Alcohol AbusePhase 2/3AdventureNCT00776685
Adventure: Teacher Delivered Personality-targeted Interventions for Substance Misuse
A Phase 2/3 study testing Personality-targeted interventions in people with Alcohol Abuse and Drug Abuse, run by King's College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Several personality factors have been shown to be associated with risk for alcohol and substance misuse, and differentiate substance abusers based on clinical profile, treatment response and susceptibility to other forms of mental illness. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 13 to 16 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Alcohol Abuse, Drug Abuse, Depression
- What is being tested?
- Personality-targeted interventions
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 3,190 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- May 2007to May 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 13 to 16 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Secondary school student
Who cannot join
- None
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London
London
About this study
Official title: Cognitive Behavioral Interventions That Target Personality Risk for Substance Abuse and Mental Illness: Delivery by Educational Professionals
Several personality factors have been shown to be associated with risk for alcohol and substance misuse, and differentiate substance abusers based on clinical profile, treatment response and susceptibility to other forms of mental illness. Personality-targeted interventions have been found to have significant preventative effects on onset and growth of drinking, binge-drinking and drinking problems in adolescents attending mainstream schools (Conrod, Castellanos \& Mackie, 2008). The interventions concurrently reduced personality-specific emotional and behavioural problems (Castellanos \& Conrod, 2006), and prevented the onset and escalation of drug-use over a two-year period (Conrod, Castellanos-Ryan \& Strang, 2010). This cluster randomised controlled trial aims to examine whether these results can be replicated when interventions are delivered by trained educational professionals. In addition, the trial will evaluate the broader impact of the programme on cigarette smoking, school attendance, academic achievement and school-wide behaviours.
Read the detailed description
The Adventure study aims to examine whether educational professionals such as teachers, mentors or individuals in a pastoral role, who are trained in carrying out personality-targeted interventions will be effective in reducing problem behaviours in a group of adolescents.
20 schools in London, U.K. were recruited for the trial, and over 2000 adolescents (mean age 13.7 years) consented to participate in the survey and intervention phases of the trial. Schools were randomly assigned to control or intervention condition, and students in intervention schools who met the criteria for any of the 4 personality risk subscales of the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale (Negative Thinking, Anxiety Sensitivity, Sensation Seeking and Impulsivity) were invited to participate in a personality-targeted intervention by trained members of staff from their schools. All participants were invited to complete follow-up surveys at 6-month intervals for 2 years. The remaining 55% of low risk students in the grad were also followed to examine population-level effects of the intervention as well.
The main outcome measures of this RCT are alcohol and illicit drug outcomes. Secondary measures include mental health symptoms, risky behaviour, school attainment and attendance, and school-wide behaviours.
It is hypothesised that teacher-delivered personality-targeted interventions will have similar preventative effects on alcohol and drug use as reported by Conrod et al (2008, 2010), in addition to the personality-specific intervention effects reported by Castellanos \& Conrod (2006). In addition, broader effects of the intervention on academic achievement and school-wide behaviour will be examined in this trial, both at the individual level and at the population-level.
- Conditions
- Alcohol Abuse, Drug Abuse, Depression, Panic Disorder, Conduct Disorder
- Being tested
- Personality-targeted interventions
- Medical subject headings
- Alcoholism, Substance-Related Disorders, Depression, Panic Disorder, Conduct Disorder
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Personality-targeted interventionsBehavioural
Also called Preventure, but now delivered by teachers
Motivational and cognitive behavioural interventions targeting four personality profiles. 2 90 minute group sessions with personality-matched peers facilitated by a trained teacher and co-facilitator
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| learning to cope with your impulsivity | Experimental | Cognitive-behavioural intervention targeting impulsive personality Receives: Behavioral: Personality-targeted interventions |
| learning to cope with your sensation seeking | Experimental | cognitive behavioural intervention designed to help sensation seeking youth manage their need for stimulation and excitement. Receives: Behavioral: Personality-targeted interventions |
| learning to cope with your anxiety sensitivity | Experimental | cognitive behavioural intervention teaching anxiety sensitive youth to manager their sensitivity to threat and anxiety. Receives: Behavioral: Personality-targeted interventions |
| learning to manage your negative thinking | Experimental | cognitive behavioural intervention targeting pessimistic and negative thinking in hopeless youth Receives: Behavioral: Personality-targeted interventions |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Binge drinking frequency
Frequency in the past 6 months that subject reported drinking 5 or more alcoholic beverages (4 or more for girls) on one drinking occasion.
Measured: 2 years
Drinking frequency
Past six months frequency of drinking
Measured: 2 years
drinking quantity
Average number of alcoholic beverages consumed on a typical drinking occasion in the past six months
Measured: 2 years
Drinking problems
number of drinking problems reported on an abbreviated version of the Rutger's Alcohol Problem Index.
