HypertensionNCT00760110
A Cohort Study of Morning Home Blood Pressure Measurement in Type 2 Diabetic Patients
An observational study of Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes, run by Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital.
Trial summary
Previous cross-sectional studies have demonstrated that blood pressure (BP) measurements at home (HBP) in the morning offer stronger predictive power for micro- and macrovascular complications in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes than casual/clinic blood pressure measurements (CBP). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 23 to 87 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes
- What is being tested?
- blood pressure measurements based on HBP or CBP
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 400 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Nov 1997to Feb 2007
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 23 to 87 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Subjects comprised 400 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes enrolled between 1999 and 2005.
Who may be able to join
- Type 2 diabetic patients with HBP and CBP measurements
Who cannot join
- Type 1 or 2 diabetic patients without HBP and CBP measurements
About this study
Official title: Usefulness of Home Blood Pressure Measurement in the Morning in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: Long-Term Results of a Prospective Longitudinal Study
Previous cross-sectional studies have demonstrated that blood pressure (BP) measurements at home (HBP) in the morning offer stronger predictive power for micro- and macrovascular complications in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes than casual/clinic blood pressure measurements (CBP). The present study examined which of HBP or CBP provides the stronger predictive power for outcomes by comparing cumulative events between hypertensive and normotensive patients over 6 years in a prospective, longitudinal study of patients with type 2 diabetes.
Read the detailed description
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
1.Subjects. After a detailed baseline examination, 400 Japanese subjects were followed up for all-cause mortality and morbidity. All participants visited our clinic regularly. Mean survey duration of all patients was 42.1±20.0 months (range, 3-72 months).Type 2 diabetes was diagnosed according to World Health Organization criteria.At the beginning of the study, 329 patients(82%)were receiving treatment with oral hypoglycemic drugs and/or insulin regimens for diabetes mellitus and 196 patients (49%) were receiving treatment with various anti-hypertensive drugs (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blocker and others) for hypertension. Mean disease duration was 13±8 years (range, 0-40 years). Mean values for other baseline measurements were as follows: BMI,23.7±3.4 kg/m2;HbA1c,6.7±1.1%; triglycerides,150±112 mg/dl;total cholesterol,198±32 mg/dl; LDL,110±29 mg/dl; and HDL,60±19 mg/dl.All patients were fully informed about the purposes and procedures for the study and provided oral consent at enrolment.
- Baseline and follow-up assessment. Participants were examined using the same methods reported previously (1,2). Briefly, all chemical laboratory data were obtained at each visit without fasting in the morning. BP was measured in the clinic and at home on waking in the morning. Clinic hypertension (CH) and morning hypertension (MH) were defined as systolic BP (SBP)>=130 mmHg and/or diastolic BP (DBP)>=85 mmHg, while clinic normotension (CN) and morning normotension (MN) were defined as SBP <130 mmHg and DBP <86 mmHg, respectively. Microalbuminuria and clinical albuminuria were defined as urinary albumin excretion rate >=30 mg/g creatinine and >=300 mg/g creatinine, respectively.
Microvascular complications were checked for at baseline and every 3 to 6 months throughout the study. Severity of nephropathy was determined using 4 categories: normal; microalbuminuria; clinical albuminuria; and dialysis. Severity of retinopathy was categorized as: normal; non-proliferative retinopathy; pre-proliferative retinopathy; and proliferative retinopathy. Development of changing microvascular events defined according to a change of at least 1 step from baseline (3,4). Macrovascular complications were coronary heart disease (CHD) and cerebrovascular disease (CVD). These events were confirmed by medical history, including contents of treatment. New or worsened (recurrent) events were defined based on clinical manifestations and treatment throughout the study.
At baseline, HT or NTs were determined on the basis of HBP and CBP measurements. Based on HBP, subjects were divided into MH and MN patients, and each endpoint was determined within the survey duration, as defined by the patient displaying sustenance of the same BP status. That is, survey duration varied between individual patients and was defined as the period of time until an MH patient at baseline displayed a change to MN, or until an MN patient at baseline displayed a change to MH. Mean survey duration until endpoints was 29.5±21.1 months(range, 3-72 months).
