural surface treated with CryoSpray at dye marked metastatic foci.
Initial treatment dosimetry will be up to 3 cycles of 10-40 second sprays. If necessary, dosimetry changes may occur after 3 subjects are treated and observed. It is unknown if dosimetry will need to be increased to enhance effectiveness. The PI may increase dosimetry by 1 cycle after each subject is treated and observed as a conservative approach to efficacy determination. If disease exists bilaterally, only one side will be sprayed.
- Conditions
- Cancer, Pleural Neoplasms
- Being tested
- CryoSpray Ablation (TM) System
- Keywords
- Parietal pleura, Neoplasms, Pleural Surface, Pleural Neoplasms, Lung Cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Pleural Neoplasms, Lung Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CryoSpray Ablation (TM) SystemDevice
Also called CSA (TM) System, CryoSpray Therapy, CSA, Cryotherapy
Subjects will be treated with spray cryotherapy using the CryoSpray Ablation (TM) System at Day 0 using up to 3 cycles of 10-40 second sprays as the studied dosimetry and will cover the affected area, including the tumor and the parietal pleural surface. If disease exists bilaterally, only one side will be sprayed. Subjects will be assessed 2-5 days from the initial treatment (Day 0) to check for mucosal sloughing, to reassess tumor burden and for additional CSA therapy as needed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CryoSpray Ablation (TM) System | Experimental | subjects will receive cryotherapy using the CryoSpray Ablation (TM) System DOSE: up to 3 cycles of 10-40 second sprays Receives: Device: CryoSpray Ablation (TM) System |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To Reduce Tumor Burden in the Pleural Space, as Determined by Visual Inspection and Biopsy of the Treatment Sites 2-5 Days Post Treatment. Safety Endpoint Clinical and Radiographic Status at 30 Days Post CryoSpray Treatment and Adverse Events.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (1)
To Determine if CryoSpray Causes a Pleurodesis Effect. To Determine if CryoSpray Affects Production of Malignant Effusion Within the Treated Pleural Cavity. To Determine if Pleural Cavity Treatment With CryoSpray is Dosimetry Dependent.
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Sep 2008 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2008
- Primary completionAug 2009
- Study completionAug 2009
Why it stopped: Business Reasons
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (18)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 3 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- CSA Medical, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Gordon Downie, M.D., Ph.D, Principal investigator, University of Texas Health Center at Tyler
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00747916
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 17-00027
- Status last verified
- Jun 2015
- First submitted
- 4 Sep 2008
- Last updated
- 16 Jul 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Johnston MH, Eastone JA, Horwhat JD, Cartledge J, Mathews JS, Foggy JR. Cryoablation of Barrett's esophagus: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Dec;62(6):842-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.05.008.
PubMed 16301023Johnston CM, Schoenfeld LP, Mysore JV, Dubois A. Endoscopic spray cryotherapy: a new technique for mucosal ablation in the esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Jul;50(1):86-92. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70352-4.
PubMed 10385730Ell C, May A, Gossner L, Pech O, Gunter E, Mayer G, Henrich R, Vieth M, Muller H, Seitz G, Stolte M. Endoscopic mucosal resection of early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2000 Apr;118(4):670-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(00)70136-3.
PubMed 10734018Champion G, Richter JE, Vaezi MF, Singh S, Alexander R. Duodenogastroesophageal reflux: relationship to pH and importance in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology. 1994 Sep;107(3):747-54. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90123-6.
PubMed 8076761Eisen GM, Sandler RS, Murray S, Gottfried M. The relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications with Barrett's esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Jan;92(1):27-31.
PubMed 8995932Johnston MH. Cryotherapy and other newer techniques. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2003 Jul;13(3):491-504. doi: 10.1016/s1052-5157(03)00044-8.
PubMed 14629105Cash BD, Johnston LR, Johnston MH. Cryospray ablation (CSA) in the palliative treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. World J Surg Oncol. 2007 Mar 16;5:34. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-5-34.
