Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 4ZEPPELINNCT00768846
Zotarolimus and Everolimus-Eluting Stents ProsPectively Compared in Real World
A Phase 4 study testing Endeavor Resolute Stent and Xience V Stent in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen at 2 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
The zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor Resolute stent is not inferior to the everolimus- eluting Xience V stent platform regarding a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularisation in a real-world population. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- Endeavor Resolute Stent and Xience V Stent
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,600 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- Sep 2008to Jun 2011
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients older than 18 years with symptomatic coronary artery disease undergoing PCI with stent implantation.
- Written, informed consent by the patient or her/his legally-authorized representative for participation in the study.
Who cannot join
- Cardiogenic shock.
- Malignancies or other comorbid conditions (for example severe liver, renal and pancreatic disease) with life expectancy less than 12 months or that may result in protocol non-compliance.
- Known allergy to the study medications: everolimus, zotarolimus, cobalt chrome.
- Inability to take clopidogrel for at least 6 months.
- Pregnancy (present, suspected or planned) or positive pregnancy test. (In women with childbearing potential a pregnancy test is mandatory.)
- Previous enrollment in this trial.
- Patient's inability to fully cooperate with the study protocol.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Germany2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
1st Medizinische Klinik Klinikum rechts der Isar
Munich, 81675
Josef Dirschinger, MD, +49-4140 ext. 2947, dirschinger@med1.med.tum.de
- Recruiting
Deutsches Herzzentrum Munich
Munich, 81675
Julinda Mehilli, MD, +49-1218- ext. 4582, mehilli@dhm.mhn.de
Stefanie Schulz, MD, +49-1218- ext. 1521, schulzs@dhm.mhn.de
About this study
Official title: Randomized Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Treatment
The zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor Resolute stent is not inferior to the everolimus- eluting Xience V stent platform regarding a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularisation in a real-world population.
Read the detailed description
The use of stents has become common practice in the percutaneous treatment of coronary artery disease. Restenosis affected 20-40% of de novo coronary lesions treated with bare metal stents. Drug-eluting stents (DES) have emerged as the most effective strategy for the prevention of restenosis. The first available DES were the Sirolimus-eluting Cypher and the Paclitaxel-eluting Taxus stent. Although their mid-term efficacy has been well-established, there is an ongoing debate on the potential of an increased incidence of late stent thrombosis, as well as of delayed onset of restenosis or catch-up phenomenon with DES. Recent evidence demonstrates that there might be differences between various DES in terms of safety and efficacy. The differences might be related to the drug, polymer or stent design. Everolimus (SDZ-RAD) and zotarolimus (ABT-578) are new antiproliferative agents that share some common structural and biological properties with sirolimus ("limus-group"). Both drugs bind to the intracellular sirolimus receptor, FK 506-binding protein 12 (FKBP 12). The drug-FKBP12 complex inhibits cell cycle progression via inactivation of the mammalian target of Rapamycin (mTOR) thereby regulating vascular smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation. Preclinical studies showed improved endothelialization and limited chronic inflammation of the everolimus-eluting stent compared with previous drug-eluting stents. Moreover, first randomized clinical trials of everolimus-eluting stents have shown promising results regarding safety, feasibility and efficacy in the suppression of neointimal proliferation. Safety and efficacy of the zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor stent have been investigated in the Endeavor clinical program. In the Endeavor III and IV trials, the Endeavour stent proved inferior to the Cypher and Taxus stents regarding angiographic endpoints. However, rates of target vessel failure were similar in both groups. The Endeavor RESOLUTE stent platform uses a new polymer with potential improvements of drug release compared to the Endeavor stent. The RESOLUTE clinical trial is the first-in man, observational, uncontrolled, non-randomized study evaluating the Endeavor Resolute drug-eluting stent with the new polymer. The trial enrolled a total of 130 patients with native coronary artery lesions. There are no data available comparing the zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor Resolute stent with the everolimus-eluting Xience V stent. Thus the aim of this prospective, randomized study is to compare the efficacy and safety of these two "new generation" drug-eluting stent platforms in a real world population.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- Endeavor Resolute Stent, Xience V Stent
- Keywords
- PCI, Stent, DES, CAD
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Endeavor Resolute StentDevice
Zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor Resolute Stent
Xience V StentDevice
Everolimus-eluting Xience V Stent
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Endeavor Resolute Stent Receives: Device: Endeavor Resolute Stent |
| 2 | Active comparator | Xience V Stent Receives: Device: Xience V Stent |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
A composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction related to the target vessel or target lesion revascularisation
Measured: 1 year after randomization
Secondary outcomes (4)
Late luminal loss
Measured: 6-8 months
Binary angiographic restenosis
Measured: 6-8 months
All cause mortality
Measured: 1 year
Stent thrombosis
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Oct 2008 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2008
- Primary completionMay 2010 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2011 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 2,600 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Adnan Kastrati, MD, Study chair, Deutsches Herzzentrum MunichJulinda Mehilli, MD, Principal investigator, Deutsches Herzzentrum Munich
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00768846
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GE IDE No. S03008
- Acronym
- ZEPPELIN
- Status last verified
- Oct 2008
- First submitted
- 6 Oct 2008
- Last updated
- 15 Oct 2008
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Oct 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00768846
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ZEPPELIN / GE IDE No. S03008
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Keywords
- PCI, Stent, DES, CAD
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 2,600 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Deutsches Herzzentrum MuenchenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2008
- Primary completion
- May 2010 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2011 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Oct 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor Resolute stent is not inferior to the everolimus- eluting Xience V stent platform regarding a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularisation in a real-world population.