Also, based on CBP, subjects were divided into CH and CN patients. These patients were followed using the same methods used for MH and MN. Mean survey duration until endpoints was 34.9±22.3 months (range,3-72 months), which was significantly longer than that based on HBP (P<0.001).
For ethical reasons, patients were treated with various anti-hypertensive, anti-diabetic, anti-dyslipidemia and/or anti-hypercoagulation agents during the course of the study by the patients'own doctors as a part of continuing standard medical care.
- Study endpoints and outcome measures. The primary endpoint was death from any cause. Secondary endpoints were new, worsened or improved microvascular events and new or worsened macrovascular events.
- Statistical analysis
- Baseline. Mean values were compared using Student's paired or unpaired t test. To compare the prevalence of micro- and macrovascular complications or medical treatment in patients with and without hypertension on the basis of HBP or CBP, Fischer's exact test with two-tailed P values was used, and then odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. If prevalence of an event was zero, 0.5 was added to all values before calculating the odds ratio and 95% CI.
- Endpoints and outcome measures. Differences in outcomes for each endpoint of death and new or worsened micro- and macrovascular complications between sustained hypertensive and normotensive patients on the basis of HBP or CBP were assessed using survival curves calculated according to Kaplan-Meier methods, then compared by hazard ratio using the log-rank test. Within the survey time defined above, a time until censoring or death (or occurrence of the event) was calculated for each endpoint.
- Risk factor assessment for outcomes. Risk factors related to outcomes determined statistically by log-rank test were assessed using hazard ratios by Cox proportional hazards model. For outcomes of microvascular complications, risk factors were determined in new, worsened or improved events. Omnibus tests were used to determine the appropriateness of Cox proportional hazards modeling. Confounding factors used in this analysis were variables with MH or CH at baseline and additional therapy for each disease.
Analysis was performed using Prism version 5.01 software (GraphPad Software, CA, USA) and the Dr. SPSSII for Windows (SPSS Japan, Tokyo, Japan). Two-tailed values of P<0.05 were defined as statistically significant.
References
- Kamoi K, et al. Usefulness of home blood pressure measurement in the morning in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 25:2218-2223, 2002
- Kamoi K, et al.Usefulness of home blood pressure measurement in the morning in type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 26:2218-2223, 2003
- The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group: The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 329:977-986, 1993
- Ohkubo Y, et al Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 28:103-117, 1995
- Conditions
- Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes
- Being tested
- blood pressure measurements based on HBP or CBP
- Keywords
- Morning BP, Clinic BP, micro- and macrovascular complications
- Medical subject headings
- Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
blood pressure measurements based on HBP or CBPDevice
To clarify which of HBP or CBP provides the stronger predictive power for the outcomes, the 400 patients were classified as with or without hypertension based on HBP and CBP measurements at baseline
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Morning hypertension and normotension | Based on HBP, subjects were divided into MH and MN patients Receives: Device: blood pressure measurements based on HBP or CBP | |
| 2 Clinic hypertension and normotension | Based on CBP, subjects were divided into CH and CN patients Receives: Device: blood pressure measurements based on HBP or CBP |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Death
Measured: Duration varied between individual patients and was as the period of time until MH or CH patient at baseline displayed a change to MN or CN, or until MN or CN patient at baseline displayed a change to MH or CH, respectively
Secondary outcomes (2)
Microvascular complications
Measured: Duration varied between individual patients and was as the period of time until MH or CH patient at baseline displayed a change to MN or CN, or until MN or CN patient at baseline displayed a change to MH or CH, respectively
Macrovascular complications
Measured: Duration varied between individual patients and was as the period of time until MH or CH patient at baseline displayed a change to MN or CN, or until MN or CN patient at baseline displayed a change to MH or CH, respectively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Sep 2008 (estimated)
- Study startNov 1997
- Primary completionFeb 2007
- Study completionFeb 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HypertensionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Kyuzi Kamoi, MD, Principal investigator, Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00760110
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1
- Status last verified
- Sep 2008
- First submitted
- 25 Sep 2008
- Last updated
- 1 Oct 2008
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Kamoi K, Ito T, Miyakoshi M, Minagawa S. Usefulness of home blood pressure measurement in the morning in patients with type 2 diabetes: long-term results of a prospective longitudinal study. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2010 May;32(3):184-92. doi: 10.3109/10641960903254513.
