AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 3NCT00791921

Efficacy Confirmation Trial of CDP870 Without Coadministration of Methotrexate (MTX) in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

A Phase 3 study testing CDP870 in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. at 7 sites in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objectives of this study are to verify the superiority in efficacy (American College of Rheumatology 20%: ACR20) and investigate the pharmacokinetics and safety of CDP870 versus placebo without coadministration of MTX in active RA patients in whom MTX cannot be administrated. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 74 years
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
CDP870
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
230 participants
Where
7 sitesJapan
Study dates
Nov 2008to Jan 2010
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 74 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects must have a diagnosis of adult-onset RA of at least 6 months but not longer than 15 years in duration as defined by the 1987 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria.
  • Subjects must have active RA disease as defined by:
  • At least 6 tender joints and 6 swollen joints
  • ESR of 28 mm/hour or CRP of 2.0 mg/dL
  • Subjects who have failed to respond or have been resistant to at least one DMARD (including MTX)
  • Subjects in whom MTX cannot be administered for any of the reasons(incomplete response/safety concerns)

Who cannot join

  • Patients who have a diagnosis of any other inflammatory arthritis
  • Patients who have a secondary, non-inflammatory type of arthritis (eg, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia)
  • Patients who currently have, or who have a history of, a demyelinating or convulsive disease of the central nervous system (eg, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy)
  • Patients who have NYHA (New York Heart Association) Class III or IV congestive heart failure
  • Patients who currently have, or who have a history of, tuberculosis
  • Patients who have a high risk of infection (with a current infectious disease, a chronic infectious disease, a history of serious infectious disease)
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Patients who currently have, or who have a history of, malignancy
  • Female patients who are breastfeeding or pregnant, who are of childbearing potential
  • Patients who previously received treatment with 2 or more anti-TNFα drugs or who previously failed to respond to treatment with 1 or more aint-TNFα drugs.

Trial locations and contacts

7 sites in 1 country.

7 sites in 1 country

Japan7 sites
  • Study site

    Chube Region

  • Study site

    Chugoku Region

  • Study site

    Hokkaido Region

  • Study site

    Kanto Region

  • Study site

    Kinki Region

  • Study site

    Kyushuh Region

  • Study site

    Shikoku Region

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Trial to Assess the Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of CDP870 Without Coadministration of MTX in Japanese Active RA Patients in Whom MTX Cannot be Administrated.

The objectives of this study are to verify the superiority in efficacy (American College of Rheumatology 20%: ACR20) and investigate the pharmacokinetics and safety of CDP870 versus placebo without coadministration of MTX in active RA patients in whom MTX cannot be administrated.

Being tested
CDP870, Placebo of CDP870
Keywords
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Certolizumab Pegol, Cimzia
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CDP870Drug

    400mg CDP870 given at Week0, 2, 4 and thereafter 200mg CDP870 given every 2weeks until Week22 subcutaneously(SC)

  • Placebo of CDP870Drug

    Placebo given every 2 weeks until Week22 (SC)

Study groups in NCT00791921
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CDP870 200mgExperimental400mg CDP870 given at Week0, 2, 4 and thereafter 200mg CDP870 given every 2weeks
Receives: Drug: CDP870
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo of CDP870
Receives: Drug: Placebo of CDP870

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12

    ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1)Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2)C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGA-VAS)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 24

    ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1)Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2)C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGA-VAS)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Nov 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2008
  3. Primary completionJan 2010
  4. Study completionJan 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
230 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00791921
Sponsor's protocol ID
CDP870-275-08-003
Status last verified
Aug 2012
First submitted
14 Nov 2008
Last updated
7 Aug 2012
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Yamamoto K, Takeuchi T, Yamanaka H, Ishiguro N, Tanaka Y, Eguchi K, Watanabe A, Origasa H, Iwai K, Sakamaki Y, van der Heijde D, Miyasaka N, Koike T. Efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol without methotrexate co-administration in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: the HIKARI randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Mod Rheumatol. 2014 Jul;24(4):552-60. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2013.843764. Epub 2013 Nov 1.

    PubMed 24981319

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing CDP870 in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. at 7 sites in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Aug 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 7 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Aug 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 (time frame: Baseline, Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00791921, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Aug 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in