Non-small Cell Lung CancerPhase 2NCT00769067
A Randomized Trial Of PF-00299804 Taken Orally Versus Erlotinib Taken Orally For Treatment Of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer That Has Progressed After One Or Two Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
A Phase 2 study testing Erlotinib and PF-00299804 in people with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Pfizer at 59 sites in 12 countries.
Trial summary
This study will compare PF-00299804 given orally on continuous schedule to the approved drug, erlotinib, in patients whose non-small cell lung cancer has progressed after chemotherapy; patients will be randomized to receive one of these drugs, and followed for efficacy and tolerance of each. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Erlotinib and PF-00299804
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 188 participants
- Where
- 59 sitesin 12 countries
- Study dates
- Nov 2008to Aug 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- advanced measurable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC);
- progressed after 1-2 prior chemotherapy;
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-2;
- tissue available for future KRAS/ EGFR testing
Who cannot join
- prior Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) targeted therapy;
- active or untreated Central Nervous System (CNS) metastases;
Trial locations and contacts
59 sites in 12 countries.
59 sites in 12 countries
United States26 sites
Winship Cancer Institute at Grady Health Systems
Atlanta, Georgia, 30303
Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322-1013
Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Augusta Oncology Associates, P.C.
Augusta, Georgia, 30901
Augusta Oncology Associates, PC
Augusta, Georgia, 30909
Center for Blood and Cancer Disorders
Bethesda, Maryland, 20817
Bridgeport Hospital
Bridgeport, Connecticut, 06610
Oncology/Hematology Associates
Clarksburg, West Virginia, 26301
John B. Amos Cancer Center
Columbus, Georgia, 31904
Georgia Cancer Specialists
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
The Longstreet Cancer Center
Gainesville, Georgia, 30501
Central Georgia Cancer Care, P.C.
Macon, Georgia, 31201
Northwest Georgia Oncology Center
Marietta, Georgia, 30106
The West Clinic
Memphis, Tennessee, 38120
University of Minnesota Cancer Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Agajanian Institute of Oncology and Hematology
Montebello, California, 90640
Northwest Alabama Cancer Center
Muscle Shoals, Alabama, 35661
Wittingham Cancer Center @ Norwalk Hospital
Norwalk, Connecticut, 06856
Kootenai Cancer Center at Post Falls
Post Falls, Idaho, 83854
Kootenai Cancer Center
Post Falls, Idaho, 83854
Associates in Oncology/Hematology, PC
Rockville, Maryland, 20850
Central Georgia Cancer Care, P.C.
Warner Robins, Georgia, 31088-2259
Medical Oncology & Hematology, P.C.
Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708
Midwestern Regional Medical Center
Zion, Illinois, 60099
Poland6 sites
Medex spolka cywilna
Chrzanów, 32-500
¿KardioDent¿
Krakow, 30-045
"Vesalius" Sp. z o.o.
Krakow, 31-108
Zaklad Rentgena i USG Wyrobek spolka jawna
Krakow, 31-215
Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej AVI Centrum Medyczne
Warsaw, 00-728
Centrum Onkologii-Instytut im. Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie
Warsaw, 02-781
Australia4 sites
Chris O'Brien Lifehouse
Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050
St. Vincent's Hospital
Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065
The Andrew Love Cancer Centre,
Geelong, Victoria, 3220
Border Medical Oncology
Wodonga, Victoria, 3690
Brazil4 sites
FUNDACAO PIO XII Hospital de Cancer de Barretos
Barretos, São Paulo, 14784-400
Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericordia de Porto Alegre (ISCMPA) - Hospital Santa Rita
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90050-170
Hospital Sao Lucas da PUCRS
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90610-000
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo Octavio Frias de Oliveira - ICESP
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246-000
Canada4 sites
Royal Victoria Hospital
Barrie, Ontario, L4M 6M2
RSM Durham Regional Cancer Centre - Lakeridge Health Oshawa
Oshawa, Ontario, L1G 2B9
The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
BC Cancer Agency - Vancouver Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6
Spain4 sites
Hospital Teresa Herrera
A Coruña, La Coruña, 15006
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol
Badalona, Barcelona, 08916
Hospital de Cruces
Barakaldo, Vizcaya, 48903
Hospital Son Llatzer
Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, 07198
South Korea3 sites
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, 110-744
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center
Seoul, 120-752
SamsungMedicalCenter,SungkyunkwanUnivSchoolofMedicine,Div. of Hematology-Oncology, Dep. of Medicine
Seoul, 135-710
Hong Kong2 sites
Department of Clinical Oncology
Shatin, New Territories
Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital
Tuenmen, New Territories
Taiwan2 sites
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, 100
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Chest Department
Taipei, 112
United Kingdom2 sites
Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Manchester, M20 4BX
Churchill Hospital
Oxford, OX3 7LJ
Puerto Rico1 site
Ponce School of Medicine / CAIMED Center
Ponce, PR, 00716
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Phase 2 Trial Of Pf-00299804 Versus Erlotinib For The Treatment Of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer After Failure Of At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
This study will compare PF-00299804 given orally on continuous schedule to the approved drug, erlotinib, in patients whose non-small cell lung cancer has progressed after chemotherapy; patients will be randomized to receive one of these drugs, and followed for efficacy and tolerance of each.