PubMed 20504126
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Oct 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Usefulness of Home Blood Pressure Measurement in the Morning in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: Long-Term Results of a Prospective Longitudinal Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00760110
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1
- Conditions
- Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes
- Keywords
- Morning BP, Clinic BP, micro- and macrovascular complications
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nagaoka Red Cross HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 1997
- Primary completion
- Feb 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Sep 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Previous cross-sectional studies have demonstrated that blood pressure (BP) measurements at home (HBP) in the morning offer stronger predictive power for micro- and macrovascular complications in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes than casual/clinic blood pressure measurements (CBP). The present study examined which of HBP or CBP provides the stronger predictive power for outcomes by comparing cumulative events between hypertensive and normotensive patients over 6 years in a prospective, longitudinal study of patients with type 2 diabetes.
Detailed description
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
1.Subjects. After a detailed baseline examination, 400 Japanese subjects were followed up for all-cause mortality and morbidity. All participants visited our clinic regularly. Mean survey duration of all patients was 42.1±20.0 months (range, 3-72 months).Type 2 diabetes was diagnosed according to World Health Organization criteria.At the beginning of the study, 329 patients(82%)were receiving treatment with oral hypoglycemic drugs and/or insulin regimens for diabetes mellitus and 196 patients (49%) were receiving treatment with various anti-hypertensive drugs (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blocker and others) for hypertension. Mean disease duration was 13±8 years (range, 0-40 years). Mean values for other baseline measurements were as follows: BMI,23.7±3.4 kg/m2;HbA1c,6.7±1.1%; triglycerides,150±112 mg/dl;total cholesterol,198±32 mg/dl; LDL,110±29 mg/dl; and HDL,60±19 mg/dl.All patients were fully informed about the purposes and procedures for the study and provided oral consent at enrolment.
- Baseline and follow-up assessment. Participants were examined using the same methods reported previously (1,2). Briefly, all chemical laboratory data were obtained at each visit without fasting in the morning. BP was measured in the clinic and at home on waking in the morning. Clinic hypertension (CH) and morning hypertension (MH) were defined as systolic BP (SBP)>=130 mmHg and/or diastolic BP (DBP)>=85 mmHg, while clinic normotension (CN) and morning normotension (MN) were defined as SBP <130 mmHg and DBP <86 mmHg, respectively. Microalbuminuria and clinical albuminuria were defined as urinary albumin excretion rate >=30 mg/g creatinine and >=300 mg/g creatinine, respectively.
Microvascular complications were checked for at baseline and every 3 to 6 months throughout the study. Severity of nephropathy was determined using 4 categories: normal; microalbuminuria; clinical albuminuria; and dialysis. Severity of retinopathy was categorized as: normal; non-proliferative retinopathy; pre-proliferative retinopathy; and proliferative retinopathy. Development of changing microvascular events defined according to a change of at least 1 step from baseline (3,4). Macrovascular complications were coronary heart disease (CHD) and cerebrovascular disease (CVD). These events were confirmed by medical history, including contents of treatment. New or worsened (recurrent) events were defined based on clinical manifestations and treatment throughout the study.
At baseline, HT or NTs were determined on the basis of HBP and CBP measurements. Based on HBP, subjects were divided into MH and MN patients, and each endpoint was determined within the survey duration, as defined by the patient displaying sustenance of the same BP status. That is, survey duration varied between individual patients and was defined as the period of time until an MH patient at baseline displayed a change to MN, or until an MN patient at baseline displayed a change to MH. Mean survey duration until endpoints was 29.5±21.1 months(range, 3-72 months).
Also, based on CBP, subjects were divided into CH and CN patients. These patients were followed using the same methods used for MH and MN. Mean survey duration until endpoints was 34.9±22.3 months (range,3-72 months), which was significantly longer than that based on HBP (P<0.001).
For ethical reasons, patients were treated with various anti-hypertensive, anti-diabetic, anti-dyslipidemia and/or anti-hypercoagulation agents during the course of the study by the patients'own doctors as a part of continuing standard medical care.
