Breast CancerTiBS-HRTNCT00797199
Monitoring of Breast Tissue Change Due to Hormone Replacement Therapy in Post-menopausal Women Using OBS
An observational study of Breast Cancer, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 2 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) is a double edged sword: it can alleviate the effects of menopause for a significant proportion of the female population, however for a smaller proportion, it will induce a significant increase in their short-term and lifetime risk to develop breast cancer (BC). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 65 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- How many people
- 14 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- Sep 2011to Jan 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 65 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Post-menopausal women attending the Endocrinology Clinic at St. Michael's Hospital (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) who have elected to undergo a 1-year HRT regiment but had no prior HRT treatment. The comparison group (control) will comprise of post-menopausal women not on HRT and had no prior HRT treatment. Controls will be recruited among women at the University Health Network or attending the Endocrinology Clinic at St. Michael's Hospital (Toronto, Ontario, Canada).
Who may be able to join
- Post-menopausal
- Attending the Endocrinology clinic at SMH
- Will start HRT treatment
- Not on HRT treatment
Who cannot join
- Current or Past HRT treatment
- Prior breast cancer
- Benign breast disease
- Bilateral breast biopsy
- Fine needle aspiration (FNA) within a year
- Cosmetic alteration (reduction/augmentation)
Show all 17Show fewer
- Gynecological surgery
- Past or current chemo- therapeutic or prevention treatment
- Controls
- Current or Past HRT treatment
- Prior breast cancer
- Benign breast disease
- Bilateral breast biopsy
- Fine needle aspiration (FNA) within a year
- Cosmetic alteration (reduction/augmentation)
- Gynecological surgery
- Past or current chemo- therapeutic or prevention treatment
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Canada2 sites
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario
About this study
Official title: Short-term Evaluations of Breast Tissue Change in Post-menopausal Women Using Optical Breast Spectroscopy (OBS)
Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) is a double edged sword: it can alleviate the effects of menopause for a significant proportion of the female population, however for a smaller proportion, it will induce a significant increase in their short-term and lifetime risk to develop breast cancer (BC). Fewer women are prescribed HRT compared to a decade ago due to concerns pertaining to BC by both physicians and patients. By developing a technology that could identify women at risk for the adverse effects of HRT, during the first few months of its use, physicians may offer HRT to a wider proportion of the female population during menopause. More importantly, as it relates to BC prevention, such a technology will identify women at risk and provide a useful decision making tool regarding their care during the menopausal years.
Read the detailed description
Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) provides many benefits to post-menopausal women, which have been overshadowed by an increase in breast cancer in women following HRT, resulting in a negative HRT cost-benefit ratio. Epidemiological studies show evidence of a direct association between HRT use and breast cancer incidence. This increase in incidence was also reflected in an increase of the mammographic breast density (MBD). Endogenous MBD is a well established risk factor for breast cancer which provides a high odds ratio (OR 4 - 6) towards breast cancer. Increases in MBD have been reported in women who initiate HRT, which is of concern as it potentially indicates a greater adverse effect of HRT on those individuals. In these cases, the majority of the incremental MBD increase manifests itself during the first year of use and decreases in the case of therapy cessation. The ability to detect changes in MBD in women commencing HRT treatment, without the ionizing radiation dose penalty imparted by mammography, thus permitting improved monitoring of MBD changes de to HRT, would certainly impact the debate on the applicability of HRT. Women identified as having increased MBD induced by HRT should discontinue its use or modify the prescription as increases in MBD potentially indicates an adverse ratio; women whose MBD has not been adversely affected by HRT can continue its use and reap the benefits of HRT (e.g. relief of climacteric symptoms, beneficial effects against osteoporosis and coronary heart disease).
