AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical PreparationDvLNCT00775983

Dilapan Versus Laminaria

A study testing laminaria and Dilapan-S in people with Cervical Preparation, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized, blinded clinical trial comparing overnight laminaria versus same-day Dilapan for cervical preparation for surgical abortions occurring between fourteen and eighteen weeks gestation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cervical Preparation
What is being tested?
laminaria and Dilapan-S
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
72 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2008to Dec 2009
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Pregnancy between fourteen and eighteen weeks gestation
  • Request for elective abortion and certainty of decision to proceed

Who cannot join

  • Incarceration
  • Minor status (women younger than eighteen years)
  • Allergy to Dilapan or laminaria
  • Inability to speak and understand Spanish or English

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • San Francisco General Hospital

    San Francisco, California, 94110

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Same-day Dilapan Versus Overnight Laminaria for Cervical Preparation for Early Second-trimester Surgical Abortion

This is a randomized, blinded clinical trial comparing overnight laminaria versus same-day Dilapan for cervical preparation for surgical abortions occurring between fourteen and eighteen weeks gestation. Comparisons will be made between procedure time, need for additional dilation, occurrence of complications, and patient and provider satisfaction.

Hypothesis:

Read more

Cervical preparation for surgical abortion, between fourteen and eighteen weeks gestation, with same-day Dilapan is non-inferior to cervical preparation with overnight laminaria within a five-minute difference.

Primary objective:

Determine differences in procedure times

Secondary objectives:

Examine complications, and need for additional dilation between early second-trimester surgical abortions performed after cervical preparation with same-day Dilapan versus those performed after cervical preparation with overnight laminaria

Being tested
laminaria, Dilapan-S

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • laminariaDevice

    place device in cervix for dilation

  • Dilapan-SDevice

    Place in cervix for dilation.

Study groups in NCT00775983
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
laminariaActive comparatorlaminaria placed for cervical dilation; usual standard of care in study clinic
Receives: Device: laminaria
Dilapan-SExperimentalexperimental treatment
Receives: Device: Dilapan-S

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Procedure Time

    Procedure time to complete early second-trimester dilation and evacuation (D\&E)

    Measured: Day of procedure

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Participants Who Experienced Complications or Need for Additional Dilation

    Any complications, or mechanical dilation required, for early second-trimester surgical abortions performed after cervical preparation with same-day Dilapan versus those performed after cervical preparation with overnight laminaria

    Measured: Day of procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Oct 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2008
  3. Primary completionDec 2009
  4. Study completionDec 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
72 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00775983
Sponsor's protocol ID
1176030877
Acronym
DvL
Status last verified
Oct 2013
First submitted
16 Oct 2008
Last updated
14 Nov 2013
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Newmann SJ, Sokoloff A, Tharyil M, Illangasekare T, Steinauer JE, Drey EA. Same-day synthetic osmotic dilators compared with overnight laminaria before abortion at 14-18 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;123(2 Pt 1):271-278. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000080.

    PubMed 24402587

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing laminaria and Dilapan-S in people with Cervical Preparation, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Jul 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Procedure Time (time frame: Day of procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00775983, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2013.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in