- Study endpoints and outcome measures. The primary endpoint was death from any cause. Secondary endpoints were new, worsened or improved microvascular events and new or worsened macrovascular events.
- Statistical analysis
- Baseline. Mean values were compared using Student's paired or unpaired t test. To compare the prevalence of micro- and macrovascular complications or medical treatment in patients with and without hypertension on the basis of HBP or CBP, Fischer's exact test with two-tailed P values was used, and then odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. If prevalence of an event was zero, 0.5 was added to all values before calculating the odds ratio and 95% CI.
- Endpoints and outcome measures. Differences in outcomes for each endpoint of death and new or worsened micro- and macrovascular complications between sustained hypertensive and normotensive patients on the basis of HBP or CBP were assessed using survival curves calculated according to Kaplan-Meier methods, then compared by hazard ratio using the log-rank test. Within the survey time defined above, a time until censoring or death (or occurrence of the event) was calculated for each endpoint.
- Risk factor assessment for outcomes. Risk factors related to outcomes determined statistically by log-rank test were assessed using hazard ratios by Cox proportional hazards model. For outcomes of microvascular complications, risk factors were determined in new, worsened or improved events. Omnibus tests were used to determine the appropriateness of Cox proportional hazards modeling. Confounding factors used in this analysis were variables with MH or CH at baseline and additional therapy for each disease.
Analysis was performed using Prism version 5.01 software (GraphPad Software, CA, USA) and the Dr. SPSSII for Windows (SPSS Japan, Tokyo, Japan). Two-tailed values of P<0.05 were defined as statistically significant.
References
- Kamoi K, et al. Usefulness of home blood pressure measurement in the morning in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 25:2218-2223, 2002
- Kamoi K, et al.Usefulness of home blood pressure measurement in the morning in type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 26:2218-2223, 2003
- The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group: The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 329:977-986, 1993
- Ohkubo Y, et al Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 28:103-117, 1995
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Morning hypertension and normotension | – | Device: blood pressure measurements based on HBP or CBPBased on HBP, subjects were divided into MH and MN patients |
| 2 Clinic hypertension and normotension | – | Device: blood pressure measurements based on HBP or CBPBased on CBP, subjects were divided into CH and CN patients |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 23 to 87 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Subjects comprised 400 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes enrolled between 1999 and 2005.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Type 2 diabetic patients with HBP and CBP measurements
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Type 1 or 2 diabetic patients without HBP and CBP measurements
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| blood pressure measurements based on HBP or CBPTo clarify which of HBP or CBP provides the stronger predictive power for the outcomes, the 400 patients were classified as with or without hypertension based on HBP and CBP measurements at baseline | Device | 1 Morning hypertension and normotension, 2 Clinic hypertension and normotension |
Primary outcome
Death
Time frame: Duration varied between individual patients and was as the period of time until MH or CH patient at baseline displayed a change to MN or CN, or until MN or CN patient at baseline displayed a change to MH or CH, respectively
2 secondary outcomes
Microvascular complications
Time frame: Duration varied between individual patients and was as the period of time until MH or CH patient at baseline displayed a change to MN or CN, or until MN or CN patient at baseline displayed a change to MH or CH, respectively
Macrovascular complications
Time frame: Duration varied between individual patients and was as the period of time until MH or CH patient at baseline displayed a change to MN or CN, or until MN or CN patient at baseline displayed a change to MH or CH, respectively
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Oct 2008.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20504126Kamoi K, Ito T, Miyakoshi M, Minagawa S. Usefulness of home blood pressure measurement in the morning in patients with type 2 diabetes: long-term results of a prospective longitudinal study. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2010 May;32(3):184-92. doi: 10.3109/10641960903254513.
Related trials for Hypertension
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Enrolling by invitation
Testing Implementation Strategies to Support Clinic Fidelity to an Outpatient Hypertension Bundle
Pregnancy Related, Hypertension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kyuzi Kamoi, MD principal investigator
Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes, run by Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Death (time frame: Duration varied between individual patients and was as the period of time until MH or CH patient at baseline displayed a change to MN or CN, or until MN or CN patient at baseline displayed a change to MH or CH, respectively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00760110, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2008.