Measured: 2 years
illicit drug use events
Time to onset of illicit drug use
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Emotional and behavioural problems, targeted and school-wide effects
Psychiatric symptoms (depression, panic anxiety, antisocial behaviours), coping skills, motives for drinking, school attendance and attainment, in-class behaviours assessed using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Brief Symptom Inventory.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Oct 2008 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2007
- Primary completionMar 2010
- Study completionMay 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Alcohol AbuseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by King's College LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 3,190 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- King's College London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Action on Addiction
- Investigators
- Patricia J Conrod, PhD, Study chair, King's College London
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00776685
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Adventure
- Acronym
- Adventure
- Status last verified
- Dec 2010
- First submitted
- 17 Oct 2008
- Last updated
- 27 Jun 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Conrod PJ, Castellanos-Ryan N, Strang J. Brief, personality-targeted coping skills interventions and survival as a non-drug user over a 2-year period during adolescence. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;67(1):85-93. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.173.
PubMed 20048226Conrod PJ, Castellanos N, Mackie C. Personality-targeted interventions delay the growth of adolescent drinking and binge drinking. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;49(2):181-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01826.x.
PubMed 18211277Conrod PJ, Stewart SH, Comeau N, Maclean AM. Efficacy of cognitive-behavioral interventions targeting personality risk factors for youth alcohol misuse. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2006 Dec;35(4):550-63. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3504_6.
PubMed 17007600O'Leary-Barrett M, Mackie CJ, Castellanos-Ryan N, Al-Khudhairy N, Conrod PJ. Personality-targeted interventions delay uptake of drinking and decrease risk of alcohol-related problems when delivered by teachers. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;49(9):954-963.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
PubMed 20732631O'Leary-Barrett M, Castellanos-Ryan N, Pihl RO, Conrod PJ. Mechanisms of personality-targeted intervention effects on adolescent alcohol misuse, internalizing and externalizing symptoms. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 May;84(5):438-52. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000082. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
PubMed 26881449Mahu IT, Doucet C, O'Leary-Barrett M, Conrod PJ. Can cannabis use be prevented by targeting personality risk in schools? Twenty-four-month outcome of the adventure trial on cannabis use: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Addiction. 2015 Oct;110(10):1625-33. doi: 10.1111/add.12991. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
PubMed 26011508Conrod PJ, O'Leary-Barrett M, Newton N, Topper L, Castellanos-Ryan N, Mackie C, Girard A. Effectiveness of a selective, personality-targeted prevention program for adolescent alcohol use and misuse: a cluster randomized controlled trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;70(3):334-42. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.651.
PubMed 23344135
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jun 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cognitive Behavioral Interventions That Target Personality Risk for Substance Abuse and Mental Illness: Delivery by Educational Professionals
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00776685
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Adventure / Adventure
- Conditions
- Alcohol Abuse, Drug Abuse, Depression, Panic Disorder, Conduct Disorder
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 3,190 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- King's College LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Action on Addiction
- Study start
- May 2007
- Primary completion
- Mar 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Oct 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Several personality factors have been shown to be associated with risk for alcohol and substance misuse, and differentiate substance abusers based on clinical profile, treatment response and susceptibility to other forms of mental illness. Personality-targeted interventions have been found to have significant preventative effects on onset and growth of drinking, binge-drinking and drinking problems in adolescents attending mainstream schools (Conrod, Castellanos \& Mackie, 2008). The interventions concurrently reduced personality-specific emotional and behavioural problems (Castellanos \& Conrod, 2006), and prevented the onset and escalation of drug-use over a two-year period (Conrod, Castellanos-Ryan \& Strang, 2010). This cluster randomised controlled trial aims to examine whether these results can be replicated when interventions are delivered by trained educational professionals. In addition, the trial will evaluate the broader impact of the programme on cigarette smoking, school attendance, academic achievement and school-wide behaviours.
Detailed description
The Adventure study aims to examine whether educational professionals such as teachers, mentors or individuals in a pastoral role, who are trained in carrying out personality-targeted interventions will be effective in reducing problem behaviours in a group of adolescents.
20 schools in London, U.K. were recruited for the trial, and over 2000 adolescents (mean age 13.7 years) consented to participate in the survey and intervention phases of the trial. Schools were randomly assigned to control or intervention condition, and students in intervention schools who met the criteria for any of the 4 personality risk subscales of the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale (Negative Thinking, Anxiety Sensitivity, Sensation Seeking and Impulsivity) were invited to participate in a personality-targeted intervention by trained members of staff from their schools. All participants were invited to complete follow-up surveys at 6-month intervals for 2 years. The remaining 55% of low risk students in the grad were also followed to examine population-level effects of the intervention as well.
The main outcome measures of this RCT are alcohol and illicit drug outcomes. Secondary measures include mental health symptoms, risky behaviour, school attainment and attendance, and school-wide behaviours.