Optical Breast Spectroscopy (OBS) is a safe and non-invasive optical technique that provides information on breast tissue composition and physiology state. Comparison of breast tissue status over time will provide information on changes in the MBD and breast cancer risk due to interventions such as HRT. To demonstrate that breast tissue status changes with HRT use, we will exploit existing algorithms correlating OBS with various biological outcomes. A completed study on a cohort of 300 healthy women (age 38 to 72) showed a high correlation between OBS optical parameters and Cumulus derived MBD. An ongoing study, to be completed Q3 2008 with an interim analysis available, suggests that OBS parameters can optically detect differences between the contralateral breasts of women with a unilateral carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and healthy controls. Through these studies, two OBS algorithms ("density" and "risk") are available for application in the proposed study. The algorithms take OBS optical data as input and output OBS-derived percent breast density (PBD) and OBS-derived risk values. The aim of the study is to examine changes in OBS-derived PBD and OBS-derived risk values due to the initiation, use and cessation of HRT over a 1 year period. The case group will comprise a population of post-menopausal women who have elected to undergo a HRT regiment designed to last at least 1 year but had no prior HRT treatment. The comparison group (control) will comprise of post-menopausal women not on HRT and had no prior HRT treatment. OBS measurements will be assessed at intervals corresponding to: baseline (pre-HRT), 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after initiation of HRT use, and 3 months after cessation of treatment (in cases where HRT is discontinued within one year). Blood will be collected at baseline and at 3 months during treatment to examine changes in circulating hormones (estrogen, progesterone). Mammography will be performed at three months during treatment and compared to a screening mammogram (taken within a year prior to HRT treatment) to determine changes in breast density. A Papanicolaou test (or PAP smear) will be performed at baseline to assess endometrial changes. Changes in OBS derived PBD and MBD as well as other pertinent risk values will be examined as a function of time.
Four model groups will be monitored consisting of cases receiving treatments of Premarin, Premarin + Provera combination, or Premarin + Prometrium combination and controls not on HRT. A total of 20 women will be recruited into each group of the four groups. While the total number of women intended for recruitment is small, they are sufficient to enable us to demonstrate that OBS changes as function of MBD changes. Of further interest, we want to determine whether OBS can detect changes prior to changes to MBD in standard clinical setting. In particular, we aim to determine the magnitude of the effect size and the variance within the study groups for later initiation of a larger definitive clinical monitoring trail of HRT effects by OBS.
The long term clinical goal is the identification of women adversely affected by HRT by OBS as they can be advised of alternative methods with possible lower risk to benefit ratio to relieve climacteric symptoms. An overall effect will be a reduction in the population-based incidence of breast cancer while not withholding the beneficial effects of HRT to the majority of women during menopause.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- Breast Cancer Risk, Hormone Replacement Therapy, Optical Transillumination Spectroscopy, Optical Breast Spectroscopy, Transillumination Breast Spectroscopy
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Treatment Group 1 | Women receiving HRT treatment of Premarin. | |
| 2-Treatment Group 2 | Women receiving combination HRT treatment of Premarin + Provera. | |
| 3- Treatment Group 3 | Women receiving combination HRT treatment of Premarin + Prometrium. | |
| 4- Controls | Women not on HRT or healthy controls. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in OBS parameters
Measured: 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Nov 2008 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2011
- Primary completionDec 2014
- Study completionJan 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Health Network, TorontoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Health Network, Toronto
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Unity Health Toronto
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lothar Lilge, PhD, Principal investigator, Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2M9; Department of Biophysics and Bioimaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2M9
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00797199
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TiBS-HRT
- Acronym
- TiBS-HRT
- Status last verified
- Mar 2016
- First submitted
- 2 Jun 2008
- Last updated
- 23 Mar 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Blyschak K, Simick M, Jong R, Lilge L. Classification of breast tissue density by optical transillumination spectroscopy: optical and physiological effects governing predictive value. Med Phys. 2004 Jun;31(6):1398-414. doi: 10.1118/1.1738191.
PubMed 15259643Simick MK, Jong R, Wilson B, Lilge L. Non-ionizing near-infrared radiation transillumination spectroscopy for breast tissue density and assessment of breast cancer risk. J Biomed Opt. 2004 Jul-Aug;9(4):794-803. doi: 10.1117/1.1758269.