- Conditions
- Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- Erlotinib, PF-00299804
- Keywords
- Lung cancer, advanced, second or third line
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Lung Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ErlotinibDrug
Continuous oral dosing at 150 mg daily.
PF-00299804Drug
Continuous oral dosing at 45mg daily
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Erlotinib |
| B | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: PF-00299804 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS: Time in weeks from randomization to date of objective disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was calculated as (first event date or last known event-free date [if the event date unavailable] minus the date of randomization plus 1) divided by 7. Objective progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), as at least 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of longest dimensions (LDs) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of LD recorded since the treatment started and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, assessed at Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, thereafter every other cycle up to end of treatment (121 weeks), followed by every 8 weeks >284 weeks
Secondary outcomes (7)
Categorical Summary of Overall Scale Change in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
EORTC QLQ-C30: included global health status/quality of life (QoL), functional (Fn) scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Scores were averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for Global Qol/Fn scales=better level of QoL/functioning or higher score for symptom scales/items=greater degree of symptoms. Overall scale change is categorized as Improved (if average scales change from baseline: for Global QoL/Fn scales >=10; for symptom scale/item <=-10), Worsened (if average scales change from baseline: for Global QoL/Fn scales <=-10; for symptom scale/item >=10), and Stable (if average scales change from baseline >-10 but <10 for Global QoL/Fn scales and symptom scale/item) and participants in each category are reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Cycle 44 (Week 188)
Categorical Summary of Overall Scale Change in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-LC13)
QLQ-LC13 consisted of 13 questions relating to disease symptoms specific to lung cancer and treatment side effects typical of treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The 13 questions comprised 1 multi-item scale for dyspnea and 10 single-item symptoms and side effects (coughing, hemoptysis, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, chest pain, arm pain, other pain, and medicine for pain). Scores averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms. Overall scale change is categorized as Improved (if average scales change from baseline <=-10), Worsened (if average scales change from baseline >=10), and Stable (if average scales change from baseline >-10 but <10) and participants in each category are reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Cycle 44 (Week 188)
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
DLQI: 10-item questionnaire to measure how much the participant's skin problem has impacted their life over the previous week on following 6 domains: symptoms/feelings (2 questions), daily activities (2 questions), leisure (2 questions), work/school (1 question), personal relationships (2 questions), and treatment (1 question). All questions were answered on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much/prevented work or studying). The DLQI total evaluable score was calculated by summing the score of each question and ranged from 0 to 30, where higher scores indicated more quality of life impairment.
Measured: Cycle (C) 1 Day (D) 1 (baseline), C1D10-14, D1 of subsequent cycles up to C44
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
Percentage of participants with objective response based on assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST version 1.0. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR: at least 30 % decrease in sum of the LDs of target lesion, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. Confirmed responses are those that persist on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response.
Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, assessed at Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, thereafter every other cycle up to end of treatment (121 weeks), followed by every 8 weeks >284 weeks
Best Overall Response (BOR)
Number of participants with BOR according to RECIST version 1.0: CR= disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR= at least 30% decrease in sum of LDs of target lesion, taking as reference baseline sum LD. Stable/no response= neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum of LDs since treatment started. Objective progression= at least a 20% increase in sum of LDs of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of LDs recorded since treatment started and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, assessed at Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, thereafter every other cycle up to end of treatment (121 weeks), followed by every 8 weeks >284 weeks
Duration of Response (DR)
Time in weeks from first documentation of objective tumor response to objective tumor progression or symptomatic deterioration or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or symptomatic deterioration or death due to any cause or last known progression-free date [if none of the event dates available] minus the date of the first CR or PR [which ever occurred first] that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 7. DR was calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response.
Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, assessed at Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, thereafter every other cycle up to end of treatment (121 weeks), followed by every 8 weeks >284 weeks
Overall Survival (OS)
Time in weeks from randomization to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (the death date or last known alive date (if death date unavailable) minus the date of randomization plus 1) divided by 7.
Measured: Baseline until end of treatment (15 August 2014); followed up every 8 weeks after discontinuation from study treatment.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Oct 2008 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2008
- Primary completionOct 2010
- Study completionAug 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Non-small Cell Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 188 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00769067
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A7471028
- Other IDs
- 2008-005235-14, 2008
- Status last verified
- Sep 2015
- First submitted
- 7 Oct 2008
- Last updated
- 7 Oct 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Ramalingam SS, O'Byrne K, Boyer M, Mok T, Janne PA, Zhang H, Liang J, Taylor I, Sbar EI, Paz-Ares L. Dacomitinib versus erlotinib in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): pooled subset analyses from two randomized trials. Ann Oncol. 2016 Mar;27(3):423-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv593. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
PubMed 26768165
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Oct 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Phase 2 Trial Of Pf-00299804 Versus Erlotinib For The Treatment Of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer After Failure Of At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00769067
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A7471028
- Conditions
- Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- Lung cancer, advanced, second or third line
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 188 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2008
- Primary completion
- Oct 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Oct 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 Aug 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will compare PF-00299804 given orally on continuous schedule to the approved drug, erlotinib, in patients whose non-small cell lung cancer has progressed after chemotherapy; patients will be randomized to receive one of these drugs, and followed for efficacy and tolerance of each.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A | Active comparator | Drug: Erlotinib |
| B | Experimental | Drug: PF-00299804 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- advanced measurable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC);
- progressed after 1-2 prior chemotherapy;
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-2;
- tissue available for future KRAS/ EGFR testing
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- prior Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) targeted therapy;
- active or untreated Central Nervous System (CNS) metastases;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ErlotinibContinuous oral dosing at 150 mg daily. | Drug | A |
| PF-00299804Continuous oral dosing at 45mg daily | Drug | B |
Primary outcome
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, assessed at Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, thereafter every other cycle up to end of treatment (121 weeks), followed by every 8 weeks >284 weeks
PFS: Time in weeks from randomization to date of objective disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was calculated as (first event date or last known event-free date [if the event date unavailable] minus the date of randomization plus 1) divided by 7. Objective progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), as at least 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of longest dimensions (LDs) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of LD recorded since the treatment started and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
7 secondary outcomes
Categorical Summary of Overall Scale Change in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Time frame: Baseline up to Cycle 44 (Week 188)
Categorical Summary of Overall Scale Change in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-LC13)
Time frame: Baseline up to Cycle 44 (Week 188)
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
Time frame: Cycle (C) 1 Day (D) 1 (baseline), C1D10-14, D1 of subsequent cycles up to C44
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, assessed at Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, thereafter every other cycle up to end of treatment (121 weeks), followed by every 8 weeks >284 weeks
Best Overall Response (BOR)
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, assessed at Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, thereafter every other cycle up to end of treatment (121 weeks), followed by every 8 weeks >284 weeks
Duration of Response (DR)
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, assessed at Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, thereafter every other cycle up to end of treatment (121 weeks), followed by every 8 weeks >284 weeks
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment (15 August 2014); followed up every 8 weeks after discontinuation from study treatment.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Oct 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26768165Ramalingam SS, O'Byrne K, Boyer M, Mok T, Janne PA, Zhang H, Liang J, Taylor I, Sbar EI, Paz-Ares L. Dacomitinib versus erlotinib in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): pooled subset analyses from two randomized trials. Ann Oncol. 2016 Mar;27(3):423-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv593. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
Related trials for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
59 sites in 12 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Erlotinib and PF-00299804 in people with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Pfizer at 59 sites in 12 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 59 sites in United States, Poland, Australia, Brazil, Canada and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Aug 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, assessed at Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, thereafter every other cycle up to end of treatment (121 weeks), followed by every 8 weeks >284 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00769067, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2015.