AzTrials
AzTrials

Lupus NephritisPhase 2ACCESSNCT00774852

Abatacept and Cyclophosphamide Combination Therapy for Lupus Nephritis

A Phase 2 study testing abatacept, cyclophosphamide and azathioprine in people with Lupus Nephritis and Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 23 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is for individuals with lupus who have developed complications in their kidneys, or lupus nephritis. The study will determine whether adding the experimental medication abatacept to standard cyclophosphamide therapy is more effective in improving lupus nephritis than standard cyclophosphamide therapy by… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and older
What is being tested?
abatacept, cyclophosphamide and azathioprine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
137 participants
Where
23 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Nov 2008to Jun 2014
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria
  • Active lupus nephritis (defined by: kidney biopsy documentation within the last 12 months using International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) classification- proliferative nephritis, active urinary sediment, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio > 1, low complement C3)
  • Positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) test result at time of study entry

Who cannot join

  • End stage renal disease
  • Use of cyclophosphamide in the past year
  • Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, moderately severe anemia
  • Active infection, including HIV, hepatitis B or C
  • History of cancer, except carcinoma in situ and treated basal and squamous cell carcinomas
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding

Trial locations and contacts

23 sites in 2 countries.

23 sites in 2 countries

United States21 sites
  • University of Michigan

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

  • Emory University

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • University of Alabama, Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

  • UNC Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

  • Medical University of South Carolina

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425

  • Rush University Medical Center

    Chicago, Illinois, 60612

  • University of Chicago

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

  • Ohio State University Medical Center

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

  • UT Southwestern

    Dallas, Texas, 75390

  • Wayne State University

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201

  • University of California San Diego

    La Jolla, California, 92037

  • Cedars Sinai Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

  • Feinstein Institute

    Manhasset, New York, 11030

  • University of Miami

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • Seligman Center for Advanced Therapeutics (NYU)

    New York, New York, 10003

  • Columbia University

    New York, New York, 10032

  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104

  • Temple University

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19147

  • University of Pittsburgh Lupus Center of Excellence

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15261

  • University of Rochester

    Rochester, New York, 14642

  • University of California San Francisco

    San Francisco, California, 94143

Other trials in United States

Mexico2 sites
  • Unidad de investigación en enfermedades crónico - degenerativas SC

    Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44620

  • El Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (INNSZ)

    Mexico City

Other trials in Mexico

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled, Phase II Multicenter Trial of CTLA4Ig (Abatacept) Plus Cyclophosphamide vs Cyclophosphamide Alone in the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis

This study is for individuals with lupus who have developed complications in their kidneys, or lupus nephritis. The study will determine whether adding the experimental medication abatacept to standard cyclophosphamide therapy is more effective in improving lupus nephritis than standard cyclophosphamide therapy by itself.

Read the detailed description

Lupus nephritis is an inflammation of the kidney that occurs in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is caused by the immune system attacking the kidney and is among the most serious complications of SLE: left untreated it can cause long term damage to the kidneys or, in some cases, result in kidney failure.

One of the more common treatments for lupus nephritis is the "Euro-lupus" therapy. In this therapy, patients receive three different drugs - cyclophosphamide, azathioprine and prednisone - over the course of several months. However, some patients do not respond to this therapy and many only show some improvement.

In this ACCESS trial for lupus nephritis, an experimental medication known as abatacept will be added to the Euro-lupus therapy to assess if it works better than Euro-lupus therapy alone. Abatacept is a man-made protein that suppresses parts of the immune system that can cause autoimmune disease. While abatacept is experimental for lupus, it has been approved by the FDA to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Abatacept is also being studied for use in other autoimmune diseases, like multiple sclerosis and type 1 diabetes.

Participants in the ACCESS trial for lupus nephritis will receive bi-weekly intravenous infusions of cyclophosphamide for 3 months, then will take azathioprine tablets daily for at least 3 months more. Abatacept or a placebo will be administered every 2 weeks initially, then every 4 weeks for at least the first 6 months. Treatment of abatacept or placebo and azathioprine may continue for the remainder of the year. All participants will take prednisone tablets daily during the entire study.

