InfluenzaPhase 3NCT00764998
Influenza Vaccine in HIV
A Phase 3 study testing Fluviral in people with Influenza and HIV, run by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at 13 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
The purposes of this research study are: 1. to see if there is a difference in the quantity of protective influenza antibodies produced by different doses of the Fluviral vaccine 2. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- What is being tested?
- Fluviral
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 285 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- Oct 2008to Aug 2009
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 - < 60 years
- HIV positive
- Able to provide signed, informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Receipt or anticipated requirement of any blood product, vaccine, or immunoglobulin preparation within one month of study vaccine administration until completion of study.
- Immunosuppressive therapy including prednisone, immune modulators, subjects undergoing dialysis, autoimmune dysfunction (including rheumatoid arthritis, lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis)
- Alcohol consumption > 4 drinks per day (1 drink is equal to a 12-ounce can of beer, or a 5-ounce glass of wine or one cocktail with 1 1/2-ounces alcohol)
- History of cancer, with the exception of cutaneous cancers including Kaposi Sarcoma, basal cell carcinoma and non-invasive HPV-related malignancy
- Known or suspected hypersensitivity to any component of the study vaccines, including chicken eggs or egg products and thimerosol
- History of immediate hypersensitivity reaction and/or reaction resulting in neurological symptoms to a previous dose of any influenza vaccine
- Presentation with or any recent history (within 24 hours) of any febrile illness (> 38 C) or symptoms of significant local or systemic infection - such subjects will be deferred from enrollment at least until one week after the illness has resolved
- Any other condition which in the opinion of the Investigator might interfere with evaluation of the study objectives.
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 1 country.
13 sites in 1 country
Canada13 sites
Southern Alberta Clinic
Calgary, Alberta, T2R 0X7
University of Alberta Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7
QEII HSC, Victoria General Hospital Site
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7
McMaster University Medical Center
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6
Infectious Disease Care Program
London, Ontario, N5Y 3H6
Immunodeficiency Service, Montreal Chest Institute
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2P4
The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
University of Ottawa Health Services
Toronto, Ontario, K1N 6N5
Sunnybrook Health Science Center
Toronto, Ontario, M2N 3M5
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2N2
BC Center for Excellence in HIV/Aids
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6
Downtown Immunodeficiency Clinic / UBC
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 2C7
HIV Care Program - Windsor Regional Hospital
Windsor, Ontario, N8W 1E3
About this study
Official title: A Controlled Trial to Assess the Immunogenicity and Efficacy of Three Vaccine Dosing Strategies in HIV Infected Adults
The purposes of this research study are:
- to see if there is a difference in the quantity of protective influenza antibodies produced by different doses of the Fluviral vaccine
- to see if these different vaccine dosing schedules reduce flu-like illness and/or reduce laboratory documented influenza in HIV Infected adults.
Read the detailed description
Immune compromised individuals are at risk for infection with influenza and more likely to manifest more severe symptoms of influenza disease. Furthermore, they are influenza vaccine hyporesponsive in comparison to healthy, adult immune competent individuals. One population of immune compromised Canadians at risk for severe influenza disease is those living with HIV infection. At least 56,000 Canadians are HIV infected [1]. This population is at risk for more severe influenza illness. Influenza viral replication and shedding is prolonged and the duration of influenza symptomatology is longer in those with HIV [2, 3]. Furthermore, influenza-related mortality rates in HIV infected individuals are increased [4]. The HIV population is known to be hyporesponsive to vaccinations, including influenza. The efficacy of influenza vaccines is compromised, in part, by reduced antibody responses observed in HIV infected individuals [5]. Nevertheless, influenza vaccination is recommended for HIV-infected individuals [6, 7]. The Centers of Disease Control guidelines state: "Influenza can result in serious illness and because vaccination with inactivated influenza vaccine might result in the production of protective antibody titers, vaccination might benefit HIV-infected persons. Therefore, influenza vaccination is recommended". As influenza vaccination is the cornerstone of public health interventions intended to protect the population against influenza, vaccine hyporesponsiveness in immune compromised populations represents a significant concern. Given the risk of influenza exposure in general as well as concerns related to poor vaccine efficacy and more severe influenza disease in immune compromised populations such as those living with HIV, strategies to improve vaccine efficacy are required.
Therefore a total of 5 conditions provide justification for a trial to be conducted at this time:
- current standard treatment with influenza vaccine is less efficacious when used in particular subgroups of immune compromised individuals, such as those diagnosed with HIV
- there exists a significant burden of influenza infection in HIV patients that must be addressed in terms of identifying an effective treatment strategy
- past randomized trials of influenza vaccination in HIV patients are of limited comparability to today's relevant base of patients, and alternative vaccination strategies require assessment
- efficacy of booster doses of influenza vaccine in HIV patients remains in question as a consequence of methodologic shortcomings in terms of both design aspects and outcomes measured of past studies
- there is a paucity of published evidence assessing the efficacy of an increased, double-dose of influenza vaccine in this patient population.
