AzTrials
AzTrials

Pelvic Fractures and Associated Hemodynamic InstabilityNCT00755365

Intraoperative Angioembolization in the Management of Pelvic Fracture-Related Hemodynamic Instability

An observational study of Pelvic Fractures and Associated Hemodynamic Instability, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Mortality associated with pelvic fractures resulting from blunt trauma ranges between 6 and 18%. In cases where hemodynamic instability is also present, the mortality rate is significantly greater, and has been reported as high as 60%. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
How many people
15 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2003to 21 Nov 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The subjects in this study are trauma patients over 18 years of age who suffered pelvic fractures and developed associated hemodynamic instability between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2007. All patients were treated at Hershey Medical Center and received intraoperative angioembolization as a part of their medical management.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with pelvic fractures and associated hemodynamic instability
  • Treatment at Hershey Medical Center
  • Patient management involved angioembolization in Operating Room

Who cannot join

  • Patients below 18 years of age

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

    Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033

Other trials in United States

About this study

Mortality associated with pelvic fractures resulting from blunt trauma ranges between 6 and 18%. In cases where hemodynamic instability is also present, the mortality rate is significantly greater, and has been reported as high as 60%. There is no general consensus among traumatologists as to the initial management of this complicated subgroup of patients. It is largely debated whether emergent orthopedic fixation or angiographic embolization should be the first line of treatment for pelvic hemorrhage

Read the detailed description

Pelvic fractures are not usually isolated injuries and it is common that these severely injured patients have concomitant abdominal or thoracic trauma further complicating their management. In situations where multiple sources of hemodynamic instability exist, the need to control hemorrhage quickly becomes imperative. In patients where emergent laparotomy or thoracotomy is indicated, the time until pelvic bleeding sources are addressed is prolonged. Some would argue that the best initial management of the pelvic fractures should be surgical stabilization, while others would support immediate angioembolization of actively bleeding pelvic vessels. The main drawback of angiographic embolization is that it occurs in a separate Angio Suite facility, with concerns being time lost to patient transport and an environment less capable of managing these extremely unstable patients.

At Hershey Medical Center, ten patients suffering pelvic fractures with associated hemodynamic instability between 2003 and 2007 were managed with intraoperative angioembolization (in the Operating Room as opposed to the Angio Suite). Extensive review of published orthopaedic, trauma surgery, and radiology journals yielded no other literature regarding intraoperative angioembolization as a management approach for these patients. Whether or not this approach has been carried out at other medical institutions, it is undoubtedly rare and results have yet to be reported in widely available literature. This novel approach has the potential to stop pelvic bleeding sooner and in a more controlled environment, where surgical stabilization can also be accomplished simultaneously. Statistical analysis and review of these patients has not been done, but may possibly show improvements in survival, shorter length of hospital stay, less time to embolization, and decreased need for supportive measures such as blood or platelet transfusion.

Keywords
pelvic fractures, angioembolism, Treatment at Hershey Medical Center, Angioembolization in Operating Room
Medical subject headings
Hip Fractures

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To present intraoperative angioembolization as a option in management of this group of patients and to describe the outcomes of these ten patients

    Measured: 4 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Sep 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2003
  3. Primary completionDec 2007
  4. Study completion21 Nov 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
15 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00755365
Sponsor's protocol ID
28576EM
Status last verified
Nov 2019
First submitted
16 Sep 2008
Last updated
22 Nov 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Agolini SF, Shah K, Jaffe J, Newcomb J, Rhodes M, Reed JF 3rd. Arterial embolization is a rapid and effective technique for controlling pelvic fracture hemorrhage. J Trauma. 1997 Sep;43(3):395-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199709000-00001.

    PubMed 9314298
  • Balogh Z, King KL, Mackay P, McDougall D, Mackenzie S, Evans JA, Lyons T, Deane SA. The epidemiology of pelvic ring fractures: a population-based study. J Trauma. 2007 Nov;63(5):1066-73; discussion 1072-3. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181589fa4.

    PubMed 17993952
  • Balogh Z, Caldwell E, Heetveld M, D'Amours S, Schlaphoff G, Harris I, Sugrue M. Institutional practice guidelines on management of pelvic fracture-related hemodynamic instability: do they make a difference? J Trauma. 2005 Apr;58(4):778-82. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000158251.40760.b2.

    PubMed 15824655
  • Bassam D, Cephas GA, Ferguson KA, Beard LN, Young JS. A protocol for the initial management of unstable pelvic fractures. Am Surg. 1998 Sep;64(9):862-7.

    PubMed 9731815
  • Fangio P, Asehnoune K, Edouard A, Smail N, Benhamou D. Early embolization and vasopressor administration for management of life-threatening hemorrhage from pelvic fracture. J Trauma. 2005 May;58(5):978-84; discussion 984. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000163435.39881.26.

    PubMed 15920412
  • Miller PR, Moore PS, Mansell E, Meredith JW, Chang MC. External fixation or arteriogram in bleeding pelvic fracture: initial therapy guided by markers of arterial hemorrhage. J Trauma. 2003 Mar;54(3):437-43. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000053397.33827.DD.

    PubMed 12634521
  • Sadri H, Nguyen-Tang T, Stern R, Hoffmeyer P, Peter R. Control of severe hemorrhage using C-clamp and arterial embolization in hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic ring disruption. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005 Sep;125(7):443-7. doi: 10.1007/s00402-005-0821-7.

    PubMed 15977021

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pelvic Fractures and Associated Hemodynamic Instability, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To present intraoperative angioembolization as a option in management of this group of patients and to describe the outcomes of these ten patients (time frame: 4 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00755365, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Nov 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in