AzTrials
AzTrials

HypertensionNCT00760110

A Cohort Study of Morning Home Blood Pressure Measurement in Type 2 Diabetic Patients

An observational study of Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes, run by Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Previous cross-sectional studies have demonstrated that blood pressure (BP) measurements at home (HBP) in the morning offer stronger predictive power for micro- and macrovascular complications in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes than casual/clinic blood pressure measurements (CBP). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 23 to 87 years
Conditions the study is for
Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes
What is being tested?
blood pressure measurements based on HBP or CBP
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
400 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Nov 1997to Feb 2007
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 23 to 87 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Subjects comprised 400 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes enrolled between 1999 and 2005.

Who may be able to join

  • Type 2 diabetic patients with HBP and CBP measurements

Who cannot join

  • Type 1 or 2 diabetic patients without HBP and CBP measurements

About this study

Official title: Usefulness of Home Blood Pressure Measurement in the Morning in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: Long-Term Results of a Prospective Longitudinal Study

Previous cross-sectional studies have demonstrated that blood pressure (BP) measurements at home (HBP) in the morning offer stronger predictive power for micro- and macrovascular complications in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes than casual/clinic blood pressure measurements (CBP). The present study examined which of HBP or CBP provides the stronger predictive power for outcomes by comparing cumulative events between hypertensive and normotensive patients over 6 years in a prospective, longitudinal study of patients with type 2 diabetes.

Read the detailed description

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

1.Subjects. After a detailed baseline examination, 400 Japanese subjects were followed up for all-cause mortality and morbidity. All participants visited our clinic regularly. Mean survey duration of all patients was 42.1±20.0 months (range, 3-72 months).Type 2 diabetes was diagnosed according to World Health Organization criteria.At the beginning of the study, 329 patients(82%)were receiving treatment with oral hypoglycemic drugs and/or insulin regimens for diabetes mellitus and 196 patients (49%) were receiving treatment with various anti-hypertensive drugs (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blocker and others) for hypertension. Mean disease duration was 13±8 years (range, 0-40 years). Mean values for other baseline measurements were as follows: BMI,23.7±3.4 kg/m2;HbA1c,6.7±1.1%; triglycerides,150±112 mg/dl;total cholesterol,198±32 mg/dl; LDL,110±29 mg/dl; and HDL,60±19 mg/dl.All patients were fully informed about the purposes and procedures for the study and provided oral consent at enrolment.

  1. Baseline and follow-up assessment. Participants were examined using the same methods reported previously (1,2). Briefly, all chemical laboratory data were obtained at each visit without fasting in the morning. BP was measured in the clinic and at home on waking in the morning. Clinic hypertension (CH) and morning hypertension (MH) were defined as systolic BP (SBP)>=130 mmHg and/or diastolic BP (DBP)>=85 mmHg, while clinic normotension (CN) and morning normotension (MN) were defined as SBP <130 mmHg and DBP <86 mmHg, respectively. Microalbuminuria and clinical albuminuria were defined as urinary albumin excretion rate >=30 mg/g creatinine and >=300 mg/g creatinine, respectively.

Microvascular complications were checked for at baseline and every 3 to 6 months throughout the study. Severity of nephropathy was determined using 4 categories: normal; microalbuminuria; clinical albuminuria; and dialysis. Severity of retinopathy was categorized as: normal; non-proliferative retinopathy; pre-proliferative retinopathy; and proliferative retinopathy. Development of changing microvascular events defined according to a change of at least 1 step from baseline (3,4). Macrovascular complications were coronary heart disease (CHD) and cerebrovascular disease (CVD). These events were confirmed by medical history, including contents of treatment. New or worsened (recurrent) events were defined based on clinical manifestations and treatment throughout the study.

At baseline, HT or NTs were determined on the basis of HBP and CBP measurements. Based on HBP, subjects were divided into MH and MN patients, and each endpoint was determined within the survey duration, as defined by the patient displaying sustenance of the same BP status. That is, survey duration varied between individual patients and was defined as the period of time until an MH patient at baseline displayed a change to MN, or until an MN patient at baseline displayed a change to MH. Mean survey duration until endpoints was 29.5±21.1 months(range, 3-72 months).

Also, based on CBP, subjects were divided into CH and CN patients. These patients were followed using the same methods used for MH and MN. Mean survey duration until endpoints was 34.9±22.3 months (range,3-72 months), which was significantly longer than that based on HBP (P<0.001).