References
- Boulos, D., et al., Estimates of HIV prevalence and incidence in Canada, 2005. Can Commun Dis Rep, 2006. 32(15): p. 165-74.
- Safrin, S., J.D. Rush, and J. Mills, Influenza in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Chest, 1990. 98(1): p. 33-7.
- Radwan, H.M., et al., Influenza in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients during the 1997-1998 influenza season. Clin Infect Dis, 2000. 31(2): p. 604-6.
- Zanetti, A.R., et al., Safety and immunogenicity of influenza vaccination in individuals infected with HIV. Vaccine, 2002. 20 Suppl 5: p. B29-32.
- Malaspina, A., et al., Compromised B cell responses to influenza vaccination in HIV-infected individuals. J Infect Dis, 2005. 191(9): p. 1442-50.
- Health Canada Progress towards Canadian target coverage rates in Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunications., in Available at: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/ccdr-rmtc/01vol27/dr2710eb.htlm. Accessed 8 December 2006. 2006.
- Prevention and Control of Influenza. Recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practice, in Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Morbidity and Morality Weekly Report. 2006. p. Vol 55/RR-10.
- Being tested
- Fluviral
- Keywords
- Influenza, HIV, Influenza Vaccine, Efficacy
- Medical subject headings
- Influenza, Human
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FluviralBiological
Also called non applicable
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Fluviral | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Biological: Fluviral |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Biological: Fluviral |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Immunogenicity measured by haemagglutination inhibition (HI)
Measured: baseline, week 4, week 8 and week 20.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Frequencies of laboratory confirmed influenza and Frequencies clinical/respiratory illness
Measured: event driven
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Oct 2008 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2008
- Primary completionApr 2009
- Study completionAug 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for InfluenzaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 285 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ontario HIV Treatment Network, Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Curtis Cooper, MD, Principal investigator, OHRI
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00764998
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CTN237
- Status last verified
- Apr 2017
- First submitted
- 1 Oct 2008
- Last updated
- 28 Apr 2017
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Cooper C, Thorne A, Klein M, Conway B, Boivin G, Haase D, Shafran S, Zubyk W, Singer J, Halperin S, Walmsley S; CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network Influenza Vaccine Research Group. Immunogenicity is not improved by increased antigen dose or booster dosing of seasonal influenza vaccine in a randomized trial of HIV infected adults. PLoS One. 2011 Mar 25;6(3):e17758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017758.
PubMed 21512577Nosyk B, Sharif B, Sun H, Cooper C, Anis AH; CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network Influenza Vaccine Research Group. The cost-effectiveness and value of information of three influenza vaccination dosing strategies for individuals with human immunodeficiency virus. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e27059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027059. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
PubMed 22162988
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Apr 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Controlled Trial to Assess the Immunogenicity and Efficacy of Three Vaccine Dosing Strategies in HIV Infected Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00764998
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CTN237
- Keywords
- Influenza, HIV, Influenza Vaccine, Efficacy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 285 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ontario HIV Treatment Network, Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network
- Study start
- Oct 2008
- Primary completion
- Apr 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Oct 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purposes of this research study are:
- to see if there is a difference in the quantity of protective influenza antibodies produced by different doses of the Fluviral vaccine
- to see if these different vaccine dosing schedules reduce flu-like illness and/or reduce laboratory documented influenza in HIV Infected adults.
Detailed description
Immune compromised individuals are at risk for infection with influenza and more likely to manifest more severe symptoms of influenza disease. Furthermore, they are influenza vaccine hyporesponsive in comparison to healthy, adult immune competent individuals. One population of immune compromised Canadians at risk for severe influenza disease is those living with HIV infection. At least 56,000 Canadians are HIV infected [1]. This population is at risk for more severe influenza illness. Influenza viral replication and shedding is prolonged and the duration of influenza symptomatology is longer in those with HIV [2, 3]. Furthermore, influenza-related mortality rates in HIV infected individuals are increased [4]. The HIV population is known to be hyporesponsive to vaccinations, including influenza. The efficacy of influenza vaccines is compromised, in part, by reduced antibody responses observed in HIV infected individuals [5]. Nevertheless, influenza vaccination is recommended for HIV-infected individuals [6, 7]. The Centers of Disease Control guidelines state: "Influenza can result in serious illness and because vaccination with inactivated influenza vaccine might result in the production of protective antibody titers, vaccination might benefit HIV-infected persons. Therefore, influenza vaccination is recommended". As influenza vaccination is the cornerstone of public health interventions intended to protect the population against influenza, vaccine hyporesponsiveness in immune compromised populations represents a significant concern. Given the risk of influenza exposure in general as well as concerns related to poor vaccine efficacy and more severe influenza disease in immune compromised populations such as those living with HIV, strategies to improve vaccine efficacy are required.