Because the ACCESS trial is a randomized, controlled study, each participant has a 50-50 chance (like flipping a coin) of receiving abatacept. Others will receive an inactive, placebo form of the drug. Note however, that all participants will receive the Euro-lupus therapy. As a blinded (masked) study, neither participants nor study physicians will know to which group a person has been assigned.

All participants will undergo regular physical examinations, medical history and various blood and urine tests. Many of these tests will be repeated throughout the study. Participants will be asked to attend 18 study visits in the first year, and one study visit at the end of the second year.

The study will reimburse participants for certain expenses incurred as part of the study.

Being tested
abatacept, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, prednisone, abatacept placebo
Keywords
lupus, systemic lupus erythematosus, lupus nephritis, SLE, abatacept, CTLA4, CTLA4Ig, glomerulonephritis
Medical subject headings
Lupus Nephritis, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Glomerulonephritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • abataceptDrug

    Also called CTLA4Ig, Orencia

    Intravenous infusion (500-1000 mg, dep on weight) at weeks 0, 2, and 4, then every 4 weeks until week 24; continue to week 48 only if partial response at 24 weeks

  • cyclophosphamideDrug

    Also called Cytoxan, Neosar

    500 mg intravenous infusion every 2 weeks for 12 weeks

  • azathioprineDrug

    Also called Imuran, Azasan

    2 mg/kg/day orally from weeks 12-28; continue until week 52 if only partial response observed at week 24

  • prednisoneDrug

    Also called Sterapred

    60 mg/day for 2 weeks, then taper to 10 mg/day by 12 weeks, then continue on stable dose

  • abatacept placeboDrug

    Intravenous infusion at weeks 0, 2, and 4, then every 4 weeks until week 24; continue to week 48 only if partial response at 24 weeks

  • azathioprine placeboDrug

    Oral capsule, daily from weeks 28 to 52, only if complete response observed at week 24

Study groups in NCT00774852
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TreatmentExperimentalAbatacept plus Euro-lupus regimen
Receives: Drug: abatacept; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: azathioprine; Drug: prednisone; Drug: azathioprine placebo
ControlPlacebo comparatorAbatacept placebo plus Euro-lupus regimen
Receives: Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: azathioprine; Drug: prednisone; Drug: abatacept placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Complete Response

    Complete response definition: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to <=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a complete responder (CR). Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks were defined as CR failures for all subsequent visits. CRs are those who successfully responded to treatment and have minimal activity of their lupus nephritis.

    Measured: Week 24

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Number of Participants With Partial Response

    Outcome measure description: Partial response definition: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <= to 125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, and improvement (reduction) >= to 50% in the urine protein to creatinine ratio at either screening or baseline visit, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day or according to protocol dosing allowances in protocol. Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks were defined as complete response failures for all subsequent visits. Partial responders are those who showed some response to treatment and low activity of their lupus nephritis.

    Measured: Week 24

  2. Number of Participants With a Complete or Partial Response

    Complete response: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to <=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a complete responder.

    Partial response: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <= to 125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, and improvement >= to 50% in the urine protein to creatinine ratio at either screening or baseline visit, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day or according to protocol dosing allowances in protocol.

    Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study were defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. CRs successfully responded to treatment and have minimal activity of their lupus nephritis. Partial responders showed some response to treatment and low activity of their lupus nephritis.

    Measured: Week 52

  3. Number of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response by Week 24 and Maintained the Complete Response Through Week 52

    Complete response definition: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to <=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a complete responder (CR). Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study were defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. CRs are those who successfully responded to treatment and had minimal activity of their lupus nephritis.

    Measured: Week 52

  4. Number of Participants Fulfilling the Proteinuria and Prednisone Criteria of a Complete Response

    A complete proteinuria and prednisone response is defined as urine protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.5 and prednisone dose tapered to <= 10mg/day. Subjects who discontinued treatment or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks are defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. Complete responders are those who successfully responded to treatment and have minimal activity of their lupus nephritis.