PubMed 17367523Field JK, Youngson JH. The Liverpool Lung Project: a molecular epidemiological study of early lung cancer detection. Eur Respir J. 2002 Aug;20(2):464-79. doi: 10.1183/09031936.02.00290202.
PubMed 12212983Pinsonneault C, Fortier J, Donati F. Tracheal resection and reconstruction. Can J Anaesth. 1999 May;46(5 Pt 1):439-55. doi: 10.1007/BF03012943.
PubMed 10349923Dumot JA. Cryotherapy Ablation for Esophageal HGD or IMCA in High Risk, Non-Surgical Patients. DDW2007 Abstract submission. Cleveland Clinic Foundation (pending publication)
Greenwald BD. CryoSpray Ablation of Early Esophageal Cancer. DDW 2007 Abstract submission. University of Maryland Medical Center. (pending publication)
Johnston M, Horwhat J, Dubois A, Schoenfeld P. Endoscopic cryotherapy in the swine esophagus: A follow-up study (Abstract). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 49:AB126, 1999.
Johnston MH, Horwhat JD, Haluska, Moses FM. Depth of injury following endoscopic spray cryotherapy: EUS assisted evaluation of mucosal ablation and subsequent healing in the swine model (Abstract). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 51: AB98, 3462, 2000.
Johnston MH. Endoscopic cryotherapy: A new ice age in gastroenterology? Medscape Gastroenterology 2: 187, 2000.
Eastone JA, Horwhat D, Haluska O, Mathews J, Johnston M. Cryoablation of swine esophageal mucosa: A direct comparison to argon plasma coagulation (APC) and multipolar electrocoagulation (MPEC) [Abstract] Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 53: A3448, 2001.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jul 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Pilot Study of the Safety, Efficacy, and Side Effects of Interventional Cryotherapy for the Eradication of Disease in the Pleural Space ("ICE PLS")
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00747916
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 17-00027
- Conditions
- Cancer, Pleural Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Parietal pleura, Neoplasms, Pleural Surface, Pleural Neoplasms, Lung Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Business Reasons
- Enrolment
- 3 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CSA Medical, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Aug 2008
- Primary completion
- Aug 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Sep 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 Jun 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and side effects of the CryoSpray Ablation(TM) System (CSA(TM) System) to treat neoplastic lesions on the parietal pleural surface.
Detailed description
The proposed study is a pilot study consisting of an estimated 10 subjects with biopsy-proven metastatic cancer in the parietal pleural surface treated with CryoSpray at dye marked metastatic foci.
Initial treatment dosimetry will be up to 3 cycles of 10-40 second sprays. If necessary, dosimetry changes may occur after 3 subjects are treated and observed. It is unknown if dosimetry will need to be increased to enhance effectiveness. The PI may increase dosimetry by 1 cycle after each subject is treated and observed as a conservative approach to efficacy determination. If disease exists bilaterally, only one side will be sprayed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CryoSpray Ablation (TM) System | Experimental | Device: CryoSpray Ablation (TM) Systemsubjects will receive cryotherapy using the CryoSpray Ablation (TM) System DOSE: up to 3 cycles of 10-40 second sprays |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- 18 years of age
- Deemed a candidate for cryotherapy based on physician physical or medical history review
- Deemed operable based on institutional criteria
- Able to sign informed consent
- Documented lung or other visceral cancer with pleural involvement.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Pregnant or nursing
- Planning to sire a child while enrolled in the study
- Known history of unresolved drug or alcohol dependency that would limit ability to comprehend or follow instructions related to informed consent, post-treatment instructions, or follow-up guidelines.
- Refusal or inability to give consent.
