Cervical PreparationDvLNCT00775983
Dilapan Versus Laminaria
A study testing laminaria and Dilapan-S in people with Cervical Preparation, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a randomized, blinded clinical trial comparing overnight laminaria versus same-day Dilapan for cervical preparation for surgical abortions occurring between fourteen and eighteen weeks gestation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Preparation
- What is being tested?
- laminaria and Dilapan-S
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 72 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2008to Dec 2009
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Pregnancy between fourteen and eighteen weeks gestation
- Request for elective abortion and certainty of decision to proceed
Who cannot join
- Incarceration
- Minor status (women younger than eighteen years)
- Allergy to Dilapan or laminaria
- Inability to speak and understand Spanish or English
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
San Francisco General Hospital
San Francisco, California, 94110
About this study
Official title: Same-day Dilapan Versus Overnight Laminaria for Cervical Preparation for Early Second-trimester Surgical Abortion
This is a randomized, blinded clinical trial comparing overnight laminaria versus same-day Dilapan for cervical preparation for surgical abortions occurring between fourteen and eighteen weeks gestation. Comparisons will be made between procedure time, need for additional dilation, occurrence of complications, and patient and provider satisfaction.
Hypothesis:
Read more
Cervical preparation for surgical abortion, between fourteen and eighteen weeks gestation, with same-day Dilapan is non-inferior to cervical preparation with overnight laminaria within a five-minute difference.
Primary objective:
Determine differences in procedure times
Secondary objectives:
Examine complications, and need for additional dilation between early second-trimester surgical abortions performed after cervical preparation with same-day Dilapan versus those performed after cervical preparation with overnight laminaria
- Conditions
- Cervical Preparation
- Being tested
- laminaria, Dilapan-S
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
laminariaDevice
place device in cervix for dilation
Dilapan-SDevice
Place in cervix for dilation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| laminaria | Active comparator | laminaria placed for cervical dilation; usual standard of care in study clinic Receives: Device: laminaria |
| Dilapan-S | Experimental | experimental treatment Receives: Device: Dilapan-S |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Procedure Time
Procedure time to complete early second-trimester dilation and evacuation (D\&E)
Measured: Day of procedure
Secondary outcomes (1)
Participants Who Experienced Complications or Need for Additional Dilation
Any complications, or mechanical dilation required, for early second-trimester surgical abortions performed after cervical preparation with same-day Dilapan versus those performed after cervical preparation with overnight laminaria
Measured: Day of procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Oct 2008 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2008
- Primary completionDec 2009
- Study completionDec 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervical PreparationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, San FranciscoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Eleanor Drey, MD, University of California, San Francisco
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00775983
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1176030877
- Acronym
- DvL
- Status last verified
- Oct 2013
- First submitted
- 16 Oct 2008
- Last updated
- 14 Nov 2013
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Newmann SJ, Sokoloff A, Tharyil M, Illangasekare T, Steinauer JE, Drey EA. Same-day synthetic osmotic dilators compared with overnight laminaria before abortion at 14-18 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;123(2 Pt 1):271-278. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000080.
PubMed 24402587
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Nov 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Same-day Dilapan Versus Overnight Laminaria for Cervical Preparation for Early Second-trimester Surgical Abortion
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00775983
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DvL / 1176030877
- Conditions
- Cervical Preparation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San FranciscoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2008
- Primary completion
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Oct 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Jul 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a randomized, blinded clinical trial comparing overnight laminaria versus same-day Dilapan for cervical preparation for surgical abortions occurring between fourteen and eighteen weeks gestation. Comparisons will be made between procedure time, need for additional dilation, occurrence of complications, and patient and provider satisfaction.
Hypothesis:
Cervical preparation for surgical abortion, between fourteen and eighteen weeks gestation, with same-day Dilapan is non-inferior to cervical preparation with overnight laminaria within a five-minute difference.
Primary objective:
Determine differences in procedure times
Secondary objectives:
Examine complications, and need for additional dilation between early second-trimester surgical abortions performed after cervical preparation with same-day Dilapan versus those performed after cervical preparation with overnight laminaria
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| laminaria | Active comparator | Device: laminarialaminaria placed for cervical dilation; usual standard of care in study clinic |
| Dilapan-S | Experimental | Device: Dilapan-Sexperimental treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Pregnancy between fourteen and eighteen weeks gestation
- Request for elective abortion and certainty of decision to proceed
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Incarceration
- Minor status (women younger than eighteen years)
- Allergy to Dilapan or laminaria
- Inability to speak and understand Spanish or English
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| laminariaplace device in cervix for dilation | Device | laminaria |
| Dilapan-SPlace in cervix for dilation. | Device | Dilapan-S |
Primary outcome
Procedure Time
Time frame: Day of procedure
Procedure time to complete early second-trimester dilation and evacuation (D\&E)
1 secondary outcome
Participants Who Experienced Complications or Need for Additional Dilation
Time frame: Day of procedure
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Nov 2013.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24402587Newmann SJ, Sokoloff A, Tharyil M, Illangasekare T, Steinauer JE, Drey EA. Same-day synthetic osmotic dilators compared with overnight laminaria before abortion at 14-18 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;123(2 Pt 1):271-278. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000080.
Related trials for Cervical Preparation
Recruiting
Office Hysteroscopy in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Trial of Cervical Preparation Strategies
Postmenopausal Women, Intrauterine Diseases
Recruiting
Cervical Ripening Balloons for Same-Day Cervical Prep
Dilation and Evacuation
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
To Check Safety of Ayurvedic Oral Cannabis in Breast and Head and Neck Cancer
Breast Cancer, Oral Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Akkermansia Muciniphila (AKK) for Radiation-Induced Skin Injury
Radiation-Induced Skin Injury
RecruitingPhase 1
Mifepristone vs Misoprostol
Cervical Preparation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing laminaria and Dilapan-S in people with Cervical Preparation, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Jul 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Procedure Time (time frame: Day of procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00775983, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2013.