AzTrials
AzTrials

Cancer of the Urinary TractNCT00751140

Merits of Performing a Modified Template Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection

A study testing Lymph Node Dissection in people with Cancer of the Urinary Tract, run by H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective is to show that performing a lymph node dissection may detect occult nodal metastasis in this patient population whereby providing important diagnostic information, with potential therapeutic benefits in patients with isolated nodal metastases. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Cancer of the Urinary Tract
What is being tested?
Lymph Node Dissection
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Sep 2008to Apr 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with suspected transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract which are deemed surgical candidates
  • Negative visible retroperitoneal or peri-hilar lymphadenopathy on pre-operative radiographic studies. Defined as the absence of suspicious abdominal, retroperitoneal, or pelvic lymphadenopathy (defined as > 1 centimeter [cm]) on pre-operative radiographic imaging (Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography [CT] or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] if CT contraindicated). Imaging studies can be done at Moffitt or at a local facility of the patient's choice. All imaging studies are going to be reviewed at Moffitt.
  • Note: Nodal involvement will depend on the size of the lymph node enlargement; usually nodes of more than 2 cm are associated with malignancy. With a threshold of 1cm, false negative rates for microscopic metastases are low (4%) and false positive rates are between 3 to 43% according to the literature. Because the aim of the study will be to perform a lymph node dissection in patients with non-metastatic disease based on pre-operative evaluation, 1 cm will be the threshold used. Nodes of more than 1 cm will be considered positive and those patients will be excluded as is mentioned in the protocol. Biopsy will not be included as part of the protocol as those potential patients with nodes of more than 1 cm will be excluded.
  • No other suspected sites of metastasis on pre-operative radiographic imaging

Who cannot join

  • Patients with visible lymph node metastasis on pre-operative radiographic studies. Defined as >1cm abdominal, retroperitoneal or pelvic lymphadenopathy
  • Patients with suspected sites of distant metastasis on pre-operative imaging. (Patients with suspected bony metastases will require a bone scan.)
  • Patients with suspected transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract with significant comorbidities making them non-surgical candidates
  • Patients with non-transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract will be excluded from this study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute

    Tampa, Florida, 33612

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Merits of Performing a Modified Template Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection at Time of Nephroureterectomy for Urothelial Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract

The primary objective is to show that performing a lymph node dissection may detect occult nodal metastasis in this patient population whereby providing important diagnostic information, with potential therapeutic benefits in patients with isolated nodal metastases.

In case of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (a cancer originating from the inner lining of the urinary tract) requiring the removal of the kidney, ureter, and cuff of bladder (a surgical termed a nephroureterectomy). Previous studies in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, have shown that doing a lymph node dissection (surgically removing the lymph nodes) may improve survival, or at least give an idea of what patients may need chemotherapy (drugs to control the cancer cells that are outside the kidney-ureter) earlier (before the nodes are enlarged in the imaging studies).

Read the detailed description

Participants will have a nephroureterectomy (taking the kidney and the ureter). Investigators will also be doing a lymph node dissection (taking the patient's lymph nodes in the same side of the kidney) to look for malignancy outside of the kidney and ureter. The lymph nodes will be sent to pathology for review.

Study visits will be scheduled 10 to 14 days after surgery for removal of stitches and analysis of the patient's pathology report.

The following procedures will be done:

  • History and physical examination, urinary cytology (test to look for malignant cells in the urine) and surveillance cystoscopy (procedure to look inside the urethra and bladder which is performed in the office under local anesthesia) every 3 months for the first 2 years after treatment, every 6 months for the next 2 years and yearly thereafter if the patient is free from recurrence.
  • Radiographic studies including chest x-ray and abdomino-pelvic computed tomography (CAT scans) will be performed every 6 months for the first 2 years and then yearly thereafter.
  • Bone scan (special imaging study to look for cancer spread in bone) in case of bone pain or elevated alkaline phosphatase level.

After surgery patients will be followed every 3 months for the first 2 years after treatment, every 6 months for the next 2 years and yearly thereafter if they are free from recurrence.

Being tested
Lymph Node Dissection
Keywords
surgical candidates, upper urinary tract, urothelial carcinoma, lymph node dissection
Medical subject headings
Urologic Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Transitional Cell

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lymph Node DissectionProcedure or surgery

    Also called nephroureterectomy

    The lymph nodes will be sent to pathology for review.

Study groups in NCT00751140
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Lymph Node Dissection at Time of NephroureterectomyExperimentalA prospective single-arm two-stage phase II study to allow for analysis of the treatment-specific outcomes and disease-specific survival of patients treated with open or laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and bladder cuff excision along with a lymph node dissection (modified template retroperitoneal lymph node dissection).
Receives: Procedure: Lymph Node Dissection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Pathologically Proven Lymph Node Metastasis

    The number of participants having pathologically proven lymph node metastasis at the time of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and modified retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND).

    The primary endpoint is the detection via lymph node dissection of pathological node positive urothelial carcinoma in patients treated with open or laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial cancer.

    Measured: Up to 4 years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Surgical Outcomes: Mean Lymph Node Count

    The mean (range) total lymph node count and lymph node count per procedure category. Between 2009 and 2011, patients with suspected upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUT-UC) underwent open, laparoscopic, or robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with modified retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND).

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Sep 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2008
  3. Primary completionApr 2012
  4. Study completionApr 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00751140
Sponsor's protocol ID
MCC-15441
Other IDs
10718
Status last verified
Dec 2012
First submitted
10 Sep 2008
Last updated
30 May 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Lymph Node Dissection in people with Cancer of the Urinary Tract, run by H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Jan 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Pathologically Proven Lymph Node Metastasis (time frame: Up to 4 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 May 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in