PubMed 15250768Blackmore KM, Knight JA, Jong R, Lilge L. Assessing breast tissue density by transillumination breast spectroscopy (TIBS): an intermediate indicator of cancer risk. Br J Radiol. 2007 Jul;80(955):545-56. doi: 10.1259/bjr/26858614. Epub 2007 May 30.
PubMed 17537757Simick MK, Lilge L. Optical transillumination spectroscopy to quantify parenchymal tissue density: an indicator for breast cancer risk. Br J Radiol. 2005 Nov;78(935):1009-17. doi: 10.1259/bjr/14696165.
PubMed 16249602
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Mar 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Short-term Evaluations of Breast Tissue Change in Post-menopausal Women Using Optical Breast Spectroscopy (OBS)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00797199
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TiBS-HRT / TiBS-HRT
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- Breast Cancer Risk, Hormone Replacement Therapy, Optical Transillumination Spectroscopy, Optical Breast Spectroscopy, Transillumination Breast Spectroscopy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Health Network, TorontoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Unity Health Toronto
- Study start
- Sep 2011
- Primary completion
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Nov 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) is a double edged sword: it can alleviate the effects of menopause for a significant proportion of the female population, however for a smaller proportion, it will induce a significant increase in their short-term and lifetime risk to develop breast cancer (BC). Fewer women are prescribed HRT compared to a decade ago due to concerns pertaining to BC by both physicians and patients. By developing a technology that could identify women at risk for the adverse effects of HRT, during the first few months of its use, physicians may offer HRT to a wider proportion of the female population during menopause. More importantly, as it relates to BC prevention, such a technology will identify women at risk and provide a useful decision making tool regarding their care during the menopausal years.
Detailed description
Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) provides many benefits to post-menopausal women, which have been overshadowed by an increase in breast cancer in women following HRT, resulting in a negative HRT cost-benefit ratio. Epidemiological studies show evidence of a direct association between HRT use and breast cancer incidence. This increase in incidence was also reflected in an increase of the mammographic breast density (MBD). Endogenous MBD is a well established risk factor for breast cancer which provides a high odds ratio (OR 4 - 6) towards breast cancer. Increases in MBD have been reported in women who initiate HRT, which is of concern as it potentially indicates a greater adverse effect of HRT on those individuals. In these cases, the majority of the incremental MBD increase manifests itself during the first year of use and decreases in the case of therapy cessation. The ability to detect changes in MBD in women commencing HRT treatment, without the ionizing radiation dose penalty imparted by mammography, thus permitting improved monitoring of MBD changes de to HRT, would certainly impact the debate on the applicability of HRT. Women identified as having increased MBD induced by HRT should discontinue its use or modify the prescription as increases in MBD potentially indicates an adverse ratio; women whose MBD has not been adversely affected by HRT can continue its use and reap the benefits of HRT (e.g. relief of climacteric symptoms, beneficial effects against osteoporosis and coronary heart disease).
Optical Breast Spectroscopy (OBS) is a safe and non-invasive optical technique that provides information on breast tissue composition and physiology state. Comparison of breast tissue status over time will provide information on changes in the MBD and breast cancer risk due to interventions such as HRT. To demonstrate that breast tissue status changes with HRT use, we will exploit existing algorithms correlating OBS with various biological outcomes. A completed study on a cohort of 300 healthy women (age 38 to 72) showed a high correlation between OBS optical parameters and Cumulus derived MBD. An ongoing study, to be completed Q3 2008 with an interim analysis available, suggests that OBS parameters can optically detect differences between the contralateral breasts of women with a unilateral carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and healthy controls. Through these studies, two OBS algorithms ("density" and "risk") are available for application in the proposed study. The algorithms take OBS optical data as input and output OBS-derived percent breast density (PBD) and OBS-derived risk values. The aim of the study is to examine changes in OBS-derived PBD and OBS-derived risk values due to the initiation, use and cessation of HRT over a 1 year period. The case group will comprise a population of post-menopausal women who have elected to undergo a HRT regiment designed to last at least 1 year but had no prior HRT treatment. The comparison group (control) will comprise of post-menopausal women not on HRT and had no prior HRT treatment. OBS measurements will be assessed at intervals corresponding to: baseline (pre-HRT), 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after initiation of HRT use, and 3 months after cessation of treatment (in cases where HRT is discontinued within one year). Blood will be collected at baseline and at 3 months during treatment to examine changes in circulating hormones (estrogen, progesterone). Mammography will be performed at three months during treatment and compared to a screening mammogram (taken within a year prior to HRT treatment) to determine changes in breast density. A Papanicolaou test (or PAP smear) will be performed at baseline to assess endometrial changes. Changes in OBS derived PBD and MBD as well as other pertinent risk values will be examined as a function of time.