    Measured: Week 24

  5. Number of Participants Fulfilling the Proteinuria and Prednisone Criteria of a Partial Response

    A partial proteinuria and prednisone response is defined as an improvement (reduction) of >=50% in the urine protein-to-creatinine ratio at either visit -1 or 0, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day. Subjects who discontinued treatment or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks are defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. Partial responders are those who showed some response to treatment and low activity of their lupus nephritis.

    Measured: Week 24

  6. Number of Participants Who Achieved No Response at 24 Weeks and Continued in the Study

    A participant who did not meet the criteria for either a complete response or a partial response at Week 24 was considered a non-responder. After Week 24, non-responders were terminated from the study and treated according to best clinical judgment unless the site investigator judged that the participant could benefit from continued participation. Non responders did not respond to treatment and lupus activity is moderate to severe.

    Measured: Week 104

  7. Number of Participants Who Achieved No Response at 24 Weeks and Continued in the Study , Achieving a Complete or Partial Response

    A participant who did not meet the criteria for either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) at Week 24 was considered a non-responder. After Week 24, non-responders were terminated from the study and treated according to best clinical judgment unless the investigator judged that the participant may benefit from continued participation. CR definition: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to <=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a CR. PR definition: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <= to 125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline, and improvement (reduction) >= to 50% in the urine protein to creatinine ratio at either screening or baseline, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day.

    Measured: Week 52

  8. Lupus Disease Activity - Participants Who Were Anti-dsDNA Positive at Baseline and Negative at Week 104

    Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: reduction in anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.

    Participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may have autoantibodies (e.g., self against self) to double-stranded DNA. Double-stranded DNA is one of multiple diagnostic tests for SLE and levels may be associated with disease activity. One measure used to assess disease activity is the number of participants who were anti-dsDNA positive at baseline but negative at Week 104. Going from positive to negative is indicative of lowered lupus activity.

    Measured: Week 104

  9. Lupus Disease Activity - Negative Anti-dsDNA

    Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: reduction in anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.

    Participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may have autoantibodies (e.g., self against self) to double-stranded DNA. Double-stranded DNA is one of multiple diagnostic tests for SLE and levels may be associated with disease activity. This measure was the number of participants who had negative anti-dsDNA at Week 104. Having a negative score is indicative of low lupus disease activity.

    Measured: Week 104

  10. Lupus Disease Activity - Presence of Hypocomplementemia

    Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.

    Participants were categorized as having hypocomplementemia if their serum complement test results (C3, and C4) were below the normal range at the site. Below normal complement test results are indicative of active lupus erythematosus.

    Measured: Week 104

  11. Lupus Disease Activity - Frequency of Flares

    Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.

    Flares can be renal or non-renal. A renal flare is defined as two successive evaluations at least 1 week apart as proteinuria >1 gm/24h for participants who attain a complete response at Week 12 and for all other participants either 1) Increasing serum creatinine and persistent proteinuria, or 2) Worsening proteinuria. A non-renal flare is defined as any new post-baseline BILAG A in a non-renal organ system using BILAG-2004. This outcome measures the number of participants with the presence of renal and non-renal flares from Week 24 through Week 52 by response status. Having flares is indicative of more lupus disease activity.

    Measured: Week 52

  12. Lupus Disease Activity - Patient Global Assessment

    Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment (PGA), SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.

    PGA is measured on a 100mm scale and assessed at Weeks 0, 12, 24, 52, and 104. Higher values indicate greater burden of disease.

    Measured: Week 104

  13. Lupus Disease Activity - Patient Global Assessment Percent Change From Baseline

    Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment (PGA), SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.

    PGA is measured on a 100mm scale and assessed at Weeks 0, 12, 24, 52, and 104. Higher values indicate greater burden of disease.

    Measured: Week 104

  14. Lupus Disease Activity - SF-36 Scores

    Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.