Therefore a total of 5 conditions provide justification for a trial to be conducted at this time:
- current standard treatment with influenza vaccine is less efficacious when used in particular subgroups of immune compromised individuals, such as those diagnosed with HIV
- there exists a significant burden of influenza infection in HIV patients that must be addressed in terms of identifying an effective treatment strategy
- past randomized trials of influenza vaccination in HIV patients are of limited comparability to today's relevant base of patients, and alternative vaccination strategies require assessment
- efficacy of booster doses of influenza vaccine in HIV patients remains in question as a consequence of methodologic shortcomings in terms of both design aspects and outcomes measured of past studies
- there is a paucity of published evidence assessing the efficacy of an increased, double-dose of influenza vaccine in this patient population.
References
- Boulos, D., et al., Estimates of HIV prevalence and incidence in Canada, 2005. Can Commun Dis Rep, 2006. 32(15): p. 165-74.
- Safrin, S., J.D. Rush, and J. Mills, Influenza in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Chest, 1990. 98(1): p. 33-7.
- Radwan, H.M., et al., Influenza in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients during the 1997-1998 influenza season. Clin Infect Dis, 2000. 31(2): p. 604-6.
- Zanetti, A.R., et al., Safety and immunogenicity of influenza vaccination in individuals infected with HIV. Vaccine, 2002. 20 Suppl 5: p. B29-32.
- Malaspina, A., et al., Compromised B cell responses to influenza vaccination in HIV-infected individuals. J Infect Dis, 2005. 191(9): p. 1442-50.
- Health Canada Progress towards Canadian target coverage rates in Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunications., in Available at: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/ccdr-rmtc/01vol27/dr2710eb.htlm. Accessed 8 December 2006. 2006.
- Prevention and Control of Influenza. Recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practice, in Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Morbidity and Morality Weekly Report. 2006. p. Vol 55/RR-10.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Fluviral | Active comparator | Biological: Fluviral |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Biological: Fluviral |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age 18 - < 60 years
- HIV positive
- Able to provide signed, informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Receipt or anticipated requirement of any blood product, vaccine, or immunoglobulin preparation within one month of study vaccine administration until completion of study.
- Immunosuppressive therapy including prednisone, immune modulators, subjects undergoing dialysis, autoimmune dysfunction (including rheumatoid arthritis, lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis)
- Alcohol consumption > 4 drinks per day (1 drink is equal to a 12-ounce can of beer, or a 5-ounce glass of wine or one cocktail with 1 1/2-ounces alcohol)
- History of cancer, with the exception of cutaneous cancers including Kaposi Sarcoma, basal cell carcinoma and non-invasive HPV-related malignancy
- Known or suspected hypersensitivity to any component of the study vaccines, including chicken eggs or egg products and thimerosol
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FluviralAlso: non applicable | Biological | Fluviral, placebo |
Primary outcome
Immunogenicity measured by haemagglutination inhibition (HI)
Time frame: baseline, week 4, week 8 and week 20.
1 secondary outcome
Frequencies of laboratory confirmed influenza and Frequencies clinical/respiratory illness
Time frame: event driven
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Apr 2017.
- Results publication: PubMed 21512577Cooper C, Thorne A, Klein M, Conway B, Boivin G, Haase D, Shafran S, Zubyk W, Singer J, Halperin S, Walmsley S; CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network Influenza Vaccine Research Group. Immunogenicity is not improved by increased antigen dose or booster dosing of seasonal influenza vaccine in a randomized trial of HIV infected adults. PLoS One. 2011 Mar 25;6(3):e17758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017758.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22162988Nosyk B, Sharif B, Sun H, Cooper C, Anis AH; CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network Influenza Vaccine Research Group. The cost-effectiveness and value of information of three influenza vaccination dosing strategies for individuals with human immunodeficiency virus. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e27059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027059. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
Related trials for Influenza
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
RecruitingPhase 2
BPL-1357 Against H1N1 Influenza Virus Challenge
Influenza, Human
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Immunogenicity of Chimeric Hemagglutinin mRNA Vaccine Candidates
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 1
pH1N1 Blinded Challenge Study
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK-1406/CD388 for Prevention of Influenza (MK-1406-005/CD388.SQ.3.06)
Influenza
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Curtis Cooper, MD principal investigator
OHRI
13 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Fluviral in people with Influenza and HIV, run by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at 13 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Immunogenicity measured by haemagglutination inhibition (HI) (time frame: baseline, week 4, week 8 and week 20.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00764998, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Apr 2017.