Four model groups will be monitored consisting of cases receiving treatments of Premarin, Premarin + Provera combination, or Premarin + Prometrium combination and controls not on HRT. A total of 20 women will be recruited into each group of the four groups. While the total number of women intended for recruitment is small, they are sufficient to enable us to demonstrate that OBS changes as function of MBD changes. Of further interest, we want to determine whether OBS can detect changes prior to changes to MBD in standard clinical setting. In particular, we aim to determine the magnitude of the effect size and the variance within the study groups for later initiation of a larger definitive clinical monitoring trail of HRT effects by OBS.
The long term clinical goal is the identification of women adversely affected by HRT by OBS as they can be advised of alternative methods with possible lower risk to benefit ratio to relieve climacteric symptoms. An overall effect will be a reduction in the population-based incidence of breast cancer while not withholding the beneficial effects of HRT to the majority of women during menopause.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Treatment Group 1 | – | –Women receiving HRT treatment of Premarin. |
| 2-Treatment Group 2 | – | –Women receiving combination HRT treatment of Premarin + Provera. |
| 3- Treatment Group 3 | – | –Women receiving combination HRT treatment of Premarin + Prometrium. |
| 4- Controls | – | –Women not on HRT or healthy controls. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 65 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Post-menopausal women attending the Endocrinology Clinic at St. Michael's Hospital (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) who have elected to undergo a 1-year HRT regiment but had no prior HRT treatment. The comparison group (control) will comprise of post-menopausal women not on HRT and had no prior HRT treatment. Controls will be recruited among women at the University Health Network or attending the Endocrinology Clinic at St. Michael's Hospital (Toronto, Ontario, Canada).
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Post-menopausal
- Attending the Endocrinology clinic at SMH
- Will start HRT treatment
- Not on HRT treatment
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Current or Past HRT treatment
- Prior breast cancer
- Benign breast disease
- Bilateral breast biopsy
- Fine needle aspiration (FNA) within a year
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Changes in OBS parameters
Time frame: 18 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Mar 2016.
- Background: PubMed 15259643Blyschak K, Simick M, Jong R, Lilge L. Classification of breast tissue density by optical transillumination spectroscopy: optical and physiological effects governing predictive value. Med Phys. 2004 Jun;31(6):1398-414. doi: 10.1118/1.1738191.
- Background: PubMed 15250768Simick MK, Jong R, Wilson B, Lilge L. Non-ionizing near-infrared radiation transillumination spectroscopy for breast tissue density and assessment of breast cancer risk. J Biomed Opt. 2004 Jul-Aug;9(4):794-803. doi: 10.1117/1.1758269.
- Background: PubMed 17537757Blackmore KM, Knight JA, Jong R, Lilge L. Assessing breast tissue density by transillumination breast spectroscopy (TIBS): an intermediate indicator of cancer risk. Br J Radiol. 2007 Jul;80(955):545-56. doi: 10.1259/bjr/26858614. Epub 2007 May 30.
- Background: PubMed 16249602Simick MK, Lilge L. Optical transillumination spectroscopy to quantify parenchymal tissue density: an indicator for breast cancer risk. Br J Radiol. 2005 Nov;78(935):1009-17. doi: 10.1259/bjr/14696165.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lothar Lilge, PhD principal investigator
Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2M9; Department of Biophysics and Bioimaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2M9
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Breast Cancer, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 2 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in OBS parameters (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00797199, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2016.