It is hypothesised that teacher-delivered personality-targeted interventions will have similar preventative effects on alcohol and drug use as reported by Conrod et al (2008, 2010), in addition to the personality-specific intervention effects reported by Castellanos \& Conrod (2006). In addition, broader effects of the intervention on academic achievement and school-wide behaviour will be examined in this trial, both at the individual level and at the population-level.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| learning to cope with your impulsivity | Experimental | Behavioral: Personality-targeted interventionsCognitive-behavioural intervention targeting impulsive personality |
| learning to cope with your sensation seeking | Experimental | Behavioral: Personality-targeted interventionscognitive behavioural intervention designed to help sensation seeking youth manage their need for stimulation and excitement. |
| learning to cope with your anxiety sensitivity | Experimental | Behavioral: Personality-targeted interventionscognitive behavioural intervention teaching anxiety sensitive youth to manager their sensitivity to threat and anxiety. |
| learning to manage your negative thinking | Experimental | Behavioral: Personality-targeted interventionscognitive behavioural intervention targeting pessimistic and negative thinking in hopeless youth |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 13 to 16 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Secondary school student
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Personality-targeted interventionsAlso: Preventure, but now delivered by teachersMotivational and cognitive behavioural interventions targeting four personality profiles. 2 90 minute group sessions with personality-matched peers facilitated by a trained teacher and co-facilitator | Behavioural | learning to cope with your anxiety sensitivity, learning to cope with your impulsivity, learning to cope with your sensation seeking, learning to manage your negative thinking |
Primary outcome
Binge drinking frequency
Time frame: 2 years
Frequency in the past 6 months that subject reported drinking 5 or more alcoholic beverages (4 or more for girls) on one drinking occasion.
Drinking frequency
Time frame: 2 years
Past six months frequency of drinking
drinking quantity
Time frame: 2 years
Average number of alcoholic beverages consumed on a typical drinking occasion in the past six months
Drinking problems
Time frame: 2 years
number of drinking problems reported on an abbreviated version of the Rutger's Alcohol Problem Index.
illicit drug use events
Time frame: 2 years
Time to onset of illicit drug use
1 secondary outcome
Emotional and behavioural problems, targeted and school-wide effects
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jun 2011.
- Background: PubMed 20048226Conrod PJ, Castellanos-Ryan N, Strang J. Brief, personality-targeted coping skills interventions and survival as a non-drug user over a 2-year period during adolescence. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;67(1):85-93. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.173.
- Background: PubMed 18211277Conrod PJ, Castellanos N, Mackie C. Personality-targeted interventions delay the growth of adolescent drinking and binge drinking. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;49(2):181-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01826.x.
- Background: PubMed 17007600Conrod PJ, Stewart SH, Comeau N, Maclean AM. Efficacy of cognitive-behavioral interventions targeting personality risk factors for youth alcohol misuse. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2006 Dec;35(4):550-63. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3504_6.
- Results publication: PubMed 20732631O'Leary-Barrett M, Mackie CJ, Castellanos-Ryan N, Al-Khudhairy N, Conrod PJ. Personality-targeted interventions delay uptake of drinking and decrease risk of alcohol-related problems when delivered by teachers. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;49(9):954-963.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26881449O'Leary-Barrett M, Castellanos-Ryan N, Pihl RO, Conrod PJ. Mechanisms of personality-targeted intervention effects on adolescent alcohol misuse, internalizing and externalizing symptoms. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 May;84(5):438-52. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000082. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26011508Mahu IT, Doucet C, O'Leary-Barrett M, Conrod PJ. Can cannabis use be prevented by targeting personality risk in schools? Twenty-four-month outcome of the adventure trial on cannabis use: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Addiction. 2015 Oct;110(10):1625-33. doi: 10.1111/add.12991. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23344135Conrod PJ, O'Leary-Barrett M, Newton N, Topper L, Castellanos-Ryan N, Mackie C, Girard A. Effectiveness of a selective, personality-targeted prevention program for adolescent alcohol use and misuse: a cluster randomized controlled trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;70(3):334-42. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.651.
Related trials for Alcohol Abuse
Recruiting
The Trans-Led Care Study
Substance Abuse, Substance Addiction
Not yet recruiting
The Development of a Transdiagnostic Intervention to Improve Social Functioning and Intimate Relationships Among Veterans
Alcohol Problems, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
Not yet recruiting
A Hybrid Type 1 Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online and Text-Messaging Intervention to Prevent Alcohol and Cannabis Initiation, Escalation, and Consequences Among First-Year College Students
Alcohol, Cannabis
Not yet recruiting
QAIAx - SGI/SI Smart Health Cities: Microcity Enclave Program (Quantum SI/AGI Agency a/k/a AI City Hall Project - UPSTO App Nos. 64/074,526, 64/063,557, 64/105,164, 63/903,181, 63/729,428, 64/125,360; USPTO EO 9424 Assignment ID: 2101042 / ARN: REEL/FRAME: 76481/0026 - OUSD-R&E, Department of War)
Asperger's Disorder, Asperger Disorder
Recruiting
Safety and Effectiveness of the BrainsWay Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (Deep TMS) for Treatment and Reduction of Heavy Drinking in Individuals With of Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)
Alcohol Use Disorder, Alcoholism
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Patricia J Conrod, PhD study chair
King's College London
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Personality-targeted interventions in people with Alcohol Abuse and Drug Abuse, run by King's College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jun 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Binge drinking frequency (time frame: 2 years). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00776685, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jun 2011.