For ethical reasons, patients were treated with various anti-hypertensive, anti-diabetic, anti-dyslipidemia and/or anti-hypercoagulation agents during the course of the study by the patients'own doctors as a part of continuing standard medical care.

  1. Study endpoints and outcome measures. The primary endpoint was death from any cause. Secondary endpoints were new, worsened or improved microvascular events and new or worsened macrovascular events.
  2. Statistical analysis
  3. Baseline. Mean values were compared using Student's paired or unpaired t test. To compare the prevalence of micro- and macrovascular complications or medical treatment in patients with and without hypertension on the basis of HBP or CBP, Fischer's exact test with two-tailed P values was used, and then odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. If prevalence of an event was zero, 0.5 was added to all values before calculating the odds ratio and 95% CI.
  4. Endpoints and outcome measures. Differences in outcomes for each endpoint of death and new or worsened micro- and macrovascular complications between sustained hypertensive and normotensive patients on the basis of HBP or CBP were assessed using survival curves calculated according to Kaplan-Meier methods, then compared by hazard ratio using the log-rank test. Within the survey time defined above, a time until censoring or death (or occurrence of the event) was calculated for each endpoint.
  5. Risk factor assessment for outcomes. Risk factors related to outcomes determined statistically by log-rank test were assessed using hazard ratios by Cox proportional hazards model. For outcomes of microvascular complications, risk factors were determined in new, worsened or improved events. Omnibus tests were used to determine the appropriateness of Cox proportional hazards modeling. Confounding factors used in this analysis were variables with MH or CH at baseline and additional therapy for each disease.

Analysis was performed using Prism version 5.01 software (GraphPad Software, CA, USA) and the Dr. SPSSII for Windows (SPSS Japan, Tokyo, Japan). Two-tailed values of P<0.05 were defined as statistically significant.

References

  1. Kamoi K, et al. Usefulness of home blood pressure measurement in the morning in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 25:2218-2223, 2002
  2. Kamoi K, et al.Usefulness of home blood pressure measurement in the morning in type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 26:2218-2223, 2003
  3. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group: The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 329:977-986, 1993
  4. Ohkubo Y, et al Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 28:103-117, 1995
Being tested
blood pressure measurements based on HBP or CBP
Keywords
Morning BP, Clinic BP, micro- and macrovascular complications
Medical subject headings
Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • blood pressure measurements based on HBP or CBPDevice

    To clarify which of HBP or CBP provides the stronger predictive power for the outcomes, the 400 patients were classified as with or without hypertension based on HBP and CBP measurements at baseline

Study groups in NCT00760110
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1 Morning hypertension and normotensionBased on HBP, subjects were divided into MH and MN patients
Receives: Device: blood pressure measurements based on HBP or CBP
2 Clinic hypertension and normotensionBased on CBP, subjects were divided into CH and CN patients
Receives: Device: blood pressure measurements based on HBP or CBP

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Death

    Measured: Duration varied between individual patients and was as the period of time until MH or CH patient at baseline displayed a change to MN or CN, or until MN or CN patient at baseline displayed a change to MH or CH, respectively

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Microvascular complications

    Measured: Duration varied between individual patients and was as the period of time until MH or CH patient at baseline displayed a change to MN or CN, or until MN or CN patient at baseline displayed a change to MH or CH, respectively

  2. Macrovascular complications

    Measured: Duration varied between individual patients and was as the period of time until MH or CH patient at baseline displayed a change to MN or CN, or until MN or CN patient at baseline displayed a change to MH or CH, respectively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Sep 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 1997
  3. Primary completionFeb 2007
  4. Study completionFeb 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
400 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00760110
Sponsor's protocol ID
1
Status last verified
Sep 2008
First submitted
25 Sep 2008
Last updated
1 Oct 2008
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Kamoi K, Ito T, Miyakoshi M, Minagawa S. Usefulness of home blood pressure measurement in the morning in patients with type 2 diabetes: long-term results of a prospective longitudinal study. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2010 May;32(3):184-92. doi: 10.3109/10641960903254513.

    PubMed 20504126

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes, run by Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Death (time frame: Duration varied between individual patients and was as the period of time until MH or CH patient at baseline displayed a change to MN or CN, or until MN or CN patient at baseline displayed a change to MH or CH, respectively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00760110, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2008.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in