    The SF-36 is a quality of life assessment that was performed at Weeks 9, 24, 36, 52, and 104. Eight scale scores are derived from responses to the 36 items of the SF-36 questionnaire which were combined to produce the Physical Component Score and the Mental Component Score. The Physical Component Score is based on the Physical Functioning Scale (10 items), the Role-Physical Scale (4 items), the Bodily Pain Scale (2 items), and the General Health Scale (5 items). The Mental Component Score is based upon the Vitality Scale (4 items), the Social Functioning Scale (2 items), the Role-Emotional Scale (3 items) and the Mental Health Scale (5 items). Each component score is transformed into a 0-100 scale, with higher numbers indicating greater quality of life.

    Measured: Week 104

  15. Lupus Disease Activity - SF-36 Scores Percent Change From Baseline

    Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.

    The SF-36 is a quality of life assessment that was performed at Weeks 9, 24, 36, 52, and 104. Eight scale scores are derived from responses to the 36 items of the SF-36 questionnaire which were combined to produce the Physical Component Score and the Mental Component Score. The Physical Component Score is based on the Physical Functioning Scale (10 items), the Role-Physical Scale (4 items), the Bodily Pain Scale (2 items), and the General Health Scale (5 items). The Mental Component Score is based upon the Vitality Scale (4 items), the Social Functioning Scale (2 items), the Role-Emotional Scale (3 items) and the Mental Health Scale (5 items). Each component score is transformed into a 0-100 scale, with higher numbers indicating greater quality of life.

    Measured: Week 104

  16. Lupus Disease Activity - Total BILAG-2004

    BILAG-2004 has 5 categories of scoring.Category A:defined by severe disease activity requiring any of the following treatments: 1) systemic high dose oral glucocorticoids, 2) IV pulse glucocorticoids, 3) systemic immunomodulators, or 4)therapeutic high dose anticoagulation in the presence of high dose steroids or immunomodulators. Category B:defined by moderate disease activity requiring any of the following treatments:1) systemic low dose oral glucocorticoids, 2) intramuscular or intra-articular or soft tissue glucocorticoids injection,3) topical glucocorticoids, 4) topical immunomodulators,5) antimalarials or thalidomide or prasterone or acitretin, or 6) symptomatic therapy.Category C:defined by mild disease.Category D is defined by inactive disease, previously affected.Category E is defined as the system never being involved.The categories are converted to a numeric score (A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, E=0) and treated as a continuous variable. Higher score= more severe disease activity.

    Measured: Week 52

  17. Proportion of Vaccinated Participants With a Competent Immune Response

    Among participants who are vaccinated, the number of who have a competent immune response at Week 52 as defined as having met both of the following criteria:

    1. Pneumococcal vaccination response - absolute value >= 0.35 ug/mL and, when measured 4-6 weeks after vaccination, a >=2-fold increase from baseline in serotype-specific antibody titer for at least 50% of the serotypes tested.
    2. Tetanus toxoid vaccination response - absolute value >=0.015 IU/mL and, when measured 4-6 weeks after vaccination, a 2-fold increase from baseline in antigen-specific antibody titer

    Competent immune response is indicative of low disease activity.

    Measured: Week 52

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Oct 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2008
  3. Primary completionDec 2012
  4. Study completionJun 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
137 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00774852
Sponsor's protocol ID
DAIT ITN034AI
Acronym
ACCESS
Status last verified
Jan 2016
First submitted
16 Oct 2008
Last updated
8 Feb 2016
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • ACCESS Trial Group. Treatment of lupus nephritis with abatacept: the Abatacept and Cyclophosphamide Combination Efficacy and Safety Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Nov;66(11):3096-104. doi: 10.1002/art.38790.

    PubMed 25403681
  • Wofsy D, Diamond B, Houssiau FA. Crossing the Atlantic: the Euro-Lupus Nephritis regimen in North America. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 May;67(5):1144-6. doi: 10.1002/art.39067. No abstract available.

    PubMed 25779381

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing abatacept, cyclophosphamide and azathioprine in people with Lupus Nephritis and Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 23 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 23 sites in United States, Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Oct 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Complete Response (time frame: Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00774852, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Feb 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in