Detailed description
The use of stents has become common practice in the percutaneous treatment of coronary artery disease. Restenosis affected 20-40% of de novo coronary lesions treated with bare metal stents. Drug-eluting stents (DES) have emerged as the most effective strategy for the prevention of restenosis. The first available DES were the Sirolimus-eluting Cypher and the Paclitaxel-eluting Taxus stent. Although their mid-term efficacy has been well-established, there is an ongoing debate on the potential of an increased incidence of late stent thrombosis, as well as of delayed onset of restenosis or catch-up phenomenon with DES. Recent evidence demonstrates that there might be differences between various DES in terms of safety and efficacy. The differences might be related to the drug, polymer or stent design. Everolimus (SDZ-RAD) and zotarolimus (ABT-578) are new antiproliferative agents that share some common structural and biological properties with sirolimus ("limus-group"). Both drugs bind to the intracellular sirolimus receptor, FK 506-binding protein 12 (FKBP 12). The drug-FKBP12 complex inhibits cell cycle progression via inactivation of the mammalian target of Rapamycin (mTOR) thereby regulating vascular smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation. Preclinical studies showed improved endothelialization and limited chronic inflammation of the everolimus-eluting stent compared with previous drug-eluting stents. Moreover, first randomized clinical trials of everolimus-eluting stents have shown promising results regarding safety, feasibility and efficacy in the suppression of neointimal proliferation. Safety and efficacy of the zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor stent have been investigated in the Endeavor clinical program. In the Endeavor III and IV trials, the Endeavour stent proved inferior to the Cypher and Taxus stents regarding angiographic endpoints. However, rates of target vessel failure were similar in both groups. The Endeavor RESOLUTE stent platform uses a new polymer with potential improvements of drug release compared to the Endeavor stent. The RESOLUTE clinical trial is the first-in man, observational, uncontrolled, non-randomized study evaluating the Endeavor Resolute drug-eluting stent with the new polymer. The trial enrolled a total of 130 patients with native coronary artery lesions. There are no data available comparing the zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor Resolute stent with the everolimus-eluting Xience V stent. Thus the aim of this prospective, randomized study is to compare the efficacy and safety of these two "new generation" drug-eluting stent platforms in a real world population.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Device: Endeavor Resolute StentEndeavor Resolute Stent |
| 2 | Active comparator | Device: Xience V StentXience V Stent |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients older than 18 years with symptomatic coronary artery disease undergoing PCI with stent implantation.
- Written, informed consent by the patient or her/his legally-authorized representative for participation in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Cardiogenic shock.
- Malignancies or other comorbid conditions (for example severe liver, renal and pancreatic disease) with life expectancy less than 12 months or that may result in protocol non-compliance.
- Known allergy to the study medications: everolimus, zotarolimus, cobalt chrome.
- Inability to take clopidogrel for at least 6 months.
- Pregnancy (present, suspected or planned) or positive pregnancy test. (In women with childbearing potential a pregnancy test is mandatory.)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Endeavor Resolute StentZotarolimus-eluting Endeavor Resolute Stent | Device | 1 |
| Xience V StentEverolimus-eluting Xience V Stent | Device | 2 |
Primary outcome
A composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction related to the target vessel or target lesion revascularisation
Time frame: 1 year after randomization
4 secondary outcomes
Late luminal loss
Time frame: 6-8 months
Binary angiographic restenosis
Time frame: 6-8 months
All cause mortality
Time frame: 1 year
Stent thrombosis
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Oct 2008.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Adnan Kastrati, MD study chair
Deutsches Herzzentrum Munich
Julinda Mehilli, MD principal investigator
Deutsches Herzzentrum Munich
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Endeavor Resolute Stent and Xience V Stent in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen at 2 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Oct 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Julinda Mehilli, MD (+49-1218 ext. 4582, mehilli@dhm.mhn.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
A composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction related to the target vessel or target lesion revascularisation (time frame: 1 year after randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Oct 2008.