- Concurrent chemotherapy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CryoSpray Ablation (TM) SystemAlso: CSA (TM) System, CryoSpray Therapy, CSA, CryotherapySubjects will be treated with spray cryotherapy using the CryoSpray Ablation (TM) System at Day 0 using up to 3 cycles of 10-40 second sprays as the studied dosimetry and will cover the affected area, including the tumor and the parietal pleural surface. If disease exists bilaterally, only one side will be sprayed. Subjects will be assessed 2-5 days from the initial treatment (Day 0) to check for mucosal sloughing, to reassess tumor burden and for additional CSA therapy as needed. | Device | CryoSpray Ablation (TM) System |
Primary outcome
To Reduce Tumor Burden in the Pleural Space, as Determined by Visual Inspection and Biopsy of the Treatment Sites 2-5 Days Post Treatment. Safety Endpoint Clinical and Radiographic Status at 30 Days Post CryoSpray Treatment and Adverse Events.
Time frame: 1 year
1 secondary outcome
To Determine if CryoSpray Causes a Pleurodesis Effect. To Determine if CryoSpray Affects Production of Malignant Effusion Within the Treated Pleural Cavity. To Determine if Pleural Cavity Treatment With CryoSpray is Dosimetry Dependent.
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jul 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 16301023Johnston MH, Eastone JA, Horwhat JD, Cartledge J, Mathews JS, Foggy JR. Cryoablation of Barrett's esophagus: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Dec;62(6):842-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.05.008.
- Background: PubMed 10385730Johnston CM, Schoenfeld LP, Mysore JV, Dubois A. Endoscopic spray cryotherapy: a new technique for mucosal ablation in the esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Jul;50(1):86-92. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70352-4.
- Background: PubMed 10734018Ell C, May A, Gossner L, Pech O, Gunter E, Mayer G, Henrich R, Vieth M, Muller H, Seitz G, Stolte M. Endoscopic mucosal resection of early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2000 Apr;118(4):670-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(00)70136-3.
- Background: PubMed 8076761Champion G, Richter JE, Vaezi MF, Singh S, Alexander R. Duodenogastroesophageal reflux: relationship to pH and importance in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology. 1994 Sep;107(3):747-54. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90123-6.
- Background: PubMed 8995932Eisen GM, Sandler RS, Murray S, Gottfried M. The relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications with Barrett's esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Jan;92(1):27-31.
- Background: PubMed 14629105Johnston MH. Cryotherapy and other newer techniques. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2003 Jul;13(3):491-504. doi: 10.1016/s1052-5157(03)00044-8.
- Background: PubMed 17367523Cash BD, Johnston LR, Johnston MH. Cryospray ablation (CSA) in the palliative treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. World J Surg Oncol. 2007 Mar 16;5:34. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-5-34.
- Background: PubMed 12212983Field JK, Youngson JH. The Liverpool Lung Project: a molecular epidemiological study of early lung cancer detection. Eur Respir J. 2002 Aug;20(2):464-79. doi: 10.1183/09031936.02.00290202.
- Background: PubMed 10349923Pinsonneault C, Fortier J, Donati F. Tracheal resection and reconstruction. Can J Anaesth. 1999 May;46(5 Pt 1):439-55. doi: 10.1007/BF03012943.
- BackgroundDumot JA. Cryotherapy Ablation for Esophageal HGD or IMCA in High Risk, Non-Surgical Patients. DDW2007 Abstract submission. Cleveland Clinic Foundation (pending publication)
- BackgroundGreenwald BD. CryoSpray Ablation of Early Esophageal Cancer. DDW 2007 Abstract submission. University of Maryland Medical Center. (pending publication)
- BackgroundJohnston M, Horwhat J, Dubois A, Schoenfeld P. Endoscopic cryotherapy in the swine esophagus: A follow-up study (Abstract). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 49:AB126, 1999.
Related trials for Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gordon Downie, M.D., Ph.D principal investigator
University of Texas Health Center at Tyler
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing CryoSpray Ablation (TM) System in people with Cancer and Pleural Neoplasms, run by CSA Medical, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Jun 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To Reduce Tumor Burden in the Pleural Space, as Determined by Visual Inspection and Biopsy of the Treatment Sites 2-5 Days Post Treatment. Safety Endpoint Clinical and Radiographic Status at 30 Days Post CryoSpray Treatment and Adverse Events. (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00747916, which also lists 18 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2015.